Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Geodesic Difference-in-Differences

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.17436 v1 pith:PQEOHPAF submitted 2025-01-29 stat.ME

classification stat.ME
keywords geodesicoutcomesspacesdistributionsmetriccausaldifference-in-differenceselectricity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Difference-in-differences (DID) is a widely used quasi-experimental design for causal inference, traditionally applied to scalar or Euclidean outcomes, while extensions to outcomes residing in non-Euclidean spaces remain limited. Existing methods for such outcomes have primarily focused on univariate distributions, leveraging linear operations in the space of quantile functions, but these approaches cannot be directly extended to outcomes in general metric spaces. In this paper, we propose geodesic DID, a novel DID framework for outcomes in geodesic metric spaces, such as distributions, networks, and manifold-valued data. To address the absence of algebraic operations in these spaces, we use geodesics as proxies for differences and introduce the geodesic average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) as the causal estimand. We establish the identification of the geodesic ATT and derive the convergence rate of its sample versions, employing tools from metric geometry and empirical process theory. This framework is further extended to the case of staggered DID settings, allowing for multiple time periods and varying treatment timings. To illustrate the practical utility of geodesic DID, we analyze health impacts of the Soviet Union's collapse using age-at-death distributions and assess effects of U.S. electricity market liberalization on electricity generation compositions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Compositional Synthetic Controls

    econ.EM 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    For outcomes that are shares summing to one, the paper estimates counterfactuals as weighted geometric means of donor compositions in log-odds space, with weights fit before treatment.

  2. Compositional difference-in-differences

    econ.EM 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A difference-in-differences estimator for categorical outcomes that identifies counterfactual category counts and shares under proportional-growth parallel trends, with applications to early voting and RGGI.

Pith tools