Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Subtle and Spectacular: Diverse White Dwarf Debris Disks Revealed by JWST

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read JWST adds 12 white dwarf debris disks, doubling the spectral sample.

desk verdict A solid, field-advancing JWST survey of white dwarf debris disks; the central detections are secure, but the abstract overstates and a null test for the subtlest features would tighten the case. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.18338 v1 pith:PQXKB2HG submitted 2025-01-30 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.SR

J. Farihi , K.Y.L. Su , C. Melis , S. J. Kenyon , A. Swan , S. Redfield , M. C. Wyatt , J. H. Debes This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EPastro-ph.SR
keywords ChemicalabundancesDebrisdisksExtrasolarrockyplanetsInfraredexcessPlanetarymineralogyPlanetesimalsWhitedwarfstarsJWSTMIRIspectroscopy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

JWST MIRI low-resolution spectroscopy of 36 polluted white dwarfs yielded 12 unambiguous detections of warm circumstellar dust, more than doubling the number of white dwarf debris disks with mid-infrared spectra available for mineralogical study. The new disks span two orders of magnitude in fractional infrared brightness and include the two faintest excesses ever detected, the strongest silicate emission seen toward any mature star, a disk with a featureless continuum at roughly 2040 K, and three candidates for glassy silica. The near-universal presence of solid-state emission implies small, optically thin dust grains that must be replenished by ongoing collisions on year-to-decade timescales. The paper argues that this diversity, including a disk that can only be fit by dust hotter than 2000 K, opens a new window onto the mineralogy and physical processing of exoplanetary debris.

What carries the argument

The central object is the white dwarf debris disk as seen in mid-infrared light. The discovery tool is JWST's Mid-Infrared Instrument Low-Resolution Spectrometer (MIRI LRS), a slit spectrograph with resolving power R≈100 over 5-12.5 µm. The method works by fitting a model white dwarf photosphere to short-wavelength photometry, then subtracting it from each MIRI spectrum; the remaining flux is the dust-only spectrum. Solid-state emission features near 9-11 µm, arising from small silicate grains in optically thin regions, carry the mineralogical information, while the smoothed thermal continuum constrains the dust temperature. The detection threshold for an excess is roughly 8%, combining instrument calibration error and a 2% uncertainty in the modeled stellar flux, and the dust-only spectra were fit with blackbodies to derive Tdust values.

What would settle it

Re-fit all 36 MIRI spectra with an independent grid of white dwarf models that includes different H/He abundances, metal line blanketing, and updated opacities; if any of the 12 excesses falls below the 8% detection threshold under a model that is equally consistent with the short-wavelength photometry, that detection should be revisited. Alternatively, take higher-resolution MIRI MRS spectra of the three glassy silica candidates and of J0707-7438: the mineralogical claims would be falsified if the observed features split into crystalline-silicate bands, while the 2040 K continuum would be falsified if longer-wavelength photometry reveals a second, cooler blackbody component.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that JWST MIRI LRS spectra of 36 metal-polluted white dwarfs show 12 unambiguous infrared excesses above the stellar continua, raising the number of white dwarf dust spectra from 8 to 20 and including the two faintest debris disks yet detected. It highlights J1613+5521, whose silicate emission is an order of magnitude stronger than that of the prototype G29-38 and among the strongest known for any debris disk, and J0707-7438, whose naked thermal continuum requires dust temperatures of about 2040 K and therefore highly refractory material or very large grains. Three sources (J0719+4021, J0802+5631, J0847+5128) show sharp emission near 9 µm that the authors interpret as glassy silica, possibly formed by high-velocity impacts or volcanism. The paper further argues that because solid-state emission is present in nearly all detected disks, the emitting grains must be small and optically thin, and their persistence requires continuous collisional replenishment. The weakest excesses are roughly 30% above the predicted photosphere, establishing that infrared spectroscopy can find disks that photometric surveys miss.

Load-bearing premise

The detections depend on the white dwarf atmosphere models being accurate to within a few percent at 5-12 µm, so that a 30% excess above the predicted photosphere really is dust and not model error.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The mineralogical sample of white dwarf debris disks grows from 8 to 20 spectra, enabling comparative studies of dust composition across a wider range of disk temperatures and fractional luminosities.
  • Disks with excesses as low as 30% above the photosphere are detectable only spectroscopically, implying that photometric surveys have missed a substantial population of faint disks (likely at least 15% of previously undetected systems in this sample).
  • The near-universal solid-state emission means most detected disks contain small, optically thin grains that are replenished within a few years by ongoing collisions, so the observed dust is a live record of current collisional activity.
  • J0707-7438's 2040 K featureless continuum implies dust that is either highly refractory (such as metallic iron) or composed of particles too large to produce silicate emission, extending the range of known disk temperatures well beyond the canonical 1000 K.
  • Confirmation of glassy silica in three disks would implicate high-velocity impacts or volcanism on exoplanetary bodies, connecting the debris seen around white dwarfs to terrestrial materials like tektites and obsidian.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 8% detection threshold governs the survey, a deeper integration on the 24 non-detections might reveal additional faint disks similar to J0547-4847 and J0720-4250, potentially pushing the detection rate above one-third.
  • The three glassy silica candidates predict specific spectral signatures at higher resolution, such as a sharper 9 µm peak and absence of olivine features; MIRI MRS or future JWST observations could test this identification.
  • The 2040 K disk around J0707-7438, if composed largely of metallic iron, should show no strong silicate features at any wavelength and a blackbody-like continuum that differs from a cool brown dwarf companion; such a differentiation could be made with 3-5 µm spectroscopy.
  • A fuller census of white dwarf debris disks using JWST could calibrate the fraction of polluted white dwarfs with detectable dust, connecting the onset of disk formation to the metallicity of the accreted material.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This letter reports 12 new white dwarf debris disk detections from JWST MIRI LRS spectroscopy of 36 metal-polluted white dwarfs, claimed to be unambiguous infrared excesses above the stellar photosphere. The paper highlights the two faintest disks yet found, the strongest silicate emission features reported for any mature star, one featureless disk with a ~2040 K blackbody continuum, and three candidates for glassy silica. The detection threshold is about 8% of the stellar continuum, the weakest excesses are ~30% at 8-12 µm, and the authors argue that solid-state emission requires small, optically thin grains that must be collisionally replenished on short timescales. The data analysis uses standard pipeline reductions, Koester atmosphere models fitted to short-wavelength photometry, and blackbody fits for the dust continuum.

Significance. If the detections are secure, the paper delivers a substantial leap in the spectroscopic sample of white dwarf debris disks, from 8 to 20, and introduces several physically interesting cases: the faintest disks, the hottest dust temperature around a white dwarf, and possible silica glass. The JWST data are public, the target selection is stated, and the claimed detection rate (12/36) is three times higher than the Spitzer-era rate. The paper is explicit about the detection threshold and about the limitations of the emissivity measurements, which is good scientific practice. However, the load-bearing claim of 'unambiguous' detections would be materially strengthened by a null test using the 24 non-detections, since the two faintest disks are seen only in the 9-11 µm region where the calibration uncertainty is not quantified.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2, detection threshold paragraph] The 8% detection threshold is tied to the stated ~2% flux calibration at 6-7 µm, but the two faintest disks (J0547-4847 and J0720-4250, Table 1) are detected only through 9-11 µm silicate features; at 6-7 µm their fluxes are within 2% of the model. The paper never quantifies the residual (F_LRS - F_model)/F_model distribution in the 9-11 µm range, neither for the 24 photosphere-only targets nor for the two nod positions individually. Because the entire 'unambiguous' claim for these marginal detections rests on the 9-11 µm systematics, the missing null test is load-bearing. Please add a figure or table showing the residual spectra or the count of non-detections exceeding 8% or 30% at 9-11 µm, and a nod-by-nod check for the two subtle detections.
  2. [Abstract and Section 3, strongest silicate feature claims] The abstract states that the survey reveals 'the strongest silicate emission features known for any debris disk orbiting any main-sequence or white dwarf star,' while Section 3 says the two objects have 'possibly the strongest silicate features' and the Figure 2 emissivities are 'indicative but perhaps not definitive' because the four stars lack longer-wavelength photometry needed to model the thermal continuum. Since the emissivity normalization directly sets the feature strength, the definitive wording in the abstract overstates the evidence. Please harmonize the abstract with the body's caveat.
  3. [Abstract and Section 3, silica glass count] The abstract says 'glassy silica orbiting two stars could be indicative of high-temperature processes,' while Section 3 states there are 'three examples (J0719+4021, J0802+5631, J0847+5128) where glassy or amorphous silica dust is strongly suggested.' This inconsistency affects the summary of results and should be corrected in revision.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and text throughout] The abstract and body contain a typo in 'Re vealed' and 'F arihi' in the author list; these appear to be formatting artifacts and should be cleaned up.
  2. [Figure 2 caption] The caption contains a duplicated word: 'J0859−3647 and and J1613+5521' should read 'J0859−3647 and J1613+5521.'
  3. [Section 3, faint disk paragraph] The phrase 'the 6−7 µm LRS fluxes are within 2% (on average) of the stellar model predictions' would be clearer if the wavelength interval over which the average is computed is specified, since the 2% calibration accuracy is itself only quoted at 6-7 µm.
  4. [Section 2, target selection] The statement that the survey was 'agnostic to all other stellar parameters' is followed by a Teff restriction and a G < 17.0 mag limit; consider reformulating to avoid an apparent contradiction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central detections are empirical data-model residuals, and all fitted parameters are interpreted using independent external theory, not derived from their own inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that 12 of 36 MIRI LRS spectra show infrared excess above white-dwarf photosphere models. The excess is a residual between observed flux and a Koester atmosphere model fitted to short-wavelength photometry; the model does not incorporate the disk excess, so the detection is not equivalent to its input. Dust temperatures are fitted to the excess itself and then used interpretively, but no quantity labeled a prediction is refitted to the same data. The silicate emissivities in Figure 2 are explicitly normalized to the fitted thermal continua ('unity at all wavelengths by definition for blackbody spectra'), which is a plotting normalization, not a derived claim. Arguments about small grains, replenishment, and high-temperature minerals invoke independent physical mechanisms such as Poynting-Robertson drag and prior laboratory/mineralogical literature, not the paper's own fitted values as premises. Self-citations appear only as background context (e.g., previous Spitzer detections) and are not load-bearing for the new detections. The absence of a reported null test for the 8% detection threshold is a legitimate robustness concern about calibration systematics, but it concerns statistical validity of a detection claim, not circular derivation. No step in the paper reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is observational. The main fitted quantities are the per-source blackbody dust temperatures; the stellar parameters are adopted from standard fits to photometry. The interpretation of silicate features and replenishment timescales relies on standard domain assumptions from the white dwarf debris disk literature, including atmosphere model accuracy, grain emission theory, and P-R drag timescales.

free parameters (1)
  • Dust continuum temperature Tdust (per-source blackbody fits) = 850-2040 K (Table 1)
    Fitted to infrared photometry and continuum segments of the LRS spectra. Used to characterize each disk and to argue that J0707-7438 requires T>2000 K for its featureless continuum.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption White dwarf atmosphere models (Koester 2010) accurately predict photospheric flux at 5-12 µm to within the stated 8% threshold.
    The excess detection rests on subtracting a model photosphere; any error could mimic or hide dust emission. Invoked in Section 2 and Figure 3.
  • domain assumption The observed 9-11 µm solid-state features arise from optically thin small silicate grains.
    Standard interpretation from prior Spitzer work (Jura et al. 2009); used to infer grain size and replenishment in Section 3.
  • domain assumption Poynting-Robertson drag removes micron-sized dust within 1-10 yr, so detected small grains must be recently produced.
    Theoretical timescale from Rafikov (2011) and Kenyon & Bromley (2017a), cited in Section 3, used for the replenishment claim.
  • domain assumption Sharp 9 µm emission peaks are interpreted as glassy silica based on analogy with HD 172555 and terrestrial tektites or obsidian.
    The 'silica glass' interpretation is an analogy, acknowledged as 'strongly suggested' and 'likely', not proven. Invoked in Section 3.
  • domain assumption The 12 targets are single stars with no unresolved companions contributing to the infrared excess.
    The paper checks for a single point source in acquisition images and Gaia RUWE for one target (J0707-7438), but for most targets the single-star assumption is adopted without detailed companion searches. Sections 2 and 3.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Subtle and Spectacular: Diverse White Dwarf Debris Disks Revealed by JWST." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PQXKB2HG

@misc{pith2026250118338,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Subtle and Spectacular: Diverse White Dwarf Debris Disks Revealed by JWST},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PQXKB2HG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.18338}
}
read the original abstract

This letter reports 12 novel spectroscopic detections of warm circumstellar dust orbiting polluted white dwarfs using JWST MIRI. The disks span two orders of magnitude in fractional infrared brightness and more than double the number of white dwarf dust spectra available for mineralogical study. Among the highlights are: i) the two most subtle infrared excesses yet detected, ii) the strongest silicate emission features known for any debris disk orbiting any main-sequence or white dwarf star, iii) one disk with a thermal continuum but no silicate emission, and iv) three sources with likely spectral signatures of silica glass. The near ubiquity of solid-state emission requires small dust grains that are optically thin, and thus must be replenished on year-to-decade timescales by ongoing collisions. The disk exhibiting a featureless continuum can only be fit by dust temperatures in excess of 2000K, implying highly refractory material comprised of large particles, or non-silicate mineral species. If confirmed, the glassy silica orbiting three stars could be indicative of high-temperature processes and subsequent rapid cooling, such as occur in high-velocity impacts or vulcanism. These detections have been enabled by the unprecedented sensitivity of MIRI LRS spectroscopy and highlight the capability and potential for further observations in future cycles.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.18338 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Gallery of JWST MIRI LRS spectra for 12 targets observed in Cycle 2 Survey program 3690. These are the dust fluxes with the stellar atmosphere subtracted, plotted as data points with error bars. The processed and extracted data are shown in grey, and these are overplotted in blue for regions where features are not obscured by the scatter in flux, and in green using 7-pixel boxcar smoothing for the noisiest regions. … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The four strongest silicate features observed with JWST MIRI, as compared with Spitzer IRS spectra for the previous record holder for a white dwarf debris disk (GD 362, now the weakest in the plot; Jura et al. 2009), and the bright￾est silicate emission seen toward a dusty main-sequence star (BD+20 307; Song et al. 2005; Weinberger et al. 2011). The data are plotted as the emissivity relative to the fitted ther￾mal … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The full photometric spectral energy distributions of the 12 stars with infrared excess plotted in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Detecting water ice and vapor disks originating from icy planetary bodies around white dwarfs with future PRIMA observations

    astro-ph.EP 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PRIMA far-infrared observations could detect water ice disks (44 µm feature) within 60 pc and water vapor disks within 20 pc for masses above ~10^20 g, based on synthetic spectra.

  2. Silicate mineralogy and bulk composition of exoplanetary material in polluted white dwarfs

    astro-ph.EP 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    New ultraviolet abundances for two white dwarfs, combined with a re-analysis of eight systems, support a tentative correlation between the Mg/Si ratio of accreted exoplanetary material and whether its dust is olivine-...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    H., Gillett, F

    Aumann, H. H., Gillett, F. C., Beichman, C. A., et al. 1984, ApJL, 278, L23, doi: 10.1086/184214

    doi:10.1086/184214 1984

  2. [2]

    P., Levens, C

    Ballering, N. P., Levens, C. I., Su, K. Y. L., & Cleeves, L. I. 2022, ApJ, 939, 108, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9a4a

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac9a4a 2022

  3. [3]

    2014, MNRAS, 444, 2147, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1565

    Bergfors, C., Farihi, J., Dufour, P., & Rocchetto, M. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 2147, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1565

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1565 2014

  4. [5]

    S., G¨ ansicke, B

    Brinkworth, C. S., G¨ ansicke, B. T., Girven, J. M., et al. 2012, ApJ, 750, 86, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/750/1/86

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/750/1/86 2012

  5. [6]

    G., Bonsor, A., & Malamud, U

    Brouwers, M. G., Bonsor, A., & Malamud, U. 2022, MNRAS, 509, 2404, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3009 —. 2023, MNRAS, 519, 2646, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3316

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3009 2022

  6. [7]

    2023, JWST Calibration Pipeline, 1.12.5, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10022973

    Bushouse, H., Eisenhamer, J., Dencheva, N., et al. 2023, JWST Calibration Pipeline, 1.12.5, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10022973

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.10022973 2023

  7. [8]

    H., Sigurdsson, S., & Hansen, B

    Debes, J. H., Sigurdsson, S., & Hansen, B. 2007, AJ, 134, 1662, doi: 10.1086/521394

    doi:10.1086/521394 2007

  8. [9]

    Dennihy, E., Farihi, J., & Fusillo, Nicola Pietro Gentile Debes, J. H. 2020, ApJ, 891, 97, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab7249

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab7249 2020

Show all 65 references
  1. [10]

    E., Klein, B

    Doyle, A. E., Klein, B. L., Dufour, P., et al. 2023, ApJ, 950, 93, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acbd44

    2023 doi

  2. [11]

    M., Redfield, S., & Veras, D

    Duvvuri, G. M., Redfield, S., & Veras, D. 2020, ApJ, 893, 166, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab7fa0

    2020 doi

  3. [12]

    2016, NewAR, 71, 9, doi: 10.1016/j.newar.2016.03.001

    Farihi, J. 2016, NewAR, 71, 9, doi: 10.1016/j.newar.2016.03.001

    2016 doi

  4. [13]

    A., Redfield, S., & Dufour, P

    Farihi, J., Barstow, M. A., Redfield, S., & Dufour, P. Hambly, N. C. 2010, MNRAS, 404, 2123, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16426.x

    2010

  5. [14]

    E., & Zuckerman, B

    Farihi, J., Becklin, E. E., & Zuckerman, B. 2005, ApJS, 161, 394, doi: 10.1086/444362

    2005 doi

  6. [15]

    R., & Hoard, D

    Farihi, J., Burleigh, M. R., & Hoard, D. W. 2008, ApJ, 674, 421, doi: 10.1086/524933

    2008 doi

  7. [16]

    T., & Koester, D

    Farihi, J., G¨ ansicke, B. T., & Koester, D. 2013, Science, 342, 218, doi: 10.1126/science.1239447

    2013 doi

  8. [17]

    2009, ApJ, 694, 805, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/694/2/805

    Farihi, J., Jura, M., & Zuckerman, B. 2009, ApJ, 694, 805, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/694/2/805

    2009 doi

  9. [18]

    Frewen, S. F. N., & Hansen, B. M. S. 2014, MNRAS, 439, 2442, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu097 G¨ ansicke, B. T., Marsh, T. R., Southworth, J., &

    2014 doi

  10. [19]

    2006, Science, 314, 1908, doi: 10.1126/science.1135033 8 F arihi et al

    Rebassa-Mansergas, A. 2006, Science, 314, 1908, doi: 10.1126/science.1135033 8 F arihi et al

    2006 doi

  11. [20]

    R., Matthews, K., Neugebauer, G., & Soifer, B

    Graham, J. R., Matthews, K., Neugebauer, G., & Soifer, B. T. 1990, ApJ, 357, 216, doi: 10.1086/168907

    1990 doi

  12. [21]

    Grether, D., & Lineweaver, C. H. 2006, ApJ, 640, 1051, doi: 10.1086/500161

    2006 doi

  13. [22]

    A., G¨ ansicke, B

    Hollands, M. A., G¨ ansicke, B. T., & Koester, D. 2018, MNRAS, 477, 93, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty592

    2018 doi

  14. [23]

    2003, ApJL, 584, L91, doi: 10.1086/374036

    Jura, M. 2003, ApJL, 584, L91, doi: 10.1086/374036

    2003 doi

  15. [24]

    2007a, ApJ, 663, 1285, doi: 10.1086/518767 —

    Jura, M., Farihi, J., & Zuckerman, B. 2007a, ApJ, 663, 1285, doi: 10.1086/518767 —. 2009, AJ, 137, 3191, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/137/2/3191

    2009 doi

  16. [25]

    Jura, M., Farihi, J., Zuckerman, B., & Becklin, E. E. 2007b, AJ, 133, 1927, doi: 10.1086/512734

    1927 doi

  17. [26]

    C., Schmidt, B

    Keller, S. C., Schmidt, B. P., Bessell, M. S., et al. 2007, PASA, 24, 1, doi: 10.1071/AS07001

    2007 doi

  18. [27]

    J., & Bromley, B

    Kenyon, S. J., & Bromley, B. C. 2017a, ApJ, 844, 116, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7b85 —. 2017b, ApJ, 850, 50, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9570

    doi

  19. [28]

    2010, ApJ, 709, 950, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/709/2/950

    Klein, B., Jura, M., Koester, D., Zuckerman, B., & Melis, C. 2010, ApJ, 709, 950, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/709/2/950

    2010 doi

  20. [29]

    L., Doyle, A

    Klein, B. L., Doyle, A. E., Zuckerman, B., et al. 2021, ApJ, 914, 61, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe40b

    2021 doi

  21. [30]

    2010, Mem

    Koester, D. 2010, Mem. Soc. Astron. Italiana, 81, 921

    2010

  22. [31]

    Koester, D., Provencal, J., & Shipman, H. L. 1997, A&A, 320, L57

    1997

  23. [32]

    2021, ApJ, 920, 156, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1354

    Lai, S., Dennihy, E., Xu, S., et al. 2021, ApJ, 920, 156, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1354

    2021 doi

  24. [33]

    M., Chen, C

    Lisse, C. M., Chen, C. H., Wyatt, M. C., et al. 2009, ApJ, 701, 2019, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/701/2/2019

    2009 doi

  25. [34]

    M., VanCleve, J., Adams, A

    Lisse, C. M., VanCleve, J., Adams, A. C., et al. 2006, Science, 313, 635, doi: 10.1126/science.1124694

    2006 doi

  26. [35]

    M., Meng, H

    Lisse, C. M., Meng, H. Y. A., Sitko, M. L., et al. 2020, ApJ, 894, 116, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab7b80

    2020 doi

  27. [36]

    2021, MNRAS, 501, 3806, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3940

    Malamud, U., Grishin, E., & Brouwers, M. 2021, MNRAS, 501, 3806, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3940

    2021 doi

  28. [37]

    Malamud, U., & Perets, H. B. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 5561, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa142

    2020 doi

  29. [38]

    C., Fanson, J., Schiminovich, D., et al

    Martin, D. C., Fanson, J., Schiminovich, D., et al. 2005, ApJL, 619, L1, doi: 10.1086/426387

    2005 doi

  30. [39]

    2017, ApJ, 834, 1, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/1

    Melis, C., & Dufour, P. 2017, ApJ, 834, 1, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/1

    2017 doi

  31. [40]

    2010, ApJ, 722, 1078, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/722/2/1078

    Melis, C., Jura, M., Albert, L., Klein, B., & Zuckerman, B. 2010, ApJ, 722, 1078, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/722/2/1078

    2010 doi

  32. [41]

    E., et al

    Melis, C., Klein, B., Doyle, A. E., et al. 2020, ApJ, 905, 56, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abbdfa

    2020 doi

  33. [42]

    D., & Rafikov, Roman R

    Metzger, B. D., & Rafikov, Roman R. Bochkarev, K. V. 2012, MNRAS, 423, 505, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20895.x

    2012

  34. [43]

    E., Biller, B

    Miles, B. E., Biller, B. A., Patapis, P., et al. 2023, ApJL, 946, L6, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acb04a

    2023 doi

  35. [44]

    T., et al

    Mullally, F., Kilic, M., Reach, W. T., et al. 2007, ApJS, 171, 206, doi: 10.1086/511858

    2007 doi

  36. [45]

    T., Farihi, J., Hollands, M., & Toonen, S

    Noor, H. T., Farihi, J., Hollands, M., & Toonen, S. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 2910, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae731

    2024 doi

  37. [46]

    Probst, R. G. 1983, ApJS, 53, 335, doi: 10.1086/190893 Rafikov, R. R. 2011, ApJL, 732, L3, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/732/1/L3 Rafikov, R. R., & Garmilla, J. A. 2012, ApJ, 760, 123, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/760/2/123

    1983 doi

  38. [47]

    T., Kuchner, M

    Reach, W. T., Kuchner, M. J., von Hippel, T., et al. 2005, ApJL, 635, L161, doi: 10.1086/499561

    2005 doi

  39. [48]

    T., Lisse, C., von Hippel, T., & Mullally, F

    Reach, W. T., Lisse, C., von Hippel, T., & Mullally, F. 2009, ApJ, 693, 697, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/693/1/697

    2009 doi

  40. [49]

    H., Wright, G

    Rieke, G. H., Wright, G. S., B¨ oker, T., et al. 2015, PASP, 127, 584, doi: 10.1086/682252

    2015 doi

  41. [50]

    Rocchetto, M., Farihi, J., & G¨ ansicke, B. T. Bergfors, C. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 574, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv282

    2015 doi

  42. [51]

    1945, Annales d’Astrophysique, 8, 143

    Schatzman, E. 1945, Annales d’Astrophysique, 8, 143

    1945

  43. [52]

    F., Cutri, R

    Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 1163, doi: 10.1086/498708

    2006 doi

  44. [53]

    L., Martin, R

    Smallwood, J. L., Martin, R. G., Livio, M., & Lubow, S. H. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 57, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1819

    2018 doi

  45. [54]

    J., & Becklin, E

    Song, I., Zuckerman, B., Weinberger, A. J., & Becklin, E. E. 2005, Nature, 436, 363, doi: 10.1038/nature03853 Steckloff, J. K., Debes, J., Steele, A., et al. 2021, ApJL, 913, L31, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abfd39

    2005 doi

  46. [55]

    2023, MNRAS, 526, 3815, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2867

    Swan, A., Farihi, J., Melis, C., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 3815, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2867

    2023 doi

  47. [56]

    J., Farihi, J., et al

    Swan, A., Kenyon, S. J., Farihi, J., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 432, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1738

    2021 doi

  48. [57]

    L., Stubbs, C

    Tonry, J. L., Stubbs, C. W., Lykke, K. R., et al. 2012, ApJ, 750, 99, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/750/2/99

    2012 doi

  49. [58]

    J., Becklin, E

    Weinberger, A. J., Becklin, E. E., Song, I., & Zuckerman, B. 2011, ApJ, 726, 72, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/726/2/72

    2011 doi

  50. [59]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.16046, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.16046

    Williams, J., Gaensicke, B., Swan, A., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.16046, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.16046

    2024 doi arXiv

  51. [60]

    J., G¨ ansicke, B

    Wilson, D. J., G¨ ansicke, B. T., & Farihi, Jay Koester, D. 2016, MNRAS, 459, 3282, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw844

    2016 doi

  52. [61]

    L., Eisenhardt, P

    Wright, E. L., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Mainzer, A. K., et al. 2010, AJ, 140, 1868, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868

    2010 doi

  53. [62]

    2017, ApJL, 836, L7, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/836/1/L7

    Xu, S., Zuckerman, B., Dufour, P., et al. 2017, ApJL, 836, L7, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/836/1/L7

    2017 doi

  54. [63]

    Zuckerman, B., & Becklin, E. E. 1987, Nature, 330, 138, doi: 10.1038/330138a0

    1987 doi

  55. [64]

    2011, ApJ, 739, 101, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/739/2/101 Subtle and Spectacular Debris Disks 9

    Zuckerman, B., Koester, D., Dufour, P., et al. 2011, ApJ, 739, 101, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/739/2/101 Subtle and Spectacular Debris Disks 9

    2011 doi

  56. [65]

    2007, ApJ, 671, 872, doi: 10.1086/522223

    Jura, M. 2007, ApJ, 671, 872, doi: 10.1086/522223

    2007 doi

  57. [66]

    N., & H¨ unsch, M

    Zuckerman, B., Koester, D., Reid, I. N., & H¨ unsch, M. 2003, ApJ, 596, 477, doi: 10.1086/377492 10 F arihi et al. APPENDIX Figure 3. The full photometric spectral energy distributions of the 1 2 stars with infrared excess plotted in Figure 1. Photometric data are shown as err...

    2003 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.