Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 8 minor 1 cited by

Sociophysics models inspired by the Ising model

T0 review · 3 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A review argues that the Ising model's binary-spin mathematics describes consensus, crashes, segregation, language change, and epidemics, because many social update rules converge to Ising-like behavior.

desk verdict A competent, broad review of Ising-inspired sociophysics whose concluding claim of convergence to Ising universality is contradicted by its own cited examples. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.23837 v1 pith:PRY73MN5 submitted 2025-06-30 physics.soc-ph cond-mat.stat-mechphysics.comp-ph

Pratik Mullick , Parongama Sen This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.soc-phcond-mat.stat-mechphysics.comp-ph
keywords sociophysicsIsingmodelopiniondynamicsphasetransitionsuniversalityGlaubercollectivebehavioragent-basedmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that a single mathematical object—the Ising model of magnetic spins—keeps resurfacing when physicists model collective social behavior. Across opinion dynamics, financial markets, social segregation, language change, game theory, and epidemic spread, agents with two possible states are treated as spins, and the models' critical points, consensus transitions, metastable states, and oscillating majorities are presented as analogues of magnetic phase transitions. The authors' stronger claim is that the analogy is not merely pictorial: many modified update rules, including voter-type imitation and generalized interaction schemes, tend to converge back to Ising-like behavior. If true, the practical payoff is that tools designed for critical phenomena—scaling laws, critical exponents, universality classes—can be carried over to predict social tipping points and long-lived near-consensus states.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Ising Hamiltonian $H = -\sum_{ij} J_{ij}\sigma_i\sigma_j - h\sum_i \sigma_i$ with binary spins $\sigma_i = \pm 1$, together with the accompanying kinetic update rules (Glauber, Metropolis, heat-bath), in which the temperature parameter is reinterpreted as social noise. The argument moves through an identity of form: whenever a social agent's probability of switching states is written as a function of a local field—neighbor pressure, payoff difference, price signal, or local tolerance—that probability takes the same functional shape as a spin-flip probability. The paper exhibits this mapping in each domain and highlights a generalized two-parameter model whose parameter line $z=y$ is the majority-rule model and whose special points recover the zero-temperature Ising model and the voter model, making the convergence to Ising universality explicit.

What would settle it

Look for a binary-state social model with local interactions whose critical exponents differ from the Ising universality class in the same dimension—for instance, a threshold or cascade model on a two-dimensional lattice with a discontinuous transition, or a voter variant with a different consensus-time scaling. Measuring a non-Ising dynamic exponent in one dimension, where the voter and Glauber dynamics are claimed equivalent, would directly undercut the convergence claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that binary-state models of social phenomena inherit the equilibrium and kinetic structure of the Ising model. The review traces this through concrete equivalences: in one dimension the voter model and the kinetic Ising model with Glauber dynamics are effectively the same; a two-parameter update family contains the voter model, the zero-temperature Ising model, and the majority-rule model as special cases; the probability rule that decides whether a resident moves in the segregation model is the heat-bath algorithm of the Ising model; and pair-persuasion opinion spreading shares the same absorbing states and coarsening exponents as Ising dynamics. On the financial side, trader buy/sell updates written as functions of a local field reduce to heat-bath dynamics, with the responsiveness parameter playing the role of inverse temperature. The review's conclusion generalizes from these cases: the Ising-Glauber dynamics is robust, and many modified social update rules converge back to Ising-like universality.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that mapping a person's two options to a spin and calling social noise 'temperature' is a substantive mathematical identification, not just a metaphor—if the analogy is only superficial, the claimed convergence to Ising universality loses its force.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In any binary social model in the same universality class, quantities such as exit probability, consensus time, persistence, and critical exponents can be transferred from one setting to another, so results proven for the voter model may constrain predictions for Ising-like opinion dynamics.
  • Societies modeled this way should show order–disorder phase transitions as control parameters such as noise, social influence, tolerance, or responsiveness cross critical values, making abrupt opinion shifts, market crashes, and tipping points expected signatures of the dynamics.
  • Systems can be trapped in metastable near-consensus states for very long times before a fluctuation flips the majority, which provides a mechanism for sudden reversals in opinion or language dominance.
  • Data-driven calibration is a natural next step: with real opinion, election, or hospitalization data setting the parameters, the same Ising machinery can move from retrospective explanation toward prediction.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the convergence-to-Ising claim holds, then the microscopic rule differences among social models matter less than their binary-state, local-interaction structure, so model selection could be guided by universality class rather than by matching every micro-rule.
  • A testable extension would compare critical exponents of threshold or cascade models with Ising exponents on the same lattice; the review does not analyze those alternatives, so its universality claim would be sharpened if Ising-class behavior persisted despite threshold-type updates.
  • The temperature-as-noise mapping suggests cross-domain parameter reuse: a noise value fitted from a segregation or finance dataset could, in principle, be used as a prior for an opinion-dynamics model on the same interaction topology.
  • The strongest empirical anchor the paper points to is electoral data where Ising and three-state models both predict rare minority-winner outcomes; an out-of-sample test across many elections would quantify how much predictive power the Ising mapping actually carries.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 8 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a review article on sociophysics models inspired by the Ising model. It surveys applications to binary opinion dynamics, financial markets, three-state opinion and business-expectation models, social segregation, language dynamics, game theory, and epidemic spreading, and it includes a brief bibliometric analysis of publications on 'Sociophysics' from the Scopus database. The paper's stated unifying thesis is that binary-state agent models built around Ising-like interactions capture collective phenomena such as phase transitions, consensus formation, criticality, and metastability, and that many modified update rules converge back to Ising-like behavior, especially Ising-Glauber dynamics. The review presents standard definitions of Glauber, Metropolis, and heat-bath dynamics, and it summarizes results from a broad set of primary references.

Significance. If the convergence-to-Ising thesis were established, the review would provide a genuinely unifying framework for a large and fragmented literature, and the paper could serve as a useful entry point for researchers in physics and social science. The review has real strengths: it collects many relevant models in one place, correctly reproduces standard formulas such as the Glauber flip probability, heat-bath probability, exit probability, and consensus-time scalings, and it explicitly notes several important distinctions, such as the difference between voter-model and Ising coarsening in higher dimensions and the existence of metastable states in the BChS model. However, the central synthetic claim is asserted rather than systematically demonstrated. The evidence cited in the review itself contains multiple counterexamples to the unqualified convergence statement, and the paper does not provide a quantitative or systematic universality check. The review is therefore more valuable as a curated survey than as a proof of a unifying principle, and the conclusion and abstract need to be qualified to match the evidence.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 11, final paragraph; Section 4; Section 5] The central claim that 'Many modified update rules, whether in voter-like models or generalized interaction schemes, tend to converge back to Ising-like behavior' is contradicted by the review's own evidence. Section 4 states that in dimensions d>1 the voter model coarsens by interfacial noise rather than curvature, which places it in a different dynamical universality class from Ising-Glauber dynamics, and it also describes a domain-size dependent rule whose growth and persistence exponents are 'markedly different' from Ising. Section 5, Eq. (8), presents Bornholdt's local field with a global magnetization term and a minority-following strategy, which are equilibrium-breaking features rather than evidence of convergence to equilibrium Ising universality. The examples that do match Ising behavior, such as the Sznajd model in 1D and the BChS critical exponents, are highlighted, while the counterexamples are acknowledged only in passing. To make the convergence claim load-bearing, the review needs either a systematic universality comparison across the cited rules or a carefully qualified statement specifying the parameter regimes and observables for which convergence holds.
  2. [Section 4, Eqs. (5)-(7); Section 6] The paper uses the generalized two-parameter model of Ref. [77] to say that 'the Ising, Voter and the majority rule model can be achieved' in two dimensions. While this is true as a parametrization of flip probabilities, it does not establish common universality: the voter endpoint (z=0.5, y=1) is not Ising-like in d>1, as the review itself notes. Similarly, Section 6 reports that the BChS model has Ising critical exponents in two and three dimensions and in the mean-field limit, but immediately adds that the dynamical behavior is different, with two time scales and long-lived metastable states. The review should explicitly separate static critical exponents from dynamical universality classes; as written, the text invites the reader to conflate them when it claims convergence to 'Ising-like universality'.
  3. [Section 3 and Section 11, temperature-as-noise mapping] The review's unifying framework depends on interpreting the Ising temperature as social noise and on treating social agents as Ising spins. The paper repeatedly calls models 'equivalent' or 'similar' to Ising dynamics without specifying the sense of equivalence. For example, Section 3 says critical exponents allow models to be grouped into universality classes, but the review does not give a concrete test of whether the social mapping is substantive or merely metaphorical, nor does it compare the Ising-type framework against alternative formulations such as threshold or cascade models. This is not a fatal flaw for a review, but the conclusion should be framed as a working analogy and a research program rather than an established equivalence, especially because the paper itself notes that energy is absent in social models.
minor comments (8)
  1. [Section 1, Figure 1] The bibliometric analysis lacks methodological detail: the exact Scopus query, search fields, inclusion and exclusion criteria, duplicate handling, and date of retrieval are not reported, so Figure 1 is not reproducible.
  2. [Section 2, Eq. (2)] The sentence 'The spin is flipped with probability 0.5 is ΔE is zero' contains a typo and should read 'if ΔE is zero'.
  3. [Section 2] The phrase 'nereast neighbours' should be corrected to 'nearest neighbours'.
  4. [Section 4] The phrase 'as in a Ising system' should be 'as in an Ising system', and 'the Ising, Voter and the majority rule model' should be 'the Ising, Voter, and majority rule models'.
  5. [Section 8] The sentence about word-ordering fluctuations says 'as shown in Fig. 6', but Figure 6 shows Schelling segregation; the intended reference appears to be Figure 2, which shows magnetization oscillations in the Ising model.
  6. [Section 11] The phrase 'the the parameters affecting collective decisions' contains a duplicated article and should be corrected.
  7. [References, Ref. [35]] The Metropolis algorithm is cited to Hastings 1970, but the standard citation for the Metropolis algorithm is Metropolis et al. (1953); the reference should be corrected or supplemented.
  8. [Abstract] The word 'sociphysics' in the final sentence is a typo and should be 'sociophysics'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: this review compiles external results, and its unifying conclusion is an interpretive synthesis rather than a derivation from fitted inputs or self-citations.

full rationale

The paper is a review article, not a derivation or prediction exercise. It surveys published models from many independent groups and describes their known behavior; no novel parameter is fitted and then relabeled as a prediction, and no equation is derived from an outcome that it is claimed to explain. The central claim in Section 11 that many modified update rules 'tend to converge back to Ising-like behavior' is presented as a qualitative synthesis of the surveyed literature, not as a theorem derived from the paper's own equations. Self-citations do exist (e.g., refs. [5], [45], [82], [83], [98], [100]), but they are interspersed with dozens of works by other authors and are used as examples or background; none is invoked as a uniqueness theorem, none is load-bearing for the paper's main message, and the review does not rely on a self-citation chain to forbid alternatives. A possible objection that the convergence claim is selective (for instance, the voter model in d>1 coarsens by interfacial noise rather than curvature, as the paper itself notes in Section 4) is a scientific-scope concern, not circularity. Under the stated rubric, this is a minor self-citation case with no substantive circularity, hence score 2.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This review paper introduces no new free parameters or invented entities. Its narrative rests on prior established results in statistical mechanics and on the domain assumption that social binary states map onto spins.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math The 1D Ising model has no finite-temperature phase transition.
    Invoked in Section 2 as background for why the model gained prominence only after Onsager's 2D solution.
  • standard math The 2D Ising model exhibits a phase transition at nonzero critical temperature.
    Invoked in Section 2 as the basis for universality and critical exponent arguments used throughout.
  • standard math Glauber dynamics with detailed balance leads to equilibrium Ising behavior.
    Used in Sections 2 and 4 to justify the equivalence of single-spin-flip updates and to connect social update rules to Ising kinetics.
  • domain assumption Binary social states (opinions, buy/sell, cooperation/defection) can be represented as Ising spins with pairwise interactions.
    This is the core modeling assumption of the entire review, introduced in Sections 1 and 4, and is not independently validated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Sociophysics models inspired by the Ising model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PRY73MN5

@misc{pith2026250623837,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Sociophysics models inspired by the Ising model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PRY73MN5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.23837}
}
read the original abstract

The Ising model, originally developed for understanding magnetic phase transitions, has become a cornerstone in the study of collective phenomena across diverse disciplines. In this review, we explore how Ising and Ising-like models have been successfully adapted to sociophysical systems, where binary-state agents mimic human decisions or opinions. By focusing on key areas such as opinion dynamics, financial markets, social segregation, game theory, language evolution, and epidemic spreading, we demonstrate how the models describing these phenomena, inspired by the Ising model, capture essential features of collective behavior, including phase transitions, consensus formation, criticality, and metastability. In particular, we emphasize the role of the dynamical rules of evolution in the different models that often converge back to Ising-like universality. We end by outlining the future directions in sociphysics research, highlighting the continued relevance of the Ising model in the analysis of complex social systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking, Group Decision Making and Beyond 2. Distorted Polarization and Vulnerability

    physics.soc-ph 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    In a zero-temperature Ising-like model of opinion dynamics, a single well-placed local field, or two opposed fields at the right sites, can override the random spontaneous consensus and force a predetermined majority.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

118 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [77]

    Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 26(10), 2317 (1993)

    De Oliveira, M., Mendes, J., Santos, M.: Nonequilibrium spin models with Ising uni- versal behaviour. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 26(10), 2317 (1993)

    work page 1993

  2. [1]

    Reviews of Modern Physics 25(2), 353 (1953)

    Newell, G.F., Montroll, E.W.: On the the- ory of the Ising model of Ferromagnetism. Reviews of Modern Physics 25(2), 353 (1953)

    1953

  3. [2]

    Reviews of Modern Physics 39(4), 883 (1967) 13

    Brush, S.G.: History of the Lenz-Ising model. Reviews of Modern Physics 39(4), 883 (1967) 13

    1967

  4. [3]

    International Journal of Modern Physics C 19(03), 409–440 (2008)

    Galam, S.: Sociophysics: A review of Galam models. International Journal of Modern Physics C 19(03), 409–440 (2008)

    2008

  5. [4]

    Journal of Statistical Physics 151, 9–20 (2013)

    Stauffer, D.: A biased review of sociophysics. Journal of Statistical Physics 151, 9–20 (2013)

    2013

  6. [5]

    OUP Oxford, Oxford (2014)

    Sen, P., Chakrabarti, B.K.: Sociophysics: an Introduction. OUP Oxford, Oxford (2014)

    2014

  7. [6]

    Interna- tional Journal of Modern Physics C 16(04), 515–531 (2005)

    Pluchino, A., Latora, V., Rapisarda, A.: Changing opinions in a changing world: A new perspective in sociophysics. Interna- tional Journal of Modern Physics C 16(04), 515–531 (2005)

    2005

  8. [7]

    Econophysics and Sociophysics: Trends and Perspectives, 67–94 (2006)

    Weisbuch, G.: Social opinion dynamics. Econophysics and Sociophysics: Trends and Perspectives, 67–94 (2006)

    2006

Show all 118 references
  1. [8]

    Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 12(1), 11 (2009)

    Sobkowicz, P.: Modelling opinion formation with physics tools: Call for closer link with reality. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 12(1), 11 (2009)

    2009

  2. [9]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 391(4), 1729–1734 (2012)

    Crokidakis, N.: Effects of mass media on opinion spreading in the Sznajd sociophysics model. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 391(4), 1729–1734 (2012)

    2012

  3. [10]

    Global Economics and Management Review 18(1), 2–11 (2013)

    Galam, S.: Modeling the Forming of Pub- lic Opinion: an approach from Sociophysics. Global Economics and Management Review 18(1), 2–11 (2013)

    2013

  4. [11]

    In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Modeling, Simulation and Visualization Methods (MSV), p

    Butt, C., Playne, D., Hawick, K.: Compar- ing Collective Behaviour of Sociophysical Models. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Modeling, Simulation and Visualization Methods (MSV), p. 1 (2014)

    2014

  5. [12]

    Advances in Com- plex Systems 21(06n07), 1802002 (2018)

    Lorenz, J., Neumann, M.: Opinion dynamics and collective decisions. Advances in Com- plex Systems 21(06n07), 1802002 (2018)

    2018

  6. [13]

    Scientific Reports 9(1), 18039 (2019)

    Tsarev, D., Trofimova, A., Alodjants, A., Khrennikov, A.: Phase transitions, collec- tive emotions and decision-making problem in heterogeneous social systems. Scientific Reports 9(1), 18039 (2019)

    2019

  7. [14]

    Evolutionary Economics 17 (2019)

    Tanimoto, J.: Evolutionary games with sociophysics. Evolutionary Economics 17 (2019)

    2019

  8. [15]

    Physics today 71(2), 40–46 (2018)

    Schweitzer, F.: Sociophysics. Physics today 71(2), 40–46 (2018)

    2018

  9. [16]

    Reports on progress in physics 77(6), 062001 (2014)

    Sornette, D.: Physics and financial eco- nomics (1776–2014): puzzles, Ising and agent-based models. Reports on progress in physics 77(6), 062001 (2014)

    2014

  10. [17]

    American Journal of Physics 76(4), 470–473 (2008)

    Stauffer, D.: Social applications of two- dimensional Ising models. American Journal of Physics 76(4), 470–473 (2008)

    2008

  11. [18]

    Galam, S.: Sociophysics: An Overview of Emblematic Founding Models, pp. 93–100. Springer, Boston, MA (2012)

    2012

  12. [19]

    Harper, New York (2015)

    Harari, Y.N.: Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. Harper, New York (2015)

    2015

  13. [20]

    British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 24(2), 251–266 (1971)

    Weidlich, W.: The statistical description of polarization phenomena in society. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 24(2), 251–266 (1971)

    1971

  14. [21]

    Physics reports 204(1), 1–163 (1991)

    Weidlich, W.: Physics and social sci- ence—the approach of synergetics. Physics reports 204(1), 1–163 (1991)

    1991

  15. [22]

    Economics, Evolution and the State: The Governance of Complexity, Chel- tenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, 120–139 (2000)

    Weidlich, W.: Sociodynamics: An Inte- grated Approach to Modelling in the Social Sciences. Economics, Evolution and the State: The Governance of Complexity, Chel- tenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, 120–139 (2000)

    2000

  16. [23]

    Physics Today27(7), 23–28 (1974)

    Callen, E., Shapero, D.: A theory of social imitation. Physics Today27(7), 23–28 (1974)

    1974

  17. [24]

    Gordon and Breach, New York (1974)

    Montroll, E.W., Badger, W.W.: Introduc- tion to Quantitative Aspects of Social Phe- nomena. Gordon and Breach, New York (1974)

    1974

  18. [25]

    Galam, S., Gefen, Y., Shapir, Y.: Socio- physics: A new approach of sociologi- cal collective behaviour. I. mean-behaviour 14 description of a strike. Journal of Mathemat- ical Sociology 9(1), 1–13 (1982)

    1982

  19. [26]

    Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 28(2), 257–274 (1995)

    Orl´ ean, A.: Bayesian interactions and col- lective dynamics of opinion: Herd behavior and mimetic contagion. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 28(2), 257–274 (1995)

    1995

  20. [27]

    Journal of mathematical sociology 1(2), 143–186 (1971)

    Schelling, T.C.: Dynamic models of segre- gation. Journal of mathematical sociology 1(2), 143–186 (1971)

    1971

  21. [28]

    American journal of sociol- ogy 83(6), 1420–1443 (1978)

    Granovetter, M.: Threshold models of col- lective behavior. American journal of sociol- ogy 83(6), 1420–1443 (1978)

    1978

  22. [29]

    Jour- nal of Mathematical sociology 9(3), 165–179 (1983)

    Granovetter, M., Soong, R.: Threshold mod- els of diffusion and collective behavior. Jour- nal of Mathematical sociology 9(3), 165–179 (1983)

    1983

  23. [30]

    Onsager, L.: Crystal statistics. I. A two- dimensional model with an order-disorder transition. Physical Review 65(3-4), 117 (1944)

    1944

  24. [31]

    Current science 69(10), 816–821 (1995)

    Bhattacharjee, S.M., Khare, A.: Fifty years of the exact solution of the two-dimensional Ising model by Onsager. Current science 69(10), 816–821 (1995)

    1995

  25. [32]

    Journal of Statis- tical Physics 44(3), 393–454 (1986)

    Aizenman, M., Fern´ andez, R.: On the crit- ical behavior of the magnetization in high- dimensional Ising models. Journal of Statis- tical Physics 44(3), 393–454 (1986)

    1986

  26. [33]

    Suzuki, S., Inoue, J., Chakrabarti, B.K.: Quantum Ising Phases and Transitions in Transverse Ising Models vol. 862. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    2012

  27. [34]

    Journal of mathematical physics 4(2), 294–307 (1963)

    Glauber, R.J.: Time-dependent statistics of the Ising model. Journal of mathematical physics 4(2), 294–307 (1963)

    1963

  28. [35]

    Oxford University Press, Oxford (1970)

    Hastings, W.K.: Monte Carlo Sampling Methods Using Markov Chains and Their Applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1970)

    1970

  29. [36]

    Journal of Physical Studies 21(3), 3002 (2017)

    Ising, T., Folk, R., Kenna, R., Berche, B., Holovatch, Y.: The fate of Ernst Ising and the fate of his model. Journal of Physical Studies 21(3), 3002 (2017)

    2017

  30. [37]

    npj Com- plexity 1(1), 10 (2024)

    Macy, M.W., Szymanski, B.K., Ho lyst, J.A.: The Ising model celebrates a century of interdisciplinary contributions. npj Com- plexity 1(1), 10 (2024)

    2024

  31. [38]

    Journal of Artificial Soci- eties and Social Simulation 5(3) (2002)

    Rainer, H., Krause, U.: Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation. Journal of Artificial Soci- eties and Social Simulation 5(3) (2002)

    2002

  32. [39]

    Reviews of modern physics 81(2), 591–646 (2009)

    Castellano, C., Fortunato, S., Loreto, V.: Statistical physics of social dynamics. Reviews of modern physics 81(2), 591–646 (2009)

    2009

  33. [40]

    Dynamic Games and Applications 1, 3–49 (2011)

    Acemoglu, D., Ozdaglar, A.: Opinion dynamics and learning in social networks. Dynamic Games and Applications 1, 3–49 (2011)

    2011

  34. [41]

    International Journal of Knowledge and Systems Science (IJKSS) 2(4), 72–91 (2011)

    Xia, H., Wang, H., Xuan, Z.: Opinion dynamics: A multidisciplinary review and perspective on future research. International Journal of Knowledge and Systems Science (IJKSS) 2(4), 72–91 (2011)

    2011

  35. [42]

    In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM Interna- tional Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp

    Das, A., Gollapudi, S., Munagala, K.: Mod- eling opinion dynamics in social networks. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM Interna- tional Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 403–412 (2014)

    2014

  36. [43]

    Participatory sensing, opinions and collective awareness, 363–401 (2017)

    S ˆ ırbu, A., Loreto, V., Servedio, V.D., Tria, F.: Opinion dynamics: models, extensions and external effects. Participatory sensing, opinions and collective awareness, 363–401 (2017)

    2017

  37. [44]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 387(12), 2937–2951 (2008)

    Gwizdalla, T.M.: Gallagher index for socio- physical models. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 387(12), 2937–2951 (2008)

    2008

  38. [45]

    Physical Review E 96(3), 032303 (2017) 15

    Biswas, S., Sen, P.: Critical noise can make the minority candidate win: The us pres- idential election cases. Physical Review E 96(3), 032303 (2017) 15

    2017

  39. [46]

    Physica A: Statis- tical Mechanics and its Applications 566, 125639 (2021)

    Biswas, K., Biswas, S., Sen, P.: Block size dependence of coarse graining in discrete opinion dynamics model: Application to the US presidential elections. Physica A: Statis- tical Mechanics and its Applications 566, 125639 (2021)

    2021

  40. [47]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 570, 125835 (2021)

    Galam, S.: Will Trump win again in the 2020 election? an answer from a sociophysics model. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 570, 125835 (2021)

    2021

  41. [48]

    Jour- nal de physique I 2(12), 2221–2229 (1992)

    Nagel, K., Schreckenberg, M.: A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic. Jour- nal de physique I 2(12), 2221–2229 (1992)

    1992

  42. [49]

    Physical Review E 51(5), 4282 (1995)

    Helbing, D., Molnar, P.: Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. Physical Review E 51(5), 4282 (1995)

    1995

  43. [50]

    Physical Review E 51(4), 2939 (1995)

    Schreckenberg, M., Schadschneider, A., Nagel, K., Ito, N.: Discrete stochastic mod- els for traffic flow. Physical Review E 51(4), 2939 (1995)

    1995

  44. [51]

    Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 68(11), 3738–3739 (1999)

    Fukui, M., Ishibashi, Y.: Jamming transition in cellular automaton models for pedestri- ans on passageway. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 68(11), 3738–3739 (1999)

    1999

  45. [52]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechan- ics and its Applications 295(3-4), 507–525 (2001)

    Burstedde, C., Klauck, K., Schadschneider, A., Zittartz, J.: Simulation of pedestrian dynamics using a two-dimensional cellular automaton. Physica A: Statistical Mechan- ics and its Applications 295(3-4), 507–525 (2001)

    2001

  46. [53]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 312(3-4), 609–618 (2002)

    Perez, G.J., Tapang, G., Lim, M., Saloma, C.: Streaming, disruptive interference and power-law behavior in the exit dynamics of confined pedestrians. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 312(3-4), 609–618 (2002)

    2002

  47. [54]

    Stanley, H.E.: Phase Transitions and Crit- ical Phenomena vol. 7. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1971)

    1971

  48. [55]

    s of Modern Physics 49(3), 435 (1977)

    Hohenberg, P.C., Halperin, B.I.: Theory of dynamic critical phenomena. s of Modern Physics 49(3), 435 (1977)

    1977

  49. [56]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambride (2007)

    Herbut, I.: A Modern Approach to Critical Phenomena. Cambridge University Press, Cambride (2007)

    2007

  50. [57]

    Routledge, New York (2018)

    Ma, S.-K.: Modern Theory of Critical Phe- nomena. Routledge, New York (2018)

    2018

  51. [58]

    Journal of Economic Surveys 4(2), 157–188 (1990)

    Coughlin, P.J.: Majority rule and election models. Journal of Economic Surveys 4(2), 157–188 (1990)

    1990

  52. [59]

    Journal of Economic Theory 103(1), 31–48 (2002)

    Eraslan, H., Merlo, A.: Majority rule in a stochastic model of bargaining. Journal of Economic Theory 103(1), 31–48 (2002)

    2002

  53. [60]

    Physical Review Letters 90(23), 238701 (2003)

    Krapivsky, P.L., Redner, S.: Dynamics of majority rule in two-state interacting spin systems. Physical Review Letters 90(23), 238701 (2003)

    2003

  54. [61]

    Physical Review E 71(3), 036101 (2005)

    Chen, P., Redner, S.: Majority rule dynam- ics in finite dimensions. Physical Review E 71(3), 036101 (2005)

    2005

  55. [62]

    Physical Review E 92(6), 062122 (2015)

    Crokidakis, N., Oliveira, P.M.C.: Inflexibil- ity and independence: Phase transitions in the majority-rule model. Physical Review E 92(6), 062122 (2015)

    2015

  56. [63]

    International Journal of Modern Physics C 11(06), 1157– 1165 (2000)

    Sznajd-Weron, K., Sznajd, J.: Opinion evo- lution in closed community. International Journal of Modern Physics C 11(06), 1157– 1165 (2000)

    2000

  57. [64]

    Computer physics com- munications 146(1), 93–98 (2002)

    Stauffer, D.: Sociophysics: the Sznajd model and its applications. Computer physics com- munications 146(1), 93–98 (2002)

    2002

  58. [65]

    The European Physical Journal B- Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 35, 279–288 (2003)

    Slanina, F., Lavicka, H.: Analytical results for the Sznajd model of opinion forma- tion. The European Physical Journal B- Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 35, 279–288 (2003)

    2003

  59. [66]

    Acta Physica Polonica B 36(08), 2537–2547 (2005)

    Sznajd-Weron, K.: Sznajd model and its applications. Acta Physica Polonica B 36(08), 2537–2547 (2005)

    2005

  60. [67]

    Europhysics Let- ters 96(4), 48002 (2011) 16

    Sznajd-Weron, K., Tabiszewski, M., Timpa- naro, A.M.: Phase transition in the Sznajd model with independence. Europhysics Let- ters 96(4), 48002 (2011) 16

    2011

  61. [68]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 565, 125537 (2021)

    Sznajd-Weron, K., Sznajd, J., Weron, T.: A review on the Sznajd model—20 years after. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 565, 125537 (2021)

    2021

  62. [69]

    Phys- ical Review E 80(4), 041129 (2009)

    Castellano, C., Mu˜ noz, M.A., Pastor- Satorras, R.: Nonlinear q-voter model. Phys- ical Review E 80(4), 041129 (2009)

    2009

  63. [70]

    Physical Review E 86(1), 011105 (2012)

    Nyczka, P., Sznajd-Weron, K., Cis lo, J.: Phase transitions in the q-voter model with two types of stochastic driving. Physical Review E 86(1), 011105 (2012)

    2012

  64. [71]

    Physical Review E 89(5), 052808 (2014)

    Timpanaro, A.M., Prado, C.P.: Exit proba- bility of the one-dimensional q-voter model: Analytical results and simulations for large networks. Physical Review E 89(5), 052808 (2014)

    2014

  65. [72]

    Physical Review E 92(5), 052812 (2015)

    Chmiel, A., Sznajd-Weron, K.: Phase tran- sitions in the q-voter model with noise on a duplex clique. Physical Review E 92(5), 052812 (2015)

    2015

  66. [73]

    Physical Review E 92(1), 012803 (2015)

    Mobilia, M.: Nonlinear q-voter model with inflexible zealots. Physical Review E 92(1), 012803 (2015)

    2015

  67. [74]

    Physical Review E 97(5), 052106 (2018)

    Vieira, A.R., Anteneodo, C.: Threshold q- voter model. Physical Review E 97(5), 052106 (2018)

    2018

  68. [75]

    The annals of proba- bility, 643–663 (1975)

    Holley, R.A., Liggett, T.M.: Ergodic theo- rems for weakly interacting infinite systems and the voter model. The annals of proba- bility, 643–663 (1975)

    1975

  69. [76]

    Physical Review E 103(6), 060301 (2021)

    Krapivsky, P., Redner, S.: Divergence and consensus in majority rule. Physical Review E 103(6), 060301 (2021)

    2021

  70. [78]

    Behera, L., Schweitzer, F.: On spatial con- sensus formation: Is the Sznajd model differ- ent from a voter model? International Jour- nal of Modern Physics C 14(10), 1331–1354 (2003)

    2003

  71. [79]

    The European Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 30, 587–592 (2002)

    Stauffer, D., Oliveira, P.M.C.: Persistence of opinion in the Sznajd consensus model: com- puter simulation. The European Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 30, 587–592 (2002)

    2002

  72. [80]

    Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 17(24), 2573 (2005)

    Godreche, C., Luck, J.: Metastability in zero-temperature dynamics: Statistics of attractors. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 17(24), 2573 (2005)

    2005

  73. [81]

    Physical Review E 74(3), 031109 (2006)

    Sznajd-Weron, K., Krupa, S.: Inflow versus outflow zero-temperature dynamics in one dimension. Physical Review E 74(3), 031109 (2006)

    2006

  74. [82]

    Phys- ical Review E 89(3), 030103 (2014)

    Roy, P., Biswas, S., Sen, P.: Exit probability in inflow dynamics: Nonuniversality induced by range, asymmetry, and fluctuation. Phys- ical Review E 89(3), 030103 (2014)

    2014

  75. [83]

    Physical Review E 80(2), 027101 (2009)

    Biswas, S., Sen, P.: Model of binary opinion dynamics: Coarsening and effect of disorder. Physical Review E 80(2), 027101 (2009)

    2009

  76. [84]

    In: 2013 Information Theory and Applications Workshop (ITA), pp

    Afrasiabi, M.H., Gu´ erin, R., Venkatesh, S.S.: Opinion formation in Ising networks. In: 2013 Information Theory and Applications Workshop (ITA), pp. 1–10 (2013)

    2013

  77. [85]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 525, 433– 442 (2019)

    Li, L., Fan, Y., Zeng, A., Di, Z.: Binary opinion dynamics on signed networks based on Ising model. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 525, 433– 442 (2019)

    2019

  78. [86]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 526, 121069 (2019)

    Frahm, K.M., Shepelyansky, D.L.: Ising- PageRank model of opinion formation on social networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 526, 121069 (2019)

    2019

  79. [87]

    Phys- ica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Appli- cations 623, 128811 (2023)

    Baldassarri, S., Gallo, A., Jacquier, V., Zocca, A.: Ising model on clustered net- works: A model for opinion dynamics. Phys- ica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Appli- cations 623, 128811 (2023)

    2023

  80. [88]

    Economic The- ory 14, 113–130 (1999)

    Brock, W.A., Durlauf, S.N.: A formal model 17 of theory choice in science. Economic The- ory 14, 113–130 (1999)

    1999

  81. [89]

    The Review of Economic Studies 68(2), 235–260 (2001)

    Brock, W.A., Durlauf, S.N.: Discrete Choice with Social Interactions. The Review of Economic Studies 68(2), 235–260 (2001)

    2001

  82. [90]

    thermome- ters

    Roehner, B.M., Sornette, D.: “thermome- ters” of speculative frenzy. The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 16, 729–739 (2000)

    2000

  83. [91]

    International Jour- nal of Modern Physics C 12(05), 667–674 (2001)

    Bornholdt, S.: Expectation bubbles in a spin model of markets: Intermittency from frustration across scales. International Jour- nal of Modern Physics C 12(05), 667–674 (2001)

    2001

  84. [92]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications287(3), 493– 506 (2000)

    Kaizoji, T.: Speculative bubbles and crashes in stock markets: an interacting-agent model of speculative activity. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications287(3), 493– 506 (2000)

    2000

  85. [93]

    Financial Innovation 6, 1–22 (2020)

    Zha, Q., Kou, G., Zhang, H., Liang, H., Chen, X., Li, C.-C., Dong, Y.: Opinion dynamics in finance and business: a lit- erature review and research opportunities. Financial Innovation 6, 1–22 (2020)

    2020

  86. [94]

    The Euro- pean Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 8, 477–482 (1999)

    Chowdhury, D., Stauffer, D.: A generalized spin model of financial markets. The Euro- pean Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 8, 477–482 (1999)

    1999

  87. [95]

    Physical Review Letters 89, 158701 (2002)

    Krawiecki, A., Ho lyst, J.A., Helbing, D.: Volatility clustering and scaling for finan- cial time series due to attractor bubbling. Physical Review Letters 89, 158701 (2002)

    2002

  88. [96]

    Physsical Review E 85, 011150 (2012)

    Harras, G., Tessone, C.J., Sornette, D.: Noise-induced volatility of collective dynam- ics. Physsical Review E 85, 011150 (2012)

    2012

  89. [97]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications316(1), 441– 452 (2002)

    Kaizoji, T., Bornholdt, S., Fujiwara, Y.: Dynamics of price and trading volume in a spin model of stock markets with het- erogeneous agents. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications316(1), 441– 452 (2002)

    2002

  90. [98]

    Frontiers in Physics 11, 1196745 (2023)

    Biswas, S., Chatterjee, A., Sen, P., Mukher- jee, S., Chakrabarti, B.K.: Social dynamics through kinetic exchange: The BChS model. Frontiers in Physics 11, 1196745 (2023)

    2023

  91. [99]

    Mukherjee, S., Chatterjee, A.: Disorder- induced phase transition in an opinion dynamics model: Results in two and three dimensions. Phys. Rev. E 94, 062317 (2016)

    2016

  92. [100]

    Mukherjee, S., Biswas, S., Sen, P.: Long route to consensus: Two-stage coarsening in a binary choice voting model. Phys. Rev. E 102, 012316 (2020)

    2020

  93. [101]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 345(3-4), 646–656 (2005)

    Hohnisch, M., Pittnauer, S., Solomon, S., Stauffer, D.: Socioeconomic interaction and swings in business confidence indicators. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 345(3-4), 646–656 (2005)

    2005

  94. [102]

    The Euro- pean Physical Journal B 57, 473–479 (2007)

    Stauffer, D., Solomon, S.: Ising, Schelling and self-organising segregation. The Euro- pean Physical Journal B 57, 473–479 (2007)

    2007

  95. [103]

    International Jour- nal of Modern Physics C 19(03), 385–391 (2008)

    M¨ uller, K., Schulze, C., Stauffer, D.: Inho- mogeneous and self-organized temperature in Schelling-Ising model. International Jour- nal of Modern Physics C 19(03), 385–391 (2008)

    2008

  96. [104]

    International Journal of Modern Physics C 14(03), 311– 320 (2003)

    Meyer-Ortmanns, H.: Immigration, integra- tion and ghetto formation. International Journal of Modern Physics C 14(03), 311– 320 (2003)

    2003

  97. [105]

    Nettle, D.: Is the rate of linguistic change constant? Lingua 108(2-3), 119–136 (1999)

    1999

  98. [106]

    Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 198 (2001)

    Itoh, Y., Ueda, S.: The Ising model for changes in word ordering rule in natural language. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 198 (2001)

    2001

  99. [107]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications389(3), 481– 489 (2010)

    Galam, S., Walliser, B.: Ising model versus normal form game. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications389(3), 481– 489 (2010)

    2010

  100. [108]

    Adami, C., Hintze, A.: Thermodynamics of evolutionary games. Phys. Rev. E 97, 062136 (2018) 18

    2018

  101. [109]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 593, 126972 (2022)

    Correia, A.D., Leestmaker, L.L., Stoof, H.T.C., Broere, J.J.: Asymmetric games on networks: Towards an Ising-model represen- tation. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 593, 126972 (2022)

    2022

  102. [110]

    Chaos, Solitons I& Fractals 180, 114540 (2024)

    Leonidov, A., Savvateev, A., Semenov, A.G.: Ising game on graphs. Chaos, Solitons I& Fractals 180, 114540 (2024)

    2024

  103. [111]

    International Journal of Quantum Information 20(01), 2150034 (2022)

    Tejasvi, U., Eithiraj, R.D., Balakrishnan, S.: Study of potential games using Ising inter- action. International Journal of Quantum Information 20(01), 2150034 (2022)

    2022

  104. [112]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 573, 125963 (2021)

    Mello, I.F., Squillante, L., Gomes, G.O., Seridonio, A.C., de Souza, M.: Epidemics, the Ising-model and percolation theory: a comprehensive review focused on covid-19. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 573, 125963 (2021)

    2021

  105. [113]

    World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Math- ematical, Computational, Physical, Electri- cal and Computer Engineering 6, 735–737 (2012)

    Crisostomo, C.P., Pi˜ nol, C.M.: An Ising- based model for the spread of infection. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Math- ematical, Computational, Physical, Electri- cal and Computer Engineering 6, 735–737 (2012)

    2012

  106. [114]

    Sumour, M.A., Aila, N., Shabat, M.: Simula- tion of the epidemiological map of COVID- 19 based on Ising model by using statistical physics. Int. J. Recent Adv. Phys 10(4), 10401 (2021)

    2021

  107. [115]

    Nature communi- cations 14(1), 3093 (2023)

    Gao, J., Heintz, J., Mack, C., Glass, L., Cross, A., Sun, J.: Evidence-driven spa- tiotemporal covid-19 hospitalization predic- tion with ising dynamics. Nature communi- cations 14(1), 3093 (2023)

    2023

  108. [116]

    Physical Review E 111(6), 064310 (2025)

    Vendeville, A.: Voter model can accurately predict individual opinions in online popu- lations. Physical Review E 111(6), 064310 (2025)

    2025

  109. [117]

    Complex & Intelligent Systems 7, 3259–3276 (2021)

    Lu, P., Zhang, Z., Li, M.: Big data-drive agent-based modeling of online polarized opinions. Complex & Intelligent Systems 7, 3259–3276 (2021)

    2021

  110. [118]

    Scientific Reports 11(1), 5721 (2021) 19

    Hurtado-Mar ´ ın, V.A., Agudelo-Giraldo, J.D., Robledo, S., Restrepo-Parra, E.: Analysis of dynamic networks based on the ising model for the case of study of co-authorship of scientific articles. Scientific Reports 11(1), 5721 (2021) 19

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.