Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Parametrized topological phases in 1d and T-duality

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A global gMPS parametrization of a family of 1d topological phases exists exactly when its Hilbert-Schmidt bundle is trivial, and T-duality acts by gauging the circle action on the associated continuous-trace C*-algebra.

desk verdict A readable, honest synthesis of the H^3(M,Z) classification and operator-algebraic T-duality wrapped around one speculative new bridge; the bridge is asserted rather than derived, so it should go to review with a referee asked to check Section 4.2. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.20905 v1 pith:Q244CU7P submitted 2024-12-30 math-ph cond-mat.str-elhep-thmath.MP

Roman Geiko This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phcond-mat.str-elhep-thmath.MP MSC 46L5546L8581T45
keywords topologicalphasesparametrizedgeneralizedmatrix-productstateshigherBerryclassT-dualitycontinuous-traceC*-algebrasDixmier-DouadyinvariantHilbert-Schmidtbundles
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that families of 1+1d topological phases—even when every member is individually in the trivial phase—can carry a genuine topological obstruction, the higher Berry class in $H^3(M,\mathbb{Z})$, which prevents a global generalized matrix-product-state (gMPS) parametrization across the parameter space $M$. It proposes that such families are naturally encoded by bundles of Hilbert-Schmidt operators built from the RG fixed gMPS tensors, and that a global parametrization exists exactly when this bundle is trivial. On that footing, the paper identifies topological T-duality with the operator-algebraic operation of gauging the circle action on the continuous-trace C*-algebra generated by the parametrized tensors: a family over a circle bundle $M$ with class $H$ is mapped to a family over the dual circle bundle $\hat M$ with class $\hat H$, related by the T-duality formulas $c_1(M)=\hat\pi_*\hat H$ and $c_1(\hat M)=\pi_* H$. The payoff is a concrete dictionary between parametrized phases and stable continuous-trace algebras, with explicit dual pairs such as $(S^3,1)\leftrightarrow(S^3,1)$ and $(S^2\times S^1,1)\leftrightarrow(S^3,0)$.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the generalized matrix-product state (gMPS) tensor, a map from the physical Hilbert space to the bounded operators on the bond space that encodes a translation-invariant pure split state; at RG fixed points the tensor is $T\circ t^{-1}(x)=x\rho^{1/2}$ for $x$ a Hilbert-Schmidt operator, so a continuous family of fixed points is locally a frame for a Hilbert-Schmidt bundle over $M$. The bundle's structure group is the projective unitary group $PU(\mathcal H)$, and isomorphisms of such bundles are classified by $H^1(M,PU(\mathcal H))\cong H^2(M,U(1))\cong H^3(M,\mathbb{Z})$ via the Dixmier-Douady theorem. The second engine is the Raeburn-Rosenberg crossed-product theorem, which states that a free $U(1)$ action on a stable continuous-trace algebra lifts to an $\mathbb{R}$-action and that the crossed product is again a stable continuous-trace algebra, with spectrum and Dixmier-Douady class related by the T-duality formulas (13). Together these two results convert the physical question whether a global MPS parametrization exists into a topological triviality question, and T-duality into a gauging operation on an algebra.

What would settle it

Take the Hopf-family of RG fixed gMPS tensors over $S^3$ and form the C*-completion of the Hilbert-Schmidt bundle; compute the Dixmier-Douady class of the resulting continuous-trace algebra. If it is not the generator of $H^3(S^3,\mathbb{Z})$, the bridge between HS bundles and continuous-trace algebras fails. Likewise, for the claimed dual pair $(S^3,0)\leftrightarrow(S^2\times S^1,\omega_{S^2}\otimes\omega_{S^1})$, compute the crossed product of $C(S^3)\otimes\mathbb K$ by the lifted $\mathbb{R}$-action: the result must be a stable continuous-trace algebra with spectrum $S^2\times S^1$ and Dixmier-Douady class $\omega_{S^2}\otimes\omega_{S^1}$, and any mismatch would falsify the dictionary.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the obstruction to a global gMPS parametrization of a family of RG fixed states is the isomorphism class of the corresponding Hilbert-Schmidt bundle, and that topological T-duality acts on this data by a crossed product with the gauge group. Concretely, a family of translation-invariant pure split states fixed by RG is locally presented by gMPS tensors taking values in Hilbert-Schmidt operators; gluing the local frames yields a bundle of Hilbert-Schmidt operators over the parameter space $M$, whose class in $H^3(M,\mathbb{Z})$ is the higher Berry class. After completing in the operator norm, the section algebra is a stable continuous-trace C*-algebra with spectrum $M$ and Dixmier-Douady invariant equal to that class. Gauging the free $U(1)$ action on the circle bundle $M$—realized as the crossed product by the lifted $\mathbb{R}$-action—then produces another stable continuous-trace algebra whose spectrum is the dual circle bundle $\hat M$ and whose Dixmier-Douady class obeys (13). This is the paper's avatar of string-theoretic T-duality for parametrized topological phases.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the operator algebra obtained by completing the bundle of Hilbert-Schmidt tensors is a stable continuous-trace algebra whose spectrum is exactly the parameter space and whose Dixmier-Douady invariant is the bundle class; this identification is asserted, not proved, and the T-duality construction would break if the algebra picked up extra structure.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the HS-bundle criterion is correct, a non-vanishing higher Berry class forces the bond dimension to be infinite: finite-dimensional injective MPS families realize only the torsion part of $H^3(M,\mathbb{Z})$ (Serre's theorem), so non-torsion parametrized phases lie outside the usual finite-bond MPS framework.
  • The T-duality pairs in Eq. (1) become concrete equivalences: the family on $S^3$ with Berry number 1 is self-dual, while the family on $S^3$ with Berry number 0 is dual to the family on $S^2\times S^1$ with class $\omega_{S^2}\otimes\omega_{S^1}$; lens spaces pair as $(L(n;1),m\omega)\leftrightarrow(L(m;1),n\omega')$.
  • Boundary conditions for a family of gMPS are carried by a projective Hilbert bundle over the same base space, and a family of boundary Hilbert spaces exists exactly when the twisting class vanishes; this gives a bulk-boundary correspondence for parametrized phases.
  • Because T-duality is implemented by a crossed product with an $\mathbb{R}$-action, it is invertible: applying the dual action to the dual family recovers the original family, so the duality is an involution on the set of parametrized phases with circle-bundle parameter spaces.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, this dictionary suggests that the higher Berry class of a lattice family could be computed from the C*-algebraic invariant of the tensor bundle (for instance via noncommutative K-theory or the Dixmier-Douady class of the crossed product), giving an algebraic probe that does not require constructing an explicit Berry connection.
  • Beyond the paper, the same crossed-product logic should extend to families over higher-rank torus bundles, where gauging $\mathbb{R}^n$ would realize higher T-duality and relate $H^3$ classes by integration along tori; the paper only states the Abelian circle-bundle case and mentions non-Abelian generalizations in passing.
  • Beyond the paper, if two families have Morita-equivalent stable continuous-trace algebras, the proposed description would regard them as equivalent phases even when their parameter spaces differ; this would make the continuous-trace algebra, rather than the parameter space itself, the invariant definition of a parametrized phase.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies families of 1+1d topological phases parametrized by a space M. It argues that families of RG fixed points of translation-invariant pure split states are encoded by bundles of Hilbert-Schmidt operators, that a global generalized MPS parametrization exists iff the HS bundle is trivial, and that the higher Berry class takes values in H^3(M,Z). The main new proposal is that topological T-duality is realized by gauging a U(1) action on the continuous-trace C*-algebra generated by parametrized gMPS tensors, thereby mapping a pair (M,H) to a dual pair (Mhat,Hhat) via the Raeburn-Rosenberg crossed product. Examples include self-duality of (S^3,1), the pair (S^3,0) <-> (S^2 x S^1, generator), and lens-space generalizations.

Significance. If the central identification and the T-duality mechanism were established, the paper would provide a useful operator-algebraic bridge between parametrized topological phases and topological T-duality, with concrete and checkable examples. The paper uses external standard classification results (Dixmier-Douady, Raeburn-Rosenberg, Matsui), has no fitted parameters, and gives explicit T-dual pairs in Eq. (1). Its reliance on the C*-completion of HS bundles is natural and potentially powerful. However, the key step connecting the gMPS tensor algebra to a stable continuous-trace algebra with the same Dixmier-Douady invariant is asserted rather than proved, and the application of the Raeburn-Rosenberg theorem is not carried out in detail. The central claim is therefore conditional on a nontrivial identification that the manuscript does not supply.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.2, after Theorem 3] The central bridge is asserted, not proved. The manuscript states that the operator-norm completion of a Hilbert-Schmidt bundle is a bundle of compact operators with typical fiber K_H, and that the section algebra of the completed bundle is a stable continuous-trace algebra with spectrum M and Dixmier-Douady invariant equal to the HS-bundle class. This identification is what makes the Raeburn-Rosenberg crossed product relevant for T-duality, but no proof or precise reference is given for this specific statement. The local trivializations of Eq. (11) are Hilbert-space trivializations of HS_H with structure group PU(H) acting by conjugation; one must show that these extend to continuous trivializations of the completed K_H-bundle and that the DD class is unchanged in the process. Without this, the T-duality relations (13) and the examples (1) do not follow from the preceding discussion.
  2. [Section 4.2, final paragraph] The sentence that gauging the U(1) action 'indeed reproduces the topological T-duality reviewed in the previous section' is an assertion, not a derivation. To apply Theorem 3, one must construct a lift of the free S^1 action on M to a locally free R-action on the section algebra A = CT(M,H), verify that the induced action is smooth in the required sense, compute the spectrum of the crossed product, and identify the resulting DD class with the class on Mhat. None of these steps is carried out for the specific algebra generated by parametrized gMPS tensors. Since this application is the paper's main new claim, it cannot be delegated to a general theorem without showing that the hypotheses are met in the present construction.
  3. [Section 3.2, Proposition 2] The proof of Proposition 2 is deferred to [52,53] with the comment that it 'repeats verbatim' after noticing Aut(HS_H) = PU(H). This is not immediate because HS_H is not a C*-algebra and, regarded merely as a Hilbert space, its automorphism group is not PU(H). The nontrivial isomorphism classes in Eq. (12) arise from the PU(H)-conjugation structure on the fibers, not from the Hilbert-space structure. The manuscript should define the category of HS bundles precisely, specify what 'Aut(HS_H)' means, and either prove the classification or cite a theorem that applies directly to this object. This is load-bearing because the 'if and only if' statement about global gMPS parametrization depends on the nontriviality of these bundles.
  4. [Section 3, Remark 3 and Eq. (9)] The construction of generalized MPS tensors for infinite-dimensional bond spaces relies on the adjointability assumption introduced in Remark 3 and on the unpublished reference [43]. Since the paper's use of infinite-dimensional bond spaces is essential for realizing non-torsion higher Berry classes, the needed adjointability statement should either be proved in the paper or explicitly flagged as an assumption. Currently the reader cannot verify the existence of the gMPS tensors used in the main construction; the assertion 'adjointable CP maps do define generalized MPS tensors [43]' is an unsupported input rather than a derived result.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Affiliation line] The affiliation contains a line-break typo: 'University of Califor nia' should read 'University of California'.
  2. [Section 3.1] The text reads 'The are defined by conditional expectations F^2 = F'; this should be 'They are defined by conditional expectations F^2 = F'.
  3. [Section 3.2] The phrase 'principle bundles' should be 'principal bundles'.
  4. [Section 4.2] There are two name typos: 'Dixmier-Doudy' should be 'Dixmier-Douady', and 'Philips and Raeburn' should be 'Phillips and Raeburn'.
  5. [Equation (13)] The push-forward maps π_* and ^π_* are used for cohomology classes, but integration along the fiber is not defined in the text; adding one clarifying sentence would improve accessibility.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

One headline claim is definitional: §3.2 defines a parametrized RG-fixed gMPS tensor via Eq. (9) as a local HS-bundle frame, so the 'global parametrization ⇔ trivial bundle' criterion is true by construction; the T-duality mechanism is independent.

  1. self definitional [Section 3.2, paragraph directly after Eq. (9)]
    "According to ( 9), the parametrized RG-fixed gMPS tensor over Uα is defined by a local frame for a HS bundle. In other words, there exists a global gMPS parametrization of a family of RG fixed states if and only if there exists a global frame for the HS bundle. The latter exists if and only if the HS bundle is trivial, i.e., the corresponding cohomology class in H 3(M, Z) vanishes."

    Eq. (9) constructs the gMPS tensor from an isomorphism t : P → HS_H, so a local tensor is, by stipulation, a local frame of the HS bundle. The next sentence makes the headline equivalence 'global gMPS parametrization ⇔ global frame ⇔ trivial HS bundle' a restatement of that definition rather than a derived classification result. The family-to-bundle correspondence may be substantive, but the biconditional itself is true by construction and does not add independent content. The T-duality result in Section 4 does not share this defect.

full rationale

The T-duality analysis is not circular: the crossed-product computation is imported from Raeburn–Rosenberg [46,59,62], and the Dixmier–Douady classification of stable continuous-trace algebras is an external theorem [52], not a parameter fitted to the desired answer. The only self-citation, [43], supplies a technical adjointability/gMPS correspondence; it is not used to define the T-duality map or the higher Berry class, so it is at most a minor non-load-bearing self-citation. The genuine reduction is in the first main claim: after Eq. (9), a parametrized RG-fixed gMPS tensor is defined as a local frame of the Hilbert-Schmidt bundle, making the abstract's 'global parametrization iff bundle trivial' true by construction. Separately, the claimed operator-norm completion of the HS bundle into a stable CT algebra with spectrum M and DD invariant equal to the HS-bundle class is asserted rather than proved; that is a correctness gap, not a circular step, because it relies on external theorems rather than on the paper's own inputs. Overall, the T-duality relation (13) retains independent content, but the paper's first headline equivalence is definitionally forced.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to data. The central claims rest on standard theorems from operator algebras and quantum spin chains, plus one unpublished companion paper [43] for the adjointability of CP maps. No new particles, forces, or entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Every translation invariant pure split state on a spin chain admits a generalized MPS/SFCS representation (Matsui's Proposition 3.5).
    This is the foundation of the MPS description of RG fixed points; cited as Proposition 1 from [4].
  • domain assumption Unique ground states of local gapped Hamiltonians are pure and split.
    Justifies restricting to split states; cited from Corollary 3.2 of [39] in Remark 2.
  • standard math Isomorphism classes of Hilbert-Schmidt bundles are H^1(M,PU(H)) = H^2(M,U(1)) = H^3(M,Z).
    Used in Proposition 2 to identify the obstruction; proof is deferred to [52,53].
  • standard math The crossed product of CT(M,H) by a lifted R action is CT(Mhat,Hhat) with Chern and DD classes related by equation (13).
    This is the Raeburn-Rosenberg theorem [46,59,62], the engine of the proposed T-duality.
  • ad hoc to paper Normal CP maps at RG fixed points are adjointable, so generalized MPS tensors exist for infinite-dimensional bond spaces.
    Stated in Remark 3 and deferred to the unpublished companion paper [43]; this is the least externally supported technical assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Parametrized topological phases in 1d and T-duality." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Q244CU7P

@misc{pith2026241220905,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Parametrized topological phases in 1d and T-duality},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Q244CU7P}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.20905}
}
read the original abstract

There are families of physical systems that cannot be adiabatically evolved to the trivial system uniformly across the parameter space, even if each system in the family belongs to the trivial phase. The obstruction is measured by higher Berry class. We analyze families of topological systems in 1+1d using families of invertible TQFTs and families of RG fixed states of spin chains. We use the generalized matrix-product states to describe RG fixed points of all translation invariant pure splits states on spin chains. Families of such fixed points correspond to bundles of Hilbert-Schmidt operators. There exists a global MPS parametrization of the family if and only if the latter bundle is trivial. We propose a novel duality of parametrized topological phases which is an avatar of the T-duality in string theory. The duality relates families with different parameter spaces and different higher Berry classes. Mathematically, the T-duality is realized by gauging the circle action on the continuous trace algebra generated by parametrized matrix-product tensors.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Higher Structures on Boundary Conformal Manifolds: Higher Berry Phase and Boundary Conformal Field Theory

    hep-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A 2-form higher Berry connection on boundary conformal manifolds is defined from boundary-condition-changing operator OPE phases; it reproduces the B-field and WZ term in string theory examples.

  2. Space of conformal boundary conditions from the view of higher Berry phase: Flow of Berry curvature in parametrized BCFTs

    hep-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a Dirac fermion BCFT with SU(2) conformal boundary conditions parametrized by a three-sphere, the filled Fermi sea carries a higher Berry curvature whose integral is quantized, realizing Berry curvature flow and Ch...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [43]

    Tom Mainiero: A Categorical Triality: Matrix Pro duct Factors, Positive Maps, and von Neumann Bimodules

    Roman Geiko, G.M. Tom Mainiero: A Categorical Triality: Matrix Pro duct Factors, Positive Maps, and von Neumann Bimodules

    work page

  2. [1]

    Proceedings Inte rnational School of Mathematical Physics - Universita’ di Camerino 30 Sept

    Accardi, L.: Non-commutative Markov chains. Proceedings Inte rnational School of Mathematical Physics - Universita’ di Camerino 30 Sept. - 12 Oct . (1974) (1974)

    work page 1974

  3. [2]

    In: Proceed- ings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol

    Bratteli, O., Jorgensen, P.E., Price, G.L.: Endomorphisms of B(H). In: Proceed- ings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 59, pp. 93–138 (1996). A merican Mathematical Society

    work page 1996

  4. [3]

    Journal of operator theory, 97–143 (2000)

    Bratteli, O., Jorgensen, P.E., Kishimoto, A., Werner, R.F.: Pure sta tes on O d. Journal of operator theory, 97–143 (2000)

    work page 2000

  5. [4]

    Matsui, T.: The split property and the symmetry breaking of the q uantum spin chain. Commun. Math. Phys. 218, 393–416 (2001)

    work page 2001

  6. [5]

    Communications in Mathematical Physics 144(3), 443–490 (1992) https://doi.org/cmp/1104249404

    Fannes, M., Nachtergaele, B., Werner, R.F.: Finitely correlated st ates on quantum spin chains. Communications in Mathematical Physics 144(3), 443–490 (1992) https://doi.org/cmp/1104249404

    arXiv 1992

  7. [6]

    Perez-Garcia, D., Verstraete, F., Wolf, M.M., Cirac, J.I.: Matrix pr oduct state representations (2006)

    work page 2006

  8. [7]

    Reviews of 12 Modern Physics 93(4), 045003 (2021)

    Cirac, J.I., Perez-Garcia, D., Schuch, N., Verstraete, F.: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states: Concepts, symmetries, th eorems. Reviews of 12 Modern Physics 93(4), 045003 (2021)

    work page 2021

Show all 62 references
  1. [8]

    Sathiapalan, B.: Duality in statistical mechanics and string theory . Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1597–1599 (1987) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.1597

    1987 doi

  2. [9]

    Physics Letters B 201(4), 466–472 (1988) https://doi.org/10.1016/0370- 2693(88)90602-8

    Buscher, T.H.: Path-integral derivation of quantum duality in non linear sigma- models. Physics Letters B 201(4), 466–472 (1988) https://doi.org/10.1016/0370- 2693(88)90602-8

    1988 doi

  3. [10]

    Nuclear Physics B 570(3), 685–698 (2000)

    Abanov, A., Wiegmann, P.B.: Theta-terms in nonlinear sigma-mode ls. Nuclear Physics B 570(3), 685–698 (2000)

    2000

  4. [11]

    SciPost Physics 8(1), 001 (2020)

    Cordova, C., Freed, D., Lam, H.T., Seiberg, N.: Anomalies in the spa ce of coupling constants and their dynamical applications i. SciPost Physics 8(1), 001 (2020)

    2020

  5. [12]

    Physical Review B 102(24), 245113 (2020)

    Hsin, P.-S., Kapustin, A., Thorngren, R.: Berry phase in quantum field theory: Diabolical points and boundary phenomena. Physical Review B 102(24), 245113 (2020)

    2020

  6. [13]

    Communications in Mathematical Physics 249(2), 383–415 (2004) https://doi

    Bouwknegt, P., Evslin, J., Mathai, V.: T-duality: Topology change from H-flux. Communications in Mathematical Physics 249(2), 383–415 (2004) https://doi. org/10.1007/s00220-004-1115-6

    2004 doi

  7. [14]

    Reviews in Mat hematical Physics 17(01), 77–112 (2005)

    Bunke, U., Schick, T.: On the topology of T-duality. Reviews in Mat hematical Physics 17(01), 77–112 (2005)

    2005

  8. [15]

    Moore, G.W., Segal, G.: D-branes and K-theory in 2D topological fi eld theory (2006)

    2006

  9. [16]

    SciPost Physics 8(1), 015 (2020)

    Tachikawa, Y.: On gauging finite subgroups. SciPost Physics 8(1), 015 (2020)

    2020

  10. [17]

    Journal of High Energy Physics 2021(2) (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep02(2021)132

    Gaiotto, D., Kulp, J.: Orbifold groupoids. Journal of High Energy Physics 2021(2) (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep02(2021)132

    2021 doi

  11. [18]

    Journal of Geometry and Physics 58(5), 576–598 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomphys.2007.12.009

    Fuchs, J., Schweigert, C., Waldorf, K.: Bi-branes: Target spac e geometry for world sheet topological defects. Journal of Geometry and Physics 58(5), 576–598 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomphys.2007.12.009

    2008 doi

  12. [19]

    Dove, T., Schick, T.: Equivariant Topological T-Duality. Commun. Math. Phys. 405(8), 179 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-024-05044-0 arXiv:2310.06064

    2024 arXiv

  13. [20]

    https:// arxiv.org/abs/0704.2592

    Daenzer, C.: A groupoid approach to noncommutative T-duality (2007). https:// arxiv.org/abs/0704.2592

    2007 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Pollmann, F., Turner, A.M., Berg, E., Oshikawa, M.: Entanglement s pectrum of a topological phase in one dimension. Phys. Rev. B 81, 064439 (2010) https:// doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.064439 13

    2010 doi

  15. [22]

    Physic al Review B 87(15), 155114 (2013)

    Chen, X., Gu, Z.-C., Liu, Z.-X., Wen, X.-G.: Symmetry protected to pological orders and the group cohomology of their symmetry group. Physic al Review B 87(15), 155114 (2013)

    2013

  16. [23]

    Transactions o f the American Mathematical Society, Series B 8(2), 39–65 (2021)

    Ogata, Y.: A classification of pure states on quantum spin chains satisfying the split property with on-site finite group symmetries. Transactions o f the American Mathematical Society, Series B 8(2), 39–65 (2021)

    2021

  17. [24]

    Journal of Mathe matical Physics 62(8) (2021)

    Kapustin, A., Sopenko, N., Yang, B.: A classification of invertible p hases of bosonic quantum lattice systems in one dimension. Journal of Mathe matical Physics 62(8) (2021)

    2021

  18. [25]

    Ogata, Y.: Classification of symmetry protected topological ph ases in quantum spin chains (2021)

    2021

  19. [26]

    JHEP 04, 100 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2017)100

    Shiozaki, K., Ryu, S.: Matrix product states and equivariant top ological field theories for bosonic symmetry-protected topological phases in ( 1+1) dimensions. JHEP 04, 100 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2017)100

    2017 doi

  20. [27]

    Physical Review B 96(7) (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.96

    Kapustin, A., Turzillo, A., You, M.: Topological field theory and mat rix prod- uct states. Physical Review B 96(7) (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.96. 075125

    2017 doi

  21. [28]

    Hsin, P.-S., Kapustin, A., Thorngren, R.: Berry phase in quantum field theory: Diabolical points and boundary phenomena. Phys. Rev. B 102, 245113 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.245113

    2020 doi

  22. [29]

    Journal of Mathema tical Physics 63(9), 091903 (2022)

    Kapustin, A., Sopenko, N.: Local Noether theorem for quantu m lattice systems and topological invariants of gapped states. Journal of Mathema tical Physics 63(9), 091903 (2022)

    2022

  23. [30]

    Communications in Mathematic al Physics 405(8), 191 (2024)

    Artymowicz, A., Kapustin, A., Sopenko, N.: Quantization of the h igher Berry cur- vature and the higher Thouless pump. Communications in Mathematic al Physics 405(8), 191 (2024)

    2024

  24. [31]

    Physical Review B 110(3), 035114 (2024)

    Ohyama, S., Terashima, Y., Shiozaki, K.: Discrete higher Berry ph ases and matrix product states. Physical Review B 110(3), 035114 (2024)

    2024

  25. [32]

    Physical Review B 109(11), 115152 (2024)

    Ohyama, S., Ryu, S.: Higher structures in matrix product state s. Physical Review B 109(11), 115152 (2024)

    2024

  26. [33]

    ar Xiv preprint arXiv:2305.07700 (2023)

    Qi, M., Stephen, D.T., Wen, X., Spiegel, D., Pflaum, M.J., Beaudry, A., Hermele, M.: Charting the space of ground states with tensor networks. ar Xiv preprint arXiv:2305.07700 (2023)

    2023

  27. [34]

    Cambridge University Press 14

    Kock, J.: Frobenius Algebras and 2-D Topological Quantum Field T heories. Cambridge University Press 14

  28. [35]

    Gradu ate Texts in Mathematics

    Bott, R., Tu, L.W.: Differential Forms in Algebraic Topology. Gradu ate Texts in Mathematics. Springer

  29. [36]

    AMS /IP Stud

    Hitchin, N.J.: Lectures on special Lagrangian submanifolds. AMS /IP Stud. Adv. Math. 23, 151–182 (2001) arXiv:math/9907034

    2001 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Kristel, P., Ludewig, M., Waldorf, K.: 2-vector bundles (2021)

    2021

  31. [38]

    Reviews in Mathe matical Physics 18(09), 935–970 (2006)

    Keyl, M., Matsui, T., Schlingemann, D., Werner, R.: Entanglement, Haag-duality and type properties of infinite quantum spin chains. Reviews in Mathe matical Physics 18(09), 935–970 (2006)

    2006

  32. [39]

    Reviews in Mathematical Physics 25(09), 1350017 (2013) https:// doi.org/10.1142/S0129055X13500177

    Matsui, T.: Boundedness of entanglement entropy and split pro perty of quantum spin chains. Reviews in Mathematical Physics 25(09), 1350017 (2013) https:// doi.org/10.1142/S0129055X13500177

    2013 doi

  33. [40]

    Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Blackadar, B.: Theory of C*-Algebras and Von Neumann Algebra s. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    2006

  34. [41]

    Commun.Math

    Robinson, D.W.: Strongly positive semigroups and faithful invaria nt states. Commun.Math. Phys. 85, 129–142 (1982)

    1982

  35. [42]

    Kraus, K.: General state changes in quantum theory. Ann. Ph ysics 64, 311–335 (1971) https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(71)90108-4

    1971 doi

  36. [44]

    Jour- nal of Functional Analysis 120(2), 511–534 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1006/jfan

    Fannes, M., Nachtergaele, B., Werner, R.F.: Finitely correlated p ure states. Jour- nal of Functional Analysis 120(2), 511–534 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1006/jfan. 1994.1041

    1994

  37. [45]

    Physical Review Lett ers 94(14) (2005) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.94.140601

    Verstraete, F., Cirac, J.I., Latorre, J.I., Rico, E., Wolf, M.M.: Ren ormalization- group transformations on quantum states. Physical Review Lett ers 94(14) (2005) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.94.140601

    2005 doi

  38. [46]

    Raeburn, I., Williams, D.P.: Morita Equivalence and Continuous-Tra ce C ∗- Algebras, (1998)

    1998

  39. [47]

    Simon, B.: Holonomy, the quantum adiabatic theorem, and berry ’s phase. Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 2167–2170 (1983) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.2167

    1983 doi

  40. [48]

    Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

    Berry, M.V.: Quantal phase factors accompanying adiabatic ch anges. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physic al Sciences 392(1802), 45–57 (1984)

    1984

  41. [49]

    Journal of statistical mechanics: theory and experiment 2007(08), 08024 (2007) 15

    Hastings, M.B.: An area law for one-dimensional quantum system s. Journal of statistical mechanics: theory and experiment 2007(08), 08024 (2007) 15

    2007

  42. [50]

    S´ eminaire Dubreil

    Serre, J.-P.: Modules projectifs et espaces fibr´ es ` a fibre ve ctorielle. S´ eminaire Dubreil. Alg` ebre et th´ eorie des nombres11(09), 18 (1957)

    1957

  43. [51]

    Atiyah, M., Segal, G.: Twisted K-theory (2004)

    2004

  44. [52]

    Bulletin de la Soci´ et´ e Math´ ematique de France91, 227–284 (1963) https://doi

    Dixmier, J., Douady, A.: Champs continus d’espaces hilbertiens et de C∗-alg` ebres. Bulletin de la Soci´ et´ e Math´ ematique de France91, 227–284 (1963) https://doi. org/10.24033/bsmf.1596

    1963 doi

  45. [53]

    Birkh¨ auser Boston, MA, Boston (1993)

    Brylinski, J.-L.: Loop Spaces, Characteristic Classes and Geome tric Quantization. Birkh¨ auser Boston, MA, Boston (1993)

    1993

  46. [54]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)

    Becker, K., Becker, M., Schwarz, J.H.: String Theory and M-The ory: A Modern Introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)

    2006

  47. [55]

    Reviews in Mathematical Physics 18(10), 1103–1154 (2006) https://doi.org/10

    Bunke, U., Rumpf, P., Schick, T.: The topology of T-duality for T n-bundles. Reviews in Mathematical Physics 18(10), 1103–1154 (2006) https://doi.org/10. 1142/s0129055x06002875

    2006

  48. [56]

    Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society

    Rosenberg, J.: Continuous-trace algebras from the bundle th eoretic point of view. Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society. Series A. Pure Ma thematics and Statistics 47(3), 368–381 (1989)

    1989

  49. [57]

    Gelfand, M.N.: On the imbedding of normed rings into the ring of o perators in Hilbert space

    I. Gelfand, M.N.: On the imbedding of normed rings into the ring of o perators in Hilbert space. Matem. Sbornik 12(54) (1943)

    1943

  50. [58]

    Journal of Algebra 19(2), 228–253 (1971) https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8693(71)90105-0

    Negrepontis, J.W.: Duality in analysis from the point of view of triple s. Journal of Algebra 19(2), 228–253 (1971) https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8693(71)90105-0

    1971 doi

  51. [59]

    Transactions of The American Mathematical Socie ty - TRANS AMER MATH SOC 305, 1–1 (1988) https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1988- 0920145-6

    Raeburn, I., Rosenberg, J.: Crossed products of continuous -trace C ∗ -algebras by smooth actions. Transactions of The American Mathematical Socie ty - TRANS AMER MATH SOC 305, 1–1 (1988) https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1988- 0920145-6

    1988 doi

  52. [60]

    Springer, Bos ton (2010)

    Lee, J.M.: Introduction to Topological Manifolds. Springer, Bos ton (2010)

    2010

  53. [61]

    Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 75, 742–749 (1969)

    Kirby, R.C., Siebenmann, L.C.: On the triangulation of manifolds and the hauptvermutung. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 75, 742–749 (1969)

    1969

  54. [62]

    Regional conference series in mathematics

    Rosenberg, J., Sciences, C.B.M.: Topology, C ∗-algebras, and String Duality. Regional conference series in mathematics. American Mathematica l Soc. 16

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.