REVIEW 2 cited by
No Need to Lift a Finger Anymore? Assessing the Quality of Code Generation by ChatGPT
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities across various NLP tasks. Additionally, LLMs are also highly valuable in supporting software engineering tasks, particularly in the field of code generation. Automatic code generation is a process of automatically generating source code or executable code based on given specifications or requirements, improving developer productivity. In this study, we perform a systematic empirical assessment to the quality of code generation using ChatGPT. We leverage 728 algorithm problems in five languages (i.e., C, C++, Java, Python, and JavaScript) and 18 CWEs with 54 code scenarios for the code generation task. Our evaluation encompasses a comprehensive analysis of code snippets generated by ChatGPT, focusing on three critical aspects: correctness, complexity, and security. We also specifically investigate ChatGPT's ability to engage in multi-round fixing process (i.e., ChatGPT's dialog ability) of facilitating code generation. By delving into the generated code and examining the experimental results, this work provides valuable insights into the performance of ChatGPT in tackling code generation tasks over the three critical aspects. Overall, our findings uncover potential issues and limitations that arise in the ChatGPT-based code generation and lay the groundwork for improving AI and LLM-based code generation techniques.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Detecting LLM-generated Code with Subtle Modification by Adversarial Training
CodeGPTSensor+, trained with adversarial samples that combine identifier renaming and structure transformation, is substantially more robust to subtle modifications of LLM-generated code than the original CodeGPTSensor.
-
Are They All Good? Evaluating the Quality of CoTs in LLM-based Code Generation
An empirical study of 1,023 CoT-code pairs shows that 76.4% of LLM-generated CoTs are low quality and that CoT correctness does not guarantee code correctness.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.