Energy and polarization based on-line interference mitigation in radio interferometry

Albert-Jan Boonstra; Chris P. Broekema; Sarod Yatawatta

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 42 references

Energy and polarization based on-line interference mitigation in radio interferometry

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that transient radio-frequency interference (RFI) can be caught inside a radio correlator, before time-averaging dilutes it, by combining two cheap per-window statistics: spectral kurtosis (which flags non-Gaussian…

desk verdict Solid, honest engineering paper combining SK and DS for online RFI flagging plus RL-based mixed precision; main weaknesses are undisclosed threshold tuning and a missing code link. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.14775 v2 pith:Q667RKO2 submitted 2024-12-19 astro-ph.IM cs.AI

Sarod Yatawatta , Albert-Jan Boonstra , Chris P. Broekema This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.IMcs.AI

keywords radioastronomyRFImitigationspectralkurtosisdirectionalstatisticspolarizationreinforcementlearningmixedprecisionarithmeticGPUcorrelator

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that transient radio-frequency interference (RFI) can be caught inside the correlator, before time-averaging dilutes it, by combining two cheap statistics on small windows: spectral kurtosis, which measures how non-Gaussian the energy is, and directional statistics of the polarization vector, which measures how aligned the polarization is. On simulated data with an interference-to-noise ratio of 100, the spectral-kurtosis path alone misses 89% of flagged RFI, the polarization path alone misses 6%, and the combined scheme misses 5% at the same false-alarm rate. On real LOFAR data, the combined online method flags about 70% of what an offline flagger with the full time-frequency footprint flags, while seeing only a 10-by-2 window. The paper also shows that a reinforcement-learning agent can choose, per computational group, whether to use 32- or 16-bit arithmetic, and the resulting flag mask differs from the all-single-precision mask by less than 1% on a 12-hour dataset. The significance is that weak, short-duration RFI, which is currently averaged away and then appears as residual contamination, could be removed in real time on GPU correlators.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are two scalar statistics computed per time-frequency window. Spectral kurtosis uses $S_1 = \sum_i |I_i|$ and $S_2 = \sum_i |I_i|^2$ to form $\tau_{\mathrm{SK}} = \frac{W d+1}{W-1}\left(\frac{W S_2}{S_1^2}-1\right)$, which tests whether the energy distribution is Gaussian; the directional statistic normalizes each polarization vector $(q_i,u_i,v_i)$ and forms $r = |\sum_i \,\text{normalised vectors}|/W$, which measures coherence of polarization direction. The argument is carried by the OR-combination of the two flags and by the reduction of both pipelines into 14 operation groups whose precision is chosen by a soft-actor-critic agent; the agent's state has 45 entries (data statistics, current precision choices, and errors versus double-precision ground truth), and its reward rewards flag agreement with ground truth minus a cost of 1 per 32-bit operation, 0.6 per 16-bit operation, 0.3 per conversion, and a penalty of 20 for overflow or underflow.

What would settle it

Run the fixed thresholds on a fresh LOFAR band or a different telescope's data with no retuning and measure the empirical false-alarm rate; the online-transfer claim is falsified if the rate departs strongly from the designed 0.05.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that energy and polarization alignment are complementary detectors of RFI in post-correlation data, and that both can run online with a window of only $W=20$ samples. The spectral-kurtosis statistic $\tau_{\mathrm{SK}}$ from Equation (4) captures non-Gaussian energy, the directional statistic $r$ from Equation (9) captures polarization coherence, and the two flags are OR-combined. The paper's simulation at INR=100 shows the combined method achieves a missed-detection probability of 0.05 with a false-alarm probability of 0.01, compared with 0.89 for spectral kurtosis alone and 0.06 for directional statistics alone; with completely unpolarized RFI the roles reverse, which is why both are kept. The paper also claims that a reinforcement-learning-trained precision configuration, which assigns 16-bit arithmetic to the later, scalar stages of both pipelines and 32-bit arithmetic to the per-sample stages, reproduces the all-32-bit flag mask to within 1% on real LOFAR data. The intended use is inside the LOFAR GPU correlator, flagging data streams before the thousands-of-samples averaging that would hide low-duty-cycle transients.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the detection thresholds ($s_{\mathrm{low}}$, $s_{\mathrm{high}}$, $\gamma$) set by combining theory with fine-tuning on synthetic data will keep the false-alarm rate near the designed 0.05 on any real data stream, even though the paper concedes that the small $W=20$ window requires fine-tuning per data stream.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Transient RFI with a duty cycle much shorter than the correlator integration time can be flagged and removed before averaging, reducing residual weak RFI in the final science data.
A small online window (10 by 2 samples) is sufficient to flag roughly 70% of what a full-footprint offline flagger flags, so online flagging can precede offline processing without needing the whole time-frequency domain.
The mixed-precision configuration found by reinforcement learning gives essentially the same flag mask as all-single-precision computation, at lower computational cost, making real-time GPU deployment feasible.
Because the two detectors fail on different RFI types (polarized versus unpolarized), a system that keeps both is more robust to unknown RFI morphology than either alone.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The reinforcement-learning precision selector is not specific to RFI flagging; the same 14-group decomposition and reward structure could tune precision for any correlator kernel whose output is a small number of bits, such as beamforming or calibration weights.
The threshold fine-tuning requirement suggests a natural next test: an online adaptive threshold version that updates the detection thresholds per data stream, which the paper lists as future work but does not evaluate.
One concrete extension would be to measure whether the less than 1% flag difference between mixed and single precision translates into a comparable difference in downstream calibrated visibilities; flag disagreements near the detection boundary could matter more than raw flag counts.
The directional-statistics detector could be applied beyond RFI, for example to flag or classify polarised transients in real-time transient surveys, since it operates on the same per-window statistic.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short take: this is a credible, well-scoped engineering paper. It combines spectral kurtosis and directional statistics into one online RFI flagger for post-correlation data, and uses a trained RL agent to pick 16- vs 32-bit arithmetic per operation group. That combination is genuinely new, and the mixed-precision piece could generalize beyond RFI.

What it does well: the algorithm is clearly specified, the simulation setup is reasonably detailed, and the results show the combined method beats SK alone at low INR (missed detection 0.05 vs 0.89 in Fig. 2, albeit with SK thresholds poorly calibrated). The real-data demo at 14 MHz is a useful sanity check, and the 1% flag difference between single- and mixed-precision in Fig. 5 makes the RL optimization credible. The paper is also honest: §2.3 and §4.2 concede that theory fails for W=20 and that fine-tuning is required, and the conclusion repeats that per-stream tuning is necessary. That honesty should be credited, not punished.

The soft spots are real but proportionate. The fine-tuning of slow, shigh, and γ is described only as 'some fine-tuning'—no search range, objective, or train/test separation is given. Since Fig. 3's false-alarm and missed-detection numbers are direct functions of those thresholds, the reported Monte Carlo performance is partly a statement about how well the thresholds were tuned for that simulation, not a turnkey property of the statistic. The paper acknowledges this, but a reader cannot reproduce or assess the tuning step without details. Second, the code link (FlagPol) is missing from the text—just a placeholder. That is a concrete reproducibility problem. Third, the RL reward uses double-precision flags as ground truth on synthetic data; that's reasonable for precision selection, but it means the 'optimal' precision is relative to that cost model, not an absolute guarantee. Minor.

Who this is for: people building online RFI mitigation for LOFAR, SKA, or similar arrays; also anyone using RL for mixed-precision kernel tuning. The paper deserves a serious referee: the idea is sound, the presentation is honest, and the weaknesses are addressable. I'd ask the authors to document the tuning procedure, release the code, and clarify how thresholds transfer across frequency bands or arrays. Would I cite it? Yes, if I worked on online RFI. Bring to reading group? Maybe—more for the mixed-precision RL angle than the RFI itself.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an online, post-correlation RFI mitigation scheme for radio interferometry that combines two detectors on each baseline: spectral kurtosis on Stokes I and a directional-statistics test on the normalized polarization vector, with flags OR-combined. The method is designed for small time-frequency windows (W=20) so it can run in real time in a GPU correlator before time averaging. The second contribution is a reinforcement-learning (soft actor-critic) approach to choose, for 14 groups of floating-point operations in the two detectors, whether each group runs in 32-bit or 16-bit precision, with a reward based on agreement with a double-precision implementation minus a cost model. The paper reports Monte Carlo false-alarm and missed-detection probabilities for SK, DS, and the combination, and LOFAR LBA spectrograms showing qualitative agreement between the combined online method and aoflagger, and a claimed <1% difference between single-precision and RL-selected mixed-precision flags.

Significance. If the reported performance transfers to deployment, the contribution is practically valuable: it addresses a real problem (short-duration RFI diluted by averaging), the algorithmic pipeline is clearly specified, and the Monte Carlo evaluation uses 400 realizations with known injected RFI. The RL-based mixed-precision selection is a useful demonstration of a general technique. However, because the detection thresholds are fine-tuned in an unspecified way and the real-data validation has no ground truth, the quantitative claims should be treated as provisional until the tuning procedure and threshold values are disclosed and validated on independent data.

major comments (3)

[Section 2.3 and Section 4.2] The quantitative results in Figs. 2 and 3 depend on a fine-tuning step that is not described. Section 2.3 concedes that at W=20 "some fine-tuning is still required" because the theoretical derivations assume large W, and Section 4.2 adds that the theoretical methods "do not yield the desired results" and "we perform some fine-tuning afterwards". No details are given: no objective function, no search range, no calibration/test separation, and no statement of whether the tuned thresholds are held fixed across the 400 Monte Carlo runs and all INR values. This matters because P_fa and P_md are direct functions of (slow, shigh, gamma). The caption of Fig. 2 also shows the fine-tuned operating point has P_fa=0.01 rather than the 0.05 target stated in the text, and SK alone has P_md=0.89 at INR=100 while DS has P_md=0.06, which suggests the SK thresholds are not well calibrated. Please report the tuned threshold values, the tuning data-generation procedure, and a sensitivity analysis, or demonstrate transfer on held-out realizations.
[Section 3.3 and Fig. 5] The RL "ground truth" is the double-precision flag, not the true RFI label. The reward in Section 3.3 compares reduced-precision flags with those "obtained by using double precision computation", and Section 3 defines the double-precision result as the ground truth. Therefore the claimed <1% difference between panels (b) and (c) of Fig. 5 demonstrates numerical equivalence of the two precision schemes, not detection accuracy. This is a valid and useful claim, but it should be stated as such, and the paper should additionally report false-alarm and missed-detection rates for single-precision versus mixed-precision on the simulated data where true RFI masks are available.
[Section 4.3 and Fig. 4] The real-data demonstration does not validate detection accuracy because there is no ground-truth RFI mask. The text reports that the online method flags "almost 70%" of the data flagged by aoflagger, but aoflagger uses the full 3500x64 window and dilates its flag mask, so the comparison measures overlap with a different detector at a different operating point rather than correctness. Please present the real-data result as a qualitative consistency check or provide an independently verified RFI mask for at least a subset of the data.

minor comments (4)

[Section 2, Eq. (2)] The definition of V_i appears to read "j(xyi − xyi)"; this should presumably be j(xyi − yxi).
[Source code statement] The source-code availability statement references "(FlagPol)" but no URL or repository identifier is given; without this link the reproducibility claim cannot be checked.
[Section 4.2, Fig. 3] The Monte Carlo results in Fig. 3 are reported as point averages without error bars or confidence intervals; given the strong INR dependence, standard errors over the 400 realizations would help the reader judge whether differences between SK, DS, and BOTH are significant.
[Section 3.3] The cost model C=0.6 for half precision and the conversion cost of 0.3 are arbitrary, as the paper notes; the statement that Tables 3 and 4 give the "optimal" precision configuration should be phrased as optimal with respect to this cost model, not optimal in an absolute sense.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; reported performance is based on injected-RFI simulations and real-data comparisons, with threshold tuning a calibration caveat rather than a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained and does not reduce to its inputs. The detection statistics are defined independently: spectral kurtosis via Eq. (4) and directional statistics via Eq. (9), with flagging rules in Eqs. (5) and (10). The small-window limitation and subsequent threshold fine-tuning are openly stated in Sections 2.3 and 4.2 ('some fine-tuning is still required' and 'we perform some fine-tuning afterwards'). This is a legitimate calibration and reproducibility caveat for the Monte Carlo operating point, but it is not a circular reduction: the central comparative result in Fig. 3, namely that DS and BOTH outperform SK at low INR, is a behavior of the two statistics under fixed thresholds across INR values, not an identity with the tuning target. The RL mixed-precision optimization does define its reward as agreement with double-precision flags, so the training objective is self-referential, but the reported less-than-1% flag difference in Fig. 5 is a real-data comparison between single-precision and mixed-precision implementations, providing independent evidence. Self-citations to Yatawatta (2021) and Yatawatta (2024) motivate choices and state agreement with prior results, but the load-bearing detection claims are tested against simulated injected RFI with known ground truth and against LOFAR data, so the self-citations are not the sole support. No equation is defined in terms of the claimed outcome, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The threshold-tuning and missing-code-link issues are correctness and reproducibility risks, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The method rests on standard Gaussian noise assumptions, a small-window threshold calibration that is acknowledged to require fine-tuning, and a simulation model whose polarization limits are taken from prior work by the same author. No new physical entities are introduced; the free parameters are threshold choices, window size, and the RL cost/reward constants that define 'optimal' precision.

free parameters (5)

slow, shigh (spectral kurtosis flag thresholds) = not reported; tuned to target false alarm 0.05
Section 2.3 says they are pre-determined; Section 4.2 says theoretical derivation fails for W=20 and 'we perform some fine-tuning afterwards'.
gamma (directional statistics threshold) = not reported; tuned similarly
Same as above, used in (10); threshold depends on false alarm target and window size.
window size W = 20 (T=10, F=2)
Chosen to minimize latency; it is a hyperparameter that changes all statistics and is stated as typically the smallest window in Section 2.3.
RL cost model constants = C=0.6 for half precision, 0.3 for conversion, reward 33, penalty 20
Section 3.3: costs are set 'arbitrarily' and reward weights chosen by hand; the resulting 'optimal' precision is relative to these constants.
RFI polarization cutoff in simulation = 90% polarization
Section 4.2 eliminates simulated RFI samples with more than 90% polarization, justified by a receiver beam argument from Yatawatta (2021); this shapes the data distribution the RL agent is trained on.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption RFI-free post-correlation data in a small window is complex circular Gaussian.
Underlies both the spectral kurtosis statistic and the directional statistics null behavior (Section 2). Real sky and receiver noise are approximately but not exactly Gaussian.
domain assumption The directional statistics of polarization have a tractable null distribution permitting threshold selection with a target false alarm probability.
Relies on Yatawatta (2021) and Guo et al.; with W=20 the paper concedes the theoretical thresholds are not accurate.
domain assumption RFI from a source at the horizon is at most 90% polarized due to the receiver beam.
Section 4.2: 'we eliminate samples that are more than 90% polarized because we expect at most 90% polarization from an RFI source at the horizon due to the receiver beam (see Fig. 1 in Yatawatta (2021))'. Real RFI may have different polarization statistics.
domain assumption The RL agent's ground truth is double-precision arithmetic output, not the true RFI labels.
Section 3 defines reward by comparing reduced-precision flags with double-precision flags, so RL optimizes numerical fidelity to a 32-bit input, not detection accuracy; detection performance is evaluated separately in Section 4.2.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Energy and polarization based on-line interference mitigation in radio interferometry." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Q667RKO2

@misc{pith2026241214775,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Energy and polarization based on-line interference mitigation in radio interferometry},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Q667RKO2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.14775}
}

read the original abstract

Radio frequency interference (RFI) is a persistent contaminant in terrestrial radio astronomy. While new radio interferometers are becoming operational, novel sources of RFI are also emerging. In order to strengthen the mitigation of RFI in modern radio interferometers, we propose an on-line RFI mitigation scheme that can be run in the correlator of such interferometers. We combine statistics based on the energy as well as the polarization alignment of the correlated signal to develop an on-line RFI mitigation scheme that can be applied to a data stream produced by the correlator in real-time, especially targeted at low duty-cycle or transient RFI detection. In order to improve the computational efficiency, we explore the use of both single precision and half precision floating point operations in implementing the RFI mitigation algorithm. This ideally suits its deployment in accelerator computing devices such as graphics processing units (GPUs) as used by the LOFAR correlator. We provide results based on real data to demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed method.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.14775 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Spectrograms of simulated data (amplitude) of 4 cor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** The false alarm and missed detection probabilities, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Spectrogram of one baseline, Stokes I amplitude at 14 MHz, (a) data (b) result after off-line flagging (aoflagger Offringa [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Spectrograms of one baseline, Stokes I amplitude at 14 MHz, (a) data (b) result after online RFI mitigation with 32 bit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

[1]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in ":" * " " * FUNCTION f...
[2]

, year 2019

author Baan , W.A. , year 2019 . title Implementing RFI Mitigation in Radio Science . journal Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation volume 8 , pages 1940010

work page 2019
[3]

, author Di Vruno , F

author Bassa , C.G. , author Di Vruno , F. , author Winkel , B. , author J \'o zsa , G.I.G. , author Brentjens , M.A. , author Zhang , X. , year 2024 . title Bright unintended electromagnetic radiation from second-generation Starlink satellites . journal volume 689 , pages L10 . 2409.11767

arXiv 2024
[4]

, author Boonstra, A

author Bentum, M. , author Boonstra, A. , author Millenaar, R. , author Gunst, A. , year 2008 . title Implementation of LOFAR RFI mitigation strategy , in: booktitle URSI General Assembly 2008 , publisher International Union of Radio Science , address Belgium . pp. pages 1--4

work page 2008
[5]

, year 2016

author Brentjens , M.A. , year 2016 . title Interference due to wind turbines at 30-200 MHz , in: booktitle 2016 Radio Frequency Interference ( RFI ) , pp. pages 7--10

work page 2016
[6]

, author Mol , J.J.D

author Broekema , P.C. , author Mol , J.J.D. , author Nijboer , R. , author van Amesfoort , A.S. , author Brentjens , M.A. , author Loose , G.M. , author Klijn , W.F.A. , author Romein , J.W. , year 2018 . title Cobalt: A GPU-based correlator and beamformer for LOFAR . journal Astronomy and Computing volume 23 , pages 180 . 1801.04834

arXiv 2018
[7]

, author Veenboer, B

author Corda, S. , author Veenboer, B. , author Awan, A.J. , author Romein, J.W. , author Jordans, R. , author Kumar, A. , author Boonstra, A.J. , author Corporaal, H. , year 2022 . title Reduced-precision acceleration of radio-astronomical imaging on reconfigurable hardware . journal IEEE Access volume 10 , pages 22819--22843

work page 2022
[8]

, author Wang, Y

author Cucho-Padin, G. , author Wang, Y. , author Li, E. , author Waldrop, L. , author Tian, Z. , author Kamalabadi, F. , author Perillat, P. , year 2019 . title Radio frequency interference detection and mitigation using compressive statistical sensing . journal Radio Science volume 54 , pages 986--1001 . https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/1...

work page doi:10.1029/2019rs006902 2019

Show all 42 references

[9]

, author Baan , W.A

author Fridman , P.A. , author Baan , W.A. , year 2001 . title RFI mitigation methods in radio astronomy . journal volume 378 , pages 327--344

2001
[10]

, author Liu, Z

author Gary, D.E. , author Liu, Z. , author Nita, G.M. , year 2010 . title A wideband spectrometer with RFI detection . journal Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific volume 122 , pages 560

2010
[11]

, author Koopmans , L.V.E

author Gehlot , B.K. , author Koopmans , L.V.E. , author Brackenhoff , S.A. , author Ceccotti , E. , author Ghosh , S. , author H \"o fer , C. , author Mertens , F.G. , author Mevius , M. , author Munshi , S. , author Offringa , A.R. , author Pandey , V.N. , author Rowlinson ,...

2024
[12]

, author Chen , S

author Guo , C. , author Chen , S. , author Feng , C. , author Zeng , Z. , year 2015 . title Correlation-statistics-based spectrum sensing exploiting energy and polarization for dual-polarized cognitive radios . journal IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications volume 14 , ...

2015
[13]

, author Wu , X

author Guo , C. , author Wu , X. , author Feng , C. , author Zeng , Z. , year 2013 . title Spectrum sensing for cognitive radios based on directional statistics of polarization vectors . journal IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications volume 31 , pages 379--393

2013
[14]

, author Zhou , A

author Haarnoja , T. , author Zhou , A. , author Abbeel , P. , author Levine , S. , year 2018 a. title Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actor . journal arXiv e-prints , pages arXiv:1801.01290 1801.01290

2018 arXiv
[15]

, author Zhou , A

author Haarnoja , T. , author Zhou , A. , author Hartikainen , K. , author Tucker , G. , author Ha , S. , author Tan , J. , author Kumar , V. , author Zhu , H. , author Gupta , A. , author Abbeel , P. , author Levine , S. , year 2018 b. title Soft Actor-Critic Algorithms and A...

2018 arXiv
[16]

, author Weber, R

author Hellbourg, G. , author Weber, R. , author Capdessus, C. , author Boonstra, A.J. , year 2012 . title Cyclostationary approaches for spatial RFI mitigation in radio astronomy . journal Comptes Rendus Physique volume 13 , pages 71--79 . note The next generation radiotelesc...

2012
[17]

, author Wong, W.F

author Ho, N.M. , author Wong, W.F. , year 2017 . title Exploiting half precision arithmetic in N vidia GPUs , in: booktitle 2017 IEEE High Performance Extreme Computing Conference (HPEC) , pp. pages 1--7

2017
[18]

, author Yatawatta , S

author Kazemi , S. , author Yatawatta , S. , year 2013 . title Robust radio interferometric calibration using the t-distribution . journal volume 435 , pages 597--605

2013
[19]

, author van der Veen , A.J

author Leshem , A. , author van der Veen , A.J. , year 2000 . title Introduction to Interference Mitigation Techniques in Radio Astronomy , in: editor Smolders , A.B. , editor van Haarlem , M.P. (Eds.), booktitle Perspectives on Radio Astronomy: Technologies for Large Antenna ...

2000
[20]

, author van der Veen, A.J

author Leshem, A. , author van der Veen, A.J. , author Boonstra, A.J. , year 2000 . title Multichannel interference mitigation techniques in radio astronomy . journal The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series volume 131 , pages 355--373

2000
[21]

, author Fan, R

author Luo, W. , author Fan, R. , author Li, Z. , author Du, D. , author Wang, Q. , author Chu, X. , year 2024 . title Benchmarking and dissecting the N vidia H opper GPU architecture , in: booktitle 2024 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS)...

2024
[22]

, author Gary , D.E

author Nita , G.M. , author Gary , D.E. , year 2010 . title The generalized spectral kurtosis estimator . journal volume 406 , pages L60--L64 . 1005.4371

2010 arXiv
[23]

, author Gary, D.E

author Nita, G.M. , author Gary, D.E. , author Liu, Z. , author Hurford, G.J. , author White, S.M. , year 2007 . title Radio frequency interference excision using spectral‐domain statistics . journal Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific volume 119 , pages 805

2007
[24]

, author Hellbourg, G

author Nita, G.M. , author Hellbourg, G. , year 2020 . title A cross-correlation based spectral kurtosis RFI detector , in: booktitle 2020 XXXIIIrd General Assembly and Scientific Symposium of the International Union of Radio Science , organization IEEE . pp. pages 1--4

2020
[25]

, author Hickish, J

author Nita, G.M. , author Hickish, J. , author MacMahon, D. , author Gary, D.E. , year 2016 . title EOVSA implementation of a spectral kurtosis correlator for transient detection and classification . journal Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation volume 05 , pages 1641009

2016
[26]

, author de Bruyn , A

author Offringa , A. , author de Bruyn , A. , author Biehl , M. , author Zaroubi , S. , author Bernardi , G. , author Pandey , V. , year 2010 . title Post-correlation radio frequency interference classification methods . journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Societ...

2010
[27]

, author Smith , K.M

author Rafiei-Ravandi , M. , author Smith , K.M. , year 2023 . title Mitigating Radio Frequency Interference in CHIME/FRB Real-time Intensity Data . journal volume 265 , pages 62 . 2206.07292

2023 arXiv
[28]

, author Boonstra, A.J

author Raza, J. , author Boonstra, A.J. , author Van der Veen, A.J. , year 2002 . title Spatial filtering of RF interference in radio astronomy . journal IEEE Signal Processing Letters volume 9 , pages 64--67

2002
[29]

, author Vohl , D

author Sclocco , A. , author Vohl , D. , author Van Nieuwpoort , R.V. , year 2020 . title Real-Time RFI Mitigation for the Apertif Radio Transient System . journal arXiv e-prints , pages arXiv:2001.03389 2001.03389

2020 arXiv
[30]

, year 2022

author Smith, E. , year 2022 . title Impact of Radio Frequency Interference and Real-Time Spectral Kurtosis Mitigation . Ph.D. thesis. West Virginia University, 11467

2022
[31]

, author Lynch , R.S

author Smith , E. , author Lynch , R.S. , author Pisano , D.J. , year 2022 . title Simulating Spectral Kurtosis Mitigation against Realistic Radio Frequency Interference Signals . journal volume 164 , pages 123 . 2207.07642

2022 arXiv
[32]

, author Wayth , R.B

author Sokolowski , M. , author Wayth , R.B. , author Lewis , M. , year 2016 . title The statistics of low frequency radio interference at the Murchison Radio-astronomy Observatory . journal ArXiv e-prints 1610.04696

2016 arXiv
[33]

, author Barto, A.G

author Sutton, R.S. , author Barto, A.G. , year 2018 . title Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction . publisher A Bradford Book , address Cambridge, MA, USA

2018
[34]

, author Van Leeuwen, J

author Van Nieuwpoort, R. , author Van Leeuwen, J. , author Sclocco, A. , author Spreeuw, H. , author Williams, C. , year 2018 . title Real-time RFI mitigation for LOFAR , A pertif and SKA , publisher Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc

2018
[35]

, year 2016

author Van Nieuwpoort , R.V. , year 2016 . title Towards exascale real-time RFI mitigation , in: booktitle 2016 Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) , pp. pages 69--74

2016
[36]

, author Francois Luus , P.S

author Vos , E.E. , author Francois Luus , P.S. , author Finlay , C.J. , author Bassett , B.A. , year 2019 . title A generative machine learning approach to RFI mitigation for radio astronomy , in: booktitle 2019 IEEE 29th International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal ...

2019
[37]

, author Winkel, B

author Vruno, F.D. , author Winkel, B. , author Bassa, C.G. , author Jozsa, G.I.G. , author Brentjens, M.A. , author Jessner, A. , author Garrington, S. , year 2023 . title Unintended electromagnetic radiation from starlink satellites detected with LOFAR between 110 and 188 MH...

2023 arXiv
[38]

, year 2019

author van Werkhoven, B. , year 2019 . title Kernel tuner: A search-optimizing GPU code auto-tuner . journal Future Generation Computer Systems volume 90 , pages 347--358

2019
[39]

, author Jessner, A

author Winkel, B. , author Jessner, A. , year 2019 . title Compatibility between wind turbines and the radio astronomy service . journal Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation volume 08 , pages 1940002 . https://doi.org/10.1142/S2251171719400026

2019 doi
[40]

, year 2021

author Yatawatta , S. , year 2021 . title Polarization-based online interference mitigation in radio interferometry , in: booktitle 2020 28th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) , pp. pages 1961--1965

2021
[41]

, year 2024

author Yatawatta, S. , year 2024 . title Reinforcement learning . journal Astronomy and Computing volume 48 , pages 100833

2024
[42]

, author Avruch, I.M

author Yatawatta, S. , author Avruch, I.M. , year 2021 . title Deep reinforcement learning for smart calibration of radio telescopes . journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society volume 505 , pages 2141--2150

2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in ":" * " " * FUNCTION f...

[2] [2]

, year 2019

author Baan , W.A. , year 2019 . title Implementing RFI Mitigation in Radio Science . journal Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation volume 8 , pages 1940010

work page 2019

[3] [3]

, author Di Vruno , F

author Bassa , C.G. , author Di Vruno , F. , author Winkel , B. , author J \'o zsa , G.I.G. , author Brentjens , M.A. , author Zhang , X. , year 2024 . title Bright unintended electromagnetic radiation from second-generation Starlink satellites . journal volume 689 , pages L10 . 2409.11767

arXiv 2024

[4] [4]

, author Boonstra, A

author Bentum, M. , author Boonstra, A. , author Millenaar, R. , author Gunst, A. , year 2008 . title Implementation of LOFAR RFI mitigation strategy , in: booktitle URSI General Assembly 2008 , publisher International Union of Radio Science , address Belgium . pp. pages 1--4

work page 2008

[5] [5]

, year 2016

author Brentjens , M.A. , year 2016 . title Interference due to wind turbines at 30-200 MHz , in: booktitle 2016 Radio Frequency Interference ( RFI ) , pp. pages 7--10

work page 2016

[6] [6]

, author Mol , J.J.D

author Broekema , P.C. , author Mol , J.J.D. , author Nijboer , R. , author van Amesfoort , A.S. , author Brentjens , M.A. , author Loose , G.M. , author Klijn , W.F.A. , author Romein , J.W. , year 2018 . title Cobalt: A GPU-based correlator and beamformer for LOFAR . journal Astronomy and Computing volume 23 , pages 180 . 1801.04834

arXiv 2018

[7] [7]

, author Veenboer, B

author Corda, S. , author Veenboer, B. , author Awan, A.J. , author Romein, J.W. , author Jordans, R. , author Kumar, A. , author Boonstra, A.J. , author Corporaal, H. , year 2022 . title Reduced-precision acceleration of radio-astronomical imaging on reconfigurable hardware . journal IEEE Access volume 10 , pages 22819--22843

work page 2022

[8] [8]

, author Wang, Y

author Cucho-Padin, G. , author Wang, Y. , author Li, E. , author Waldrop, L. , author Tian, Z. , author Kamalabadi, F. , author Perillat, P. , year 2019 . title Radio frequency interference detection and mitigation using compressive statistical sensing . journal Radio Science volume 54 , pages 986--1001 . https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/1...

work page doi:10.1029/2019rs006902 2019