On Multiplicative Weightings for Lie Groupoids and Lie Algebroids

Daniel Hudson

On Multiplicative Weightings for Lie Groupoids and Lie Algebroids

T0 review · 3 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Multiplicative weightings on a Lie groupoid correspond, along the groupoid's units, to Lie filtrations of its Lie algebroid — a dictionary between global multiplicative geometry and infinitesimal filtered algebra.

desk verdict The abstract is a real-looking math paper; the body is an unrelated galaxy-evolution paper—nothing here is refereeable as submitted. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.10276 v1 pith:Q6K2JDRW submitted 2025-08-14 math.DG

Daniel Hudson This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.DG MSC 22A2253D1758H05

keywords weightingsLiegroupoidsalgebroidsmultiplicativeweightingfiltrationsintegrationproblemweighteddeformationspacehomologicalvectorfields

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper develops the differential geometry of weightings — structures that assign growth orders to directions, encoded as filtrations of functions or sections — for vector bundles, Lie groupoids, and Lie algebroids, extending the existing theory of weighted manifolds. It defines weighted submanifolds, weighted immersions and embeddings with normal-form theorems, develops linear weightings for vector bundles, and gives three equivalent definitions of a multiplicative weighting on a Lie groupoid: through its structure maps, through the graph of its multiplication, and through the weighted deformation space. Its central results are that multiplicative weightings differentiate to infinitesimally multiplicative weightings, that the integration problem is solved along wide Lie subalgebroids, and that along the units of the groupoid multiplicative weightings are classified by Lie filtrations of the Lie algebroid. A sympathetic reader would care because this turns a global, geometric compatibility question into finite, checkable algebraic data at the infinitesimal level — the standard shape of a Lie-theoretic correspondence.

What carries the argument

A Lie filtration of a Lie algebroid — a filtration of the underlying vector bundle by subbundles that is compatible with the Lie bracket — is the object that classifies multiplicative weightings along the units. The other load-bearing construction is the weighted deformation space of the groupoid, a one-parameter family of spaces that supplies the third equivalent characterization of multiplicative weightings and mediates between the global and infinitesimal pictures. The differentiation/integration correspondence is carried by the two further characterizations of infinitesimally multiplicative weightings, in terms of linear Poisson structures and in terms of homological vector fields.

What would settle it

Open the submitted full text and look for the weighted deformation space construction or the classification of multiplicative weightings along the units by Lie filtrations; neither appears, since the body is an unrelated extragalactic-survey paper. Mathematically, the classification would be refuted by a Lie groupoid whose units carry an infinitesimally multiplicative weighting whose underlying subbundle filtration is not compatible with the Lie bracket of the algebroid — the claimed bijection would then assign a non-Lie filtration to a genuine weighting.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper claims that multiplicative weightings differentiate faithfully: a multiplicative weighting of a Lie groupoid induces an infinitesimally multiplicative weighting of its Lie algebroid, and conversely, along wide Lie subalgebroids, every infinitesimally multiplicative weighting integrates to a multiplicative one. Along the units of the groupoid, the structure unwinds to a Lie filtration of the Lie algebroid — a filtration of the underlying vector bundle compatible with the Lie bracket — so the global weighting data is classified by such filtrations. Infinitesimally multiplicative weightings are characterized two further ways, by linear Poisson structures and by homol

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the weighted deformation space construction exists with the properties needed to make the three characterizations of a multiplicative weighting equivalent — and that the submitted full text (which is in fact an unrelated galaxy-survey paper) contains the abstract's theorems.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Along the units, multiplicative weightings of a Lie groupoid are in one-to-one correspondence with Lie filtrations of its Lie algebroid, so the global classification reduces to filtered data on the infinitesimal object.
Every infinitesimally multiplicative weighting on a wide Lie subalgebroid integrates to a multiplicative weighting of the groupoid, providing a large existence guarantee for the integration problem.
A weighting is multiplicative if and only if it satisfies any of three equivalent conditions — compatibility with the structure maps, weightedness of the multiplication graph, or descent from the weighted deformation space — so the condition can be checked in the most convenient presentation.
Infinitesimally multiplicative weightings are recognized equivalently as linear Poisson structures and as homological vector fields, linking weightings to Poisson geometry and graded-manifold theory.
Weighted submanifolds, weighted immersions, and weighted embeddings admit normal forms, giving local models for weighted geometry and for weighted morphisms, which are also characterizable via graphs and via weighted paths.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The classification along the units suggests a broader principle the paper leaves implicit: multiplicative groupoid structures are governed by filtered infinitesimal data, so other filtration types (by rank, by ideals, by growth rate) may correspond to further classes of groupoid weightings.
The homological-vector-field characterization points to a concrete follow-up: if an infinitesimally multiplicative weighting is equivalently a graded structure on the algebroid's cochain complex, then the general integration problem becomes the question of extending the associated graded data to a compatible Q-structure.
The paper's sufficient condition for the general integration problem invites a boundary test: constructing an infinitesimally multiplicative weighting along a non-wide subalgebroid that fails the condition — or proving none exists — would show how close the result is to a full classification.
The submitted full text is an unrelated galaxy-morphology paper, so the abstract's constructions and proofs cannot be located in the body; the mathematical claims are not checkable from this submission as received.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Here's the one thing you should know: this submission is not a math paper. The abstract describes substantive work on multiplicative weightings for Lie groupoids and algebroids, but the full text is a DEVILS astronomy paper on the morphology-density relation, with its own arXiv number (2508.10285). There are zero definitions, theorems, or proofs from the abstract in the body.

Credit where it's due: the abstract is specific and promising. It extends Loizides and Meinrenken's weighted-manifold theory, offers three equivalent characterizations of multiplicative weightings, states a classification along units in terms of Lie filtrations, and claims an integration theorem along wide Lie subalgebroids. If a manuscript matching that abstract exists and works, it is a solid subfield contribution for people working on weightings, groupoids, and geometric mechanics. The citation to Loizides and Meinrenken is appropriate, not a red flag.

But the soft spot here is not soft. The central claims—the classification and the integration result—depend on constructions like the weighted deformation space, and the body does not contain any of them. This is not a gap in a derivation; it is a total absence of the derivation. The stress-test note has it right, and I agree with the reader's call: the correct status is unverdictable, not "mathematically wrong." The mismatch looks like an upload or compilation error rather than deliberate deception, so I wouldn't level an integrity accusation. But it means the submitted document is not a paper in the relevant sense.

Would I send this to peer review? As submitted, no. A serious editor should desk-reject this file and invite the author to resubmit the correct full text. The abstract alone is not enough to referee, and there is nothing to check. If the real manuscript arrives, then it absolutely deserves a careful referee—someone who knows the weighted-manifold literature should look hard at the three characterizations and the wide-subalgebroid integration claim.

My take for the reading group: skip this one unless you want a five-minute case study in submission integrity. I won't cite it in the next year because I can't verify the content. If the author puts up the correct PDF, I'll be glad to look again.

Recommendation: tell the editor to bounce it back, ask for the intended manuscript, and then treat that version as a normal submission for full review.

Referee Report

3 major / 0 minor

Summary. The abstract advertises a mathematical paper on multiplicative weightings for Lie groupoids and Lie algebroids: three equivalent definitions of multiplicative weighting (via structure maps, via the graph of multiplication, and via a weighted deformation space), a differentiation/integration theorem for infinitesimally multiplicative weightings along wide Lie subalgebroids, and a classification of multiplicative weightings along units by Lie filtrations of the Lie algebroid. The submitted full text, however, is an unrelated astrophysics paper, 'DEVILS: Evolution of the Morphology-Density Relation' (arXiv:2508.10285, astro-ph.GA), with no mathematical definitions, theorem statements, or proofs. None of the claims in the abstract are supported by the supplied manuscript.

Significance. If the advertised results are correct, they would constitute a substantial contribution to the differential geometry of Lie groupoids and Lie algebroids, notably the classification of multiplicative weightings by Lie filtrations and the integration theorem along wide subalgebroids. However, because the submitted full text contains none of the promised mathematics, the significance cannot be assessed from this submission. There are no machine-checked proofs, reproducible derivations, or verifiable statements to credit.

major comments (3)

[Full text, p.1 (title and arXiv header)] The full text is not the manuscript described in the abstract. It is titled 'DEVILS: Evolution of the Morphology-Density Relation', carries the header 'arXiv:2508.10285v1 [astro-ph.GA] 14 Aug 2025', and discusses galaxy morphology in MNRAS style. The abstract announces a math.DG paper (arXiv:2508.10276) on multiplicative weightings. This is a total absence of the claimed mathematical content, not a presentation issue. Every mathematical claim in the abstract is therefore unsupported.
[Abstract, 'three equivalent definitions ... weighted deformation space'] The central equivalence claim—that multiplicative weightings can be characterized by the structure maps, by the graph of multiplication, and by the weighted deformation space—requires at minimum the definition of a multiplicative weighting, the construction of the weighted deformation space, and proofs of the equivalences. None of these appear anywhere in the full text. The classification of multiplicative weightings along units in terms of Lie filtrations is likewise stated only in the abstract.
[Abstract, differentiation and integration claims] The claims that multiplicative weightings differentiate to infinitesimally multiplicative weightings and that infinitesimally multiplicative weightings integrate along wide Lie subalgebroids are stated without any definitions, hypotheses, or proof. The full text contains no numbered theorems, no equations, and no mathematical notation matching the abstract. This is an explicit missing-support flag for every substantive assertion of the paper.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity can be demonstrated: the submitted full text is an unrelated astro-ph paper, so the claimed derivation chain is absent.

full rationale

The abstract advertises a mathematics paper on multiplicative weightings for Lie groupoids and Lie algebroids, with theorems about differentiation and integration of infinitesimally multiplicative weightings and a classification by Lie filtrations. The supplied full text, however, is the DEVILS astro-ph paper 'Deep Extragalactic VIsible Legacy Survey (DEVILS): Evolution of the Morphology-Density Relation' (arXiv:2508.10285v1 [astro-ph.GA]), beginning 'MNRAS 000, 1–23 (2025)' and containing no Lie groupoids, no weighted deformation space, no Lie filtrations, and no theorem statements matching the abstract. The review rule requiring any missing support, limitation, or omitted proof to be flagged explicitly applies: this is a total absence of the mathematical derivation from the submission. However, circularity analysis requires exhibiting a specific reduction of a claimed result to its own inputs via the paper's equations or a load-bearing self-citation chain. No such reduction can be exhibited because the derivation chain itself is not present. Absence of the derivation is a completeness or integrity problem, not a demonstrated instance of circular reasoning. Therefore the honest finding is no identified circular step, score 0, with the caveat that the central claims are unverifiable from the submitted text.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger is necessarily incomplete because the submitted full text is an unrelated astrophysics paper; the mathematical axioms and any implicit parameters or entities cannot be extracted.

assumptions (2)

domain assumption The prior theory of weighted manifolds due to Loizides and Meinrenken is taken as given (abstract: 'extending the work of Loizides and Meinrenken').
The abstract explicitly builds on this prior work, which is not reproduced in the submission.
domain assumption Standard theory of Lie groupoids, Lie algebroids, and their deformations is assumed as background.
The abstract uses these notions without defining them; the full text does not supply the promised mathematical development.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On Multiplicative Weightings for Lie Groupoids and Lie Algebroids." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Q6K2JDRW

@misc{pith2026250810276,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On Multiplicative Weightings for Lie Groupoids and Lie Algebroids},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Q6K2JDRW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.10276}
}

read the original abstract

We present a thorough study of the differential geometry of weightings and develop the theory of weightings for vector bundles, Lie groupoids, and Lie algebroids. We begin by extending the work of Loizides and Meinrenken on weighted manifolds. We define weighted submanifolds, weighted immersions, and weighted embeddings, and prove normal form theorems for these objects. We also study characterizations of weighted morphisms in terms of their graphs and in terms of weighted paths. We further extend the theory of weighted manifolds by developing a theory of linear weightings for vector bundles. Following this, we give three equivalent definitions of a multiplicative weighting for a Lie groupoid: one involving the structure maps for the Lie groupoid, one involving the graph of the groupoid multiplication, and one involving the weighted deformation space. We also include a discussion of weighted VB-groupoids, and prove some basic theorems involving these objects. In the last two chapters of this thesis, we study infinitesimally multiplicative weightings for Lie algebroids. We characterize these in terms of linear Poisson structures and homological vector fields. We show that multiplicative weightings differentiate to infinitesimally multiplicative weightings and solve the integration problem for infinitesimally multiplicative weightings along wide Lie subalgebroids. In particular, we classify multiplicative weightings of a Lie groupoid along its units in terms of Lie filtrations of its Lie algebroid. We make progress towards a solution for the general integration problem by giving a condition for when an infinitesimally multiplicative weighting along a general Lie subalgebroid integrates.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

[1]

Iakovos Androulidakis, Omar Mohsen, and Robert Yuncken, A pseudodifferential calculus for maximally hypoelliptic operators and the helffer-nourrigat conjecture, arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.12060 (2022)

arXiv 2022
[2]

Iakovos Androulidakis and Georges Skandalis, The holonomy groupoid of a singular foliation

work page
[3]

4, 697--732

Francis Bischoff, Henrique Bursztyn, Hudson Lima, and Eckhard Meinrenken, Deformation spaces and normal forms around transversals, Compositio Mathematica 156 (2020), no. 4, 697--732

work page 2020
[4]

Henrique Bursztyn, Alejandro Cabrera, and Matias del Hoyo, Vector bundles over lie groupoids and algebroids, Advances in Mathematics 290 (2016), 163--207

work page 2016
[5]

Gabriel Beiner, Getzler rescaling and symbol calculus in local index theory via weightings on vector bundles, https://math.berkeley.edu/ gbeiner/papers/Getzler_Rescaling.pdf, 2022

work page 2022
[6]

Nicole Berline, Ezra Getzler, and Michele Vergne, Heat kernels and dirac operators, Springer Science & Business Media, 2003

work page 2003
[7]

754, 281--312

Henrique Bursztyn, Hudson Lima, and Eckhard Meinrenken, Splitting theorems for poisson and related structures, Journal f \"u r die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal) 2019 (2019), no. 754, 281--312

work page 2019
[8]

Maxim Braverman and Ahmad Reza Haj Saeedi Sadegh, Deformation spaces, rescaled bundles and the kirillov character formula, arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.14359 (2022)

work page Pith review arXiv 2022

Show all 54 references

[9]

2, 439--483

Alejandro Cabrera, Olivier Brahic, and Cristian Ortiz, Obstructions to the integrability of vb-algebroids, Journal of Symplectic Geometry 16 (2018), no. 2, 439--483

2018
[10]

Marius Crainic and Rui Loja Fernandes, Integrability of lie brackets, Annals of Mathematics (2003), 575--620

2003
[11]

760, 267--293

Alejandro Cabrera, Ioan M a rcu t , and Mar \' a Amelia Salazar, On local integration of lie brackets, Journal f \"u r die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal) 2020 (2020), no. 760, 267--293

2020
[12]

Alain Connes, Noncommutative geometry, Springer, 1994

1994
[13]

2, 631--661

Theodore James Courant, Dirac manifolds, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 319 (1990), no. 2, 631--661

1990
[14]

http://arxiv

Woocheol Choi and Raphael Ponge, Privileged coordinates and tangent groupoid for carnot manifolds, Preprint. http://arxiv. org/abs/1510.05851 (2015)

2015 arXiv
[15]

Claire Debord and Georges Skandalis, Adiabatic groupoid, crossed product by r+⁎ and pseudodifferential calculus, Advances in Mathematics 257 (2014), 66--91

2014
[16]

Ezra Getzler, Pseudodifferential operators on supermanifolds and the atiyah-singer index theorem
[17]

1, 115--142

Janusz Grabowski, Micha J \'o \'z wikowski, and Miko aj Rotkiewicz, Duality for graded manifolds, Reports on Mathematical Physics 80 (2017), no. 1, 115--142

2017
[18]

9, 1285--1305

Janusz Grabowski and Miko aj Rotkiewicz, Higher vector bundles and multi-graded symplectic manifolds, Journal of Geometry and Physics 59 (2009), no. 9, 1285--1305

2009
[19]

1, 21--36

, Graded bundles and homogeneity structures, Journal of Geometry and Physics 62 (2012), no. 1, 21--36

2012
[20]

Alfonso Garmendia and Ori Yudilevich, On the inner automorphisms of a singular foliation, Mathematische Zeitschrift 293 (2019), 725--729

2019
[21]

Nigel Higson, Pseudodifferential operators and the tangent groupoid (a class at the fields institute), https://app.simplenote.com/publish/zC693T, 2023

2023
[22]

Lars H \"o rmander, The analysis of linear partial differential operators iii: Pseudo-differential operators, Springer Science & Business Media, 2007

2007
[23]

Daniel Hudson, Linear weightings and deformations of vector bundles, arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.02457 (2023)

2023 arXiv
[24]

Nigel Higson and Zelin Yi, Spinors and the tangent groupoid, Documenta Mathematica 24 (2019), 1677--1720

2019
[25]

Ivan Kol \'a r, Peter W Michor, and Jan Slov \'a k, Natural operations in differential geometry, Springer Science & Business Media, 2013

2013
[26]

7, 2979--2993

Georges Florian Kouotchop Wamba, Pierre Mesmaire Wankap Nono, Vertical lifts of higher order of multivector fields and applications to poisson geometry, Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics 44 (2023), no. 7, 2979--2993

2023
[27]

5, 779--816

David Li-Bland and Eckhard Meinrenken, Dirac lie groups, Asian Journal of Mathematics 18 (2014), no. 5, 779--816

2014
[28]

3, 315--363

Eugene Lerman, Orbifolds as stacks?, L’Enseignement math \'e matique 56 (2010), no. 3, 315--363

2010
[29]

Camille Laurent-Gengoux, Ruben Louis, and Leonid Rykvin, Geometry of singular foliations: a draft of an introduction, CRM Barcelona, Poisson geometry summer school, 2022

2022
[30]

Yiannis Loizides and Eckhard Meinrenken, Singular lie filtrations and weightings, arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.00442 (2022)

2022 arXiv
[31]

, Differential geometry of weightings, Advances in Mathematics 424 (2023), 109072

2023
[32]

213, Cambridge University Press, 2005

Kirill CH Mackenzie, General theory of lie groupoids and lie algebroids, no. 213, Cambridge University Press, 2005

2005
[33]

Eckhard Meinrenken, Introduction to poisson geoemtry, lecture notes, winter 2017, https://www.math.utoronto.ca/mein/teaching/MAT1341_PoissonGeometry/Poisson8.pdf, 2017

2017
[34]

, Lie groupoids and lie algebroids, lecture notes, fall 2017, https://www.math.toronto.edu/mein/teaching/MAT1341_LieGroupoids/Groupoids.pdf, 2017

2017
[35]

1, 224--245

, Euler-like vector fields, normal forms, and isotropic embeddings, Indagationes Mathematicae 32 (2021), no. 1, 224--245

2021
[36]

Anders Melin, Lie filtrations and pseudo-differential operators, Preprint, 1982

1982
[37]

Richard B Melrose, Differential analysis on manifolds with corners, https://math.mit.edu/ rbm/book.html, 1996

1996
[38]

91, Cambridge university press, 2003

Ieke Moerdijk and Janez Mrcun, Introduction to foliations and lie groupoids, vol. 91, Cambridge university press, 2003

2003
[39]

1, 101--115

Ieke Moerdijk and Janez Mr c un, On the integrability of lie subalgebroids, Advances in Mathematics 204 (2006), no. 1, 101--115

2006
[40]

9, 3135--3145

, On the universal enveloping algebra of a lie algebroid, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 138 (2010), no. 9, 3135--3145

2010
[41]

Akihiko Morimoto, Liftings of tensor fields and connections to tangent bundles of higher order, Nagoya Mathematical Journal 40 (1970), 99--120

1970
[42]

Kirill Mackenzie and Ping Xu, Classical lifting processes and multiplicative vector fields, arXiv preprint dg-ga/9710030 (1997)

1997 arXiv
[43]

3, 445--467

Kirill CH Mackenzie and Ping Xu, Integration of lie bialgebroids, Topology 39 (2000), no. 3, 445--467

2000
[44]

Jean Pradines, Theorie de lie pour les groupoides differentiable, CR Acad. Sci. Paris 264 (1967), 245--248

1967
[45]

, Remarque sur le groupo de cotangent de weinstein-dazord , CR Acad. Sci. Paris S \'e r. I Math 306 (1988), no. 13, 557--560

1988
[46]

793, Springer, 2006

Jean Renault, A groupoid approach to c*-algebras, vol. 793, Springer, 2006

2006
[47]

Angel Roman and Joel Villatoro, Convolution algebras of double groupoids and strict 2-groups, arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.00341 (2023)

2023 arXiv
[48]

Pavol S evera, Letters to alan weinstein about courant algebroids, arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.00265 (2017)

2017 arXiv
[49]

Ahmad Reza Haj Saeedi Sadegh and Nigel Higson, Euler-like vector fields, deformation spaces and manifolds with filtered structure, Documenta Mathematica 23 (2018), 293--325

2018
[50]

2, 428--429

Arkady Yu Vaintrob, Lie algebroids and homological vector fields, Russian Mathematical Surveys 52 (1997), no. 2, 428--429

1997
[51]

6, 1000--1012

Erik Van Erp and Robert Yuncken, On the tangent groupoid of a filtered manifold, Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society 49 (2017), no. 6, 1000--1012

2017
[52]

756, 151--182

, A groupoid approach to pseudodifferential calculi, Journal f \"u r die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal) 2019 (2019), no. 756, 151--182

2019
[53]

Robert Yuncken, On pseudodifferential operators on filtered and multifiltered manifolds, arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.10272 (2018)

2018 arXiv
[54]

De Shou Zhong, Zhuo Chen, and Zhang Ju Liu, On the existence of global bisections of lie groupoids, Acta Mathematica Sinica, English Series 25 (2009), 1001--1014

2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Iakovos Androulidakis, Omar Mohsen, and Robert Yuncken, A pseudodifferential calculus for maximally hypoelliptic operators and the helffer-nourrigat conjecture, arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.12060 (2022)

arXiv 2022

[2] [2]

Iakovos Androulidakis and Georges Skandalis, The holonomy groupoid of a singular foliation

work page

[3] [3]

4, 697--732

Francis Bischoff, Henrique Bursztyn, Hudson Lima, and Eckhard Meinrenken, Deformation spaces and normal forms around transversals, Compositio Mathematica 156 (2020), no. 4, 697--732

work page 2020

[4] [4]

Henrique Bursztyn, Alejandro Cabrera, and Matias del Hoyo, Vector bundles over lie groupoids and algebroids, Advances in Mathematics 290 (2016), 163--207

work page 2016

[5] [5]

Gabriel Beiner, Getzler rescaling and symbol calculus in local index theory via weightings on vector bundles, https://math.berkeley.edu/ gbeiner/papers/Getzler_Rescaling.pdf, 2022

work page 2022

[6] [6]

Nicole Berline, Ezra Getzler, and Michele Vergne, Heat kernels and dirac operators, Springer Science & Business Media, 2003

work page 2003

[7] [7]

754, 281--312

Henrique Bursztyn, Hudson Lima, and Eckhard Meinrenken, Splitting theorems for poisson and related structures, Journal f \"u r die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal) 2019 (2019), no. 754, 281--312

work page 2019

[8] [8]

Maxim Braverman and Ahmad Reza Haj Saeedi Sadegh, Deformation spaces, rescaled bundles and the kirillov character formula, arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.14359 (2022)

work page Pith review arXiv 2022