Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Qubit Regularization of Quantum Field Theories

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that asymptotically free quantum field theories can be recovered from qubit-regularized lattice models with a strictly finite local Hilbert space, through a new renormalization group flow in which the Gaussian…

desk verdict A clean proceedings summary of the decoupled-fixed-point RG idea, where the two reviewed examples carry the weight and the new gauge-theory results are placeholders; the fXY small-lambda case is an acknowledged extrapolation. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.05716 v2 pith:QGIJKZ6J submitted 2025-02-08 hep-lat cond-mat.str-elhep-th

Shailesh Chandrasekharan This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-latcond-mat.str-elhep-th MSC 81T2581T2782B2082B27 PACS 11.15.Ha05.50.+q
keywords qubitregularizationasymptoticfreedomrenormalizationgroupflowdecoupledfixedpointcrossovercriticalityHeisenbergcombBKTtransitionmonomer-dimer-tensor-networkbasis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that asymptotically free quantum field theories can be reproduced from lattice models with a strictly finite local Hilbert space, contrary to the usual assumption that such theories need an ever-growing number of states per site. The key proposal is a new renormalization group flow in which the critical point of the qubit-regularized model is a decoupled fixed point, not the Gaussian ultraviolet fixed point of the continuum theory. The universal physics of the Gaussian fixed point then appears as a crossover in an intermediate range of lattice sizes, before the massive infrared theory takes over at long distances. Two (1+1)-dimensional examples are offered as evidence: the Heisenberg comb for the 2D O(3) quantum field theory and the fXY dimer model for the massive theory at the BKT transition. The paper also introduces a monomer-dimer-tensor-network basis for constructing qubit-regularized SU(N) gauge theories, and reports that simple versions of these theories reproduce the expected confinement-deconfinement transitions.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is a renormalization group flow in which the quantum critical point of a qubit-regularized model is a decoupled fixed point: two independent critical theories that do not interact. A small coupling between them acts as the marginally relevant perturbation that generates three length scales: a lattice scale, an intermediate scale where the Gaussian UV physics of the asymptotically free QFT appears, and a long scale where the massive QFT emerges. The two concrete implementations are the Heisenberg comb Hamiltonian, with spins on a ladder where one leg decouples at J=infinity, and the fXY partition function, a sum over oriented self-avoiding loops equivalent to two layers of close-packed dimers at lambda=0, with lambda the fugacity of inter-layer dimers. For gauge theories, the MDTN basis provides an orthonormal, sign-problem-free Hilbert space built from irreps of SU(N), on which the ASQR scheme keeps only anti-symmetric irreps.

What would settle it

Compute the step-scaling function of the fXY model at lambda = 0.01 for lattice sizes well beyond 1280, such as L = 2560, 5120, and 8192: if the data does not begin to follow the universal SSF curve of the XY model and xi(L)/L does not eventually decrease from 0.7506912..., the crossover scenario is falsified. Similarly, for the Heisenberg comb at a fixed large J, increasing L beyond Lmin(J) must show the SSF continuing to track the O(3) curve; a deviation would falsify the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that qubit-regularized theories with a strictly finite local Hilbert space can reproduce asymptotically free QFTs through a novel RG flow in which the critical point is a decoupled fixed point, not the Gaussian UV fixed point. The universal physics of the Gaussian fixed point then appears as a crossover: at small lattice sizes the decoupled fixed point dominates, at intermediate sizes the UV physics of the desired QFT becomes visible, and at very large sizes the massive IR QFT emerges. The paper supports this with two reviewed examples: the Heisenberg comb, where the J=infinity critical point flows to a decoupled k=1 WZW fixed point and the 2D O(3) step-scaling function is reproduced for L>Lmin(J); and the fXY model, a four-state Euclidean model whose lambda=0 critical point consists of two decoupled layers of close-packed dimers and which reproduces the massive QFT of the BKT transition as lambda tends to zero. The paper also introduces a monomer-dimer-tensor-network (MDTN) basis for SU(N) lattice gauge theories and shows that a simple anti-symmetric qubit regularization (ASQR) reproduces the finite-temperature confinement-deconfinement transitions of SU(2) and SU(3) gauge theories.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim rests on extrapolating that the plateau seen in the correlation-length ratio at the BKT value for small coupling is a crossover effect, and that on lattices larger than 1280 sites the data would eventually join the universal scaling curve; that joining is not directly observed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the J tending to infinity limit of the Heisenberg comb, the Gaussian UV fixed point of the 2D O(3) QFT is fully recovered as a crossover phenomenon for lattice sizes L greater than Lmin(J).
  • The massive QFT at the BKT transition can be reproduced from a four-dimensional local Hilbert space without fine-tuning, and universal quantities such as the helicity modulus emerge more easily than in the traditional XY model.
  • The MDTN basis gives a sign-problem-free Hamiltonian formulation of qubit-regularized lattice gauge theories, avoiding the Clebsch-Gordan sign problems of the Kogut-Susskind approach.
  • In the ASQR scheme, the finite-temperature confinement-deconfinement transition of SU(2) gauge theory is consistent with the 3D Ising transition while that of SU(3) is first order, matching traditional expectations.
  • If asymptotic freedom can be recovered this way, qubit-regularized models with a small finite local Hilbert space can serve as a starting point for quantum simulations of asymptotically free theories.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One extension the paper does not pursue is whether the same decoupled-fixed-point crossover exists in (2+1)- and (3+1)-dimensional non-Abelian gauge theories; if it does, it would change the practical route to quantum simulation of QCD.
  • The existence of two examples suggests the mechanism may be generic whenever a marginally relevant operator couples two decoupled critical theories, which could connect to known models of deconfined quantum criticality.
  • If the plateau interpretation is correct, the fXY model is a numerically superior lattice for extracting BKT universal data, since it reaches the UV value at L about 1000 while the traditional XY model does not at L about 2500; this could be exploited with classical Monte Carlo before quantum computers are available.
  • The MDTN basis may allow qubit-regularized gauge theories with exact Gauss's law and no sign problem, which would enable Monte Carlo studies of confinement-deconfinement transitions and possibly reveal new quantum critical points.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This proceedings contribution argues that asymptotically free quantum field theories can be recovered from qubit-regularized models with strictly finite-dimensional local Hilbert spaces through a novel renormalization-group flow in which the critical point is a decoupled fixed point and the universal UV physics appears as a crossover. The paper reviews two previously published examples, the Heisenberg comb for the 2D O(3) QFT and the fXY dimer model for the 2D O(2)/BKT QFT, and then proposes an orthonormal monomer-dimer-tensor-network (MDTN) basis for SU(N) lattice gauge theory. Using the anti-symmetric qubit regularization (ASQR) scheme in this basis, the paper reports a classical Monte Carlo study of confinement-deconfinement transitions on honeycomb and diamond lattices.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper is significant because it challenges the common assumption that asymptotic freedom requires an infinite-dimensional local Hilbert space and because it offers a concrete, sign-problem-free route toward quantum simulation of asymptotically free theories. The strengths of the manuscript are its use of non-perturbative step-scaling comparisons against external universal curves from Refs. [6,7] without fitting, the direct SSF collapse in the Heisenberg comb for J=3,5,10, and the conceptually useful MDTN construction for gauge theories. The manuscript is also transparent about the extrapolative nature of the fXY small-coupling evidence and about the fact that the new gauge-theory results are deferred to a companion paper [13]. The main weaknesses are the unverified crossover interpretation for the fXY model at small lambda and the non-self-contained nature of the gauge-theory results in Section 5.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3 / Fig. 6 caption] The fXY model, which is one of only two examples supporting the paper's central claim, is not directly verified at the couplings that matter most. The Fig. 6 caption states that for lambda=0.2 and 0.01, l_UV>1280 and predicts that the data will eventually fall on the solid SSF curve, and the text says that the approach of xi(L)/L to 0.7506912... is 'most likely' a crossover phenomenon. No data at L>1280 are shown, so the identification of the plateau as a crossover rather than as the signature of a different fixed point is an extrapolation. Because the abstract and conclusions present 'two examples' of the new RG flow, the evidence is currently stronger for the Heisenberg comb than for the fXY model; the authors should either provide corroborating large-L data or an alternative diagnostic (for example, helicity modulus scaling or a finite-size collapse of the full correlation-length distribution) and explicitly downgrade the fXY example to a predicted but unverified crossover.
  2. [Section 5 / Fig. 9] The gauge-theory results are not self-contained. Fig. 9 shows chi as a function of L without error bars, and the text does not provide the Monte Carlo estimator used beyond Eq. (9), the number of measurements, the lattice sizes, or a quantitative determination of the transition. In particular, the claim that the SU(2) transition is 'consistent with the 3D Ising transition' is not supported by any finite-size scaling fit or Binder cumulant, and the claim that the SU(3) transition is first order is not supported by a latent-heat or hysteresis diagnostic. All details are deferred to Ref. [13]. As it stands, the conclusion that 'even the simple ASQR scheme is able to capture the finite-temperature confinement-deconfinement physics' cannot be checked from this manuscript; the authors should either include the quantitative analysis or label these results as preliminary and correspondingly limit the conclusion.
  3. [Section 5 / Eq. (9) and H(E) definition] The paper describes 'new types of qubit-regularized lattice gauge theories' and mentions constructing 'new local Hamiltonians,' but the model actually analyzed is a classical Hamiltonian H(E)=sum_l (1-delta_{lambda_l,1}) with no plaquette or kinetic term, and no quantum Hamiltonian for the MDTN/ASQR theory is written. The confinement-deconfinement transition studied is therefore a classical statistical-mechanics transition in the MDTN basis, not yet the quantum gauge-theory dynamics that qubit regularization ultimately requires. The manuscript should explicitly distinguish the classical MDTN model from the quantum Hamiltonians promised in the introduction and state what additional terms are needed to reach the quantum case.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2 / Eq. (3)] In Section 2, the text attributes the four-dimensional Hilbert space H_Q = H_0 xor H_1 to 'Ref. [5]', but this construction belongs to the Heisenberg comb paper, Ref. [4]; the reference should be corrected.
  2. [Section 3 / Refs. [4,5]] The repeated use of 'Ref. [5]' for both the fXY model and the Heisenberg-comb Hilbert space creates confusion; the authors should renumber or clarify the citations so that each reference is used consistently.
  3. [Fig. 2 caption and Section 3 text] There are several typographical problems: the Fig. 2 caption contains garbled text ('i nt h i sp a p e ra n di n[ 30 ]'), Section 3 misspells 'Berezinskii' as 'Berezenski', and the reference title for [5] misspells 'Thouless' as 'Thoules'.
  4. [Section 4 / Eq. (10)] In Eq. (10), the truncation set Q is defined for link irreps, but the summation is written over [{epsilon_s},{epsilon_omega}] in Q; the text should clarify whether site irreps are also truncated or whether the constraint applies only to the link irreps as stated earlier.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular derivation: SSF comparisons are made against external universal curves, couplings are scanned rather than fitted, and the only weak point is an extrapolation for small lambda, which is an evidence gap rather than a circular reduction.

full rationale

This paper is a proceedings review that assembles two prior qubit-regularization examples and adds an MDTN/ASQR construction. I find no step in which a predicted quantity is equivalent to an input by construction. In Section 2, the step-scaling function of the Heisenberg comb is compared with the universal SSF of the 2D O(3) model computed non-perturbatively in Ref. [6], an external benchmark; the J values are scanned couplings, not fitted parameters, and the Monte Carlo data are not tuned to land on the solid curve. In Section 3, the fXY data are compared with the SSF obtained from the traditional XY model and with the known BKT value xi(L)/L = 0.7506912... from Ref. [7]; lambda is again a scanned coupling and the critical point is known independently, so the match is not produced by a fit. The statement for lambda=0.2 and 0.01 that data will eventually fall on the universal curve is explicitly described as requiring L > 1280, which is beyond the accessible lattice sizes; this is an extrapolation and an evidence gap, not a circular reduction. The MDTN/ASQR construction is a basis and Hamiltonian proposal, and the confinement-deconfinement data in Section 5 are Monte Carlo results displayed in the paper and detailed in the companion paper [13]. Self-citations are present, especially to Refs. [4], [5], and [13], but the load-bearing comparisons in Sections 2 and 3 are anchored to external universal data, and no equation in the paper is equivalent to its own input. The score of 1 reflects only the minor self-citation and extrapolation concerns; it does not represent detected circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The conceptual AF-crossover results introduce no fitted free parameters; lambda and J are scanned couplings. The gauge-theory construction introduces one hand-chosen truncation (ASQR) and several physics assumptions whose validity is not demonstrated in this manuscript. No new particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • ASQR link-irrep truncation Q = Q={1,2} for SU(2), Q={1,3,3bar} for SU(3)
    Chosen by hand to be the antisymmetric irreps; not fitted to data but a modeling choice that determines the theory.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Peter-Weyl theorem provides an orthonormal basis of the link Hilbert space as a direct sum over SU(N) irreps
    Used in Section 4 to define dimer-tensor basis states |D^lambda_ij>.
  • domain assumption The decoupled fixed point (lambda=0 or J=infinity) is critical and the coupling acts as a marginally relevant perturbation, producing three scales
    Assumed in Sections 2-3; supported by Monte Carlo data but not proven analytically.
  • domain assumption For lambda <= 0.2 in the fXY model, the observed approach to xi/L=0.7506912... is a crossover plateau, and data will eventually collapse onto the universal SSF at L >> Lmin
    Explicit extrapolation in Section 3, Fig. 6; not directly observed.
  • ad hoc to paper The ASQR truncation to antisymmetric link irreps preserves the universal confinement-deconfinement physics of the full SU(N) gauge theory
    Assumed in Sections 4-5; no convergence study in this paper.
  • domain assumption Finite-temperature deconfinement transitions of SU(N) gauge theories follow Z_N spin model universality and can be captured by the classical Hamiltonian H(E)
    Standard Svetitsky-Yaffe result cited as [15]; used in Section 5.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Qubit Regularization of Quantum Field Theories." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QGIJKZ6J

@misc{pith2026250205716,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Qubit Regularization of Quantum Field Theories},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QGIJKZ6J}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.05716}
}
read the original abstract

To study quantum field theories on a quantum computer, we must begin with Hamiltonians defined on a finite-dimensional Hilbert space and then take appropriate limits. This approach can be seen as a new type of regularization for quantum field theories, which we refer to as qubit regularization. A related finite-dimensional regularization, known as the D-theory approach, was proposed long ago as a general framework for all quantum field theories. In this framework, the dimensionality of the local Hilbert space at each spatial point can increase as needed through an additional flavor index. To reproduce asymptotically free QFTs, most studies assume that qubit-regularized theories require extending the local Hilbert space to infinity. However, contrary to this common belief, recent discoveries in (1+1) dimensions have revealed two examples where asymptotic freedom appears to emerge within a strictly finite-dimensional local Hilbert space through a novel renormalization group (RG) flow. These findings motivate further investigation into whether asymptotically free gauge theories could also emerge within a strictly finite-dimensional local Hilbert space. To support these explorations, we propose an orthonormal basis called the monomer-dimer-tensor-network (MDTN) basis and use it to construct new types of qubit-regularized lattice gauge theories.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.05716 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Traditional RG flow in the space of lattice models for an asymptotically free QFT with a Gaussian UV fixed point (FP). It is straightforward to construct lattice models that flow to the Gaussian FP, if the local Hilbert space is allowed to be infinite-dimensional. However, this becomes challenging with qubit regularization. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. An illustration of the RG flow of the qubit regularized : This figure illustrates an alternative RG flow, discovered at the critical points of two q ed field theoriesdemonstrating how asymptotically free QFTs with a UV fixed point (FP [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The SSF of the 2D 𝑂(3) QFT. The solid black line represents the results obtained in Ref. [6] using the traditional lattice formulation, while the data points correspond to the Heisenberg comb Hamiltonian described in eq. (3). For each fixed value of 𝐽, the data for 𝐿 > 𝐿min begins to align with the universal SSF, and 𝐿min increases with 𝐽, allowing us to access more of the SSF in the UV regime. This figure was origi… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The plot of 𝜉 (𝐿)/𝐿 as a function of 𝐿 in the traditional XY model (referred to as bXY in the figure) as compared to the qubit regularized model (referred to as the fXY in the figure). Note that 𝜉 (𝐿)/𝐿 does not reach the value of 0.7506... expected in the traditional …
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The left figure shows an illustration of a self-avoiding oriented loop configuration. There are also Fock-vacuum sites, FIG. 3. The left figure shows an illustration of a self-avoiding oriented loop configuration. There are also Fock-vacuum sites [PITH_FULL_IM…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Plot of the universal step-scaling function obtained from the bXY model (solid line) and the data from the dimers that connect the two layers. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. A pictorial representation of basis states in the sub [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Illustration of a dimer, similar to Fig. FIG. 4. Illustration of a dimer, similar to Fig. jtibltHQfSU(3) 32it SU(3) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Plot of 𝜒 as a function of the lattice size 𝐿, showing the confinement-deconfinement transition as a function of 𝛽 on the diamond lattice (𝑑 = 3) in qubit-regularized lattice gauge theory within the ASQR scheme. The left plot shows results for the 𝑆𝑈(2) gauge theory, w…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Topological Regularization

    physics.gen-ph 2025-07 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    The paper argues that ultraviolet divergences are topological boundary artifacts and that homotopy-equivalent regularizations give identical physics, but the key proof is incomplete and internally inconsistent.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

16 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [13]

    Chandrasekharan, R.X

    S. Chandrasekharan, R.X. Siew, T. Bhattacharya,Monomer-dimer tensor-network basis for qubit regularized gauge theories, [2502.14175]

    arXiv

  2. [1]

    C. W. Bauer, Z. Davoudi, N. Klco, and M. J. Savage,Quantum simulation of fundamental particles and forces, Nature Rev. Phys.5(2023) 420 [2404.06298]

    arXiv 2023

  3. [2]

    A. D. Meglio, K. Jansen, I. Tavernelli, C. Alexandrou, S. Arunachalam, et al.,Quantum Computing for High-Energy Physics: State of the Art and Challenges, PRX Quantum 5 (2024) 037001 [2307.03236]

    arXiv 2024

  4. [3]

    D-Theory: Field Quantization by Dimensional Reduction of Discrete Variables

    R. Brower, S. Chandrasekharan, S. Riederer, and U. J. Wiese, D theory: Field quan- tization by dimensional reduction of discrete variables, Nucl. Phys. B 693 (2004) 149 [hep-lat/0309182]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2004

  5. [4]

    Bhattacharya, A.J.Buser, S.Chandrasekharan, R.Gupta, andH.Singh, Qubitregulariza- tion of asymptotic freedom, Phys

    T. Bhattacharya, A.J.Buser, S.Chandrasekharan, R.Gupta, andH.Singh, Qubitregulariza- tion of asymptotic freedom, Phys. Rev. Lett.126 (2021) 172001 [2012.02153]

    work page arXiv 2021

  6. [5]

    Asymptotic Freedom at the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless Transition without Fine-Tuning Using a Qubit Regularization

    S. Maiti, D. Banerjee, S. Chandrasekharan, and M. K. Marinkovic,Asymptotic freedom at theBerezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thoulesstransitionwithoutfine-tuningusingaqubitregularization , Phys. Rev. Lett.132 (2024) 041601 [2307.06117]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  7. [6]

    Asymptotic Scaling in the Two-Dimensional $O(3)$ $\sigma$-Model at Correlation Length $10^5$

    S. Caracciolo, R. G. Edwards, A. Pelissetto, A. D. Sokal,Asymptotic scaling in the two- dimensional 𝑂(3) sigma model at correlation length105, Phys. Rev. Lett.75 (1995) 1891 [hep-lat/9411009]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1995

  8. [7]

    Hasenbusch, The Two dimensional XY model at the transition temperature: A High precision Monte Carlo study, J

    M. Hasenbusch, The Two dimensional XY model at the transition temperature: A High precision Monte Carlo study, J. Phys. A38(2005) 5869 [cond-mat/0502556]

    arXiv 2005

Show all 16 references
  1. [8]

    Chandrasekharan and U

    S. Chandrasekharan and U. J. Wiese,Quantum link models: A discrete approach to gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B492 (1997) 455 [hep-lat/9609042]

    1997 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Brower, S

    R. Brower, S. Chandrasekharan, and U. J. Wiese,QCD as a quantum link model, Phys. Rev. D 60(1999) 094502 [hep-th/9704106]

    1999 arXiv

  3. [10]

    D 108 (2023) 094513 [2307.05593]

    A.N.Ciavarella, QuantumsimulationoflatticeQCDwithimprovedHamiltonians ,Phys.Rev. D 108 (2023) 094513 [2307.05593]

    2023 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Alexandru, P

    A. Alexandru, P. F. Bedaque, A. Carosso, M. J. Cervia, E. M. Murairi, and A. Sheng,Fuzzy gauge theory for quantum computers, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 094502 [2308.05253]

    2024 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Liu and S

    H. Liu and S. Chandrasekharan,Qubit regularization and qubit embedding algebras, Sym- metry 14(2022) 305 [2112.02090]

    2022 arXiv

  6. [14]

    J.B.KogutandL.Susskind, HamiltonianformulationofWilson’slatticegaugetheories ,Phys. Rev. D11 (1975) 395. 15 Qubit Regularization of Quantum Field Theories Shailesh Chandrasekharan

    1975

  7. [15]

    Svetitsky and L

    B. Svetitsky and L. G. Yaffe,Critical behavior at finite temperature confinement transitions, Nucl. Phys. B210(1982) 423

    1982

  8. [16]

    D.H.AdamsandS.Chandrasekharan, Chirallimitofstronglycoupledlatticegaugetheories , Nucl. Phys. B662(2003) 220 [hep-lat/0303003]. 16

    2003 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.