Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Strain-engineering spin-valley locking effect in altermagnetic monolayer with multipiezo properties

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read By choosing the direction and sign of applied strain, a single predicted monolayer of Janus Nb2SeTeO can be switched between an anomalous valley Hall phase, a quantum anomalous Hall insulator, and a quantum spin Hall phase.

desk verdict Plausible DFT prediction of strain-tunable topological phases in an altermagnetic monolayer, but the phase diagram rests on a zero-strain-fitted Hubbard U and the 'QSHE' label is loose. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.05597 v1 pith:QHI6XZT4 submitted 2024-12-07 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Yuqian Jiang , Xinge Zhang , Haoyue Bai , Yuping Tian , Wei-Jiang Gong , Xiangru Kong This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords altermagnetismJanusmonolayerNb2SeTeOspin-valleylockingpiezovalleyeffectquantumanomalousHallspinstrainengineering
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper predicts that monolayer Janus Nb2SeTeO—a stable altermagnet—can be switched among three topological behaviors purely by mechanical strain. Tensile uniaxial strain splits the degenerate X and Y valleys, giving rise to a large valley polarization and an anomalous valley Hall effect. Compressive uniaxial strain inverts the bands in only one spin channel, producing a quantum anomalous Hall insulator whose chiral edge currents flow in opposite directions depending on whether the strain is applied along the a or b axis. Compressive biaxial strain inverts the bands in both spin channels at once, producing a quantum spin Hall phase with quantized spin Hall conductance carried by two opposite-chirality edge states. If correct, the material would allow reversible strain-controlled switching of dissipationless edge currents and valley polarization in a single two-dimensional layer.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is the C-paired spin-valley locking effect: in the altermagnet, crystal symmetry pairs opposite spins with opposite valleys, so the X and Y valleys carry different spin channels without requiring spin-orbit coupling. Uniaxial strain breaks the equivalence of the a and b directions, so the two valleys respond differently: one conduction valley moves up and the other down, creating valley polarization (the piezovalley effect) and unbalanced Berry curvature. At stronger compression the same valley shifts drive a band inversion in one spin channel under uniaxial strain, and in both spin channels under biaxial strain. The topological character is read out from Wannier charge center evolution and from the distribution of Berry curvature in the Brillouin zone.

What would settle it

Recompute the strained band structures with a different functional, such as the hybrid functional used to calibrate the unstrained gap, at the claimed transition strains (-1.2% uniaxial, -5.8% uniaxial, -1.2% biaxial) and check whether the band inversions and Chern numbers +1/-1 survive; alternatively, measure the transverse conductance of an exfoliated Nb2SeTeO monolayer under controlled uniaxial and biaxial strain and look for the predicted strain-direction reversal of the Hall signal.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the altermagnetic monolayer Janus Nb2SeTeO hosts a crystal-symmetry-paired spin-valley locking effect, and that this effect makes the topological phase a function of strain direction and sign. Without strain, the X and Y valleys are degenerate but carry opposite spins. Tensile uniaxial strain along the a or b axis lifts the valley degeneracy monotonically, producing unbalanced Berry curvature and the anomalous valley Hall effect. Compressive uniaxial strain between about -1.2% and -5.8% induces a band inversion at the X valley (for strain along a) or the Y valley (for strain along b) in a single spin channel, giving Chern number -1 or +1 and edge states whose chirality is chosen by the strain direction. Compressive biaxial strain of about -1.2% closes and reopens the gap at both valleys simultaneously, yielding two chiral edge states with opposite Chern numbers and a quantized spin Hall conductance, which the authors call AM-QSHE. The monolayer is also reported to have a large out-of-plane piezoelectric coefficient and a Néel temperature near 200 K.

Load-bearing premise

The whole phase diagram depends on one density-functional approximation (a single +U value, 4.6 eV, matched to the unstrained gap) being correct for the strained valley ordering; if the approximation misplaces the X and Y valley states under strain, none of the three topological phases would occur.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The predicted stability (phonon spectrum without imaginary modes and Born-Huang-valid elastic constants) makes Nb2SeTeO a concrete experimental target for strain-controlled topological devices.
  • Tensile strain gives a tunable valley polarization, so the same monolayer could act as a mechanically adjustable valley filter or valley Hall source.
  • Compressive uniaxial strain in the range -1.2% to -5.8% creates dissipationless chiral edge states whose flow direction is reversed simply by switching the strain from the a axis to the b axis.
  • Compressive biaxial strain produces a time-reversal-broken quantum spin Hall phase, i.e., a quantized spin Hall conductance formed by two opposite-chirality edge channels rather than helical edge states.
  • A single material, without doping or magnetic-field switching, could host all three regimes (valley Hall, anomalous Hall, spin Hall) depending only on its elastic state.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct experimental test is to exfoliate or grow Nb2SeTeO on a flexible substrate and measure the transverse conductance under bending: the prediction is a sign reversal of the anomalous Hall effect when compression is switched from one in-plane axis to the other.
  • The same valley-selective band-inversion recipe could be searched computationally in other altermagnetic square-lattice monolayers, especially the V2SeXO family, to find materials with larger strain windows or higher Néel temperatures.
  • Because the edge-state chirality is set by the strain orientation rather than by a magnetic field, the phase transition offers a mechanical 'write' mechanism for chiral edge channels, potentially usable in reconfigurable topological circuits.
  • The biaxial AM-QSHE, being time-reversal-broken yet spin-Hall-quantized, suggests that 'spin Hall' order can arise without helical edge states; checking whether the spin Hall conductance remains quantized with disorder would test whether this is a true bulk topological invariant.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript predicts, from first-principles DFT calculations, that monolayer Janus Nb2SeTeO is a stable altermagnet exhibiting spin-valley locking, and that strain engineering drives it through three topological phases: tensile uniaxial strain produces an anomalous valley Hall effect, compressive uniaxial strain produces a quantum anomalous Hall insulator whose chiral edge-state direction is controlled by the strain axis, and compressive biaxial strain produces a 'quantum spin Hall' phase with quantized spin Hall conductivity. The topological character is supported by Berry curvature, Wannier charge center evolution, and edge-state calculations.

Significance. If the predictions are correct, the paper identifies a single material in which dissipationless edge states and valley polarization can be switched by elastic strain, which is of interest for spintronics and valleytronics. The paper uses standard first-principles workflows (PBE+U, phonon and elastic stability checks, WannierTools), and the topological invariant calculations are internally consistent. The main caveats are the reliance on a single Hubbard U value calibrated at zero strain and the nonstandard definition of quantum spin Hall effect in a time-reversal-symmetry-broken system.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. II and Figs. 3-4] The entire strain-driven phase diagram is computed with PBE+U using U = 4.6 eV, a value chosen in Sec. II to reproduce the HSE06 band gap of the unstrained structure only. The band inversions that define the QAHE and QSHE phases occur at small energy scales (tens of meV) and involve the relative ordering of Nb-d-derived valley states at X and Y, which is exactly the quantity most sensitive to the exchange-correlation functional. The paper does not provide HSE06 calculations at any strained structure, nor does it report a U-sensitivity analysis. This missing validation leaves open the possibility that the predicted AVHE/QAHE/QSHE phase windows are artifacts of the U choice. The authors should recompute the phase boundaries with HSE06 at the critical strains, or at least show that the phase diagram is stable over a reasonable range of U values.
  2. [Sec. III (biaxial strain, Fig. 4)] The claim of a quantum spin Hall effect in this time-reversal-symmetry-broken altermagnet rests on the observation of two chiral edge states with opposite Chern numbers and a 'nearly quantized' spin Hall conductivity. In a system with spin-orbit coupling, spin is not a conserved quantum number, and the spin current operator is not uniquely defined; therefore the quantization of the SHC requires a topological invariant (e.g., spin Chern number) rather than a numerical value at a single strain. The authors should clarify whether the SHC is exactly quantized, how it depends on the choice of spin projection axis and on disorder, and why the absence of helical edge states still justifies the label 'quantum spin Hall effect'. Absent this justification, the AM-QSHE phase is a phenomenological observation rather than a demonstrated topological phase.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eqs. (2) and (3)] The Brillouin-zone integrals are written with a d^3k measure, but the system is a 2D monolayer; the measure should be d^2k.
  2. [Fig. 1(c) caption] The phrase 'spin-dw' should read 'spin-down'.
  3. [Abstract and Sec. III] The word 'mutipizeo' should be 'multipiezo', and 'consistents' in Sec. III should be 'consists'.
  4. [Fig. 3(f) caption] The phrase 'for for' is a duplicated word and should be corrected.
  5. [Sec. II] The sentence 'To be consistent with the band gap calculated by HSE06 hybrid functional, The PBE+U method is used...' has a comma splice and inconsistent capitalization; please rephrase.
  6. [Sec. III (piezoelectricity)] The paper claims a 'multipiezo effect' but reports only the out-of-plane e31 component; it would be helpful to state the other independent components or explicitly refer to the supplementary material for completeness.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Minor self-consistency in U=4.6 eV calibration; central strain-driven phase diagram is an independent calculation, not circular.

  1. self definitional [Sec. II (Computational Methods); Sec. III Results, first paragraph.]
    "To be consistent with the band gap calculated by HSE06 hybrid functional, The PBE+U method is used to test different U values for the d orbitals in Nb atoms. U is chosen as 4.6 eV ... The electronic band structure calculated by HSE06 in Fig.S1(c) demonstrate that the band gap is about 96 meV, which is consistent with that by PBE+U calculations without SOC as shown in Fig. 1(c)."

    U=4.6 eV is selected specifically to reproduce the HSE06 band gap, so the later assertion that the PBE+U and HSE06 gaps are consistent is an identity enforced by the fit rather than an independent confirmation. This is a genuine but minor self-consistency: it validates the functional choice, not a new result. The topological phase diagram under strain (band inversions at -1.2%, metallic limits at -5.8% and 10.2%, Berry curvature distributions, WCC evolutions, Chern numbers, and quantized SHC) is not a target of the U fit; those boundaries are outputs of the subsequent calculation, so the central AVHE/QAHE/QSHE predictions do not reduce to the calibration input.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is largely self-contained. The magnetic ground state, piezoelectric coefficients, valley polarizations, Berry curvatures, Wannier charge center evolutions, Chern numbers, edge states, and spin Hall conductances are all computed from first-principles DFT/Wannier calculations, with no analytic result being defined in terms of the quantity it is said to predict. The strain-dependent phase boundaries (compressive uniaxial -1.2% to -5.8%, compressive biaxial around -1.2%, and the metallic onset at 10.2%) are emergent outputs, not fitted targets. The only identifiable reduction is the PBE+U/HSE06 band-gap agreement, which holds by construction because U=4.6 eV was chosen to match that gap; this is a calibration check, not a load-bearing prediction. The one self-citation ([53], quantum layer spin Hall effect) is used as a comparative analogy for the AM-QSHE characterization, while the QSHE evidence (quantized SHC, WCC continuity, two opposite chiral edge states) is computed independently in this paper. No uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work to force the choice of strain phase. The robustness of the U choice under strain is a legitimate correctness concern but does not constitute circularity, since the phase diagram is not equivalent to the input by construction. Overall circularity is minor and confined to the functional-calibration sentence.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central prediction rests on one fitted parameter (Hubbard U = 4.6 eV), on the domain assumption that PBE+U captures the strained band ordering, and on the ad hoc interpretation of the biaxial phase as a quantum spin Hall effect. The proposed Nb2SeTeO monolayer is an invented material with no experimental evidence; the topological invariants themselves are computed rather than fitted, which keeps the circularity burden low.

free parameters (1)
  • Hubbard U for Nb d orbitals = 4.6 eV
    U is chosen in Sec. II to make the PBE+U band gap consistent with the HSE06 band gap (about 96 meV). The entire strain phase diagram, including the band inversions at -1.2% and +1.2% strain, is computed with this fixed value and no U-sensitivity analysis is shown.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Kohn-Sham DFT with PBE+U at U = 4.6 eV accurately describes the band ordering and spin splitting in Nb2SeTeO
    Invoked in Sec. II and III to establish the altermagnetic ground state and the band inversions under strain; no hybrid-functional or many-body cross-check is performed at the strained structures.
  • domain assumption The calculated magnetic ground state (AM) and exchange parameters are robust to the choice of exchange-correlation functional
    Sec. III uses PBE+U energy differences among four magnetic patterns (AM is 2.03 eV below FM) and a Monte Carlo Néel temperature around 200 K; these results depend on the functional and U.
  • standard math Wannier interpolation via Wannier90 preserves the DFT band topology and Berry curvature
    Sec. II uses Wannier90 and WannierTools to compute WCC evolution and edge states; this assumes the Wannierization is smooth and converged.
  • ad hoc to paper A quantized SHC and two opposite-Chern chiral edge states constitute a well-defined quantum spin Hall effect in a time-reversal-symmetry-broken altermagnet
    Sec. III interprets the 1.2% biaxial strain phase as AM-QSHE based on nearly quantized SHC and edge states; unlike TRS-protected QSHE, this requires spin conservation and spatial separation of edge channels, which is not rigorously established.
invented entities (1)
  • Monolayer Janus Nb2SeTeO
    purpose: Proposed altermagnetic host for C-paired spin-valley locking, multipiezo effect, and strain-tunable AVHE, QAHE, and QSHE.
    No experimental synthesis is reported; the paper provides only DFT-based predictions (lattice constant, stability, electronic structure) plus phonon stability, so the existence of this material is not yet independently confirmed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Strain-engineering spin-valley locking effect in altermagnetic monolayer with multipiezo properties." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QHI6XZT4

@misc{pith2026241205597,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Strain-engineering spin-valley locking effect in altermagnetic monolayer with multipiezo properties},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QHI6XZT4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.05597}
}
read the original abstract

Recently, altermagnetism (AM) in condensed matter systems has attracted much attention due to the physical properties arising from the alternating spins in both real space and reciprocal space. In our work, we propose a stable monolayer Janus Nb2SeTeO with altermagnetic ground state and a new type of spin-valley locking (SVL) effect. The monolayer Janus Nb2SeTeO exhibits a mutipizeo effect with a large out-of-plane piezoelectricity and piezovalley effect with large valley polarization. The piezovalley effect is induced by the uniaxial strain effect in different directions, which contributes the anomalous valley Hall effect (AVHE) in the AM system. Moreover, the compressive uniaxial strain could induce the quantum anomalous Hall effect (QAHE) in the AM system, where the chirality of the dissipationless topological edge states could be manipulated by the direction of uniaxial strain. These manifest topological phase transitions could be realized via the piezovalley effect in the AM system. Furthermore, the AM quantum spin Hall effect (QSHE) could be induced by the biaxial strain effect, which contributes the quantized spin Hall conductance. Our work reveals that strain-engineering technique could provide as an important method to tune the dissipationless edge states in monolayer Janus Nb2SeTeO. By designing the SVL effect could emerge new physics in AM systems, such as AVHE, QAHE and QSHE.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.05597 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) The top view of the monolayer Janus structure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) The spin-polarized band structures under uniaxial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The topological phase transitions induced by compressive uniaxial strain. The band inversions around (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The topological phase transitions and topological properties induced by biaxial strain. (a) The band inversions appear [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Elasto-Hall conductivity and the anomalous Hall effect in altermagnets

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-02 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Strain distorts the Berry curvature quadrupole of an altermagnet into a net monopole, producing an anomalous Hall effect linear in the electric field.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    L. Bai, W. Feng, S. Liu, L. Å mejkal, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Altermagnetism: Exploring new frontiers in magnetism and spintronics, Advanced Functional Mate- rials 10.1002/adfm.202409327 (2024)

    doi:10.1002/adfm.202409327 2024

  2. [2]

    L.Åmejkal, J.Sinova,andT.Jungwirth,Beyondconven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symme- try, Physical Review X12, 10.1103/physrevx.12.031042 (2022)

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.12.031042 2022

  3. [3]

    Cheong and F.-T

    S.-W. Cheong and F.-T. Huang, Altermagnetism with non-collinear spins, npj Quantum Materials 9, 10.1038/s41535-024-00626-6 (2024)

    doi:10.1038/s41535-024-00626-6 2024

  4. [4]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  5. [5]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  6. [6]

    Mazin (The PRX Editors), Editorial: Altermagnetism—a new punch line of fundamental magnetism, Phys

    I. Mazin (The PRX Editors), Editorial: Altermagnetism—a new punch line of fundamental magnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040002 (2022)

    2022

  7. [7]

    Å mejkal, R

    L. Šmejkal, R. González-Hernández, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Science Advances6, 10.1126/sciadv.aaz8809 (2020)

    doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaz8809 2020

  8. [8]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum- dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 88, 10.7566/jpsj.88.123702 (2019)

    doi:10.7566/jpsj.88.123702 2019

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-z antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 102, 014422 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    Å mejkal, Prediction of un- conventional magnetism in doped fesb 2, Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, 10.1073/pnas.2108924118 (2021)

    I.I.Mazin, K.Koepernik, M.D.Johannes, R.González- Hernández, and L. Šmejkal, Prediction of un- conventional magnetism in doped fesb 2, Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, 10.1073/pnas.2108924118 (2021)

    2021 doi

  3. [11]

    R. M. Fernandes, V. S. de Carvalho, T. Birol, and R. G. Pereira, Topological transition from nodal to nodeless zeeman splitting in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 109, 024404 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    Y.-X. Li, Y. Liu, and C.-C. Liu, Creation and manipu- lation of higher-order topological states by altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B109, L201109 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    Parshukov, R

    K. Parshukov, R. Wiedmann, and A. P. Schnyder, Topo- logical responses from gapped weyl points in 2d alter- magnets (2024), arXiv:2403.09520 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Y.-X. Li, Y. Liu, and C.-C. Liu, Creation and manipula- tion of higher-order topological states by altermagnets, Physical Review B 109, 10.1103/physrevb.109.l201109 (2024)

    2024 doi

  7. [15]

    Wu, Y.-l

    B. Wu, Y.-l. Song, W.-x. Ji, P.-j. Wang, S.-f. Zhang, and C.-w. Zhang, Quantum anomalous hall effect in an anti- ferromagnetic monolayer of moo, Physical Review B107, 10.1103/physrevb.107.214419 (2023)

    2023 doi

  8. [16]

    C. Luo, Z. Huang, H. Qiao, X. Qi, and X. Peng, Val- leytronics in two-dimensional magnetic materials, Jour- nal of Physics: Materials7, 022006 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    J. R. Schaibley, H. Yu, G. Clark, P. Rivera, J. S. Ross, K. L. Seyler, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Valleytronics in 2d materials, Nature Reviews Materials 1, 10.1038/na- trevmats.2016.55 (2016)

    2016 doi

  10. [18]

    Rycerz, A.and Tworzydo and C

    J. Rycerz, A.and Tworzydo and C. W. J. Beenakker, Val- ley filter and valley valve in graphene, Nature Physics3, 172 (2007)

    2007

  11. [19]

    D. Xiao, W. Yao, and Q. Niu, Valley-contrasting physics in graphene: Magnetic moment and topological trans- port, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 236809 (2007)

    2007

  12. [20]

    Xiao, G.-B

    D. Xiao, G.-B. Liu, W. Feng, X. Xu, and W. Yao, Cou- pled spin and valley physics in monolayers ofmos2 and other group-vi dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 196802 (2012)

    2012

  13. [21]

    J. Y. Liu, J. Yu, J. L. Ning, H. M. Yi, L. Miao, L. J. Min, Y. F. Zhao, W. Ning, K. A. Lopez, Y. L. Zhu, T. Pillsbury, Y. B. Zhang, Y. Wang, J. Hu, H. B. Cao, B.C.Chakoumakos, F.Balakirev, F.Weickert, M.Jaime, Y. Lai, K. Yang, J. W. Sun, N. Alem, V. Gopalan, C. Z. Chang, N. Sa...

    2021 doi

  14. [22]

    H.-Y. Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezomagnetism and noncollinear spin current, Nature Communications 12, 10.1038/s41467-021-23127- 7 (2021)

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    W. Zhu, Y. Long, H. Chen, and J. Ren, Quantum valley hall effects and spin-valley locking in topologi- cal kane-mele circuit networks, Physical Review B 99, 10.1103/physrevb.99.115410 (2019)

    2019 doi

  16. [24]

    T. Dvir, A. Zalic, E. H. Fyhn, M. Amundsen, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Linder, and H. Steinberg, Planar graphene-nbse2 josephson junctions in a parallel magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B103, 115401 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    Y. Wang, L. Deng, Q. Wei, Y. Wan, Z. Liu, X. Lu, Y. Li, L. Bi, L. Zhang, H. Lu, H. Chen, P. Zhou, L. Zhang, Y. Cheng, X. Zhao, Y. Ye, W. Huang, S. J. Pennycook, K. P. Loh, and B. Peng, Spin-valley locking effect in de- fect states of monolayer mos2, Nano Letters 20, 2129 (2020)

    2020

  18. [26]

    Duprez, S

    H. Duprez, S. Cances, A. Omahen, M. Masseroni, M. J. Ruckriegel, C. Adam, C. Tong, R. Garreis, J. D. Ger- ber, W. Huang, L. Gächter, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, T. Ihn, and K. Ensslin, Spin-valley locked excited states spectroscoy in a one-particle bilayer graphene quantum dot,...

    2024 doi

  19. [27]

    Zhang, X

    F. Zhang, X. Cheng, Z. Yin, C. Liu, L. Deng, Y. Qiao, Z. Shi, S. Zhang, J. Lin, Z. Liu, M. Ye, Y. Huang, X. Meng, C. Zhang, T. Okuda, K. Shi- mada, S. Cui, Y. Zhao, G.-H. Cao, S. Qiao, J. Liu, and C. Chen, Crystal-symmetry-paired spin-valley locking in a layered room-temperatu...

    2024

  20. [28]

    Y. Wang, W. Wei, F. Li, X. Lv, B. Huang, and Y. Dai, Valley polarization caused by crystalline sym- metry breaking, Materials Horizons8, 244 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    H. Lin, J. Si, X. Zhu, K. Cai, H. Li, L. Kong, X. Yu, and H.-H. Wen, Structure and physical properties of csv2se2−xO and v2se2O, Phys. Rev. B98, 075132 (2018)

    2018

  22. [30]

    Y. Zhu, T. Chen, Y. Li, L. Qiao, X. Ma, C. Liu, T. Hu, H. Gao, and W. Ren, Multipiezo effect in altermagnetic v2seteo monolayer, Nano Letters24, 472 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Hohenberg and W

    P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Inhomogeneous electron gas, Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964)

    1964

  24. [32]

    Kohn and L

    W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Self-consistent equations in- cluding exchange and correlation effects, Phys. Rev.140, A1133 (1965)

    1965

  25. [33]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  26. [34]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Computational Materials Science 6, 15 (1996)

    1996

  27. [35]

    J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G. I. Csonka, O. A. Vydrov, G. E. Scuseria, L. A. Constantin, X. Zhou, and K. Burke, Restoring the density-gradient expansion for exchange in solids and surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 136406 (2008)

    2008

  28. [36]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  29. [37]

    J. Heyd, G. E. Scuseria, and M. Ernzerhof, Hybrid func- tionals based on a screened coulomb potential, The Jour- nal of Chemical Physics118, 8207 (2003)

    2003

  30. [38]

    A. I. Liechtenstein, V. I. Anisimov, and J. Zaanen, Density-functional theory and strong interactions: Or- bital ordering in mott-hubbard insulators, Phys. Rev. B 52, R5467 (1995)

    1995

  31. [39]

    S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y. Savrasov, C. J. Humphreys, and A. P. Sutton, Electron-energy-loss spec- traandthestructuralstabilityofnickeloxide: Anlsda+u study, Phys. Rev. B57, 1505 (1998)

    1998

  32. [40]

    H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, Special points for brillouin-zoneintegrations,Phys.Rev.B 13,5188(1976)

    1976

  33. [41]

    Togo and I

    A. Togo and I. Tanaka, First principles phonon calcu- lations in materials science, Scripta Materialia 108, 1 (2015)

    2015

  34. [42]

    L. Liu, X. Ren, J. Xie, B. Cheng, W. Liu, T. An, H. Qin, and J. Hu, Magnetic switches via electric field in bn nanoribbons, Applied Surface Science480, 300 (2019)

    2019

  35. [43]

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, G. Pizzi, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Vanderbilt, and N. Marzari, An updated version of wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally-localised wannier functions, Computer Physics Communications 185, 2309 (2014)

    2014

  36. [44]

    Q. Wu, S. Zhang, H.-F. Song, M. Troyer, and A. A. Soluyanov, Wanniertools: An open-source software pack- age for novel topological materials, Computer Physics Communications 224, 405 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    L. Dong, J. Lou, and V. B. Shenoy, Large in-plane and vertical piezoelectricity in janus transition metal dichal- chogenides, ACS Nano11, 8242 (2017)

    2017

  38. [46]

    Tong, S.-J

    W.-Y. Tong, S.-J. Gong, X. Wan, and C.-G. Duan, Con- cepts of ferrovalley material and anomalous valley hall effect, Nature Communications7, 10.1038/ncomms13612 (2016)

    2016 doi

  39. [47]

    Hu, W.-Y

    H. Hu, W.-Y. Tong, Y.-H. Shen, X. Wan, and C.-G. Duan, Concepts of the half-valley-metal and quantum anomalous valley hall effect, npj Computational Mate- rials 6, 10.1038/s41524-020-00397-1 (2020)

    2020 doi

  40. [48]

    K.Sheng, B.Zhang, H.-K.Yuan,andZ.-Y.Wang,Strain- engineered topological phase transitions in ferrovalley 2h−rucl2 monolayer, Phys. Rev. B105, 195312 (2022)

    2022

  41. [49]

    S. Ji, R. Yao, C. Quan, J. Yang, F. Caruso, and X. Li, Anomalous valley hall effect induced by mirror symmetry breaking in transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B 107, 174434 (2023)

    2023

  42. [50]

    W. Du, R. Peng, Z. He, Y. Dai, B. Huang, and Y. Ma, Anomalous valley hall effect in antiferromag- netic monolayers, npj 2D Materials and Applications6, 10.1038/s41699-022-00289-6 (2022)

    2022 doi

  43. [51]

    Chang, J

    C.-Z. Chang, J. Zhang, X. Feng, J. Shen, Z. Zhang, M. Guo, K. Li, Y. Ou, P. Wei, L.-L. Wang, Z.-Q. Ji, Y. Feng, S. Ji, X. Chen, J. Jia, X. Dai, Z. Fang, S.-C. Zhang, K. He, Y. Wang, L. Lu, X.-C. Ma, and Q.-K. Xue, Experimental observation of the quantum anomalous hall effect i...

    2013

  44. [52]

    Y. Deng, Y. Yu, M. Z. Shi, Z. Guo, Z. Xu, J. Wang, X. H. Chen, and Y. Zhang, Quantum anomalous hall effect in intrinsic magnetic topological insulator mnbi 2 te 4, Science367, 895 (2020)

    2020

  45. [53]

    Tian, C.-B

    Y. Tian, C.-B. Wang, B.-Y. Zhang, X. Kong, and W.-J. Gong, Quantum layer spin hall effect in sliding antiferro- magnetic bilayers, Journal of Materials Chemistry C12, 10950 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.