Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Detecting Phishing Sites Using ChatGPT

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.05816 v3 pith:QKAPCUX6 submitted 2023-06-09 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords llmsphishingsitessystemdetectionresultsbeenchatgpt
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs), including ChatGPT, is having a significant impact on a wide range of fields. While LLMs have been extensively researched for tasks such as code generation and text synthesis, their application in detecting malicious web content, particularly phishing sites, has been largely unexplored. To combat the rising tide of cyber attacks due to the misuse of LLMs, it is important to automate detection by leveraging the advanced capabilities of LLMs. In this paper, we propose a novel system called ChatPhishDetector that utilizes LLMs to detect phishing sites. Our system involves leveraging a web crawler to gather information from websites, generating prompts for LLMs based on the crawled data, and then retrieving the detection results from the responses generated by the LLMs. The system enables us to detect multilingual phishing sites with high accuracy by identifying impersonated brands and social engineering techniques in the context of the entire website, without the need to train machine learning models. To evaluate the performance of our system, we conducted experiments on our own dataset and compared it with baseline systems and several LLMs. The experimental results using GPT-4V demonstrated outstanding performance, with a precision of 98.7% and a recall of 99.6%, outperforming the detection results of other LLMs and existing systems. These findings highlight the potential of LLMs for protecting users from online fraudulent activities and have important implications for enhancing cybersecurity measures.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evaluating Large Language Models' Capability to Launch Fully Automated Spear Phishing Campaigns: Validated on Human Subjects

    cs.CR 2024-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Fully automated AI spear phishing achieved a 54% click-through rate on 101 human participants, matching human experts and far exceeding a 12% control rate.

  2. "Explain, Don't Just Warn!" -- A Real-Time Framework for Generating Phishing Warnings with Contextual Cues

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PhishXplain uses a local LLM to generate real-time phishing warnings with annotated screenshots and contextual explanations, and a user study found these warnings improved later phishing detection.

  3. Phishing Webpage Detection: Unveiling the Threat Landscape and Investigating Detection Techniques

    cs.CR 2025-09 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey categorizing phishing webpage detection into URL, content, and visual approaches, with an analysis of research gaps and suggested directions.

Pith tools