Neutrino energy and momentum emission from magnetized dense quark matter

Igor A. Shovkovy; Ritesh Ghosh

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 34 references

Neutrino energy and momentum emission from magnetized dense quark matter

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Magnetized quark matter's neutrino emission is too symmetric to explain pulsar kicks.

desk verdict A careful Landau-quantized electron calculation that plausibly settles the old electron-spin estimates, but the pulsar-kick verdict leans on an extrapolation beyond the regime where the paper's own quark-unquantized approximation is safe. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.03318 v2 pith:QMKTQHYA submitted 2025-01-06 hep-ph astro-ph.HEhep-thnucl-th

Ritesh Ghosh , Igor A. Shovkovy This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-phastro-ph.HEhep-thnucl-th

keywords neutrinoemissionquarkmatterstrongmagneticfieldsLandauquantizationdirectUrcaprocesspulsarkickscompactstarcoolingFermi-liquidcorrections

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper calculates, from first principles, how fast neutrinos carry energy and momentum out of dense quark matter in a strong magnetic field. It treats electrons as fully Landau-quantized, because their chemical potential is small, while treating quarks through Fermi-liquid corrections, because their chemical potentials are much larger. The calculation finds that the neutrino energy emission oscillates with magnetic field strength and is suppressed by at most about 20 percent, while the net momentum emitted along the field is very small. The authors estimate the resulting pulsar kick velocity at roughly 2 km/s for a $10^{16}$ G field, too small to explain even modest 100 km/s kicks. If right, magnetic-field-driven asymmetric neutrino emission from unpaired quark matter is not a viable kick mechanism.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the neutrino self-energy in a background field, evaluated through the Kadanoff-Baym transport equation after the Schwinger phases cancel between the electron propagator and the W-boson self-energy. Electron states are handled with the Landau-level spectral function containing Laguerre polynomials and spin projectors, while the W-boson self-energy uses zero-field quark propagators with Fermi-liquid dispersion $E_{p,f} = \mu_f + v_F(p-p_F)$, where $v_F = 1 - 2\alpha_s/(3\pi)$. The factorized structure $(\bar{P}\cdot P_\nu)(\bar{K}\cdot Y_e)$, with the Landau-level dependent electron four-vector $Y_e$, carries the rate calculation; the relative smallness of $\dot{P}_{\nu,z}/\dot{\mathcal{E}}_\nu$ comes from cancellations between polar and equatorial Fermi-surface contributions.

What would settle it

A direct calculation of the same Urca rates with full Landau quantization of both electrons and quarks at $|eB| \approx 10^4$ MeV$^2$ would settle whether the neglected quark quantization changes the momentum asymmetry; if $\eta$ there exceeds the paper's $\sim 2\times10^{-3}|eB|/(\mu_e T)$ estimate by roughly an order of magnitude, the conclusion that kicks stay below 100 km/s would not hold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central quantitative discovery is a small dimensionless momentum-to-energy asymmetry, $\eta \equiv \dot{P}_{\nu,z}/\dot{\mathcal{E}}_\nu \simeq 2\times 10^{-3}\,|eB|/(\mu_e T)$ in the regime relevant to compact stars, with the momentum rate oscillating in sign as Landau-level thresholds cross the electron Fermi energy. Using this ratio, the authors derive a kick velocity estimate $v_k \simeq 1.9$ km/s for $B = 10^{16}$ G, $R_c = 10$ km, $M = M_\odot$, $\mu_e = 40$ MeV, $\mu_f = 300$ MeV, and $\Delta T = 10$ MeV, far below the $v_k \sim 100$ km/s associated with observed pulsar kicks. They also find that the energy emission rate is only mildly suppressed by the field, around 20% at $T = 0.5$ MeV for fields below $10^{17}$ G, and that in the lowest-Landau-level limit the energy rate grows while $\eta$ peaks only near 0.15.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes quark Landau quantization is negligible because quark chemical potentials are much larger than the magnetic energy scale; if that split treatment fails at the highest fields considered, the rates, the oscillations, and the kick estimate could change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The net neutrino momentum emission from unpaired quark matter stays below roughly a few percent for fields up to about $10^{17}$ G, so this mechanism cannot produce the $\sim 100$ km/s pulsar kicks.
Stellar cooling in the quark core is only mildly affected by fields below $10^{17}$ G, since the energy rate is suppressed at most about 20% at $T \simeq 0.5$ MeV, with a substantial enhancement only when electrons are confined to the lowest Landau level.
The rates oscillate with $|eB|/\mu_e^2$, with peaks at Landau-level thresholds, and the oscillations are washed out when $|eB| \lesssim \pi T\mu_e$.
The magnetic field partially replaces Fermi-liquid corrections for the energy rate by relaxing transverse momentum conservation, but the momentum rate remains suppressed when those corrections are absent.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

As an extension, the same first-principles treatment could be applied to neutrino opacity and transport in magnetized quark matter; the small free-streaming asymmetry found here suggests the trapped-neutrino diffusion phase, which the paper sets aside, is the likelier route to large kicks if any.
Extension: in color-superconducting quark phases, pairing gaps alter the Urca phase space, so the momentum asymmetry could behave differently; a dedicated calculation is the paper's stated next step.
Because $\eta$ grows linearly with $|eB|/(\mu_e T)$, only extreme fields beyond the approximation's validity range could give order-unity asymmetry, so robust kicks from this channel would require physics outside the regime considered here.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague,

What you should know: this is the first treatment of neutrino emission from magnetized unpaired quark matter that puts electrons in full Landau levels and quarks in a Fermi-liquid dispersion, deriving the rates from the Kadanoff-Baym equation rather than from hand-wavy spin-polarization factors. The central result, that the asymmetry ratio eta = P_dot_z / E_dot is small, roughly 2e-3 |eB|/(mu_e T), differs sharply from the older spin-polarization estimates, and the paper gives a physical picture (polar vs equatorial Fermi-surface regions contributing with opposite signs) that makes the small net value believable at moderate fields.

The formalism is spelled out carefully. The zero-field limit is checked against Iwamoto's rate, and the normalization constant C_T is extracted from the numerical data and cross-checked against an independent zero-field evaluation. The oscillatory dependence on |eB|/mu_e^2 and its temperature smoothing are handled with care, and the paper is honest that the T->0 divergences are artifacts of the low-temperature approximation.

The main soft spot is the treatment of quarks as unquantized. The paper justifies this by mu_f >> sqrt(|eB|), but that is not the relevant scale for the phase space. What matters is the Landau-level spacing at the quark Fermi surface, Delta ~ |eB|/mu_f, relative to the temperature T. For mu_f = 260 MeV and T = 1 MeV, Delta exceeds T already above |eB| ~ 260 MeV^2, i.e. B ~ 4e16 G. Figure 4 and the fit in Eq. (3.4) extend well beyond that, up to |eB| ~ 5000 MeV^2. The paper itself flags |eB| >~ 10^4 MeV^2 as questionable, but the same criterion is violated much earlier. So the smallness of eta at the high-field end is not yet established from first principles. This is a restriction on the parameter space of the conclusion, not a refutation of the low/moderate-field calculation.

Minor point: no code or data is released, and C_T is extracted from the numerical data rather than derived, which makes independent verification harder.

This paper is for anyone working on neutrino cooling or pulsar kicks in quark matter cores. It deserves a serious referee. The referee should ask for a quantitative estimate of quark Landau-level corrections, or a restriction of the astrophysical claims to the regime where Delta << T.

Recommendation: send it to peer review. The quark-quantization issue is the main thing to press on.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a first-principles Kadanoff-Baym calculation of neutrino and antineutrino emission from unpaired dense quark matter in a strong magnetic field. Electrons are treated with full Landau-level quantization, while up and down quarks are treated as unquantized quasiparticles with Fermi-liquid corrections. The authors derive integral expressions for the energy emission rate and the net longitudinal momentum emission rate, study their temperature and field dependence numerically, and extract a small asymmetry ratio eta ~ 2e-3 |eB|/(mu_e T). Using this ratio they estimate pulsar kick velocities of order a few km/s and conclude that asymmetric neutrino emission from dense quark matter is unlikely to explain kicks of ~100 km/s.

Significance. The derivation is systematic and largely self-contained: the Kadanoff-Baym equation, the Landau-level electron spectral function, the one-loop quark contribution to the W-boson self-energy, and the zero-field Iwamoto limit are all presented in detail, with appendices supplying the technical steps. The zero-field normalization is cross-checked against an independent evaluation, and the lowest-Landau-level limits are obtained analytically. If the high-field part can be made robust, these rates would be the standard reference for neutrino emission from magnetized unpaired quark matter, and the smallness of eta would be an important negative result for the pulsar-kick mechanism.

major comments (2)

[2.2-2.3, Eqs. (2.19)-(2.25)] The replacement q = pe - p_nu ~ pe drops corrections of relative order p_nu/pe ~ T/mu_e. This is not a harmless overall expansion for the momentum asymmetry, because eta itself is of the same order in the regime of interest: with mu_e = 40 MeV and T = 1 MeV, Eq. (3.4) gives eta ~ 1% at |eB| ~ 200 MeV^2, while T/mu_e ~ 2.5%. Terms involving p_nu in cos(theta_eu) and in the phase-space delta functions can therefore change eta at order one. Please provide a first-order estimate in p_nu/pe, or a numerical comparison of Eq. (2.15) with and without the approximation, to justify the small-asymmetry conclusion.
[3.4 and 3.6, Eqs. (3.4) and (3.10)] The linear scaling eta ~ 2 x 10^-3 |eB|/(mu_e T) is quoted without stating the field range or the scatter; the numerical eta is strongly oscillatory and even changes sign at some fields, as shown in Figure 4(b). The kick velocity in Eq. (3.10) inherits this estimate, so the summary statement in Section 4 (that neutrino momentum emission is unlikely to account for even modest pulsar kicks) should be softened to a limited-field statement, e.g., valid only for |eB| <~ mu_f T and modulo the quark-quantization issue raised above. A restricted claim would still be valuable, but the present wording overgeneralizes.

minor comments (6)

[Appendix E] The first sentence of Appendix E says 'neutron emission rate'; this should be 'neutrino emission rate'.
[Author affiliation] The affiliation line contains a rendering artifact, 'Univers ity', which should be fixed.
[Figure 4] The horizontal axis labels in the rendered figure are broken (e.g., '1 x 10' followed by a garbled superscript); please replace them with clean logarithmic axis labels.
[Equation (E.10)] The coefficients c1 and c2 in the fit for C_T should be stated to be numerical fit coefficients, and the fit range and accuracy should be reported.
[Section 2.1] The phrase 'Landau level widths' is invoked to justify neglecting quark quantization, but widths are never defined or estimated; if they are the intended justification, please provide an estimate.
[Eq. (2.31)] It would be helpful to state explicitly in Section 2.5 that Eq. (2.31) is less accurate at finite temperature and is not used for the main conclusions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the neutrino rates are derived from the Kadanoff–Baym equation and the Landau-level electron spectral function, and the smallness of the momentum-to-energy ratio eta is an output of the calculation, not an input.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and does not feed the target result back into its inputs. The rates in Eqs. (2.24) and (2.25) are obtained from the Kadanoff–Baym kinetic equation (2.3), the weak-interaction Lagrangian (2.4), the electron Landau-level spectral function (2.10), and a one-loop W-boson self-energy built from standard external inputs (Iwamoto's direct Urca framework, Baym–Chin Fermi-liquid corrections, and Schäfer–Schwenzer). No target quantity such as the net longitudinal momentum rate enters as an input. The zero-field normalization factor C_T is extracted from the smallest-field data point of the same calculation, but it is only a constant B-independent renormalization, it is explicitly checked against the independent zero-field fit in Eq. (E.10), and it does not control the oscillatory field dependence or the sign structure of P_dot_nu,z. The scaling eta ~ 2e-3 |eB|/(mu_e T) is presented as an estimate obtained by comparing the paper's own numerical rates, and the kick-velocity estimate (3.9) is an application of that output, not a statistically forced prediction of a separate quantity. The paper's self-citations (Refs. [25], [34]) supply standard parameter-free formalism — the Kadanoff–Baym transport method and Landau-level propagators in a magnetic field — rather than a uniqueness theorem or the target emission rates, so they are not load-bearing. The skeptical concern about neglecting quark Landau quantization is an approximation-validity issue, not a circularity: the paper states the spacing criterion |eB|/mu_f being small compared with temperature, and it flags the |eB| >~ 10^4 MeV^2 regime as questionable (Sec. 3.2), but nothing in that assumption is defined in terms of the smallness of eta that the paper concludes.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation is built on standard thermal field theory and the Landau-level electron propagator, plus the key domain assumption that quark Landau effects are negligible because mu_q >> sqrt(|eB|). The Fermi-liquid input (v_F = 1 - kappa) is taken from prior literature. The only fitted quantities are the zero-field normalization C_T (extracted from a low-B data point, then cross-checked) and the asymmetry scaling coefficient 2e-3 in Eq. (3.4), which is a parametrization of the numerical results used for the pulsar-kick estimate.

free parameters (2)

C_T (zero-field normalization constant) = C_T values: 1.11 (T=0.25 MeV), 1.2 (T=0.5 MeV), 1.385 (T=1 MeV), 1.805 (T=2 MeV)
Extracted from the numerical ratio at the smallest magnetic field value (|eB| ~ 20 MeV^2) to normalize the B-nonzero rates by the zero-field rate; cross-checked against Eq. (E.10).
Coefficient in asymmetry scaling eta = Ceta ~ 2e-3
Fitted to the computed numerical rates for energy and momentum emission over the studied parameter range (Sec. 3.4); used in the pulsar-kick estimate in Sec. 3.6. This is a compact parametrization of the numerical results, not derived analytically.

assumptions (6)

standard math Kadanoff-Baym transport equation for the neutrino distribution function, Eq. (2.3), with neutrino self-energy evaluated at one loop in the Fermi theory of weak interactions.
Used in Sec. 2.1; standard thermal field theory machinery with external parameters G_F and cos theta_C.
domain assumption Neglect of quark Landau-level quantization in the W-boson self-energy.
Sec. 2.1: justified by mu_u, mu_d around 300 MeV much larger than sqrt(|eB|) around 25 MeV; the rates and eta rely on this split treatment.
domain assumption Quark Fermi-liquid dispersion relations with v_F = 1 - kappa, kappa = 2 alpha_s/(3 pi), and a constant velocity near the Fermi surface.
Sec. 2.2 and Appendix E; taken from Baym-Chin [20]; without it the direct Urca phase space collapses and the rate is suppressed by T/mu_f.
domain assumption Electron mass neglected and positron and antiquark terms dropped.
Sec. 2.2 around Eq. (2.20): justified by m_e much smaller than mu_e and T much smaller than mu_e; drops the lambda = -1 Landau states.
domain assumption Dominance of quark and electron states near the Fermi surfaces and neutrino momenta of order T, so q approximately p_e and quark momenta are replaced by Fermi momenta in smooth parts of the integrand.
Sec. 2.2, leading to Eq. (2.19); this is the standard degenerate-matter approximation used by Iwamoto [21,22].
standard math The electron propagator in a magnetic field in the Landau-level representation, including the Schwinger phase and the spectral function in Eqs. (C.1)-(C.5), is a valid input.
Based on refs. [33,34]; the Schwinger phase cancels when contracted with the W-boson self-energy.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Neutrino energy and momentum emission from magnetized dense quark matter." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QMKTQHYA

@misc{pith2026250103318,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Neutrino energy and momentum emission from magnetized dense quark matter},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QMKTQHYA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.03318}
}

read the original abstract

Using first-principles field-theoretic methods, we investigate neutrino emission from strongly magnetized dense quark matter under conditions relevant to compact stars. We develop a customized approximation that fully accounts for the Landau-level quantization of electron states while neglecting such quantization for quarks. This approach is well-justified in dense quark matter, where the chemical potentials of up and down quarks significantly exceed those of electrons. Our analysis provides a detailed exploration of the influence of strong magnetic fields on neutrino emission, including both the modification of the total emission rate and the emergence of emission asymmetry relative to the magnetic field direction. We further examine the role of temperature in smoothing the oscillatory behavior of neutrino emission as a function of magnetic field strength. Additionally, we study the interplay between the Landau-level quantization of electrons and the Fermi-liquid effects of quarks in modifying the phase space of relevant weak processes. Finally, we briefly discuss the broader implications of magnetic fields on stellar cooling processes and the potential contribution of asymmetric neutrino emission to pulsar kicks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

[1]

G. Baym, T. Hatsuda, T. Kojo, P.D. Powell, Y. Song and T. Ta katsuka, From hadrons to quarks in neutron stars: a review , Rep. Prog. Phys. 81 (2018) 056902 [1707.04966]. – 29 –

arXiv 2018
[2]

Annala, T

E. Annala, T. Gorda, J. Hirvonen, O. Komoltsev, A. Kurkel a, J. Nättilä et al., Strongly interacting matter exhibits deconﬁned behavior in massive neutron stars , Nature Commun. 14 (2023) 8451 [2303.11356]

arXiv 2023
[3]

Turolla, S

R. Turolla, S. Zane and A. Watts, Magnetars: the physics behind observations. A review , Rep. Prog. Phys. 78 (2015) 116901 [1507.02924]

arXiv 2015
[4]

Kaspi and A

V.M. Kaspi and A. Beloborodov, Magnetars, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 55 (2017) 261 [1703.00068]

arXiv 2017
[5]

Lai and S.L

D. Lai and S.L. Shapiro, Cold equation of state in a strong magnetic ﬁeld - eﬀects of in verse beta-decay, Astrophys. J. 383 (1991) 745

work page 1991
[6]

Yakovlev and C.J

D.G. Yakovlev and C.J. Pethick, Neutron star cooling , Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 42 (2004) 169 [astro-ph/0402143]

arXiv 2004
[7]

Baiko and D.G

D.A. Baiko and D.G. Yakovlev, Direct urca process in strong magnetic ﬁelds and neutron star cooling, Astron. Astrophys. 342 (1999) 192 [ astro-ph/9812071]

arXiv 1999
[8]

Neutrino emission rates in highly magnetized neutron stars revisited

M. Riquelme, A. Reisenegger, O. Espinosa and C.O. Dib, Neutrino emission rates in highly magnetized neutron stars revisited , Astrophys. J. 439 (2005) 427 [astro-ph/0505238]

work page Pith review arXiv 2005

Show all 34 references

[9]

Potekhin, J.A

A.Y. Potekhin, J.A. Pons and D. Page, Neutron stars - cooling and transport , Space Sci. Rev. 191 (2015) 239 [1507.06186]

2015 arXiv
[10]

Lai and Y.-Z

D. Lai and Y.-Z. Qian, Neutrino transport in strongly magnetized proto neutron stars and the origin of pulsar kicks. 2. The Eﬀect of asymmetric magnetic ﬁel d topology, Astrophys. J. 505 (1998) 844 [astro-ph/9802345]

1998 arXiv
[11]

Arras and D

P. Arras and D. Lai, Can parity violation in neutrino transport lead to pulsar kicks ?, Astrophys. J. 519 (1999) 745 [astro-ph/9806285]

1999 arXiv
[12]

Sagert and J

I. Sagert and J. Schaﬀner-Bielich, Pulsar kicks by anisotropic neutrino emission from quark matter in strong magnetic ﬁelds , Astron. Astrophys. 489 (2008) 281 [0708.2352]

2008 arXiv
[13]

Potekhin and G

A.Y. Potekhin and G. Chabrier, Magnetic neutron star cooling and microphysics , Astron. Astrophys. 609 (2018) A74 [1711.07662]

2018 arXiv
[14]

Dehman, J.A

C. Dehman, J.A. Pons, D. Viganò and N. Rea, How bright can old magnetars be? Assessing the impact of magnetized envelopes and ﬁeld topology on neut ron star cooling , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 520 (2022) L42 [2301.02261]

2022 arXiv
[15]

Tambe, D

P. Tambe, D. Chatterjee, M. Alford and A. Haber, Eﬀect of Magnetic Fields on Urca Rates in Neutron Star Mergers , 2409.09423

arXiv
[16]

Kumamoto and C

M. Kumamoto and C. Welch, Eﬀects of Landau quantization on neutrino emission and absorption, Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 063009 [2412.02925]

2025 arXiv
[17]

Belyaev and A

V. Belyaev and A. Gvozdev, Direct URCA-processes in neutron star quark core with strong magnetic ﬁeld , EPJ Web Conf. 158 (2017) 05003

2017
[18]

Ayala, D

A. Ayala, D. Manreza Paret, A. Pérez Martínez, G. Piccin elli, A. Sánchez and J.S. Ruíz Montaño, Kicks of magnetized strange quark stars induced by anisotropi c emission of neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 103008 [1801.06246]

2018 arXiv
[19]

Ayala, S

A. Ayala, S. Bernal-Langarica and D. Manreza-Paret, Estimate for the Neutrino Magnetic Moment from Pulsar Kick Velocities Induced at the Birth of Stra nge Quark Matter Neutron Stars, Universe 10 (2024) 301 [2406.03745]. – 30 –

2024 arXiv
[20]

Baym and S.A

G. Baym and S.A. Chin, Landau Theory of Relativistic Fermi Liquids , Nucl. Phys. A 262 (1976) 527

1976
[21]

Iwamoto, Quark Beta Decay and the Cooling of Neutron Stars , Phys

N. Iwamoto, Quark Beta Decay and the Cooling of Neutron Stars , Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 (1980) 1637

1980
[22]

Iwamoto, Neutrino emissivities and mean free paths of degenerate quark matter, Annals Phys

N. Iwamoto, Neutrino emissivities and mean free paths of degenerate quark matter, Annals Phys. 141 (1982) 1

1982
[23]

Schäfer and K

T. Schäfer and K. Schwenzer, Neutrino emission from ungapped quark matter , Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 114037 [astro-ph/0410395]

2004 arXiv
[24]

Sedrakian and A

A. Sedrakian and A. Dieperink, Coherence eﬀects and neutrino pair bremsstrahlung in neutron stars , Phys. Lett. B 463 (1999) 145 [nucl-th/9905039]

1999 arXiv
[25]

Schmitt, I.A

A. Schmitt, I.A. Shovkovy and Q. Wang, Neutrino emission and cooling rates of spin-one color superconductors, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 034012 [hep-ph/0510347]

2006 arXiv
[26]

Jaikumar, C.D

P. Jaikumar, C.D. Roberts and A. Sedrakian, Direct Urca neutrino rate in colour superconducting quark matter , Phys. Rev. C 73 (2006) 042801 [nucl-th/0509093]

2006 arXiv
[27]

Prakash, I

M. Prakash, I. Bombaci, M. Prakash, P.J. Ellis, J.M. Lat timer and R. Knorren, Composition and structure of protoneutron stars , Phys. Rep. 280 (1997) 1 [nucl-th/9603042]

1997 arXiv
[28]

Weinberg, The quantum theory of ﬁelds

S. Weinberg, The quantum theory of ﬁelds. Vol. 2: Modern applications , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1996)

1996
[29]

Gradshteyn and I.M

I.S. Gradshteyn and I.M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products , Academic Press, New York, 5 ed. (1980)

1980
[30]

Le Bellac, Thermal Field Theory , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (July, 2000)

M. Le Bellac, Thermal Field Theory , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (July, 2000)

2000
[31]

Burrows, Beta Decay in Quark Stars , Phys

A. Burrows, Beta Decay in Quark Stars , Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 (1980) 1640

1980
[32]

Glendenning, Compact stars: Nuclear physics, particle physics, and genera l relativity, Springer, New York, 2nd ed

N.K. Glendenning, Compact stars: Nuclear physics, particle physics, and genera l relativity, Springer, New York, 2nd ed. (2000)

2000
[33]

Schwinger, On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization , Phys

J.S. Schwinger, On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization , Phys. Rev. 82 (1951) 664

1951
[34]

Miransky and I.A

V.A. Miransky and I.A. Shovkovy, Quantum ﬁeld theory in a magnetic ﬁeld: From quantum chromodynamics to graphene and Dirac semimetals , Phys. Rep. 576 (2015) 1 [1503.00732]. – 31 –

2015 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

G. Baym, T. Hatsuda, T. Kojo, P.D. Powell, Y. Song and T. Ta katsuka, From hadrons to quarks in neutron stars: a review , Rep. Prog. Phys. 81 (2018) 056902 [1707.04966]. – 29 –

arXiv 2018

[2] [2]

Annala, T

E. Annala, T. Gorda, J. Hirvonen, O. Komoltsev, A. Kurkel a, J. Nättilä et al., Strongly interacting matter exhibits deconﬁned behavior in massive neutron stars , Nature Commun. 14 (2023) 8451 [2303.11356]

arXiv 2023

[3] [3]

Turolla, S

R. Turolla, S. Zane and A. Watts, Magnetars: the physics behind observations. A review , Rep. Prog. Phys. 78 (2015) 116901 [1507.02924]

arXiv 2015

[4] [4]

Kaspi and A

V.M. Kaspi and A. Beloborodov, Magnetars, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 55 (2017) 261 [1703.00068]

arXiv 2017

[5] [5]

Lai and S.L

D. Lai and S.L. Shapiro, Cold equation of state in a strong magnetic ﬁeld - eﬀects of in verse beta-decay, Astrophys. J. 383 (1991) 745

work page 1991

[6] [6]

Yakovlev and C.J

D.G. Yakovlev and C.J. Pethick, Neutron star cooling , Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 42 (2004) 169 [astro-ph/0402143]

arXiv 2004

[7] [7]

Baiko and D.G

D.A. Baiko and D.G. Yakovlev, Direct urca process in strong magnetic ﬁelds and neutron star cooling, Astron. Astrophys. 342 (1999) 192 [ astro-ph/9812071]

arXiv 1999

[8] [8]

Neutrino emission rates in highly magnetized neutron stars revisited

M. Riquelme, A. Reisenegger, O. Espinosa and C.O. Dib, Neutrino emission rates in highly magnetized neutron stars revisited , Astrophys. J. 439 (2005) 427 [astro-ph/0505238]

work page Pith review arXiv 2005