Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Late-time tails and mass inflation for the spherically symmetric Einstein-Maxwell-scalar field system

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proves decay of scalar field derivatives on charged black hole horizons for large data, and derives mass inflation and sharp late-time tails from it.

desk verdict Theorem 1.1, the higher-order decay for large data, is the real result and looks solid; the sharp Price law is the part that needs a referee to check the compressed Luk–Oh verification. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.17927 v1 pith:QQBTBE5B submitted 2024-12-23 gr-qc math.AP

Onyx Gautam This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qcmath.AP MSC 35Q7583C0583C5783C7535B4035L05 PACS 04.20.-q04.70.Bw
keywords Einstein–Maxwell–scalarfieldsystemsphericalsymmetryblackholedecaymassinflationlate-timetailsPrice'slawlargedataenergyestimates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that scalar fields on spherically symmetric charged black holes, arising from smooth compactly supported future-admissible data, decay on the event horizon at the rate $|(v\partial_v)^k \varphi|_H \lesssim_{\epsilon,k,\varphi} v^{-1+\epsilon}$ for every $k \geq 0$. This is the first decay statement for higher-order derivatives of the scalar field in this nonlinear model, and it holds for large initial data. The decay result feeds into two further conclusions: it verifies the integrated higher-derivative bounds that yield generic mass inflation at the Cauchy horizon, and it upgrades the known pointwise decay to a sharp Price-law tail $|(v\partial_v)^k \varphi|_H - C_k L[\varphi] v^{-3}| \lesssim v^{-3-\delta}$. A sympathetic reader should care because it completes the dynamical picture of strong cosmic censorship in this model in the $C^2$ class, and supplies exact asymptotic constants for late-time radiation.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by three commutator vector fields: $U$ (a global redshift vector field), $V$ (outgoing null at large $r$ and timelike near the horizon), and $S$ (a scaling vector field equal to $v\partial_v$ on the horizon and equal to $u\partial_u + r\partial_r$ at large $r$). The load-bearing identities are the commutation formulas $[\square, S] = (2 + O(r^{-1}))\square + O(r^{-1+\epsilon})\partial_r^2$ plus lower-order terms, and $[\square, U] + f_U U^2$ with $f_U = 2(\varpi - e^2/r)/r^2 \geq 2c_H/r^2$, whose sign is the redshift effect. These formulas feed into a hierarchy of $r^p$-weighted energy estimates with $p \in (0,2)$ for $\Gamma^\alpha \varphi$, closed by induction without a bootstrap: the order-$\alpha$ energy is controlled by lower-order energies plus weak and strong geometric controls on derivatives of the renormalized Hawking mass $\varpi$, the null gauge quantity $\kappa$, and $\gamma$. For the sharp tails, the paper adds a spacetime elliptic estimate showing that $S^2$ plus the wave operator is elliptic, and a Sobolev-type inequality that upgrades $L^2$ control of $(r\partial_r)$-derivatives to $L^\infty$, yielding the $v^{-3}$ law. The renormalized Hawking mass $\varpi$ is defined as the Hawking mass plus $e^2/(2r)$, and the redshift lower bound is the statement $\varpi - e^2/r \geq c_H > 0$.

What would settle it

Compute (numerically or by construction) the event-horizon decay of a solution from the generic future-admissible data class: if any derivative $(v\partial_v)^k \varphi$ decays slower than $v^{-1+\epsilon}$ for some $\epsilon > 0$, or if the sharp tail $|(v\partial_v)^k \varphi - C_k L[\varphi]v^{-3}|$ fails to be $O(v^{-3-\delta})$, the theorem is false. A more targeted test is to exhibit a smooth future-admissible solution in which $\varpi - e^2/r$ does not stay strictly positive throughout the exterior rectangle, since that would break assumption (6) of the characteristic problem.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is a decay statement with no smallness requirement: smooth compactly supported future-admissible spherically symmetric data produce solutions satisfying $|(v\partial_v)^k \varphi|_H \lesssim v^{-1+\epsilon}$ on the event horizon. The proof reduces the nonlinear Einstein–Maxwell–scalar field system to a characteristic rectangle and builds a hierarchy of $r^p$-weighted energy estimates for $\Gamma^\alpha \varphi$, where $\Gamma$ is one of three vector fields: a global redshift vector field $U$, an outgoing vector field $V$, and a scaling vector field $S$ that equals $v\partial_v$ near the horizon. A key innovation is a reductive structure in the commutator $[\square, \Gamma^\alpha]$ that lets all error terms be absorbed using only lower-order control, which removes the smallness assumption. From this decay the paper derives, using previously established criteria, that the Hawking mass becomes infinite at the Cauchy horizon for a generic class of data; and, by feeding the estimates into an existing late-time tails framework, it proves the sharp asymptotic $|(v\partial_v)^k \varphi|_H - C_k L[\varphi] v^{-3}| \lesssim v^{-3-\delta}$. The same framework yields the decay rates $\partial_{\bar v} \varphi|_H = C v^{-4} + o(v^{-4})$ and $\partial^2_{\bar v} \varphi|_H = O(v^{-5})$ used to construct two-ended black holes containing both null and spacelike singularities.

Load-bearing premise

The proof needs the renormalized Hawking mass to stay strictly above the charge term, $\varpi - e^2/r \geq c_H > 0$, everywhere in the exterior characteristic rectangle; if this redshift lower bound fails, the commutator error terms cannot be absorbed and the whole energy hierarchy collapses. The paper derives this bound from eventual subextremality and monotonicity, but it remains the most fragile structural premise.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Generic mass inflation follows: the Hawking mass diverges at the Cauchy horizon for the large-data generic class, settling a central question about the interior instability of charged black holes.
  • The leading late-time tail is exact: up to small corrections, $(v\partial_v)^k \varphi$ on the horizon behaves as $C_k L[\varphi] v^{-3}$, with a nonzero coefficient on generic data, so Price's law has a sharp and explicit form.
  • Higher-order derivatives of the scalar field now have proven decay, giving the first large-data statement of this kind for the nonlinear system.
  • The decay rates $\partial_{\bar v} \varphi|_H = C v^{-4} + o(v^{-4})$ and $\partial^2_{\bar v} \varphi|_H = O(v^{-5})$ are sufficient to glue two-ended black hole spacetimes that contain both null and spacelike singularities.
  • The bootstrap-free inductive energy hierarchy provides a template that may transfer to other spherically symmetric matter models where a redshift lower bound holds.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An extension left implicit: the sharp Price law supplies a new gauge-invariant asymptotic charge $L[\varphi]$ that characterizes the generic data class, and one could study how $L[\varphi]$ varies with the initial data and whether it can vanish on a codimension-one set in the full nonlinear phase space.
  • The reductive commutator structure suggests that a similar bootstrap-free hierarchy could be set up for other spherically symmetric matter models, such as self-gravitating wave maps, as long as a global redshift lower bound and an outgoing-null vector field with the same large-$r$ behavior can be constructed.
  • A testable extension is numerical: evolve generic spherically symmetric Einstein–Maxwell–scalar field data and measure the horizon decay exponent; if the first few derivatives do not decay like $v^{-1+\epsilon}$, the theorem's quantitative range would need re-examination.
  • The $v^{-3}$ law for scalar field derivatives is likely to imply corresponding tails for the electromagnetic field and Weyl curvature components through the constraint equations, predicting late-time tails in the curvature as well.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper establishes exterior decay for spherically symmetric solutions of the Einstein-Maxwell-scalar field system with large, compactly supported future-admissible Cauchy data. The main theorem (Theorem 3.1; rough version Theorem 1.1) shows |(v∂v)^k φ|_H ≲ v^{-1+ε} along the event horizon, with constants depending on the initial data norm D_k. The proof is an inductive hierarchy of r^p-weighted energy estimates built on commutators U, V, S, with a careful bookkeeping of which geometric quantities are bounded versus allowed to grow slowly in r. From this estimate the paper derives generic mass inflation (Corollary 1.14) via the criteria of Luk-Oh-Shlapentokh-Rothman, and a sharp Price law (Theorem 1.15) by attempting to verify the hypotheses of Luk-Oh's Main Theorem 4, with a downstream application by Van de Moortel to two-ended black holes with null and spacelike singularities (Theorem 1.18). I examined the stress-test concern about assumption (6) of Theorem 3.1; it does not land, because (2.12)-(2.13) imply ϖ - e^2/r is non-increasing in u and non-decreasing in v, so the eventual subextremality lower bound propagates to the characteristic rectangle exactly as claimed in Section 3.

Significance. If the proof is completed as advertised, this is a substantial result: it resolves the mass-inflation question left open by Luk-Oh for this matter model, provides the first decay statement for higher-order derivatives of the scalar field for large data, and gives a sharp Price law in a nonlinear spherically symmetric setting. The manuscript has real strengths: an explicit and largely self-contained proof strategy with tracked constants, an honest accounting of which geometric quantities are bounded versus merely slowly growing, a clean reduction of the mass-inflation criterion to the estimates I_{4,1} and I_{8,k} (Section 2.3), and a clear separation between the main decay theorem and the conditional applications. No circularity is apparent: the decay is derived from a weighted energy hierarchy, and the mass-inflation and tails results are routed through previously established criteria. However, the advertised late-time tails result is not yet supported as written, because the verification of the Luk-Oh assumptions is asserted rather than proved at several key points.

major comments (3)
  1. [§8.4, Lemma 8.10 and (8.82)] The proof of Theorem 1.15 rests on the verification of the hypotheses of [29, Main Theorem 4], and the verification of hypothesis (gBV2) requires g^{-1} - m^{-1} = O_Γ^{Mc}(r^{-1+ε}) in M_med. Lemma 10.15 dismisses the crucial inequalities (10.102)-(10.104) as a 'tedious but straightforward computation', and the bound (10.111) is then asserted without tracking the regions and weights. The ingredients in Lemmas 10.12 and 10.14 give E_ϖ = O(r^{-1} min(r^ε,u^ε)) and E_{(-γ)} = O(r^{-3}); converting these into a uniform O_Γ^{Mc}(r^{-1+ε}) error on all of M_med (including points where r ≤ u and u is arbitrarily large) requires an argument that is not present, particularly because the non-decaying part ϖ|_I(u) in (10.110) is only bounded as O_Γ(u^ε) in (10.113). Since the sharp Price law (Theorem 1.15), the second proof of mass inflation via Dafermos's criterion, and the Van de Moortel application (Theorem 1.18) all depend on this conversion, the authors must either supply the complete proof of Lemma 10.15 and of (10.111) with explicit region-by-region weights, or restrict the claims in the abstract and introduction accordingly.
  2. [§10.4.6, (10.117)-(10.119)] Equation (8.82), the commutator estimate [∂r, L] = O(b_α, r^{-s}g_{<α})[∂r Γ_{<α} + r^{-2+s} Γ_{≤α}], is stated with 'We omit the proof, but the argument is an induction with base case lemma 2.13'. This estimate is used immediately in the proof of (8.83), and through Lemma 8.10 it feeds into Proposition 8.13, Proposition 8.1, and ultimately into the energy and pointwise-norm estimates (Propositions 6.1 and 7.1) that prove the main Theorem 3.1. An omitted induction over a non-trivial commutator identity is a genuine gap in the proof of the central claim, and since the paper itself flags the omission, it should be supplied in full (or a detailed proof of the base case and inductive step at least sketched) before publication.
  3. [§10.4.6, (10.117)-(10.119)] The three implications used to verify assumption (S) of [29] are asserted by combining 'the results of section 9 and lemma 10.15' rather than proved. In particular, the factor A_0 = C(ϖ_i, c_H, r_min, M_0, D_{M_0+5}) is claimed to absorb the pointwise norms, but the passage from the P_{α,p} control and the r^{-1/2-ε} ū^{-1+2ε} bound in the wave zone to the O_Γ^{M_0}(A_0 ar{τ}^{-1+ε}) statements involves the same conversion that is only asserted in Lemma 10.15. This is load-bearing for Theorem 1.15: if any of the three displayed implications fails in the stated region, the Luk-Oh main theorem cannot be invoked. The authors should provide the detailed derivation of (10.117)-(10.119) or weaken the statement of Theorem 1.15 accordingly.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Remark 1.5] The final sentence reads 'We do not expect the same result to hold if ∂v is replaced by ∂v'; the second ∂v should presumably be ∂_{ar v} or the sentence should refer to v∂v versus ∂v, and should be corrected.
  2. [§6.2.1, equation (6.9)] In the second line of (6.9), the integrand for the constant-v curve is written as r^2 (-ν)^{-1} (∂uψ) du, which appears to be missing the square on ∂uψ; compare with the definition of E[ψ] in (2.28).
  3. [Lemma 10.12, (10.78)] The estimate |(u∂u)^m ϖ|_I(u)| ≲ C min(r^ε, u^ε) has a right-hand side depending on r, although ϖ|_I is a function of u only; the intended bound is presumably O(u^ε) (or O(1) after subtracting the final mass), and the statement should be clarified.
  4. [Abstract and Section 1.2.3] The abstract cites 'Dafermos (arXiv:arch-ive/0307013)' informally; this should be a standard numbered reference (currently [10]) for consistency with the rest of the bibliography.
  5. [§10.4.1] The parameters J_d, K_d, and η_d are introduced in the list following (10.94) but I did not find where they are subsequently used; the authors should either use them in the verification of the Luk-Oh assumptions or delete them to avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central decay estimate is obtained from an r^p-weighted energy hierarchy, and the applications are routed through independent external theorems.

full rationale

The main theorem (Theorem 1.1/3.1) is derived directly from an induction of r^p-weighted energy estimates, pointwise estimates, and geometric estimates (Sections 6–9); the target decay v^{-1+ε} is the output of the hierarchy, not an input. The redshift assumption (6) of Theorem 3.1 is justified by monotonicity of ϖ−e^2/r from the equations (2.12)-(2.13) and eventual subextremality, which is an external structural fact, not the decay conclusion. The mass-inflation applications use the independent criteria of Luk–Oh–Shlapentokh-Rothman [33] and Dafermos [10], which are external theorems with their own hypotheses. The late-time tails result (Theorem 1.15/10.17) is obtained by verifying the assumptions of the independent Luk–Oh [29] Main Theorem 4; the verification uses estimates proved in this paper, but does not assume the sharp Price law. The only flagged weakness is that some inequalities in Lemma 10.15 (e.g., (10.102)-(10.104) and the Mmed bound (10.111)) are asserted in a 'tedious but straightforward' computation rather than fully written out; that is a rigor/completeness risk, not a circular reduction. No equation is defined in terms of its own conclusion, no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no load-bearing claim reduces to a self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard PDE techniques and prior theorems in the field. There are no fitted parameters: all constants (epsilon, eta0, R0, R*) are chosen in the proof rather than tuned to data. The commutator vector fields U, V, S are analytic tools, not new physical entities. The redshift lower bound and the future-admissible data class are domain assumptions from the setup of the theorem.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Future-admissible, smooth, compactly supported spherically symmetric Cauchy data settling to subextremal Reissner-Nordstrom.
    Used in Section 3 to reduce the problem to a characteristic rectangle and to guarantee that the horizon is eventually subextremal. This is the setting of the main theorem.
  • domain assumption Redshift lower bound: ϖ - e^2/r ≥ c_H > 0 throughout R_char (Theorem 3.1, assumption (6)).
    Propagated from eventual subextremality and monotonicity; used in Step 2a and throughout the energy estimates to give the good sign in the U-commutator (Lemma 2.19). If false, the energy hierarchy fails.
  • standard math Global well-posedness of (1.1) in spherical symmetry, cited from [27] and [31, Thm. 4.1].
    Used to pass from Cauchy data to a characteristic rectangle with the required properties. This is a prior theorem taken as background.
  • standard math Mass inflation criteria of Luk-Oh-Shlapentokh-Rothman [33] and Dafermos [10].
    These prior theorems convert decay and lower-bound statements into mass inflation. The paper verifies their hypotheses but does not reprove the criteria.
  • standard math Late-time tails machinery of Luk-Oh [29, Main Theorem 4].
    The sharp Price law (Theorem 10.17) is obtained by verifying the assumptions of this external theorem, not by a self-contained derivation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Late-time tails and mass inflation for the spherically symmetric Einstein-Maxwell-scalar field system." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QQBTBE5B

@misc{pith2026241217927,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Late-time tails and mass inflation for the spherically symmetric Einstein-Maxwell-scalar field system},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QQBTBE5B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.17927}
}
abstract

We establish a decay result in the black hole exterior region of spherically symmetric solutions to the Einstein-Maxwell-scalar field system arising from compactly supported admissible data. Our result allows for large initial data, and it is the first decay statement for higher order derivatives of the scalar field. Solutions to this model generically develop a singularity in the black hole interior. Indeed, Luk--Oh (arxiv:1702.05715, arxiv:1702.05716) identify a generic class of initial data that produces $C^2$-future-inextendible solutions. However, they leave open the question of mass inflation: does the Hawking mass become identically infinite at the Cauchy horizon? By work of Luk--Oh--Shlapentokh-Rothman (arxiv:2201.12294), our decay result implies mass inflation for sufficiently regular solutions in the generic class considered by Luk--Oh (arxiv:1702.05715, arxiv:1702.05716). Together with the methods and results of Luk--Oh (arXiv:2404.02220), our estimates imply a late-time tails result for the scalar field. This result provides another proof of generic mass inflation, through a result of Dafermos (arXiv:arch-ive/0307013). Another application of our late-time tails result, due to Van de Moortel, is the global construction of two-ended black holes that contain null and spacelike singularities.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.17927 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The a priori Penrose diagram for solutions to (1.1). The achronal singular set S, to which the area-radius function r extends continuously to 0, may be empty, as it is in Reissner–Nordstr¨om. This characterization is due to [8, 10, 27]. In particular, Dafermos [8] proved that S can be non-empty only for large perturbations of Reissner–Nordstr¨om. 1.3. Ideas of the proof. 1.3.1. Use of a scaling vector field. Our str… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The characteristic rectangle Rchar depicted on the Penrose diagram of a general solution to (1.1). Note that the achronal singular set S may be empty, as is the case in Reissner–Nordstr¨om. The statement that the diagram looks as depicted is due to [8, 27]. take ϖi in assumption (4) to be the supremum of ϖ on the Cauchy data. The future admissibility condition on the data implies that the event horizon is eventually… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The foliation Στ . Proof. It is enough to consider the case p = 0, which is an immediate consequence of a Hardy type inequality (lemma 6.2 with a = 0 and v1 = vR0 (τ ) in the limit v2 → ∞). □ Lemma 6.7. For p < 3, we have Ep[ψ](1) ≤ C(p, R0)D0[ψ] 2 . (6.16) Proof. This is immediate from the definitions and a change of variables: Ep[ψ](1) = Z R0 rmin r 2 (Uψ) 2 dr + Z ∞ R0 r p (∂r(rψ))2 dr + |ψ| 2 (1, 1) ≤ R 2 0D0[ψ]… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Mass inflation from rough initial data for the spherically symmetric Einstein-Maxwell-scalar field system with $\Lambda$

    gr-qc 2025-06 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    Rough initial data for the spherically symmetric Einstein-Maxwell-scalar field system with a positive cosmological constant trigger mass inflation at the Cauchy horizon for every sub-extremal Reissner-Nordstrom-de Sit...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [29]

    Late time tail of waves on dynamic asymptotically flat spacetimes of odd space dimensions

    Jonathan Luk and Sung-Jin Oh. Late time tail of waves on dynamic asymptotically flat spacetimes of odd space dimensions. 2024. arXiv: 2404.02220 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Late-time asymptotics for the wave equa- tion on spherically symmetric, stationary spacetimes

    Yannis Angelopoulos, Stefanos Aretakis, and Dejan Gajic. “Late-time asymptotics for the wave equa- tion on spherically symmetric, stationary spacetimes”. In: Adv. Math. 323 (2018), pp. 529–621

    work page 2018

  3. [2]

    Late-time tails and mode coupling of linear waves on Kerr spacetimes

    Yannis Angelopoulos, Stefanos Aretakis, and Dejan Gajic. “Late-time tails and mode coupling of linear waves on Kerr spacetimes”. In: Adv. Math. 417 (2023), p. 108939. issn: 0001-8708

    work page 2023

  4. [3]

    Nonlinear stability of extremal Reissner- Nordstr¨ om black holes in spherical symmetry

    Yannis Angelopoulos, Christoph Kehle, and Ryan Unger. Nonlinear stability of extremal Reissner- Nordstr¨ om black holes in spherical symmetry. 2024. arXiv: 2410.16234 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  5. [4]

    Structure of the Charged Spherical Black Hole Interior

    A. Bonanno et al. “Structure of the Charged Spherical Black Hole Interior”. In: Proceedings: Mathe- matical and Physical Sciences 450.1940 (1995), pp. 553–567

    work page 1995

  6. [5]

    Black Hole Singularities: A Numerical Approach

    Patrick R. Brady and John D. Smith. “Black Hole Singularities: A Numerical Approach”. In: Physical Review Letters 75.7 (Aug. 1995), pp. 1256–1259

    work page 1995

  7. [6]

    On crossing the Cauchy horizon of a Reiss- ner–Nordstr¨ om black-hole

    Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar and James B. Hartle. “On crossing the Cauchy horizon of a Reiss- ner–Nordstr¨ om black-hole”. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 384 (1982), pp. 301–315

    work page 1982

  8. [7]

    On the Global Uniqueness for the Einstein–Maxwell-Scalar Field System with a Cosmological Constant: Part 3. Mass Inflation and Extendibility of the Solutions

    Jo˜ ao L. Costa et al. “On the Global Uniqueness for the Einstein–Maxwell-Scalar Field System with a Cosmological Constant: Part 3. Mass Inflation and Extendibility of the Solutions”. In: Annals of PDE 3.1 (Mar. 2017)

    work page 2017

Show all 54 references
  1. [8]

    Black Holes Without Spacelike Singularities

    Mihalis Dafermos. “Black Holes Without Spacelike Singularities”. In: Comm. Math. Phys. 332.2 (May 2014), pp. 729–757

    2014

  2. [9]

    Stability and Instability of the Cauchy Horizon for the Spherically Symmetric Einstein-Maxwell-Scalar Field Equations

    Mihalis Dafermos. “Stability and Instability of the Cauchy Horizon for the Spherically Symmetric Einstein-Maxwell-Scalar Field Equations”. In: Annals of Mathematics 158.3 (2003), pp. 875–928

    2003

  3. [10]

    The interior of charged black holes and the problem of uniqueness in general relativity

    Mihalis Dafermos. “The interior of charged black holes and the problem of uniqueness in general relativity”. In: Comm. Pure and Appl. Math 58.4 (2005), pp. 445–504

    2005

  4. [11]

    The Interior of Dynamical Vacuum Black Holes I: the C 0-stability of the Kerr Cauchy Horizon

    Mihalis Dafermos and Jonathan Luk. The Interior of Dynamical Vacuum Black Holes I: the C 0-stability of the Kerr Cauchy Horizon . 2017. arXiv: 1710.01722 [gr-qc]. 82

    2017

  5. [12]

    A new physical-space approach to decay for the wave equation with applications to black hole spacetimes

    Mihalis Dafermos and Igor Rodnianski. “A new physical-space approach to decay for the wave equation with applications to black hole spacetimes”. In:XVIth International Congress on Mathematical Physics (2009), pp. 421–433

    2009

  6. [13]

    A proof of Price’s law for the collapse of a self-gravitating scalar field

    Mihalis Dafermos and Igor Rodnianski. “A proof of Price’s law for the collapse of a self-gravitating scalar field”. In: Inventiones mathematicae 162.2 (Nov. 2005), pp. 381–457

    2005

  7. [14]

    Lectures on black holes and linear waves

    Mihalis Dafermos and Igor Rodnianski. “Lectures on black holes and linear waves”. In: Evolution equations. Vol. 17. Clay Math. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2013, pp. 97–205

    2013

  8. [15]

    A proof of Price’s Law on Schwarzschild black hole manifolds for all angular momenta

    Roland Donninger, Wilhelm Schlag, and Avy Soffer. “A proof of Price’s Law on Schwarzschild black hole manifolds for all angular momenta”. In: Adv. Math. 226.1 (Jan. 2011), pp. 484–540

    2011

  9. [16]

    On pointwise decay of linear waves on a Schwarzschild black hole background

    Roland Donninger, Wilhelm Schlag, and Avy Soffer. “On pointwise decay of linear waves on a Schwarzschild black hole background”. In: Comm. Math. Phys. 309 (2012), pp. 51–86. eprint: 0911.3179

    2012 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Boundedness of Massless Scalar Waves on Kerr Interior Backgrounds

    Anne T. Franzen. “Boundedness of Massless Scalar Waves on Kerr Interior Backgrounds”. In: Annales Henri Poincar´ e21.4 (Feb. 2020), pp. 1045–1111

    2020

  11. [18]

    Boundedness of Massless Scalar Waves on Reissner-Nordstr¨ om Interior Back- grounds

    Anne T. Franzen. “Boundedness of Massless Scalar Waves on Reissner-Nordstr¨ om Interior Back- grounds”. In: Comm. Math. Phys. 343 (2016), pp. 601–650

    2016

  12. [19]

    A sharp version of Price’s law for wave decay on asymptotically flat spacetimes

    Peter Hintz. “A sharp version of Price’s law for wave decay on asymptotically flat spacetimes”. In: Comm. Math. Phys. 389.1 (2022), pp. 491–542

    2022

  13. [20]

    Boundedness and decay of scalar waves at the Cauchy horizon of the Kerr spacetime

    Peter Hintz. “Boundedness and decay of scalar waves at the Cauchy horizon of the Kerr spacetime”. In: Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici 92.4 (Oct. 2017), pp. 801–837

    2017

  14. [21]

    Analysis of linear waves near the Cauchy horizon of cosmological black holes

    Peter Hintz and Andr´ as Vasy. “Analysis of linear waves near the Cauchy horizon of cosmological black holes”. In: Journal of Mathematical Physics 58.8 (Aug. 2017)

    2017

  15. [22]

    Evolution of the interior of a charged black hole

    William A. Hiscock. “Evolution of the interior of a charged black hole”. In: Phys. Lett. A 83.3 (1981), pp. 110–112

    1981

  16. [23]

    Strong Cosmic Censorship in the presence of matter: the decisive effect of horizon oscillations on the black hole interior geometry

    Christoph Kehle and Maxime Van de Moortel. Strong Cosmic Censorship in the presence of matter: the decisive effect of horizon oscillations on the black hole interior geometry . 2022. arXiv: 2105.04604 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Gravitational collapse to extremal black holes and the third law of black hole thermodynamics

    Christoph Kehle and Ryan Unger. Gravitational collapse to extremal black holes and the third law of black hole thermodynamics . 2022. arXiv: 2211.15742 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Uniform decay estimates and the Lorentz invariance of the classical wave equa- tion

    Sergiu Klainerman. “Uniform decay estimates and the Lorentz invariance of the classical wave equa- tion”. In: Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 38.3 (1985), pp. 321–332

    1985

  19. [26]

    On almost global existence for nonrelativistic wave equa- tions in 3D

    Sergiu Klainerman and Thomas C. Sideris. “On almost global existence for nonrelativistic wave equa- tions in 3D”. In: Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 49.3 (1996), pp. 307–321

    1996

  20. [27]

    The Global Structure of Spherically Symmetric Charged Scalar Field Space- times

    Jonathan Kommemi. “The Global Structure of Spherically Symmetric Charged Scalar Field Space- times”. In: Comm. Math. Phys. 323 (2013), pp. 35–106

    2013

  21. [28]

    Improved Decay for Solutions to the Linear Wave Equation on a Schwarzschild Black Hole

    Jonathan Luk. “Improved Decay for Solutions to the Linear Wave Equation on a Schwarzschild Black Hole”. In: Annales Henri Poincar´ e11.5 (Oct. 2010), pp. 805–880

    2010

  22. [30]

    Proof of linear instability of the Reissner–Nordstr¨ om Cauchy horizon under scalar perturbations

    Jonathan Luk and Sung-Jin Oh. “Proof of linear instability of the Reissner–Nordstr¨ om Cauchy horizon under scalar perturbations”. In: Duke Mathematical Journal 166.3 (Feb. 2017)

    2017

  23. [31]

    Strong cosmic censorship in spherical symmetry for two-ended asymp- totically flat initial data I. The interior of the black hole region

    Jonathan Luk and Sung-Jin Oh. “Strong cosmic censorship in spherical symmetry for two-ended asymp- totically flat initial data I. The interior of the black hole region”. In: Annals of Mathematics 190.1 (2019), pp. 1–111

    2019

  24. [32]

    Strong Cosmic Censorship in Spherical Symmetry for Two-Ended Asymptotically Flat Initial Data II: The Exterior of the Black Hole Region

    Jonathan Luk and Sung-Jin Oh. “Strong Cosmic Censorship in Spherical Symmetry for Two-Ended Asymptotically Flat Initial Data II: The Exterior of the Black Hole Region”. In: Annals of PDE 5.1 (Mar. 2019), p. 6

    2019

  25. [33]

    A Scattering Theory Approach to Cauchy Horizon Instability and Applications to Mass Inflation

    Jonathan Luk, Sung-Jin Oh, and Yakov Shlapentokh-Rothman. “A Scattering Theory Approach to Cauchy Horizon Instability and Applications to Mass Inflation”. In:Annales Henri Poincar´ e24.2 (July 2022), pp. 363–411

    2022

  26. [34]

    Instability results for the wave equation in the interior of Kerr black holes

    Jonathan Luk and Jan Sbierski. “Instability results for the wave equation in the interior of Kerr black holes”. English. In: Journal of functional analysis 271.7 (Oct. 2016), pp. 1948–1995. issn: 0022-1236

    2016

  27. [35]

    Precise late-time asymptotics of scalar field in the interior of a subextreme Kerr black hole and its application in Strong Cosmic Censorship conjecture

    Siyuan Ma and Lin Zhang. “Precise late-time asymptotics of scalar field in the interior of a subextreme Kerr black hole and its application in Strong Cosmic Censorship conjecture”. In: Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 376 (2023), pp. 7815–7856. 83

    2023

  28. [36]

    Sharp Decay for Teukolsky Equation in Kerr Spacetimes

    Siyuan Ma and Lin Zhang. “Sharp Decay for Teukolsky Equation in Kerr Spacetimes”. In: Comm. Math. Phys. 401.1 (Feb. 2023), pp. 333–434

    2023

  29. [37]

    Instability of black hole inner horizons

    John Michael McNamara. “Instability of black hole inner horizons”. In: Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 358 (1978), pp. 499–517

    1978

  30. [38]

    Price’s law on nonstationary space-times

    Jason Metcalfe, Daniel Tataru, and Mihai Tohaneanu. “Price’s law on nonstationary space-times”. In: Adv. Math. 230.3 (2012), pp. 995–1028

    2012

  31. [39]

    Optimal decay for solutions of the Teukolsky equation on the Kerr metric for the full subextremal range |a| < M

    Pascal Millet. Optimal decay for solutions of the Teukolsky equation on the Kerr metric for the full subextremal range |a| < M. 2023. arXiv: 2302.06946

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    The rp-weighted energy method of Dafermos and Rodnianski in general asymp- totically flat spacetimes and applications

    Georgios Moschidis. “The rp-weighted energy method of Dafermos and Rodnianski in general asymp- totically flat spacetimes and applications”. In: Annals of PDE 2.6 (2016), pp. 1–194

    2016

  33. [41]

    Inner structure of a charged black hole: an exact mass-inflation solution

    Amos Ori. “Inner structure of a charged black hole: an exact mass-inflation solution”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 67.7 (1991), pp. 789–792

    1991

  34. [42]

    Structure of space-time

    Roger Penrose. “Structure of space-time”. In: Battelle Rencontres (Jan. 1968). Ed. by C.M. de Witt and J.A. Wheeler, pp. 121–235

    1968

  35. [43]

    Inner-horizon instability and mass inflation in black holes

    Eric Poisson and Werner Israel. “Inner-horizon instability and mass inflation in black holes”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 63 (16 Oct. 1989), pp. 1663–1666

    1989

  36. [44]

    Internal structure of black holes

    Eric Poisson and Werner Israel. “Internal structure of black holes”. In: Phys. Rev. D 41 (6 Mar. 1990), pp. 1796–1809

    1990

  37. [45]

    Strong cosmic censorship for the spherically symmetric Einstein-Maxwell-charged- Klein-Gordon system with positive Λ: stability of the Cauchy horizon and H 1 extensions

    Flavio Rossetti. “Strong cosmic censorship for the spherically symmetric Einstein-Maxwell-charged- Klein-Gordon system with positive Λ: stability of the Cauchy horizon and H 1 extensions”. In: Annales Henri Poincar´ e(June 2024)

    2024

  38. [46]

    Price’s law for spherically symmetric charged black holes

    Quinten Rutgers. “Price’s law for spherically symmetric charged black holes”. In preparation. 2024+

    2024

  39. [47]

    Instability of the Kerr Cauchy horizon under linearised gravitational perturbations

    Jan Sbierski. “Instability of the Kerr Cauchy horizon under linearised gravitational perturbations”. In: Annals of PDE 9.7 (2023)

    2023

  40. [48]

    On holonomy singularities in general relativity and the C 0,1 loc -inextendibility of space- times

    Jan Sbierski. “On holonomy singularities in general relativity and the C 0,1 loc -inextendibility of space- times”. In: Duke Mathematical Journal 171.14 (2022), pp. 2881–2942

    2022

  41. [49]

    The C 0-inextendibility of the Schwarzschild spacetime and the spacelike diameter in Lorentzian geometry

    Jan Sbierski. “The C 0-inextendibility of the Schwarzschild spacetime and the spacelike diameter in Lorentzian geometry”. In: Journal of Differential Geometry 108.2 (2018), pp. 319–378

    2018

  42. [50]

    Internal instability in a Reissner–Nordstr¨ om black hole

    Michael Simpson and Roger Penrose. “Internal instability in a Reissner–Nordstr¨ om black hole”. In: Int. J. Theor. Phys. 7.3 (Apr. 1973), pp. 183–197

    1973

  43. [51]

    Local decay of waves on asymptotically flat stationary space-times

    Daniel Tataru. “Local decay of waves on asymptotically flat stationary space-times”. In: American Journal of Mathematics 135.2 (2013), pp. 361–401

    2013

  44. [52]

    Mass inflation and the C 2-inextendibility of spherically symmetric charged scalar field dynamical black holes

    Maxime Van de Moortel. “Mass inflation and the C 2-inextendibility of spherically symmetric charged scalar field dynamical black holes”. In: Comm. Math. Phys. 382.2 (2021), pp. 1263–1341

    2021

  45. [53]

    Stability and Instability of the Sub-extremal Reissner–Nordstr¨ om Black Hole Interior for the Einstein–Maxwell–Klein–Gordon Equations in Spherical Symmetry

    Maxime Van de Moortel. “Stability and Instability of the Sub-extremal Reissner–Nordstr¨ om Black Hole Interior for the Einstein–Maxwell–Klein–Gordon Equations in Spherical Symmetry”. In: Comm. Math. Phys. 360.1 (Jan. 2018), pp. 103–168

    2018

  46. [54]

    The coexistence of null and spacelike singularities inside spherically sym- metric black holes

    Maxime Van de Moortel. “The coexistence of null and spacelike singularities inside spherically sym- metric black holes”. In preparation. 2024+. Department of Mathematics, Princeton University Email address : gm9165@princeton.edu 84

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.