Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Estimation and Inference in Ultrahigh Dimensional Partially Linear Single-Index Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.04471 v1 pith:QR6TNWI6 submitted 2024-04-06 stat.ME math.STstat.TH

classification stat.MEmath.STstat.TH
keywords testdimensionalstatisticestimationinferenceproposeproposedultrahigh
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

This paper is concerned with estimation and inference for ultrahigh dimensional partially linear single-index models. The presence of high dimensional nuisance parameter and nuisance unknown function makes the estimation and inference problem very challenging. In this paper, we first propose a profile partial penalized least squares estimator and establish the sparsity, consistency and asymptotic representation of the proposed estimator in ultrahigh dimensional setting. We then propose an $F$-type test statistic for parameters of primary interest and show that the limiting null distribution of the test statistic is $\chi^2$ distribution, and the test statistic can detect local alternatives, which converge to the null hypothesis at the root-$n$ rate. We further propose a new test for the specification testing problem of the nonparametric function. The test statistic is shown to be asymptotically normal. Simulation studies are conducted to examine the finite sample performance of the proposed estimators and tests. A real data example is used to illustrate the proposed procedures.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Short Note of Comparison between Convex and Non-convex Penalized Likelihood

    stat.ME 2025-02 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    Lasso is convex and fast but biased; SCAD and MCP reduce bias but are non-convex and slower, so method choice depends on context.

Pith tools