pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.25955 · v1 · pith:QRWDMLZEnew · submitted 2026-06-24 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Single-dish HI Intensity Mapping with the SKAO: Precursor Progress with MeerKAT's Large Area Synoptic Survey (MeerKLASS)

Steven Cunnington , Jingying Wang , Mario G. Santos , Matilde Barberi-Squarotti , Philip Bull , Stefano Camera , Isabella P. Carucci , Zhaoting Chen
show 11 more authors
Brandon Engelbrecht Jos\'e Fonseca Karin Fornazier Keith Grainge Wenkai Hu Melis O. Irfan Yichao Li Alkistis Pourtsidou Marta Spinelli Amadeus Witzemann Laura Wolz
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-25 20:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords single-dish HI intensity mappingMeerKAT MeerKLASSSKAO precursor21cm cosmologycross-correlationauto-power spectrumforeground mitigation
0
0 comments X

The pith

MeerKAT single-dish observations detect cosmological HI signals and validate the strategy for SKA-Mid.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that MeerKAT's Large Area Synoptic Survey has produced high-significance cross-correlations between HI intensity maps and optical galaxy surveys along with measurable auto-power spectra from single-dish total-power observations. These detections show that stable calibration and foreground mitigation can recover cosmological signal even when scanning wide areas in auto-correlation mode. A sympathetic reader cares because the largest cosmological scales require surveys spanning thousands of square degrees, which single-dish operation makes feasible. If the results hold, the same methods can be scaled directly to SKA-Mid to map neutral hydrogen over much larger volumes at higher redshifts.

Core claim

MeerKLASS has achieved multiple cosmological detections from single-dish HI intensity mapping, including high-significance cross-correlations with optical galaxy surveys and continually improving measurements of the HI auto-power spectrum. These results demonstrate that stable calibration, effective foreground mitigation, and statistical recovery of cosmological signal are all achievable with a large multi-dish telescope in total-power mode. The success of MeerKLASS therefore validates the observational strategies required for SKA-Mid and marks a key milestone in demonstrating the viability of single-dish HI intensity mapping for cosmology.

What carries the argument

Single-dish auto-correlation mode observations of the 21 cm line on a multi-dish array, enabling wide-sky total-power intensity mapping.

If this is right

  • SKA-Mid can apply the same single-dish methodology in Band 1 to reach redshifts up to z approximately 3.
  • The approach will map cosmological volumes several orders of magnitude larger than those currently accessible.
  • The refined techniques form the operational foundation for a large portion of the SKAO cosmology programme.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The single-dish route may prove complementary to interferometric surveys by more efficiently capturing the largest-scale modes needed for certain cosmological tests.
  • Successful validation at MeerKAT wavelengths could accelerate planning for intensity-mapping campaigns on other existing or planned radio facilities.
  • If foreground control continues to improve, the auto-power spectrum measurements alone may eventually yield competitive constraints on the HI bias and growth rate without requiring optical cross-matches.

Load-bearing premise

The reported cross-correlations and auto-power spectra arise from genuine cosmological HI rather than residual systematics or foreground leakage.

What would settle it

An independent re-analysis of the same MeerKAT data using an alternative foreground-cleaning pipeline that removes the reported cross-correlation signal at high significance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.25955 by Alkistis Pourtsidou, Amadeus Witzemann, Brandon Engelbrecht, Isabella P. Carucci, Jingying Wang, Jos\'e Fonseca, Karin Fornazier, Keith Grainge, Laura Wolz, Mario G. Santos, Marta Spinelli, Matilde Barberi-Squarotti, Melis O. Irfan, Philip Bull, Stefano Camera, Steven Cunnington, Wenkai Hu, Yichao Li, Zhaoting Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Flowchart showing each step in the KATcali calibration pipeline. For calibration, we construct a model for all components that contribute to the total signal and fit the free parameters by comparing the model to the TOD using a prescribed likelihood with priors. Our model, in temperature units, is expressed as 𝑇model(𝑡, 𝜈) = 𝑇ps(𝑡, 𝜈) + 𝑇diffuse (𝑡, 𝜈) + 𝑇el(𝑡, 𝜈) + 𝑇diode (𝑡, 𝜈) + 𝑇rec (𝑡, 𝜈), (1) where 𝑇… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The mean sky map (𝑇sky) and corresponding residuals (𝑇res ≡ 𝑇cal − 𝑇model) at 1023 MHz from the combination of all scans. Magenta dots mark the positions of point sources with flux > 1 Jy at 1.4 GHz, which were not included in the sky model used for calibration. flux response at different beam positions. We can obtain the diode power fitting results, 𝑇diode (𝜈), for two tracking observations that are befor… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Linear regression between MeerKLASS and ancillary data: OVRO-LWA at 1.8◦ resolution (left) and Maipi/MU at 5◦ resolution (right). Through the use of linear regression between MeerKLASS and ancillary datasets measurements of the average spectral index across the 154◦ < 𝛼 < 163◦ region were obtained under the assumption that the MeerKLASS maps are so dominated by diffuse Galactic synchrotron emission that, i… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Spectral energy distribution between OVRO-LWA, Haslam and MeerKLASS data (left). MeerK￾LASS (green), EDGES (blue) and ARCADE2 (red) predictions for the spectral index at 980 MHz (right). synchrotron spectral index: ARCADE2 (Fixsen et al., 2011) and EDGES (Mozdzen et al., 2019). For the spectral curvature results, the synchrotron template made from Haslam data was preferred over the Haslam data themselves d… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Cross-correlation power spectra between both MeerKLASS L-band intensity maps and overlapping galaxy surveys, all at 𝑧 ∼ 0.43. Coloured dashed lines are the fitted models to each set of data points. Hollow markers indicate negative power. MeerKLASS L-band pilot survey × WiggleZ: ∼10 hours of useable observations between 1015−973 MHz (0.4 < 𝑧 < 0.46), targeting a single patch of ∼ 200 deg2 spanning (153◦ , 1… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Left panel: The measured angular stacked image. The dashed circle shows the 1.2 deg boundary. Central panel: The measurement of the stacked spectrum (“Stacked spectrum”). The orange dashed line shows the average of the reference spectrum over the random shuffles (“Reference spectrum”). The shaded region shows the estimated measurement error (“Measurement error”). Right panel: The estimated correlation matr… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Left panel: Number count of useable (unflagged due to contamination) 3D voxels in maps within the 971–1075 MHz band per dish (𝑥-axis) and observation block (𝑦-axis). Out of the 41 observed blocks, 14 are completely flagged and therefore not shown in this plot. The definition of the subsets (𝑠A to 𝑠D) is highlighted with magenta lines and is carried out, ensuring that the global number counts (and thus the … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: MeerKLASS intensity maps at 760 MHz shown by the fluctuating colour map region. The full UHF-band range will cover 0.4 < 𝑧 < 1.45 gives it a ∼ 400× larger volume than the L-band deep field (black￾solid) (0.4 < 𝑧 < 0.46) which yielded the most recent published MeerKLASS results. Dotted and solid red outlines mark the approximate footprints for MeerKLASS XLP observations, which commenced in early 2025 and wi… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Using the SKAO to map the intensity of neutral hydrogen's 21cm emission line will be a golden opportunity to constrain models of cosmology. To access the largest cosmological scales, wide-sky surveys should ideally reach thousands of square degrees, requiring SKA-Mid's dishes to scan the sky in auto-correlation mode, so-called single-dish observations. In this chapter, we overview the latest results from MeerKAT's Large Area Synoptic Survey (MeerKLASS), which has been pioneering this single-dish observing strategy, and motivating its continuation with the SKA-Mid AA4 deployment. MeerKLASS, operating on the same Karoo site where the SKA-Mid is being built, has now achieved multiple cosmological detections from single-dish observations, including high-significance cross-correlations with optical galaxy surveys and continually improving measurements of the HI auto-power spectrum. These results demonstrate that stable calibration, effective foreground mitigation, and statistical recovery of cosmological signal are all achievable with a large multi-dish telescope in total-power mode. The success of MeerKLASS therefore validates the observational strategies required for SKA-Mid and marks a key milestone in demonstrating the viability of single-dish HI intensity mapping for cosmology. Looking ahead, SKA-Mid's increased sensitivity and Band 1 coverage (350-1050 MHz) will allow the same methodology to probe redshifts up to $z\,{\sim}\,3$, mapping volumes several orders of magnitude larger than currently accessible. The techniques refined with MeerKLASS thus form the operational and scientific foundation for a large portion of the SKAO's cosmology programme.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript overviews results from MeerKAT's Large Area Synoptic Survey (MeerKLASS), reporting multiple cosmological detections via single-dish HI intensity mapping. These include high-significance cross-correlations with optical galaxy surveys and improving measurements of the HI auto-power spectrum. The central claim is that stable calibration, effective foreground mitigation, and statistical recovery of cosmological signal have been demonstrated, thereby validating observational strategies for SKA-Mid and establishing a foundation for its cosmology program up to z~3.

Significance. If the reported cross-correlations and auto-spectra are shown to be genuine cosmological HI signal, the work would represent a key empirical milestone for single-dish intensity mapping on a large multi-dish array. It would directly support the feasibility of wide-sky, total-power observations with SKA-Mid, enabling access to the largest cosmological scales in HI.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The headline validation claim—that MeerKLASS 'validates the observational strategies required for SKA-Mid'—rests on the assertion of 'high-significance cross-correlations' and 'statistical recovery of cosmological signal.' However, the abstract supplies no quantitative significance levels, error bars, null-test results, simulation-based recovery fractions, or frequency-dependent leakage checks. This directly impacts the load-bearing assumption that the statistical signatures arise from genuine 21 cm signal rather than residual systematics or foreground leakage.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The LaTeX rendering of redshift range (z\,{\sim}\,3) should be standardized for journal style.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed review and for highlighting the need for greater quantitative support in the abstract. We address the comment below and will make the requested revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The headline validation claim—that MeerKLASS 'validates the observational strategies required for SKA-Mid'—rests on the assertion of 'high-significance cross-correlations' and 'statistical recovery of cosmological signal.' However, the abstract supplies no quantitative significance levels, error bars, null-test results, simulation-based recovery fractions, or frequency-dependent leakage checks. This directly impacts the load-bearing assumption that the statistical signatures arise from genuine 21 cm signal rather than residual systematics or foreground leakage.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by the inclusion of specific quantitative metrics. In the revised version we will update the abstract to report the measured significance levels of the cross-correlations (with associated error bars), reference the null-test results and simulation-based recovery fractions presented in the main body, and note the frequency-dependent leakage checks that have been performed. These additions will make the validation claim more self-contained while remaining within the abstract length constraints. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results rest on external cross-correlations.

full rationale

The paper reports observational detections (cross-correlations with independent optical surveys and auto-power spectra) from MeerKLASS single-dish data. These measurements supply external grounding rather than internal fits or predictions. The validation claim for SKA-Mid follows directly from the reported statistical recovery and foreground mitigation, without any self-definitional loops, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. No equations or derivation chains are present that reduce the central result to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated or extractable from the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5921 in / 1066 out tokens · 28387 ms · 2026-06-25T20:04:37.180954+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    doi:10.18727/0722-6691/5117

    4MOSTCollaborationetal.TheMessenger,175:3–11,Mar.2019. doi:10.18727/0722-6691/5117. J.Akeretetal.AstronomyandComputing,18:8–17,Jan.2017. doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2016.11.001. M. Amiri et al.Astrophys. J. Supp., 261(2):29,

    work page doi:10.18727/0722-6691/5117 2019

  2. [2]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac6fd9. M. Amiri et al.Astrophys. J., 947(1):16,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac6fd9

  3. [4]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0f1d. M. Amiri et al.arXiv:, 11

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0f1d

  4. [6]

    Modelling MeerKAT L-band beams

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab104. Astropy Collaboration et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics, 558:A33, Oct

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab104

  5. [7]

    2012.21704.x

    doi: 10.1051/ 0004-6361/201322068. R.A.Battye,R.D.Davies,andJ.Weller.MNRAS,355:1339–1347,2004.doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966. 2004.08416.x. S. Bharadwaj, B. Nath, B. B. Nath, and S. K. Sethi.J. Astrophys. Astron., 22:21,

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966 2004

  6. [8]

    doi: 10.1007/BF02933588. C. Blake et al.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 406:803–821,

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02933588

  7. [10]

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.063505. A. Bracco, M. Padovani, and D. Galli.Astronomy & Astrophysics, 686:A52, June

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.063505

  8. [11]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449625. P. Bull, P. G. Ferreira, P. Patel, and M. G. Santos.Astrophys. J., 803(1):21,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449625

  9. [12]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202453461. T.-C. Chang, U.-L. Pen, J. B. Peterson, and P. McDonald.Phys. Rev. Lett., 100:091303,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453461

  10. [13]

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.091303. S. Chatterjee et al. InAdvancing Astrophysics with the SKA – II (AASKAII)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.091303

  11. [14]

    Chen et al.arXiv e-prints, art

    Z. Chen et al.arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:2504.03908, Apr

    arXiv

  12. [15]

    CHIME Collaboration et al.APJ, 947(1):16, Apr

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.03908. CHIME Collaboration et al.APJ, 947(1):16, Apr

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.03908

  13. [16]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb13f. S. Cunnington et al.MNRAS, 523(2):2453–2477, Aug

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acb13f

  14. [17]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1567. S. Cunnington et al.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 518(4):6262–6272,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1567

  15. [19]

    doi: 10.1007/s10509-026-04547-7. N. Dalal, O. Dore, D. Huterer, and A. Shirokov.Phys. Rev. D, 77:123514,

    work page doi:10.1007/s10509-026-04547-7

  16. [20]

    D.I.L.deVilliers.IEEETransactionsonAntennasandPropagation,61(5):2457–2465,2013

    doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevD.77.123514. D.I.L.deVilliers.IEEETransactionsonAntennasandPropagation,61(5):2457–2465,2013. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2013.2239953. DESI Collaboration et al. 10

    work page doi:10.1109/tap.2013.2239953 2013

  17. [22]

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010. 18188.x. S.P.Driveretal.Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc.,513(1):439–467,2022. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac472. D. A. Dunne et al.APJ, 965(1):7, Apr

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010 2010

  18. [23]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2dfc. D. A. Dunne et al.arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:2503.21743, Mar

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2dfc

  19. [24]

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503. 21743. M. W. Eastwood et al.The Astronomical Journal, 156(1):32, July

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503

  20. [25]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ aac721. D. J. Eisenstein and W. Hu.Astrophys. J., 496:605,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/

  21. [26]

    doi: 10.1086/305424. K. M. A. Elahi et al. InAdvancing Astrophysics with the SKA – II (AASKAII)

    work page doi:10.1086/305424

  22. [28]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/734/1/5. J. Fonseca et al. InAdvancing Astrophysics with the SKA – II (AASKAII)

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/734/1/5

  23. [29]

    2006.08.002

    doi: 10.1016/j.physrep. 2006.08.002. A. E. Guzmán, J. May, H. Alvarez, and K. Maeda.Astronomy & Astrophysics, 525:A138, Jan

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep 2006

  24. [30]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913628. C. G. T. Haslam, C. J. Salter, H. Stoffel, and W. E. Wilson.Astronomy & Astrophysicss, 47:1–143, Jan

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913628

  25. [31]

    W.Huetal.Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc.,493(4):5854–5870,Apr.2020.doi:10.1093/mnras/staa650

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.76.083012. W.Huetal.Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc.,493(4):5854–5870,Apr.2020.doi:10.1093/mnras/staa650. M. O. Irfan et al.MNRAS, 509(4):4923–4939, Feb

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.76.083012 2020

  26. [32]

    MNRAS , keywords =

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3346. J.JonasandMeerKATTeam. InMeerKATScience:OnthePathwaytotheSKA,page1,Jan.2016. doi: 10.22323/1.277.0001. I. I. Khabibullin et al.MNRAS, 521(4):5536–5556, June

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3346 2016

  27. [33]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad818. E. D. Kovetz et al. 9

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad818

  28. [34]

    doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/79/4/046902. R. Lehmensiek and D. I. de Villiers. In2019 URSI Asia-Pacific Radio Science Conference (AP- RASC), pages 1–3,

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/79/4/046902

  29. [35]

    doi: 10.23919/URSIAP-RASC.2019.8738133. Y. Li et al.Astrophys. J., 954(2):139,

    work page doi:10.23919/ursiap-rasc.2019.8738133 2019

  30. [36]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace896. J. Liske et al.MNRAS, 452(2):2087–2126, Sept

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ace896 2087

  31. [37]

    MNRAS , year=2015, volume=452, pages=

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1436. A.LiuandJ.R.Shaw.Publ.Astron.Soc.Pac.,132(1012):062001,2020. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ ab5bfd. LSST DESC et al. 9

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1436 2020

  32. [38]

    doi: 10.2172/1471560. M. Lujan Niemeyer et al.APJl, 934(2):L26, Aug. 2022a. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac82e5. M. Lujan Niemeyer et al.APJ, 929(1):90, Apr. 2022b. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5cb8. S. Manconi, A. Cuoco, and J. Lesgourgues.Physical Review Letters, 129(11):111103, Sept

    work page doi:10.2172/1471560 2041

  33. [39]

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.111103. S. Mangla et al. 12

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.111103

  34. [40]

    P.McDonaldandU.Seljak.JCAP,2009(10):007,Oct.2009.doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2009/10/007

    doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/763/1/L20. P.McDonaldandU.Seljak.JCAP,2009(10):007,Oct.2009.doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2009/10/007. 22 Single-dish IM with the SKAO Cunnington & Wang et al. MeerKLASS Collaboration et al.MNRAS, 537(4):3632–3661, Mar

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/763/1/l20 2041

  35. [41]

    S., Genel, S., et al

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/ staf195. MeerKLASS Collaboration et al. in prep. T. J. Mozdzen et al.MNRAS, 483(4):4411–4423, Mar

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/

  36. [42]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3410. S. K. Ocker, J. M. Cordes, S. Chatterjee, and M. R. Gorsuch.APJ, 934(1):71, July

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3410

  37. [43]

    A.R.Offringaetal.MNRAS,405(1):155–167,June2010

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac75ba. A.R.Offringaetal.MNRAS,405(1):155–167,June2010. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16471.x. E. Orlando and A. Strong.MNRAS, 436(3):2127–2142, Dec

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac75ba 2010

  38. [44]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1718. M. Padovani et al.arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:2106.10929, June

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1718

  39. [46]

    10.1051/0004-6361/201525967

    ISSN 1432-0746. doi: 10.1051/ 0004-6361/201525967. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201525967. M. Santos et al. InAdvancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array (AASKA14), page 19, Apr

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525967

  40. [47]

    doi: 10.22323/1.215.0019. M. G. Santos et al. InMeerKAT Science: On the Pathway to the SKA, 9

    work page doi:10.22323/1.215.0019

  41. [48]

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.083007. U. Seljak.Physical Review Letters, 102(2):021302, Jan

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.083007

  42. [49]

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102. 021302. F. Sinigaglia, E. Elson, G. Rodighiero, and M. Vaccari.MNRAS, 514(3):4205–4221, Aug

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102

  43. [50]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1584. F. Sinigaglia et al.Astron. Astrophys., 704:A152,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1584

  44. [51]

    SKAOCosmologySWGetal.Publ.Astron.Soc.Austral.,37:e007,2020

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555928. SKAOCosmologySWGetal.Publ.Astron.Soc.Austral.,37:e007,2020. doi:10.1017/pasa.2019

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555928 2020

  45. [52]

    D.TramonteandY.-Z.Ma.MNRAS,498(4):5916–5935,Nov.2020

    doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slt074. D.TramonteandY.-Z.Ma.MNRAS,498(4):5916–5935,Nov.2020. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2727. D.Tramonte,Y.-Z.Ma,Y.-C.Li,andL.Staveley-Smith.MNRAS,489(1):385–400,Oct.2019. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2146. F. Villaescusa-Navarro et al.Astrophys. J., 866(2):135,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slt074 2020

  46. [53]

    23 Single-dish IM with the SKAO Cunnington & Wang et al

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aadba0. 23 Single-dish IM with the SKAO Cunnington & Wang et al. J. Wang et al.MNRAS, 505(3):3698–3721, Aug

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aadba0

  47. [54]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1365. I. K. Wehus et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics, 597:A131, Jan

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1365

  48. [55]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/ 201525659. M. White, Y.-S. Song, and W. J. Percival.MNRAS, 397(3):1348–1354, Aug

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/

  49. [56]

    2009, MNRAS, 394, 1825, doi:10.1111/j

    doi: 10.1111/j. 1365-2966.2008.14379.x. M. J. Wilensky, M. O. Irfan, and P. Bull.arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:2409.06770, Sept

    work page doi:10.1111/j 2008

  50. [57]

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.06770. T. L. Wilson, K. Rohlfs, and S. Hüttemeister.Tools of Radio Astronomy

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.06770

  51. [58]

    L.Wolzetal

    doi: 10.1007/ 978-3-642-39950-3. L.Wolzetal. InAdvancingAstrophysicswiththeSKA–II(AASKAII).2026. arXivsearch:Report number AASKAII/Wolz01. L.Wolzetal.Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc.,464(4):4938–4949,2017. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2556. L.Wolzetal.Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc.,510(3):3495–3511,2022. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3621. S.Wyithe,A.Loeb,andP.Geil.MNRAS,383:1195,2008. ...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2556 2026

  52. [59]

    doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-32362-1_2. 24

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32362-1_2