Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2108.04884 v3 pith:QU7RSHPF submitted 2021-08-10 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords dataadultdatasetscensusfairnessresearchalgorithmicavailable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Although the fairness community has recognized the importance of data, researchers in the area primarily rely on UCI Adult when it comes to tabular data. Derived from a 1994 US Census survey, this dataset has appeared in hundreds of research papers where it served as the basis for the development and comparison of many algorithmic fairness interventions. We reconstruct a superset of the UCI Adult data from available US Census sources and reveal idiosyncrasies of the UCI Adult dataset that limit its external validity. Our primary contribution is a suite of new datasets derived from US Census surveys that extend the existing data ecosystem for research on fair machine learning. We create prediction tasks relating to income, employment, health, transportation, and housing. The data span multiple years and all states of the United States, allowing researchers to study temporal shift and geographic variation. We highlight a broad initial sweep of new empirical insights relating to trade-offs between fairness criteria, performance of algorithmic interventions, and the role of distribution shift based on our new datasets. Our findings inform ongoing debates, challenge some existing narratives, and point to future research directions. Our datasets are available at https://github.com/zykls/folktables.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 3 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Linear Strategic Classification with Endogenous Improvements

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    In a linear strategic-classification model where manipulation can genuinely improve outcomes, the optimal strategic classifier is a parallel shift of the Bayes boundary, and it is a provably better proxy for the impro...

  2. "All that Glitters": Approaches to Evaluations with Unreliable Model and Human Annotations

    cs.CL 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Encoder models trained on noisy classroom ratings look super-human under standard concordance metrics, but generalizability, disattenuation, and hierarchical rater analyses show the apparent advantage is partly spurio...

Pith tools