REVIEW 1 cited by
Understanding the Relationship between Prompts and Response Uncertainty in Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are widely used in decision-making, but their reliability, especially in critical tasks like healthcare, is not well-established. Therefore, understanding how LLMs reason and make decisions is crucial for their safe deployment. This paper investigates how the uncertainty of responses generated by LLMs relates to the information provided in the input prompt. Leveraging the insight that LLMs learn to infer latent concepts during pretraining, we propose a prompt-response concept model that explains how LLMs generate responses and helps understand the relationship between prompts and response uncertainty. We show that the uncertainty decreases as the prompt's informativeness increases, similar to epistemic uncertainty. Our detailed experimental results on real-world datasets validate our proposed model.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Multimodal LLM Augmented Reasoning for Interpretable Visual Perception Analysis
A multimodal LLM's pairwise judgments on visual clutter and Gestalt simplicity correlate most strongly with human visual complexity ratings across the SAVOIAS and IC9600 datasets.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.