Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

LMStyle Benchmark: Evaluating Text Style Transfer for Chatbots

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.08943 v1 pith:QY6IOMJ5 submitted 2024-03-13 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords benchmarklmstylestyleevaluationllmsmetricstransferappropriateness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Since the breakthrough of ChatGPT, large language models (LLMs) have garnered significant attention in the research community. With the development of LLMs, the question of text style transfer for conversational models has emerged as a natural extension, where chatbots may possess their own styles or even characters. However, standard evaluation metrics have not yet been established for this new settings. This paper aims to address this issue by proposing the LMStyle Benchmark, a novel evaluation framework applicable to chat-style text style transfer (C-TST), that can measure the quality of style transfer for LLMs in an automated and scalable manner. In addition to conventional style strength metrics, LMStyle Benchmark further considers a novel aspect of metrics called appropriateness, a high-level metrics take account of coherence, fluency and other implicit factors without the aid of reference samples. Our experiments demonstrate that the new evaluation methods introduced by LMStyle Benchmark have a higher correlation with human judgments in terms of appropriateness. Based on LMStyle Benchmark, we present a comprehensive list of evaluation results for popular LLMs, including LLaMA, Alpaca, and Vicuna, reflecting their stylistic properties, such as formality and sentiment strength, along with their appropriateness.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Classic4Children: Adapting Chinese Literary Classics for Children with Large Language Model

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    InstructChild fine-tunes Qwen2-7B with personality and narrative structure instructions plus a readability reward, and reports better child-friendly adaptations of the Four Great Classical Novels than GPT-4o and other...

  2. Mitigating Stylistic Biases of Machine Translation Systems via Monolingual Corpora Only

    cs.CL 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Babel detects and repairs stylistic mismatches in machine translation outputs using a style detector and a diffusion-based applicator trained on monolingual corpora.

Pith tools