Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

AI Hospital: Benchmarking Large Language Models in a Multi-agent Medical Interaction Simulator

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.09742 v4 pith:R4DUNTF4 submitted 2024-02-15 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords llmsmedicalemphclinicalhospitalinteractionsdiagnosticgaps
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Artificial intelligence has significantly advanced healthcare, particularly through large language models (LLMs) that excel in medical question answering benchmarks. However, their real-world clinical application remains limited due to the complexities of doctor-patient interactions. To address this, we introduce \textbf{AI Hospital}, a multi-agent framework simulating dynamic medical interactions between \emph{Doctor} as player and NPCs including \emph{Patient}, \emph{Examiner}, \emph{Chief Physician}. This setup allows for realistic assessments of LLMs in clinical scenarios. We develop the Multi-View Medical Evaluation (MVME) benchmark, utilizing high-quality Chinese medical records and NPCs to evaluate LLMs' performance in symptom collection, examination recommendations, and diagnoses. Additionally, a dispute resolution collaborative mechanism is proposed to enhance diagnostic accuracy through iterative discussions. Despite improvements, current LLMs exhibit significant performance gaps in multi-turn interactions compared to one-step approaches. Our findings highlight the need for further research to bridge these gaps and improve LLMs' clinical diagnostic capabilities. Our data, code, and experimental results are all open-sourced at \url{https://github.com/LibertFan/AI_Hospital}.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. TinyTroupe: An LLM-powered Multiagent Persona Simulation Toolkit

    cs.MA 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    TinyTroupe provides a toolkit for fine-grained persona-based LLM multi-agent simulations with built-in support for population sampling, experimentation, and validation.

  2. Toward the Autonomous AI Doctor: Quantitative Benchmarking of an Autonomous Agentic AI Versus Board-Certified Clinicians in a Real World Setting

    cs.HC 2025-06 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a retrospective sample of 500 urgent-care telehealth visits, a proprietary AI doctor matched clinicians' top diagnosis 81% of the time and treatment plans 99.2% of the time, but the design cannot support claims of ...

  3. FinTeam: A Multi-Agent Collaborative Intelligence System for Comprehensive Financial Scenarios

    cs.CE 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A four-agent LLM pipeline trained with role-specific data improves human preference on comprehensive Chinese financial analysis tasks.

  4. AI4Research: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Research

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that organizes AI-for-research work into five tasks, comprehension, survey, discovery, writing, and peer review, and compiles associated tools and benchmarks.

Pith tools