Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Uncertainty estimation for Cross-dataset performance in Trajectory prediction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.07310 v2 pith:R5GQWQDD submitted 2022-05-15 cs.CV

Uncertainty estimation for Cross-dataset performance in Trajectory prediction

classification cs.CV
keywords predictiontrajectoryacrossbeendatasetsmethodsperformancebetter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

While a lot of work has been carried on developing trajectory prediction methods, and various datasets have been proposed for benchmarking this task, little study has been done so far on the generalizability and the transferability of these methods across dataset. In this paper, we observe the performance of two of the latest state-of-the-art trajectory prediction methods across four different datasets (Argoverse, NuScenes, Interaction, Shifts). This analysis allows to gain some insights on the generalizability proprieties of most recent trajectory prediction models and to analyze which dataset is more representative of real driving scenes and therefore enables better transferability. Furthermore we present a novel method to estimate prediction uncertainty and show how it could be used to achieve better performance across datasets.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. BEVal: A Cross-dataset Evaluation Study of BEV Segmentation Models for Autonomous Driving

    cs.CV 2024-08 accept novelty 5.0

    Cross-dataset tests show BEV segmentation models generalize poorly across datasets and sensor setups, but multi-dataset training improves performance over single-dataset baselines.