Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Efficiently Learning at Test-Time: Active Fine-Tuning of LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.08020 v3 pith:RBXYAWIY submitted 2024-10-10 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords fine-tuningretrievalnearesttest-timeactivedatainformationneighbor
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Recent efforts in fine-tuning language models often rely on automatic data selection, commonly using Nearest Neighbors retrieval from large datasets. However, we theoretically show that this approach tends to select redundant data, limiting its effectiveness or even hurting performance. To address this, we introduce SIFT, a data selection algorithm designed to reduce uncertainty about the model's response given a prompt, which unifies ideas from retrieval and active learning. Whereas Nearest Neighbor retrieval typically fails in the presence of information duplication, SIFT accounts for information duplication and optimizes the overall information gain of the selected examples. We focus our evaluations on fine-tuning at test-time for prompt-specific language modeling on the Pile dataset, and show that SIFT consistently outperforms Nearest Neighbor retrieval, with minimal computational overhead. Moreover, we show that our uncertainty estimates can predict the performance gain of test-time fine-tuning, and use this to develop an adaptive algorithm that invests test-time compute proportional to realized performance gains. We provide the $\texttt{activeft}$ (Active Fine-Tuning) library which can be used as a drop-in replacement for Nearest Neighbor retrieval.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. HiLSVA: Design and Evaluation of a Human-in-the-Loop Agentic System for Scientific Visualization

    cs.HC 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    HiLSVA shows that a human-in-the-loop LLM agent system can help novices and experts complete scientific visualization tasks, while human oversight adds measurable execution time.

  2. RTTC: Reward-Guided Collaborative Test-Time Compute

    cs.CL 2025-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    RTTC uses a reward model to route each query to direct inference, retrieval-augmented generation, or test-time training, plus caching to cut redundant work.

  3. Beyond Independent Passages: Adaptive Passage Combination Retrieval for Retrieval Augmented Open-Domain Question Answering

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    AdaPCR jointly retrieves and reranks passage pairs for open-domain QA, showing small EM/F1 gains over an in-context retrieval baseline, mostly on multi-hop HotpotQA.

  4. Continuous Self-Improvement of Large Language Models by Test-time Training with Verifier-Driven Sample Selection

    cs.CL 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A test-time training method that fine-tunes LoRA adapters on verifier-selected high-confidence pseudo-labels, reporting large gains on math benchmarks, but evaluated on the same queries it adapts on.

Pith tools