Impact of nonlinearities on relativistic dynamical tides in compact binary inspirals

Eric Poisson; Tristan Pitre

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Impact of nonlinearities on relativistic dynamical tides in compact binary inspirals

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Nonlinear tidal effects lower a neutron star's resonant frequency parameter by as much as 15 percent, so the approach to resonance begins earlier during a binary inspiral and the tidal response is amplified.

desk verdict The new GR computation of p2 is solid and worth citing; the flashier 'earlier resonance' claim is a conditional consequence of an admittedly pragmatic single-pole resummation, so the abstract overstates the physics. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.08722 v1 pith:RGTOHVZS submitted 2025-06-10 gr-qc astro-ph.HE

Tristan Pitre , Eric Poisson This is my paper · ORCID

classification gr-qcastro-ph.HE MSC 83C3583C2585A15 PACS 04.30.-w04.25.Nx97.60.Jd

keywords dynamicaltidesneutronstarstidaldeformabilitygeneralrelativitynonlinearpolytropicequationsofstategravitationalwavesresponsefunction

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that nonlinear aspects of the tidal deformation of a neutron star are comparable in size to the dynamical (time-derivative) corrections, and that they cannot be ignored when modeling dynamical tides in a binary inspiral. Working in full general relativity and without calling on a normal-mode decomposition, it computes the quadratic tidal constant $p_2$ for relativistic polytropes and combines it with the static and dynamic constants $k_2$ and $\ddot{k}_2$ into a single-pole response function. The result is a frequency parameter $\omega_*$ that is up to 15 percent smaller than the purely linear estimate, meaning the approach to resonance starts earlier in the inspiral and the tidal response is enhanced. This confirms, in a relativistic setting, the Newtonian mode-based finding of Yu et al. and shows that dynamical and nonlinear tides come together.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the simultaneous time-derivative and nonlinear expansion of the spacetime metric of a tidally deformed body, expressed through perturbation variables for quadrupole, hexadecapole, and monopole sectors. The load-bearing objects are the three tidal constants $k_2$, $\ddot{k}_2$, and $p_2$ appearing in the relation between the mass quadrupole moment and the tidal moment, together with the frequency-domain response function $\tilde{k}_2(\omega)$, which the paper pragmatically extends from the low-frequency expansion $\propto 1+\omega^2/\omega_*^2$ to the one-pole form $(1-\omega^2/\omega_*^2)^{-1}$. This one-pole form is what converts the computed constants into the prediction that resonance is approached earlier.

What would settle it

Compare the response function predicted by Eq. (1.8) with a high-precision numerical-relativity simulation of a polytropic neutron star in a tidal field whose frequency is swept up to $\omega_*$; if the simulated $\tilde{k}_2(\omega)$ deviates substantially from $k_2(1-\omega^2/\omega_*^2)^{-1}$ before the peak, the earlier-resonance conclusion fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the nonlinear tidal constant $p_2$ is numerically comparable to the dynamic constant $\ddot{k}_2$, so that the effective resonance frequency $\omega_*$, defined by $\omega_*^2 = k_2/(\ddot{k}_2 + \frac14 p_2 M'/(M+M') GM/R^3)$, is lower than a linear treatment would predict. For polytropic equations of state the ratio of nonlinear to linear frequency parameters ranges from about 0.85 for low compactness to about 0.94 near the maximum mass. Because the tidal response function $\tilde{k}_2(\omega) = k_2 (1-\omega^2/\omega_*^2)^{-1}$ grows as $\omega$ approaches $\omega_*$, the earlier resonance produces a strong magnification of the tidal response. The paper also computes the hexadecapole quadratic constant $p_4$, with similar qualitative behavior.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the approximate one-resonance formula remains accurate up to the resonance frequency even after nonlinear terms are included; the paper only checks this approximation in the simpler linear case, where it reproduces the f-mode frequency.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For equal-mass binaries, the nonlinear correction lowers $\omega_*$ by roughly 15 percent for low-compactness stars and by roughly 6 percent near the maximum-mass configuration.
At a given orbital frequency, the response function $\tilde{k}_2(\omega)$ is magnified relative to the linear prediction because the one-pole at $\omega_*$ is closer (Fig. 5).
The reduction is larger when the companion is more massive, through the factor $M'/(M+M')$ in Eq. (1.10), so the effect is strongest for asymmetric mass ratios.
Gravitational waveforms from inspiralling neutron-star binaries should include a nonlinear tidal phase correction of order 10–20 percent relative to the linearized description, consistent with the Newtonian result of Yu et al.
The same expansion yields the hexadecapole quadratic constant $p_4$, whose behavior parallels $p_2$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The one-pole continuation is only checked against the f-mode frequency in the linear ($p_2=0$) case; testing the same formula against a direct numerical-relativity computation of the tidal response for the same polytrope, with nonlinear terms included, would settle whether the 15 percent shift is physical.
The near-universality of $p_2/\ddot{k}_2$ across polytropic indices suggests the 6–15 percent resonance shift may persist for realistic equations of state, but this paper does not compute those.
Because the nonlinear term also contributes to a time-independent piece of the quadrupole moment (Eq. 8.7a), nonlinear tides may leave a detectable imprint in the inspiral phasing even before the resonance regime; the paper does not develop that consequence.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Two things. First, the quadratic tidal constants p2 and p4 for relativistic polytropes are genuinely new, and the calculation looks careful—two independent numerical routes agreeing to six digits is real evidence. Second, the flashy result—that nonlinearities shift the effective resonance frequency by up to 15%—is not a direct measurement from the perturbation equations; it comes from plugging the computed constants into a single-pole ansatz for the response function. The paper says so ("pragmatic extension"), but the abstract and intro state the 15% as if it were a settled prediction.

The genuinely new contribution is the p2 computation itself. The framework is inherited from Poisson 2021 and the linear dynamics from Pitre & Poisson 2024; the new step is solving the second-order perturbation equations and extracting p2 and p4. The equations are explicit, the handling of the tidal-moment redefinition ambiguity is transparent, and the table gives numbers. That is solid, reproducible work by the standards of this field. The 6-digit agreement between two computations is particularly reassuring.

The main soft spot is exactly what the stress-test flags. Eq. (8.9) is an ansatz. The low-frequency expansion (8.8) is valid for small omega; the one-pole resummation is validated only for p2 = 0, against the f-mode, in the previous paper. Nothing here checks that for p2 ≠ 0 the exact response remains one-pole up to omega ≈ omega_star. Without that check, Fig. 5 is an illustration of the ansatz, not a prediction. The paper is not hiding this, but a referee should push them to state the caveat more prominently, and ideally to test against Yu et al.'s Newtonian mode calculation or available NR results.

Second minor issue: Appendix A shows the junction conditions for n < 1 polytropes have a divergent surface-layer term. The authors argue it is an artifact of expanding at the unperturbed surface, and they keep n ≥ 1 for the headline plots. That is reasonable, but it does mean the perturbative scheme is not fully controlled at the softest end of their parameter range.

The citation pattern is fine: they lean on their own earlier work, but those papers are the actual foundations here, and they cite Yu et al. and the numerical-relativity literature.

Bottom line: this deserves serious peer review. The p2 values will be useful even if the resonance claim is eventually softened. The appropriate referee request is: keep the calculation, discuss the domain of validity of the single-pole form, and align the abstract with the conditional nature of the physical conclusion. I would bring it to reading group and would cite it for the p2 table.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper computes the nonlinear (quadratic) relativistic tidal constant p2, together with p4, for polytropic neutron-star models, using a second-order static perturbation scheme matched to the exterior metric of Ref. [36]. It combines these with the previously computed dynamic constant kdot2 to define a frequency parameter omega_* through Eq. (1.10), and reports that the nonlinear term lowers omega_* by up to 15% relative to the linear estimate. The paper interprets this as an earlier approach to resonance and an enhanced tidal response during binary inspiral, in qualitative agreement with the Newtonian mode-coupling results of Yu et al.

Significance. If the main physical claim holds, the paper is a valuable general-relativistic confirmation of the importance of nonlinear dynamical tides without relying on a mode decomposition. The strengths are substantial: the second-order perturbation equations are given explicitly (Sec. IV), the junction conditions and tidal-moment redefinition invariance are discussed carefully (Secs. VI-VII), and Table I reports agreement to six significant digits between two independent computations. The frequency parameter is constructed from independently computed constants rather than fitted, and the paper is transparent about the pragmatic nature of the response-function extension. However, the physical conclusion about earlier resonance depends on an additional, only partially validated ansatz, so the significance is conditional pending that validation.

major comments (2)

[Sec. VIII, Eq. (8.9); Sec. I E, Eqs. (1.8)-(1.10)] The central physical conclusion is not a direct consequence of the computed p2 alone. Equation (8.8) is a low-frequency expansion valid to O(Omega^2), and replacing it by the single-pole form (8.9), then interpreting omega_* as a resonance frequency, is an additional ansatz. The only validation cited (Ref. [35]) is for p2 = 0, where omega_* agrees with the f-mode; no test is provided for p2 != 0. Since Figs. 4 and 5 and the statement that the approach to resonance occurs earlier all depend on this continuation, the manuscript should either supply an independent check (for example, higher-order terms in the simultaneous expansion, comparison with nonlinear mode calculations, or numerical-relativity data) or explicitly demote these results to model-dependent predictions of the one-pole ansatz.
[Appendix A, Eqs. (A1)-(A2)] For polytropes with n < 1 the extrinsic-curvature jump diverges at the stellar surface, so the junction conditions [K_ab] = 0 used in Sec. VI are not satisfied for these models. The rebuttal in Appendix A is an analogy with the density expansion, not a demonstration that the divergence is an artifact of the perturbative expansion. Because Fig. 1 and Table I present p2 values for n = 0.5, those values are not supported unless the divergence is shown to be harmless; alternatively the n = 0.5 curve should be removed or explicitly labeled as tentative.

minor comments (5)

[Sec. IV heading] The heading contains a typo: "quadropole" should be "quadrupole".
[Sec. VI] The phrase "the joint occurs at the deformed surface" should read "the junction occurs at the deformed surface".
[Sec. I A] The phrase "exiting developments" should be "exciting developments".
[Figs. 1 and 4] The n = 0.5 model appears in Fig. 1 and Table I but not in the frequency-parameter figures because kdot2 is unavailable for n = 0.5; the text should state this mismatch explicitly to avoid the impression that omega_* was computed for n = 0.5.
[Sec. I E, Eq. (1.10)] The definition of omega_* mixes the physically static p2 term with the dynamical kdot2 term; although the text justifies this as natural, a one-sentence reminder that the p2 contribution is static would help readers distinguish the two effects.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The p2 values are genuinely computed, but the headline 15% frequency shift flows from the self-cited single-pole ansatz of Eq. (8.9), whose stated validation is restricted to the linear p2=0 case.

ansatz smuggled in via citation [Sec. VIII, Eq. (8.9); Sec. I E, Eqs. (1.8)-(1.10), footnote 6]
"In the next stage of developments we follow our approach in Ref. [35] and pragmatically extend the domain of validity of Eq. (8.8) by writing it as ... (8.9) ... This procedure was extensively motivated and justified in Ref. [35]. ... As we argued in Ref. [35], it is expected to provide a faithful description of the tidal response of a compact star."

The paper's headline claim that nonlinearities lower the frequency parameter, and the enhanced response of Fig. 5, are obtained after replacing the low-frequency expansion (8.8) with the single-pole form (8.9). That replacement is not derived here; it is imported from the authors' own Ref. [35], and the only validation cited is the linear case p2=0, in which omega* was compared with the f-mode (footnote 6 explicitly says 'This comparison was done in a strictly linear description... p2 was set equal to zero'). Thus the 15% decrease of omega* and the resonance amplification are consequences of the chosen self-cited ansatz applied to the computed p2, not consequences forced by the perturbation calculation of p2 alone.

full rationale

The novel numerical content of the paper, the quadratic tidal constant p2, is computed by integrating the second-order Einstein equations and matching the interior solution to the exterior metric via the junction conditions; Table I reports agreement to six significant digits between independent computations, and the redefinition freedom in Sec. VII is shown not to affect the final P2. So p2 is not fitted to the resonance claim, and the paper is not circular in the self-definitional or fitted-input sense. However, the central physical conclusion that the nonlinearity lowers omega* by up to 15% is not a direct consequence of p2: it is obtained only after the low-frequency expansion (8.8) is resummed to the single-pole form (8.9), and that resummation is justified by appeal to the authors' own Ref. [35], whose validation covers only the linear p2=0 case. This makes the headline result partially dependent on a self-cited ansatz that is not independently established for the nonlinear term. Appendix A is also relevant as a flagged limitation: for polytropes with n<1 the authors find that the jump in extrinsic curvature diverges at the surface, and they state 'We shall not be concerned with the formal difficulties that arise when the r->R limit of (mu+p) d mu/dp does not exist.' This does not directly affect the n>=1 figures used for the main frequency claim, but it signals that the perturbative scheme is not fully controlled for the softest models considered in Fig. 1, which is a correctness risk rather than an added circularity. Overall, because the p2 computation is independent and the ansatz is openly labelled 'pragmatic', the paper has substantial independent content; but the resonance-shift prediction reduces in part to a self-cited, unvalidated-for-p2 extrapolation, giving a score of 4 rather than 0-2 or 6+.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The core calculation is grounded in the perturbation framework of Ref. [36]. The free parameters are the polytropic index, the central-density parameter, and the binary mass fraction assumed for the figures; none are fitted to external data. The key axioms are the weak-field and slow-time expansion, use of the exterior metric from Ref. [36], the polytropic equation of state, the ad hoc continuation of the response function, and the dismissal of the n < 1 surface-layer divergence. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)

polytropic index n = 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 (sampled)
Equation of state p = K rho^(1+1/n) is chosen by hand; every numerical value of k2, kdot2, p2, and omega_* depends on n.
central pressure-density ratio b = p_c/rho_c = 1e-5 up to b_max for each n (Table I)
Parametrizes the equilibrium sequence; varying b sweeps compactness M/R and sets the range of the curves.
companion mass fraction M'/(M+M') = 1/2 in Figs. 3 to 5; kept general in Eq. (1.10)
The nonlinear correction to omega_* scales with the mass fraction; the figures assume equal masses.
tidal-moment redefinition parameters lambda_2, lambda_4 = chosen so that T2 = T4 = 0
These constants fix the freedom in redefining E_ab and E_abcd (Sec. VII); the final p2 and p4 are invariant under further redefinitions.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption The tidal field is weak and slowly varying, so the metric can be expanded simultaneously in powers of E_ab and in time derivatives, truncated at second order in E_ab and at second time derivatives.
Introduced in Sec. I B as the foundation of the expansion that defines k2, kdot2, and p2; it excludes strong-field and rapid-driving corrections.
domain assumption The exterior metric of a tidally deformed body and the relation between the mass quadrupole and the tidal moments, as derived in Ref. [36], are correct.
Used throughout Secs. VI to VIII; the paper imports the exterior solution and the operational definition of Q_ab from Ref. [36] without rederiving it. Ref. [36] shares an author with this paper.
domain assumption Polytropic equations of state p = K rho^(1+1/n), epsilon = n p model neutron star matter adequately for the qualitative conclusion.
Adopted in Sec. VII; real microphysical equations of state are not treated, so quantitative values apply only to polytropes.
ad hoc to paper The response function can be continued from the low-frequency form to tilde k2(omega) = k2 (1 - omega^2/omega_*^2)^-1 and trusted up to omega near omega_*.
Sec. I E and Eq. (8.9); this is the pragmatic harmonic-oscillator ansatz that turns the low-frequency expansion into a resonance form. It is not derived in general relativity.
ad hoc to paper The junction conditions reduce to equality of interior and exterior radial functions at r = R, and the apparent divergence of the extrinsic curvature jump for n < 1 polytropes is an artifact of perturbation theory.
Appendix A states that the extrinsic curvature jump is nonzero and formally infinite for n < 1, interprets it as an artifact, and proceeds with Eq. (6.3). This affects the n = 0.5 results.
domain assumption Quadrupole (ell = 2) tidal response dominates the frequency parameter; monopole and hexadecapole pieces do not change omega_*.
The paper computes p4 and hexadecapole terms but omits them from the central relation Eq. (1.10), assuming they are subdominant for dynamical tides.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Impact of nonlinearities on relativistic dynamical tides in compact binary inspirals." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RGTOHVZS

@misc{pith2026250608722,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Impact of nonlinearities on relativistic dynamical tides in compact binary inspirals},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RGTOHVZS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.08722}
}

abstract

The tidal deformation of a neutron star in a binary inspiral driven by the emission of gravitational waves affects the orbital dynamics and produces a measurable modulation of the waves. Late in the inspiral, a regime of dynamical tides takes over from a prior regime of static tides. A recent analysis by Yu et al. [M.N.R.A.S. 519, 4325 (2022)] reveals that nonlinear aspects of the tidal interaction are important during the regime of dynamical tides. Their theoretical framework is grounded in Newtonian gravity and fluid mechanics, and relies on a representation of the tidal deformation in terms of the star's normal modes of vibration. We confirm their observation in a general relativistic treatment of the tidal deformation of a neutron star, without relying on a mode representation of this deformation. The starting point of our description is a simultaneous time-derivative and nonlinear expansion of the tidal deformation, expressed in terms of three encapsulating constants, the static $k_2$, dynamic $\ddot{k}_2$, and nonlinear $p_2$ tidal constants. We describe the neutron star's deformation in terms of a well-defined quadrupole moment tensor, which is related to the tidal quadrupole moment through a frequency-domain response function $\tilde{k}_2(\omega)$. In a pragmatic extension of our simultaneous expansion, we express this in a form proportional to $(1-\omega^2/\omega_*^2)^{-1}$, the characteristic response of a harmonic oscillator subjected to a driving force of frequency $\omega$, with a natural-frequency parameter $\omega_*$ constructed from the tidal constants. We compute these for polytropic stellar models, and show that the nonlinear constant $p_2$ lowers the frequency parameter by as much as 15% relative to an estimation based on a purely linear treatment of the tidal deformation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.08722 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** of Ref. [9]). In Ref. [35] we computed the dynamic tidal constant ¨k2 for relativistic polytropes, and explained its relevance to a description of dynamical tides in a binary inspiral. Our main goal in this paper is to compute the quadratic tidal constant p2, also for relativistic polytropes, and to explain its importance in an improved description of dynamical tides. Our results for p2 are displayed in [PITH_FULL_… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. Static and dynamic tidal constants as functions of stellar compactness [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. Frequency parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (4 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Ratio of nonlinear to linear frequency parameters as a function of compactness [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Plot of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Quadratic tidal constant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. Static and dynamic tidal constants as functions of stellar compactness [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Nonlinear hydrodynamics in spinning neutron stars: Theoretical universal relations and equilibrium solutions
gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

Affine-model hydrodynamics shows three-wave NS tidal couplings are fixed by linear Love numbers, yet omit ~1.7 rad of GW phase per star by merger; four-wave terms cannot lock f-modes.
Dynamical Tidal Response of Schwarzschild Black Holes
gr-qc 2025-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

The dynamical Love numbers of a Schwarzschild black hole are nonzero at quadratic order in frequency, run logarithmically with a coefficient set by dissipation, and are now matched including their finite, scheme-depen...
TTE-CAM: Self-Explainable Class Activation Maps for Pretrained Black-Box CNNs
cs.CV 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

A test-time convolution-head replacement converts pretrained CNNs into self-explainable models that keep black-box accuracy and produce faithful class activation maps.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

[36]

Poisson, Compact body in a tidal environment: New types of relativistic Love numbers, and a post-Newtonian opera- 22 tional definition for tidally induced multipole moments, Phys

E. Poisson, Compact body in a tidal environment: New types of relativistic Love numbers, and a post-Newtonian opera- 22 tional definition for tidally induced multipole moments, Phys. Rev. D103, 064023 (2021)

work page 2021
[35]

Pitre and E

T. Pitre and E. Poisson, General relativistic dynamical tides in binary inspirals without modes, Phys. Rev. D109, 064004 (2024)

2024
[1]

E. E. Flanagan and T. Hinderer, Constraining neutron-star tidal Love numbers with gravitational-wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D77, 021502 (2008)

work page 2008
[2]

¨Ozel and P

F. ¨Ozel and P. Freire, Masses, radii, and the equation of state of neutron stars, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.54, 401 (2016). 21

work page 2016
[3]

Oertel, M

M. Oertel, M. Hempel, T. Kl¨ ahn, and S. Typel, Equations of state for supernovae and compact stars, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 015007 (2017)

2017
[4]

G. Baym, T. Hatsuda, T. Kojo, P. D. Powell, Y. Song, and T. Takatsuka, From hadrons to quarks in neutron stars: a review, Rept. Prog. Phys.81, 056902 (2018)

work page 2018
[5]

B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017)

work page 2017
[6]

B. P. Abbottet al.(The LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration), GW170817: Measurements of Neutron Star Radii and Equation of State, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 161101 (2018)

work page 2018

Show all 40 references

[7]

Narikawa, N

T. Narikawa, N. Uchikata, and T. Tanaka, Gravitational-wave constraints on the GWTC-2 events by measuring the tidal deformability and the spin-induced quadrupole moment, Phys. Rev. D104, 084056 (2021)

2021
[8]

Landry, R

P. Landry, R. Essick, and K. Chatziioannou, Nonparametric constraints on neutron star matter with existing and upcoming gravitational wave and pulsar observations, Phys. Rev. D101, 123007 (2020)

2020
[9]

Chatziioannou, Neutron star tidal deformability and equation-of-state constraints, Gen

K. Chatziioannou, Neutron star tidal deformability and equation-of-state constraints, Gen. Rel. Grav.52, 109 (2020)

2020
[10]

Pacilio, A

C. Pacilio, A. Maselli, M. Fasano, and P. Pani, Ranking Love Numbers for the Neutron Star Equation of State: The Need for Third-Generation Detectors, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 101101 (2022)

2022
[11]

Hinderer, A

T. Hinderer, A. Taracchini, F. Foucart, A. Buonanno, J. Steinhoff, M. Duez, L. E. Kidder, H. P. Pfeiffer, M. A. Scheel, B. Szilagyi, K. Hotokezaka, K. Kyutoku, M. Shibata, and C. W. Carpenter, Effects of Neutron-Star Dynamic Tides on Gravitational Waveforms within the Effectiv...

2016
[12]

Steinhoff, T

J. Steinhoff, T. Hinderer, A. Buonanno, and A. Taracchini, Dynamical tides in general relativity: Effective action and effective-one-body Hamiltonian, Phys. Rev. D94, 104028 (2016)

2016
[13]

Steinhoff, T

J. Steinhoff, T. Hinderer, T. Dietrich, and F. Foucart, Spin effects on neutron star fundamental-mode dynamical tides: Phenomenology and comparison to numerical simulations, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 033129 (2021)

2021
[14]

Andersson and P

N. Andersson and P. Pnigouras, The phenomenology of dynamical neutron star tides, M.N.R.A.S.503, 533 (2021)

2021
[15]

Passamonti, N

A. Passamonti, N. Andersson, and P. Pnigouras, Dynamical tides in neutron stars: the impact of the crust, M.N.R.A.S. 504, 1273 (2021)

2021
[16]

Passamonti, N

A. Passamonti, N. Andersson, and P. Pnigouras, Dynamical tides in superfluid neutron stars, M.N.R.A.S.514, 1494 (2022)

2022
[17]

Schmidt and T

P. Schmidt and T. Hinderer, Frequency domain model off-mode dynamic tides in gravitational waveforms from compact binary inspirals, Phys. Rev. D100, 021501 (2019)

2019
[18]

M. K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia, H. O. Silva, R. Patil, and J. Steinhoff, Gravitoelectric dynamical tides at second post- Newtonian order, J. High. Energ. Phys.2023, 67 (2023)

2023
[19]

M. K. Mandal, P. Mastrolia, H. O. Silva, R. Patil, and J. Steinhoff, Renormalizing Love: tidal effects at the third post- Newtonian order, J. High. Energ. Phys.2024, 188 (2024)

2024
[20]

Andersson and W

N. Andersson and W. C. G. Ho, Using gravitational-wave data to constrain dynamical tides in neutron star binaries, Phys. Rev. D97, 023016 (2018)

2018
[21]

Williams, G

N. Williams, G. Pratten, and P. Schmidt, Prospects for distinguishing dynamical tides in inspiralling binary neutron stars with third generation gravitational-wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D105, 123032 (2022)

2022
[22]

Pratten, P

G. Pratten, P. Schmidt, and N. Williams, Impact of Dynamical Tides on the Reconstruction of the Neutron Star Equation of State, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 081102 (2022)

2022
[23]

H. Yu, N. N. Weinberg, P. Arras, J. Kwon, and T. Venumadhav, Beyond the linear tide: impact of the non-linear tidal response of neutron stars on gravitational waveforms from binary inspirals, M.N.R.A.S.519, 4325 (2022)

2022
[24]

N. N. Weinberg, P. Arras, E. Quataert, and J. Burkart, Nonlinear tides in close binary systems, Astrophys. J.751, 136 (2012)

2012
[25]

A. K. Schenk, P. Arras, E. E. Flanagan, S. A. Teukolsky, and I. Wasserman, Nonlinear mode coupling in rotating stars and the r-mode instability in neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D65, 024001 (2001)

2001
[26]

Hossein Nouri, S

F. Hossein Nouri, S. Bose, M. D. Duez, and A. Das, Nonlinear mode-tide coupling in coalescing binary neutron stars with relativistic corrections, Phys. Rev. D106, 083001 (2022)

2022
[27]

H.-J. Kuan, K. Kiuchi, and M. Shibata, Tidal resonance in binary neutron star inspirals: A high-precision study in numerical relativity (2024), arXiv:2411.16850 [hep-ph]

2024
[28]

N. N. Weinberg, P. Arras, and J. Burkart, An instability due to the nonlinear coupling ofp-modes tog-modes: Implications for coalescing neutron star binaries, Astrophys. J.769, 121 (2013)

2013
[29]

N. N. Weinberg, Growth rate of the tidal p-mode g-mode instability in coalescing binary neutron stars, Astrophys. J.819, 109 (2016)

2016
[30]

Essick, S

R. Essick, S. Vitale, and N. N. Weinberg, Impact of the tidalp−ginstability on the gravitational wave signal from coalescing binary neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D94, 103012 (2016)

2016
[31]

Essick and N

R. Essick and N. N. Weinberg, A comparison of p-g tidal coupling analyses (2018), arXiv:1809.00264 [astro-ph.HE]

2018 arXiv
[32]

B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese,et al.(LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Constraining thep-Mode–g-Mode Tidal Instability with GW170817, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 061104 (2019)

2019
[33]

Reyes and D

S. Reyes and D. A. Brown, Constraints on nonlinear tides due to p–g mode coupling from the neutron star merger GW170817, Astrophys. J.894, 41 (2020)

2020
[34]

K. J. Kwon, H. Yu, and T. Venumadhav, Resonance locking of anharmonicg-modes in coalescing neutron star binaries (2024), arXiv:2410.03831 [gr-qc]

2024 arXiv
[37]

Regge and J

T. Regge and J. A. Wheeler, Stability of a Schwarzschild singularity, Phys. Rev.108, 1063 (1957)

1957
[38]

Martel and E

K. Martel and E. Poisson, Gravitational perturbations of the Schwarzschild spacetime: A practical covariant and gauge- invariant formalism, Phys. Rev. D71, 104003 (2005)

2005
[39]

Israel, Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity, Nuovo Cimento44, 1 (1966)

W. Israel, Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity, Nuovo Cimento44, 1 (1966)

1966
[40]

Poisson and C

E. Poisson and C. M. Will,Gravity: Newtonian, Post-Newtonian, Relativistic(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2014)

2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [36]

Poisson, Compact body in a tidal environment: New types of relativistic Love numbers, and a post-Newtonian opera- 22 tional definition for tidally induced multipole moments, Phys

E. Poisson, Compact body in a tidal environment: New types of relativistic Love numbers, and a post-Newtonian opera- 22 tional definition for tidally induced multipole moments, Phys. Rev. D103, 064023 (2021)

work page 2021

[2] [35]

Pitre and E

T. Pitre and E. Poisson, General relativistic dynamical tides in binary inspirals without modes, Phys. Rev. D109, 064004 (2024)

2024

[3] [1]

E. E. Flanagan and T. Hinderer, Constraining neutron-star tidal Love numbers with gravitational-wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D77, 021502 (2008)

work page 2008

[4] [2]

¨Ozel and P

F. ¨Ozel and P. Freire, Masses, radii, and the equation of state of neutron stars, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.54, 401 (2016). 21

work page 2016

[5] [3]

Oertel, M

M. Oertel, M. Hempel, T. Kl¨ ahn, and S. Typel, Equations of state for supernovae and compact stars, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 015007 (2017)

2017

[6] [4]

G. Baym, T. Hatsuda, T. Kojo, P. D. Powell, Y. Song, and T. Takatsuka, From hadrons to quarks in neutron stars: a review, Rept. Prog. Phys.81, 056902 (2018)

work page 2018

[7] [5]

B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017)

work page 2017

[8] [6]

B. P. Abbottet al.(The LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration), GW170817: Measurements of Neutron Star Radii and Equation of State, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 161101 (2018)

work page 2018