Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Are DNNs fooled by extremely unrecognizable images?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.03843 v2 pith:RHGUKZ43 submitted 2020-12-07 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords imagesdnnssfisfoolingnaturalfeaturesobjectscharacteristic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Fooling images are a potential threat to deep neural networks (DNNs). These images are not recognizable to humans as natural objects, such as dogs and cats, but are misclassified by DNNs as natural-object classes with high confidence scores. Despite their original design concept, existing fooling images retain some features that are characteristic of the target objects if looked into closely. Hence, DNNs can react to these features. In this paper, we address the question of whether there can be fooling images with no characteristic pattern of natural objects locally or globally. As a minimal case, we introduce single-color images with a few pixels altered, called sparse fooling images (SFIs). We first prove that SFIs always exist under mild conditions for linear and nonlinear models and reveal that complex models are more likely to be vulnerable to SFI attacks. With two SFI generation methods, we demonstrate that in deeper layers, SFIs end up with similar features to those of natural images, and consequently, fool DNNs successfully. Among other layers, we discovered that the max pooling layer causes the vulnerability against SFIs. The defense against SFIs and transferability are also discussed. This study highlights the new vulnerability of DNNs by introducing a novel class of images that distributes extremely far from natural images.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. HEM: a margin-based loss for visual categorisation tasks

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new margin-based loss, HEM, trains image classifiers that are more robust to unknown and adversarial inputs and better at continual learning and segmentation than cross-entropy-trained models.

Pith tools