Pith. sign in

REVIEW

On the Pitfalls of Batch Normalization for End-to-End Video Learning: A Study on Surgical Workflow Analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.07976 v5 pith:RJBYXH7P submitted 2022-03-15 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords learningend-to-endpitfallssurgicalvideobatchissuestasks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Batch Normalization's (BN) unique property of depending on other samples in a batch is known to cause problems in several tasks, including sequence modeling. Yet, BN-related issues are hardly studied for long video understanding, despite the ubiquitous use of BN in CNNs (Convolutional Neural Networks) for feature extraction. Especially in surgical workflow analysis, where the lack of pretrained feature extractors has led to complex, multi-stage training pipelines, limited awareness of BN issues may have hidden the benefits of training CNNs and temporal models end to end. In this paper, we analyze pitfalls of BN in video learning, including issues specific to online tasks such as a 'cheating' effect in anticipation. We observe that BN's properties create major obstacles for end-to-end learning. However, using BN-free backbones, even simple CNN-LSTMs beat the state of the art {\color{\colorrevtwo}on three surgical workflow benchmarks} by utilizing adequate end-to-end training strategies which maximize temporal context. We conclude that awareness of BN's pitfalls is crucial for effective end-to-end learning in surgical tasks. By reproducing results on natural-video datasets, we hope our insights will benefit other areas of video learning as well. Code is available at: \url{https://gitlab.com/nct_tso_public/pitfalls_bn}

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools