Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 59 references

An Agnostic Approach to Building Empirical Type Ia Supernova Light Curves: Evidence for Intrinsic Chromatic Flux Variation Using Nearby Supernova Factory Data

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper presents evidence that Type Ia supernovae have a second, non-dust mode of phase-independent chromatic variation, about 13% of the modeled variance, which standard single-color light-curve models can mistake for dust.

desk verdict A genuinely new two-template phase-independent SN Ia model that supports the qualitative leak claim; the headline 13% is CCM89-relative, not a direct measure of intrinsic variance. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.07880 v1 pith:RLA7PAJ2 submitted 2025-05-10 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.CO

Jared Hand , A. G. Kim , G. Aldering , P. Antilogus , C. Aragon , S. Bailey , C. Baltay , S. Bongard
show 30 more authors
K. Boone C. Buton Y. Copin S. Dixon D. Fouchez E. Gangler R. Gupta B. Hayden W. Hillebrandt Mitchell Karmen M. Kowalski D. Küsters P.-F. Léget F. Mondon J. Nordin R. Pain E. Pecontal R. Pereira S. Perlmutter K. A. Ponder D. Rabinowitz M. Rigault D. Rubin K. Runge C. Saunders N. Suzuki C. Tao S. Taubenberger R. C. Thomas M. Vincenzi (The Nearby Supernova Factory)
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.CO
keywords TypeIasupernovaeempiricallight-curvemodelschromaticfluxvariationdustextinctionintrinsicvariabilitysupernovastandardizationspectrophotometry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to test whether the phase-independent color variation of Type Ia supernovae is really one-dimensional. It builds an empirical light-curve model with two independent chromatic templates and no assumed dust law, fits it to spectrophotometric time series of 73 supernovae, and examines the two-dimensional plane those templates span. The plane intersects the standard CCM89 dust-extinction plane along the dust-like direction, but the orthogonal direction carries variation centered blueward of 4500 Å that dust cannot produce; the paper estimates that about 13% of the phase-independent flux variance is non-dust-like. If the claim holds, common one-color-template models such as the SALT family are likely absorbing intrinsic supernova variation into their dust-like color parameter, which would bias both the inferred dust law and standardized distances.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is a two-dimensional plane in wavelength space, denoted by the unit bivector $L = L_1 \wedge L_2$, which encodes all phase-independent chromatic variation while remaining independent of the arbitrary choice of basis vectors. To interpret the plane, the paper constructs a CCM89-derived basis: the first template $L_1'$ is the intersection of the model plane with the plane spanned by the CCM89 dust curves $a(\lambda)$ and $b(\lambda)$, and $L_2'$ is a $90^\circ$ rotation within the model plane, maximizing its component perpendicular to the dust plane. The per-supernova coefficients in this basis are then projected onto the complement of the CCM89 plane, and the median fraction of the resulting perpendicular component yields the 13% non-dust variance figure.

What would settle it

A concrete check would be to train the same model on synthetic light curves generated with only CCM89 dust extinction and no intrinsic phase-independent variation, then measure the perpendicular variance fraction; if the recovered fraction is comparable to 13%, the metric's non-dust signal is an artifact of the dust-plane completeness assumption rather than intrinsic variability.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that a physics-agnostic three-template model for Type Ia supernova light curves—one phase-dependent template and two phase-independent chromatic templates—converges to a stable two-dimensional phase-independent variation plane. In the CCM89-derived basis, the first template is the line shared with the CCM89 dust plane and behaves like a dust law, while the second is orthogonal in the model plane and is dominated by rapidly varying chromatic flux, with its strongest features in the Ca II H&K region and other lines blueward of 4500 Å. Projecting each supernova's $c_1, c_2$ coefficients onto the complement of the CCM89 plane gives a median non-dust variance fraction of 0.13 with a 68% range [0.05, 0.4]. The paper concludes that this non-dust component is effectively intrinsic variation that previous single-phase-independent-template models can 'leak' into their color parameter, so the dust-like template and the color-luminosity relation are not purely extrinsic.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the CCM89 dust-extinction model spans all possible extrinsic chromatic variation; if real extinction or other environmental effects can produce wavelength dependence outside the CCM89 $a(\lambda), b(\lambda)$ subspace, the perpendicular component attributed to intrinsic variability will be overestimated.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Standard one-color-template models, including the SALT family, cannot represent the second phase-independent mode, so their color parameter mixes dust extinction with intrinsic variation; the paper's 13% figure quantifies the fraction of variance at risk of being misattributed.
  • If a second chromatic template is included, residual scatter in standardized distances should drop or, at minimum, the systematic floor from modeling should be lower than the roughly 0.08 mag level of spectral standardization.
  • The non-dust template's concentration blueward of 4500 Å implies that spectral regions containing Ca II H&K, Si II, and Fe II lines carry information about intrinsic diversity that photometric color alone could mistake for reddening.
  • The recovered dust-like first template gives $R_V \approx 2.4$ in the CCM89 basis and $R_V \approx 2.18$ in the maximum-variance basis, but the paper stresses that these values are not physical extinction-law measurements because intrinsic variation can leak into them.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test of the 13% claim is to simulate supernovae with a known two-component intrinsic color distribution, fit them with a single-color template model, and check whether the recovered non-dust residual has the same strength and wavelength signature; the paper does not run this injection test.
  • The geometric-algebra plane machinery could be carried into higher spectral resolution: with more than ten wavelength bins, the second template should either sharpen into identifiable spectral features, supporting intrinsic variation, or dissolve into noise, undermining the 13% figure.
  • If the two-dimensional phase-independent plane is a general property of Type Ia supernovae, the same agnostic architecture could be applied to other transient classes to test whether a second chromatic mode appears there as well.
  • The paper does not correlate the $c_2'$ coefficient with host-galaxy properties; testing whether the second mode tracks stellar mass or local environment would help decide whether it is intrinsic to the explosion or an environmental extinction effect.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript presents a Stan-based empirical SN Ia spectral flux model with one phase-dependent and two phase-independent chromatic flux variation templates, trained on 73 sigma-clipped SNfactory SNe Ia using nλ=10 spectrally binned photometry. Because the two phase-independent templates span a plane, the authors use bivector methods to define two interpretable bases: a maximum-variance-ratio (MVR) basis and a CCM89-derived basis whose first vector lies on the intersection of the model plane with the CCM89 dust plane. In both bases, the second template shows rapidly varying, spectral-feature-like structure blueward of about 4500 Å that is not consistent with standard dust, and the authors report that approximately 13% of phase-independent chromatic flux variability is not dust-like. They argue that SALT2-class models with a single phase-independent color template can leak intrinsic variation into that template.

Significance. If the qualitative detection holds, the paper is a useful contribution to SN Ia standardization: it provides evidence for a second phase-independent chromatic degree of freedom and warns that single-color-template models may conflate intrinsic and extrinsic variation. The model architecture is genuinely agnostic in its training, the use of bivectors to handle basis ambiguity in the two-dimensional template plane is elegant, and the comparison with SALT2, SNEMO, and Twins Embedding is informative. The authors also deserve credit for explicitly flagging reverse leakage (intrinsic variation contaminating L1') and the phase-averaging ambiguity. However, the quantitative headline is currently not as robust as the abstract suggests: the 13% statistic as computed is not a variance fraction, and the label 'not dust-like' is conditional on the completeness of the CCM89 two-parameter dust family.

major comments (4)
  1. [§4.4] The abstract states that 'approximately 13% of modeled phase-independent flux variance is not dust-like,' but the calculation described in §4.4 does not compute a variance fraction. The procedure normalizes each SN's vector c = c1' L1' + c2' L2', computes the perpendicular component of each normalized vector with respect to the CCM89 plane, and reports the median of the resulting per-object values, with 68% interval [0.05, 0.4]. A variance fraction would instead be a variance-weighted quantity such as Σ_i |c_{i,⊥}|^2 / Σ_i |c_i|^2. The median of normalized directions can differ substantially from the variance fraction, especially when the variance is dominated by a subset of objects. The wording of the abstract and conclusion should be changed to describe the statistic actually computed, or the variance-weighted quantity should be reported.
  2. [§3.4.2; §4.4] The 'not dust-like' classification is made with respect to the plane spanned by the CCM89 a(λ) and b(λ) curves. The paper explicitly warns that intrinsic variability can contaminate L1' (reverse leakage), but it does not address the forward leakage: any extrinsic extinction whose wavelength dependence lies outside the CCM89 span—for example, power-law extinction with varying β, Fitzpatrick-Massa style parametrizations, or dust with different grain properties—contributes to the perpendicular component and is therefore counted as 'intrinsic.' Because the 13% figure is computed as the perpendicular component relative to that same plane, the headline quantitative claim is conditional on CCM89 being a complete description of the dust in the sample. The 80° plane-separation angle and the sign flip in L2' are consistent with non-CCM89 dust as well as with intrinsic variation. The authors should either test alternative dust families or reframe the 13% as 'non-CCM89-like' rather than 'not dust-like.'
  3. [§2] The training set is curated by a 2σ clip of SALT2 c and x1 along their longer tails, which explicitly removes heavily reddened SNe Ia with peak B−V > 0.18. Since the reported 13% is a relative measure of non-dust-like to dust-like variance in this selected sample, the removal of reddened objects can inflate the non-dust fraction by reducing the dust-like variance in the denominator. The manuscript should report how the 13% value changes with the clipping threshold, or analyze an unclipped sample, before presenting the number as a population statement about SNe Ia.
  4. [§3.2, Eq. (6)] The error model is an important modeling choice for the central claim: the paper adds 2% of maximum observed flux in quadrature and adopts a Cauchy likelihood, explicitly to achieve stable convergence. Because L2' and L2_mvr are residual-driven templates, the evidence for a second phase-independent component depends on this error model not creating or suppressing the signal. The pull-distribution check is useful, but the robustness of the recovered L2 template and of the 13% statistic should be demonstrated against alternative choices, such as a Student-t or Normal likelihood with the same added variance, or different values of the 2% term.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§1.2] The sentence 'These two phase-dependent components provide the flexibility...' should refer to the two phase-independent components; as written it contradicts the model description.
  2. [Figure 14 caption] The caption says both yellow and blue points compare c′2 and c′1; one of these should be s1 versus c′2 (or c′1 versus c′2) to match the corner plot.
  3. [Eq. (7)] The normalization expression contains a bare 'q' before the sums; this appears to be a typesetting error for a square root and should be corrected.
  4. [Table 1] The table formatting introduces spaces in decimal numbers, e.g., '0 .12'; this is a LaTeX rendering issue that should be fixed for readability.
  5. [§3.5] The 'space station crew' analogy and the term 'tail wagging' are informal for a journal article; consider tightening this paragraph.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the 13% 'non-dust-like' fraction is a data-dependent projection onto an explicitly defined CCM89 plane, independently corroborated by a dust-free MVR basis.

full rationale

The paper does not commit a circular reduction of its central claim to its inputs. The two-dimensional phase-independent plane L is trained with a generative model that contains no dust extinction law; the CCM89 basis is introduced only as a post-hoc interpretive representation (Section 3.4.2). L1' is defined as the intersection of L with the CCM89 plane, so its 'dust-like' character is definitional, and the paper explicitly warns that 'this basis does not guarantee a physical decomposition into exclusive dust and intrinsic components' and that 'any dust-like properties inferred from L1 in isolation are physically ambiguous.' The 13% value is not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction: it is the median of a data-dependent perpendicular-projection distribution computed in Section 4.4, and it would have been zero if L had been parallel to the CCM89 plane. The independent MVR basis, which is constructed without any dust plane (Section 3.4.1), yields a similar second component with the same sign flip and spectral-feature alignment, so the core detection of a second phase-independent component does not depend on the CCM89 construction for its existence. The paper also explicitly flags the remaining interpretive limitation, stating that 'in its current form, this model cannot distinguish between phase-averaged spectral variation or truly phase-independent intrinsic variation' (Section 4.1.3). Self-citations to SNfactory, SNEMO, and Twins Embedding work are used for data provenance and comparison, not as load-bearing uniqueness theorems. The main concern, that non-CCM89 extinction could contribute to the perpendicular component and be mislabeled as intrinsic, is a correctness or external-validity question about the completeness of the CCM89 dust family, not a circularity of the derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the CCM89 dust benchmark, the Gaussian-core sample selection, the adopted error model, and a large set of template parameters fit to 73 SNe Ia. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (7)
  • Fiducial flux template F0 = 159 node values fit to SNfactory sample
    Defines the mean spectral surface; estimated from the training data in Section 3.1 and Section 4.
  • Phase-dependent variation template M1 = 159 node values fit to data; shown in Figures 10 and 12
    Encodes stretch-like and NIR-bump variation; estimated jointly with per-SN s1.
  • Phase-independent template L1 = 10 wavelength components fit to data; Figures 7 and 8
    First phase-independent chromatic variation direction; appears dust-like in both bases.
  • Phase-independent template L2 = 10 wavelength components fit to data; Figures 7 and 8
    Second phase-independent direction; provides the central evidence for intrinsic variation.
  • Per-SN parameters (chi0, s1, c1, c2, t0) = Values for 73 SNe in Table 1
    Each SN's achromatic offset, stretch, two color coefficients, and phase alignment are fit in the refit stage.
  • GPMP kernel length scale rho = fixed to 4 days
    Chosen to match the phase node spacing; the paper states the model is insensitive to reasonable choices.
  • Added uncertainty 2% of maximum flux and Cauchy scale = 2% of each SN's maximum flux
    Added after initial runs to account for underestimated uncertainties and heavy tails; directly affects likelihood width and posterior uncertainties.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption CCM89 extinction law a(lambda), b(lambda) spans all dust-like phase-independent SN Ia color variation.
    Used in Section 3.4.2 to define L1' as the intersection with the CCM89 plane and in Section 4.4 to measure the 13% non-dust fraction.
  • domain assumption SALT2 c and x1 2-sigma clipping preserves the SN Ia population core relevant for cosmology and does not bias the phase-independent decomposition.
    Section 2 describes the clipping; the paper acknowledges it removes heavily reddened SNe with peak B-V > 0.18.
  • ad hoc to paper The error model (nominal uncertainties plus 2% maximum-flux term, Cauchy likelihood) adequately captures true residual scatter.
    Section 3.2 states this was added after initial trials; credibility is checked only through the pull distribution of residuals.
  • standard math The Gaussian process mean predictor with fixed Matern C5/2 kernel and rho = 4 days yields valid interpolated light curves.
    Equations 2 and 3 define the interpolation; the paper notes insensitivity to rho.
  • domain assumption SNfactory spectrophotometric calibration, host subtraction, and PSF extraction are correct as published.
    Section 2 relies on Aldering et al. 2002, Bongard et al. 2011, Buton et al. 2013, and Pereira et al. 2013.
  • standard math Geometric algebra operations (plane intersection, rotation, projection) correctly implement the intended linear algebra.
    Appendix C describes the operations; the authors say the plane intersection was confirmed with a conventional linear algebra approach.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of An Agnostic Approach to Building Empirical Type Ia Supernova Light Curves: Evidence for Intrinsic Chromatic Flux Variation Using Nearby Supernova Factory Data." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RLA7PAJ2

@misc{pith2026250507880,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: An Agnostic Approach to Building Empirical Type Ia Supernova Light Curves: Evidence for Intrinsic Chromatic Flux Variation Using Nearby Supernova Factory Data},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RLA7PAJ2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.07880}
}
read the original abstract

We present a new empirical Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) model with three chromatic flux variation templates: one phase dependent and two phase independent. No underlying dust extinction model or patterns of intrinsic variability are assumed. Implemented with Stan and trained using spectrally binned Nearby Supernova Factory spectrophotometry, we examine this model's 2D, phase-independent flux variation space using two motivated basis representations. In both, the first phase-independent template captures variation that appears dust-like, while the second captures a combination of effectively intrinsic variability and second-order dust-like effects. We find that approximately 13% of the modeled phase-independent flux variance is not dust-like. Previous empirical SN Ia models either assume an effective dust extinction recipe in their architecture, or only allow for a single mode of phase-independent variation. The presented results demonstrate such an approach may be insufficient, because it could "leak" noticeable intrinsic variation into phase-independent templates.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.07880 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. SALT2 c and x1 cuts to better capture a Gaus￾sian ‘core’ for training. The shaded regions correspond to 2σ clippings along the longer tail of each respective c and x1 distribution; blue points correspond to sigma-clipped super￾novae. longer tail ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A schematic of our model’s flux nodes. Each SN Ia has an effective flux node matrix Feff that is an element-wise product of the sample’s fiducial flux template F0 and a warping matrix Ω. This warping matrix includes the phase-dependent chromatic flux variation template M1, two phase-independent chromatic flux variation templates L1 ′ and L2 ′ (which make up the two dimension phase-independent chromatic variation mod… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. A directed acyclic graph representation of our model. Per-SN model parameters are located in the bottom red box; global template parameters are in the top blue box. The dashed arrows are deterministic relations (transformations and definitions). The only explicit conditional probability in the model’s architecture relates observations f obs λ (t) to modeled flux fλ(t). We perform Gaussian process mean predictor (GPM… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (13 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: This is an illustration of a bivector (the blue par￾allelogram) v1∧v2 constructed by the vectors v1 and v2 (the red vectors) in three dimensions. A three-dimensional space allows for the corresponding cross product to be included for reference (the red dashed vector). …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: provides a three-dimensional view of the geo￾metric intuition involved in finding the CCM89-derived basis. All calculations discussed here are implemented using geometric algebra, which provides a novel ap￾proach to study oriented subspaces. Geometric alge￾bra implemen…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Best-fit model residuals with respect to observations presented for each of our ten bands. Eight day binned averages for each band are presented as black diamonds, with error bars being binned standard deviations. The carets at the top and bottom edges represent points…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The blue solid line corresponds to the first MVR component L1 mvr, which appears nominally more consistent with dust-like variation than its counterpart L2 mvr, given as the magenta dashed. L1 mvr has a best-fit R mvr V = 2.18 given as the gray dotted line, with most o…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The top plot presents phase-independent chro￾matic flux variation templates L1 ′ and L2 ′ . L1 ′ has a re￾covered total-to-selective extinction of R int V = 2.4. The bot￾tom plot presents a decomposition of L2 ′ into its parallel and perpendicular components with respe…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: This figure demonstrates a ±0.2 mag c2 variation (blue for CCM89-basis c ′ 2, maroon for c MVR 2 ) of L2 ′ overlaid on SALT2’s mean template t = 0 phase spectrum (dashed black line). The spectrum is binned via synthetic photometry with top hat filters, presented as bla…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The model’s ∆m3(15) (the ∆mB(15) analog for the fixed band 3) as a function of s1 calculated for the fixed band 3 along the training sample’s obtained s1 value range. Wavelength (Å) 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000 Phase of Node (days) 7500 10 0 10 20 30 40 M1 …
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: A visualization of ±0.09 mag variation in s1 on the model’s fiducial flux template F0, as warped by the phase-dependent chromatic flux template M1. Positive s1 contribution is given by light shaded regions, while negative s1 contribution is given by the dark shaded re…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Comparison of fit c ′ 1 (top, blue), c ′ 2 (middle, magenta), and s1 (bottom, yellow) samples against our χ0 samples. The correlation between χ0 and s1 arises from s1’s changing of Feff’s scale, which is then compensated for by a change in χ0. There are no correlation…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Corner plot for per-SN parameters s1, c ′ 1, c ′ 2. Magenta points compare s1 and c ′ 1, yellow points compare c ′ 2 and c ′ 1, and blue points compare c ′ 2 and c ′ 1 parameter sets, respectively. We measure only marginal rank correlations between both c ′ 1 vs. s1 a…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Per-SN comparison of our stretch parameter s1 versus SALT2’s stretch proxy x1. An ordinary least squares linear best fit is provided with a solid black line. Error bars correspond to 68th percentiles. The model’s extended phase-independent architecture captures a nuan…
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: A per-SN comparison of our per-SN chromatic flux variation parameters c ′ 1 (top) and c ′ 2 (bottom) against SALT2’s c parameter. We measure a clear rank anticorre￾lation between c ′ 1 and SALT2 c, but measure no correla￾tion between c ′ 2 and SALT2 c. We interpret th…
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Posterior samplings for each of the L1 template’s ten components. The x-axis labels the 2000 samples for each of the 16 samplers, concatenated in sequence for 32000 total draws. The aforementioned groupings are shaded blue, green, and pink. The dark gray rectangles ma…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2002, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Aldering, G., Adam, G., Antilogus, P., et al. 2002, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 4836, Survey and Other Telescope Technologies and Discoveries, ed. J. A. Tyson & S. Wolff, 61–72, doi: 10.1117/12.458107

    doi:10.1117/12.458107 2002

  2. [2]

    2020, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 4, 63, doi: 10.3847/2515-5172/ab8fa5

    Aldering, G., Antilogus, P., Aragon, C., et al. 2020, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 4, 63, doi: 10.3847/2515-5172/ab8fa5

    work page doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ab8fa5 2020

  3. [3]

    2009, A&A, 500, L17, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200911973

    Bailey, S., Aldering, G., Antilogus, P., et al. 2009, A&A, 500, L17, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200911973

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200911973 2009

  4. [4]

    2014, A&A, 568, A22, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423413

    Betoule, M., Kessler, R., Guy, J., et al. 2014, A&A, 568, A22, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423413

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423413 2014

  5. [5]

    P., et al

    Blondin, S., Matheson, T., Kirshner, R. P., et al. 2012, AJ, 143, 126, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/143/5/126

    doi:10.1088/0004-6256/143/5/126 2012

  6. [6]

    Bohlin, R. C. 2014, AJ, 147, 127, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/147/6/127

    doi:10.1088/0004-6256/147/6/127 2014

  7. [7]

    2011, MNRAS, 418, 258, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19480.x

    Bongard, S., Soulez, F., Thi´ ebaut,´E., & Pecontal, ´E. 2011, MNRAS, 418, 258, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19480.x

    arXiv 2011

  8. [8]

    2021a, ApJ, 912, 71, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abec3b —

    Boone, K., Aldering, G., Antilogus, P., et al. 2021a, ApJ, 912, 71, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abec3b —. 2021b, ApJ, 912, 70, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abec3c

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abec3b

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    2009, PASP, 121, 238, doi: 10.1086/597788

    Branch, D., Chau Dang, L., & Baron, E. 2009, PASP, 121, 238, doi: 10.1086/597788

    2009 doi

  2. [10]

    1993, AJ, 106, 2383, doi: 10.1086/116810

    Branch, D., Fisher, A., & Nugent, P. 1993, AJ, 106, 2383, doi: 10.1086/116810

    1993 doi

  3. [11]

    2020, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2004.10206

    Brout, D., & Scolnic, D. 2020, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2004.10206. https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.10206

    2020 arXiv

  4. [12]

    R., Stritzinger, M., Phillips, M

    Burns, C. R., Stritzinger, M., Phillips, M. M., et al. 2011, AJ, 141, 19, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/141/1/19

    2011 doi

  5. [13]

    2013, A&A, 549, A8, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219834

    Buton, C., Copin, Y., Aldering, G., et al. 2013, A&A, 549, A8, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219834

    2013 doi

  6. [14]

    A., Clayton, G

    Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245, doi: 10.1086/167900

    1989 doi

  7. [15]

    D., et al

    Carpenter, B., Gelman, A., Hoffman, M. D., et al. 2017, Journal of statistical software, 76

    2017

  8. [16]

    2011, A&A, 529, L4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116723

    Chotard, N., Gangler, E., Aldering, G., et al. 2011, A&A, 529, L4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116723

    2011 doi

  9. [17]

    Y., et al

    Conley, A., Sullivan, M., Hsiao, E. Y., et al. 2008, ApJ, 681, 482, doi: 10.1086/588518

    2008 doi

  10. [18]

    2015, MNRAS, 448, 1345, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2716

    Dhawan, S., Leibundgut, B., Spyromilio, J., & Maguire, K. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 1345, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2716

    2015 doi

  11. [19]

    K., Boone, K., Aldering, G., et al

    Fakhouri, H. K., Boone, K., Aldering, G., et al. 2015, ApJ, 815, 58, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/815/1/58

    2015 doi

  12. [20]

    Foley, R. J. 2013, MNRAS, 435, 273, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1292

    2013 doi

  13. [21]

    2007, A&A, 466, 11, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066930

    Guy, J., Astier, P., Baumont, S., et al. 2007, A&A, 466, 11, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066930

    2007 doi

  14. [22]

    B., Heathcote, S

    Hamuy, M., Suntzeff, N. B., Heathcote, S. R., et al. 1994, PASP, 106, 566, doi: 10.1086/133417

    1994 doi

  15. [23]

    R., Suntzeff, N

    Hamuy, M., Walker, A. R., Suntzeff, N. B., et al. 1992, PASP, 104, 533, doi: 10.1086/133028

    1992 doi

  16. [24]

    2013, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1306.1660

    Hitzer, E. 2013, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1306.1660. https://arxiv.org/abs/1306.1660

    2013 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Hoyle, F., & Fowler, W. A. 1960, ApJ, 132, 565, doi: 10.1086/146963

    1960 doi

  18. [26]

    Iben, I., J., & Tutukov, A. V. 1984, ApJS, 54, 335, doi: 10.1086/190932 Ivezi´ c,ˇZ., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., et al. 2019, ApJ, 873, 111, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c

    1984 doi

  19. [27]

    G., & Kirshner, R

    Jha, S., Riess, A. G., & Kirshner, R. P. 2007, ApJ, 659, 122, doi: 10.1086/512054

    2007 doi

  20. [28]

    W., Maguire, K., & Sullivan, M

    Jha, S. W., Maguire, K., & Sullivan, M. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 706, doi: 10.1038/s41550-019-0858-0

    2019 doi

  21. [29]

    Kasen, D., & Woosley, S. E. 2007, ApJ, 656, 661, doi: 10.1086/510375

    2007 doi

  22. [30]

    D., Jones, D

    Kenworthy, W. D., Jones, D. O., Dai, M., et al. 2021, ApJ, 923, 265, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac30d8

    2021 doi

  23. [31]

    1996, PASP, 108, 190, doi: 10.1086/133709

    Kim, A., Goobar, A., & Perlmutter, S. 1996, PASP, 108, 190, doi: 10.1086/133709

    1996 doi

  24. [32]

    2004, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Lantz, B., Aldering, G., Antilogus, P., et al. 2004, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 5249, Optical Design and Engineering, ed. L. Mazuray, P. J. Rogers, & R. Wartmann, 146–155, doi: 10.1117/12.512493 L´ eget, P. F., Gangler,...

    2004 doi

  25. [33]

    Kirshner, R. P. 2017, ApJ, 842, 93, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6038

    2017 doi

  26. [34]

    2022, MNRAS, 510, 3939, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3496

    Avelino, A. 2022, MNRAS, 510, 3939, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3496

    2022 doi

  27. [35]

    2002, PASP, 114, 803, doi: 10.1086/341707

    Nugent, P., Kim, A., & Perlmutter, S. 2002, PASP, 114, 803, doi: 10.1086/341707

    2002 doi

  28. [36]

    1995, ApJL, 455, L147, doi: 10.1086/309846

    Hauschildt, P. 1995, ApJL, 455, L147, doi: 10.1086/309846

    1995 doi

  29. [37]

    2011, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825

    Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., et al. 2011, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825

    2011

  30. [38]

    C., Aldering, G., et al

    Pereira, R., Thomas, R. C., Aldering, G., et al. 2013, A&A, 554, A27, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201221008

    2013 doi

  31. [39]

    1997, ApJ, 483, 565, doi: 10.1086/304265

    Perlmutter, S., Gabi, S., Goldhaber, G., et al. 1997, ApJ, 483, 565, doi: 10.1086/304265

    1997 doi

  32. [40]

    1999, ApJ, 517, 565, doi: 10.1086/307221

    Perlmutter, S., Aldering, G., Goldhaber, G., et al. 1999, ApJ, 517, 565, doi: 10.1086/307221

    1999 doi

  33. [41]

    Phillips, M. M. 1993, ApJL, 413, L105, doi: 10.1086/186970

    1993 doi

  34. [42]

    Pierel, J. D. R., Jones, D. O., Kenworthy, W. D., et al. 2022, ApJ, 939, 11, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac93f9 28 Hand et. Al

    2022 doi

  35. [43]

    G., Nugent, P., Filippenko, A

    Riess, A. G., Nugent, P., Filippenko, A. V., Kirshner, R. P., & Perlmutter, S. 1998a, ApJ, 504, 935, doi: 10.1086/306106

    doi

  36. [44]

    G., Press, W

    Riess, A. G., Press, W. H., & Kirshner, R. P. 1996, ApJ, 473, 88, doi: 10.1086/178129

    1996 doi

  37. [45]

    G., Filippenko, A

    Riess, A. G., Filippenko, A. V., Challis, P., et al. 1998b, AJ, 116, 1009, doi: 10.1086/300499 Robert Kern and the Clifford Team. 2021, clifford: Geometric Algebra for Python, 1.4.0. https://github.com/pygae/clifford

    2021 doi

  38. [46]

    M., Rubin, D., Strolger, L., & Garnavich, P

    Rose, B. M., Rubin, D., Strolger, L., & Garnavich, P. M. 2020, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2012.01460. https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.01460

    2020 arXiv

  39. [47]

    2015, ApJ, 813, 137, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/813/2/137

    Rubin, D., Aldering, G., Barbary, K., et al. 2015, ApJ, 813, 137, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/813/2/137

    2015 doi

  40. [48]

    2022, ApJS, 263, 1, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac7b7f

    Rubin, D., Aldering, G., Antilogus, P., et al. 2022, ApJS, 263, 1, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac7b7f

    2022 doi

  41. [49]

    2018, ApJ, 869, 167, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaec7e

    Saunders, C., Aldering, G., Antilogus, P., et al. 2018, ApJ, 869, 167, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaec7e

    2018 doi

  42. [50]

    A., Ruiter, A

    Scalzo, R. A., Ruiter, A. J., & Sim, S. A. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 2535, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1808

    2014 doi

  43. [51]

    M., Riess, A

    Scolnic, D. M., Riess, A. G., Foley, R. J., et al. 2014, ApJ, 780, 37, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/780/1/37

    2014 doi

  44. [52]

    M., Jones, D

    Scolnic, D. M., Jones, D. O., Rest, A., et al. 2018, ApJ, 859, 101, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aab9bb

    2018 doi

  45. [53]

    2019, NewAR, 87, 101535, doi: 10.1016/j.newar.2020.101535

    Soker, N. 2019, NewAR, 87, 101535, doi: 10.1016/j.newar.2020.101535

    2019

  46. [54]

    2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2207.07645

    Stein, G., Seljak, U., Bohm, V., et al. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2207.07645. https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.07645

    2022 arXiv

  47. [55]

    2021, MNRAS, 508, 4310, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2849

    Narayan, G. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 4310, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2849

    2021 doi

  48. [56]

    2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1903.08008

    Vehtari, A., Gelman, A., Simpson, D., Carpenter, B., & B¨ urkner, P.-C. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1903.08008. https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.08008

    2019 arXiv

  49. [57]

    V., Ganeshalingam, M., et al

    Wang, X., Filippenko, A. V., Ganeshalingam, M., et al. 2009, ApJL, 699, L139, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/699/2/L139

    2009 doi

  50. [58]

    C., & Draine, B

    Weingartner, J. C., & Draine, B. T. 2001, ApJ, 548, 296, doi: 10.1086/318651

    2001 doi

  51. [59]

    1973, ApJ, 186, 1007, doi: 10.1086/152565

    Whelan, J., & Iben, Icko, J. 1973, ApJ, 186, 1007, doi: 10.1086/152565

    1973 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.