Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

ALMA 0.1 pc View of Molecular Clouds Associated with High-Mass Protostellar Systems in the Small Magellanic Cloud: Are Low-Metallicity Clouds Filamentary or Not?

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In the Small Magellanic Cloud, only about 60% of molecular clouds around massive protostars are filamentary, and those filaments are hotter, less turbulent, and younger than the non-filamentary clouds.

desk verdict First uniform 0.1 pc survey of SMC high-mass YSO clouds; the filament/non-filament split is real but the quantitative classification needs a robustness test before the evolutionary story carries weight. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.02190 v2 pith:RLUU7P4W submitted 2025-01-04 astro-ph.GA

Kazuki Tokuda , Yuri Kunitoshi , Sarolta Zahorecz , Kei E. I. Tanaka , Itsuki Murakoso , Naoto Harada , Masato I. N. Kobayashi , Tsuyoshi Inoue
show 8 more authors
Marta Sewi{l}o Ayu Konishi Takashi Shimonishi Yichen Zhang Yasuo Fukui Akiko Kawamura Toshikazu Onishi Masahiro N. Machida
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords starformationmolecularcloudsSmallMagellanicCloudinterstellarfilamentslowmetallicityyoungstellarobjectsCOemissionprotostars
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether the filamentary molecular clouds that are common in the Milky Way also exist in a much more metal-poor galaxy, the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC), around massive young stars. Using millimeter-wave observations at roughly 0.1 parsec resolution toward 17 massive protostars, it finds that about 60% of the associated CO clouds have steep radial intensity profiles and qualify as filaments, while the rest appear smooth and diffuse. The filamentary clouds tend to be hotter, have smaller velocity dispersions, and are more often linked to protostellar outflows, so the paper interprets them as younger structures that lose their sharp edges as the clouds evolve. If correct, this means filamentary structure is not a guaranteed long-lived stage of high-mass star formation in low-metallicity environments, a result with consequences for how stars of different masses form there.

What carries the argument

The analysis rests on FilFinder, an algorithm that traces the spines of elongated structures in moment-0 CO maps, followed by Gaussian fitting of the brightness profile perpendicular to each spine to measure width and a power-law fit to the radial intensity profile. The radial slope $p$ is the classification variable: clouds with $p$ steeper than $-1.0$ are called filaments, matching the Plummer-like $r^{-1}$ profiles measured in Milky Way filaments; the rest are non-filaments. All physical comparisons (temperature, velocity dispersion, line mass, virial ratio) are then made between these two groups.

What would settle it

Measure the radial CO profiles with an optically thinner tracer or dust continuum at the same ~0.1 pc resolution; if the steep outer slopes vanish, or if varying the threshold across, say, p = -0.8 to -1.2 erases the temperature and velocity-dispersion differences between the two groups, the claimed evolutionary transition would not survive.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that at 0.1 pc resolution, eleven of seventeen CO clouds around spectroscopically confirmed massive young stellar objects in the SMC have radial profiles steeper than $r^{-1}$ and are classified as filaments, while six do not. Filaments have higher CO(3-2) peak brightness temperatures and lower velocity dispersions at a given column density than non-filaments, and three of the four outflows found in the sample are associated with filaments. The paper concludes that filaments form early, carry the heated and compressed conditions of their formation, and then become less prominent, cooling and developing turbulence until they appear as smooth non-filamentary clouds before the parent cloud is dispersed. This evolutionary transition, it argues, has not been reported in Milky Way or LMC high-mass star-forming regions and may be a signature of inefficient cooling at low metallicity.

Load-bearing premise

The classification into filaments versus non-filaments depends entirely on a hand-chosen threshold, p = -1.0, for how steep the radial intensity profile must be, and the paper does not show how the conclusions shift if that threshold or the filament-finding settings change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • About 60% (11 of 17) of the SMC clouds are filamentary at 0.1 pc resolution, so filamentary structure is present but not universal around massive protostars in this metal-poor galaxy.
  • Filamentary clouds are hotter and less turbulent than non-filamentary ones, implying that the hot, compressed state is an early-phase property of these clouds.
  • Outflows are found almost exclusively in filamentary clouds, tying filaments to the youngest, actively accreting protostars.
  • The filament-to-nonfilament transition with cooling and turbulence growth is a predicted sequence for low-metallicity clouds that has not been observed in the Milky Way or the LMC.
  • If filaments dissipate earlier in low-metallicity environments, low-mass star formation via filament fragmentation may be suppressed, consistent with a top-heavy IMF.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The p = -1.0 threshold is untested; a systematic sweep of threshold slopes and FilFinder settings could turn the 60/40 split into a continuum, so the clean two-population story should be treated as provisional.
  • The interpretation predicts that low-metallicity clouds should show a deficit of low-mass cores relative to Milky Way clouds of similar mass, which is testable with high-resolution dust-continuum core counts in the SMC.
  • If missing large-scale emission is flattening the measured radial profiles, combining total-power and interferometric data would restore extended emission and could reclassify some non-filaments as filaments, changing the inferred fraction.
  • The 'younger equals filamentary' sequence could be tested by measuring filament ages through chemical clocks, such as N2H+ depletion or CO isotope ratios, rather than relying on outflow presence alone.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes ALMA CO(3-2) archival data at ~0.1 pc resolution toward 17 massive young stellar objects (YSOs) in the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC), a low-metallicity environment at Z~0.2 Z_sun. The authors use FilFinder to identify elongated structures, measure radial intensity profiles perpendicular to the extracted spines, and classify clouds as filaments if the power-law slope p is steeper than -1.0, otherwise as non-filaments. They report that about 60% of the clouds are filamentary, that filamentary clouds have higher brightness temperatures and lower velocity dispersions than non-filamentary clouds, and they interpret these differences as evidence for a three-stage evolutionary scenario in which low-metallicity filaments form hot, cool inefficiently, and are later smoothed by turbulence. The paper also reports new CO outflow detections toward YSOs #33 and #34.

Significance. If the classification and resulting physical contrasts are robust, this would be an important observational step: it provides the first systematic 0.1 pc resolution view of cloud structure around massive protostars in a metal-poor dwarf galaxy, directly testing whether filamentary structures are universal. The study makes good use of archival ALMA data with a relatively large, uniformly processed sample (17 sources, ~30% of the spectroscopically confirmed SMC YSOs). The analysis pipeline is transparent: FilFinder parameters are stated, the radial-profile fitting is described, and the comparison with LMC filaments from Tokuda et al. (2023) is a useful benchmark. The paper also reports new outflow detections, which are valuable in their own right. The main significance rests on the binary filament/non-filament split and the physical differences derived from it; those are currently not demonstrated to be robust.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.2, Table 2, and Summary] The classification into filaments and non-filaments relies on the tentative threshold p = -1.0, and no robustness test is presented. Several sources lie close to the boundary: #10, #15, and #25 have p = -1.0, #29 has p = -0.9, and #23 and #34 have p = -0.8, with typical fitting errors of ±0.1. A shift of one fitting error can move multiple objects across the boundary, changing the reported 60% fraction and all subsequent group comparisons. The paper should test how the classification changes for other thresholds (e.g., p = -0.9 and -1.1) and for variations in the FilFinder settings (flatten percent, adapt_thresh, smooth_size), and report the sensitivity of the temperature and velocity-dispersion contrasts to these choices.
  2. [Summary, item 1, versus Table 2] The Summary states that 'eleven clouds' were classified as filaments and 'six' as non-filaments, but Table 2 lists only 10 checkmarks in the filament column, with #13 lacking an identified spine. This is a concrete internal inconsistency. The abstract's 'about 60%' is consistent with 10/17 but not with 11/17. The authors must correct the count and ensure the abstract, summary, and Table 2 agree; if the classification is threshold-dependent, the choice of threshold should be justified by this sensitivity analysis.
  3. [Section 4.1.2 and Figure 7] The claim that filamentary clouds have higher brightness temperatures than non-filamentary clouds is based on a visual comparison of histograms for 10-11 versus 6-7 objects, without any statistical test. The non-filament category also includes #13, which has no spine and is an outlier at 26 K, so the comparison is sensitive to how #13 is treated. A quantitative significance test (e.g., a Kolmogorov-Smirnov or permutation test) and a statement of the resulting p-value are needed before the temperature difference can be regarded as established.
  4. [Section 3.2 and Section 4.1.1] The radial profiles used to measure p are derived from 12 m-array-only data with a maximum recoverable scale (MRS) of ~1.5 pc, comparable to the median cloud radius of ~1.5 pc cited from Ohno et al. (2023). Missing large-scale flux will preferentially suppress the outer, lower-intensity parts of the profiles, which could flatten the measured slopes and bias the classification toward 'non-filament'. The paper dismisses this concern in one sentence; it should quantify the effect, for example by comparing a subset of fields with ACA+TP data or by showing that the fitted range (between half the beam and half the MRS) is not dominated by the largest scales.
  5. [Section 4.1.1 and Figure 6(a)] The claimed correlation between column density and velocity dispersion for filaments is based on a least-squares fit that excludes #18, the source with the largest linewidth contribution from an outflow. The text calls the trend 'marginal in the constraints', which is appropriate, but the fit parameters (slope and uncertainty) are not reported in the text, and the same relation is not examined for non-filaments. The comparison of velocity dispersions between the two categories also lacks a significance test. These issues should be addressed for the velocity-dispersion claims to be load-bearing.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.2] The text says the fitted p values range from -0.5 to -2.2, but Table 2 shows a range from -0.4 to -2.0. Please check the quoted range against the table.
  2. [Section 3.2] The phrase 'power-low fitting' should be 'power-law fitting'.
  3. [Figure 6] The dashed line in panel (a) is described in the caption but the fitted power-law index and its uncertainty are not given in the text; they should be stated explicitly.
  4. [Section 4.2.3] The three-stage evolutionary scenario is clearly presented as a proposal, but it would help to label it explicitly as speculative and to note which of its stages have direct observational support versus which rely on simulation precedent.
  5. [Section 2] The sentence 'the SMC exhibits unique characteristics' is followed by an apparent typo: 'the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) with a distance of 50 pc' should presumably read 'with a distance of 50 kpc'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the filament classification uses an externally motivated slope threshold, and the physical comparisons rely on independent measurements.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that roughly 60% of the 0.1 pc-scale CO clouds around massive YSOs in the SMC have steep radial profiles and are therefore filaments, while the remaining clouds are non-filaments. The classification threshold is explicitly external: the paper states that MW observational studies and numerical works suggest radial profiles following approximately r^-1, and it adopts this as a 'tentative criterion' for the SMC sample. This is not a fitted parameter, and the threshold is not derived from the SMC data. The subsequent physical comparisons—peak brightness temperature, velocity dispersion, and outflow association—are measured independently of the radial-profile slope used for classification. The evolutionary scenario in Section 4.2 is post-hoc interpretation rather than a circular derivation. Self-citations to Tokuda et al. and Shimonishi et al. provide observational details and LMC comparison data from independent ALMA observations; they do not supply the classification criterion or any uniqueness claim, so they are not load-bearing in a circular sense. The tentative nature of the p = -1.0 threshold and the presence of sources near the boundary are robustness concerns, not circularity, and the discrepancy between the summary's 'eleven' filaments and Table 2's ten checkmarks is an internal consistency issue rather than a circular derivation. No step in the analysis reduces by construction to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The classification and the derived physical quantities depend on several hand-chosen thresholds (p = -1.0, FilFinder settings, mask thresholds) and on prior calibration assumptions (XCO = 7.5e20, CO(3-2)/CO(1-0) ratio of 1) with factor 2-3 uncertainty. The evolutionary scenario is an interpretive overlay from numerical simulations, not a direct measurement. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Radial profile slope threshold p = -1.0
    Chosen to separate filaments from non-filaments based on Milky Way Plummer-like profiles; classification and derived statistics depend on this threshold without robustness testing.
  • FilFinder flatten percent = 95
    Parameter for arctangent flattening of moment-0 images before filament extraction; affects spine identification.
  • Moment-0 mask intensity threshold = 10-20 K km/s
    Emission mask threshold roughly scaled to noise per field; regions selected above threshold with area > 5 beams.
  • FilFinder adapt_thresh = 0.1 pc
    Adaptive threshold scale parameter for structure identification.
  • FilFinder smooth_size = 0.05 pc
    Smoothing scale used in FilFinder.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption CO(3-2) traces gas at H2 density >~1e4 cm^-3 in the SMC, unlike in the Milky Way where CO traces lower-density gas.
    Invoked in Section 1 and 3.2 to justify that observed CO structures are dense filaments and to compare with LMC/MW; based on prior SMC studies (Muraoka et al. 2017).
  • domain assumption The CO(3-2)/CO(1-0) integrated intensity ratio is 1 and XCO = 7.5e20 cm^-2 (K km/s)^-1 converts CO intensity to H2 column density.
    Section 3.2; the paper notes factor 2-3 uncertainty and that a lower ratio (0.7) would increase column densities; column densities, densities, and line masses depend on this.
  • domain assumption 12CO emission in SMC dense clouds is optically thick and beam filling factor is close to 1, so peak brightness temperature traces kinetic temperature.
    Section 4.1.2; underpins the temperature difference between filament and non-filament classes.
  • domain assumption Milky Way interstellar filaments have Plummer-like radial column density profiles with p ~ -1, so a p threshold of -1.0 is a reasonable separator.
    Section 3.2; external benchmark from Arzoumanian et al. 2011; if SMC filaments have intrinsically different profiles, classification is biased.
  • domain assumption Projection or inclination does not drive the filament versus non-filament dichotomy.
    Section 4.2.1; argued from lack of steep velocity gradients in moment-1 maps, but not quantitatively tested; if many filaments are along the line of sight, the 60% fraction would be a lower limit.
  • ad hoc to paper The three-stage evolutionary scenario (hot young filaments, cooling, turbulence-smoothing) follows from numerical simulations and low-metallicity cooling theory.
    Section 4.2.3; post-hoc interpretation not directly tested by the cross-sectional data; no time evolution observed.
  • domain assumption Molecular clouds in the sample are self-gravitating.
    Section 3.2; based on line mass vs virial mass ratio ~3, within factor 3 uncertainty; used to link to star formation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of ALMA 0.1 pc View of Molecular Clouds Associated with High-Mass Protostellar Systems in the Small Magellanic Cloud: Are Low-Metallicity Clouds Filamentary or Not?." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RLUU7P4W

@misc{pith2026250102190,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: ALMA 0.1 pc View of Molecular Clouds Associated with High-Mass Protostellar Systems in the Small Magellanic Cloud: Are Low-Metallicity Clouds Filamentary or Not?},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RLUU7P4W}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.02190}
}
abstract

Filamentary molecular clouds are an essential intermediate stage in the star formation process. To test whether these structures are universal throughout cosmic star formation history, it is crucial to study low-metallicity environments within the Local Group. We present an ALMA analysis of the ALMA archival data at the spatial resolution of $\sim$0.1 pc for 17 massive young stellar objects (YSOs) in the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC; Z $\sim$0.2 $Z_{\odot}$). This sample represents approximately 30% of the YSOs confirmed by Spitzer spectroscopy. Early ALMA studies of the SMC have shown that the CO emission line traces an H$_2$ number density of $\gtrsim$10$^4$ cm$^{-3}$, an order of magnitude higher than in the typical Galactic environments. Using the CO($J$ = 3-2) data, we investigated the spatial and velocity distribution of molecular clouds. Our analysis shows that about 60% of the clouds have steep radial profiles from the spine of the elongated structures, while the remaining clouds have a smooth distribution and are characterized by lower brightness temperatures. We categorized the former as filaments and the latter as non-filaments. Some of the filamentary clouds are associated with YSOs with outflows and exhibit higher temperatures, likely reflecting their formation conditions, suggesting that these clouds are younger than non-filamentary ones. This indicates that even if filaments form during star formation, their steep structures may become less prominent and transit to a lower-temperature state. Such transitions in structure and temperature have not been reported in metal-rich regions, highlighting a key behavior for characterizing the evolution of the interstellar medium and star formation in low-metallicity environments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.02190 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The overall view of the SMC and the positions of the target YSOs. The red and cyan backgrounds show Hα (Smith & MCELS Team 1999) and Herschel 350 µm (Meixner et al. 2013) images, respectively. The yellow and gray crosses indicate spectroscopically confirmed YSOs identified by Oliveira et al. (2013), with the former being the targets of this study, labeled with the corresponding numbers as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A gallery showing the spatial distribution of CO toward the observed ALMA fields. The color scale images represent the peak brightness temperature distribution of CO(3–2). Contours highlight regions where the CO intensity is 10 K. The black crosses indicate the Spitzer positions of YSOs (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Moment 0 maps of CO(3–2) toward massive YSOs in the SMC. The integrated-velocity ranges are provided at the top of each panel. Black plus signs represent the Spitzer positions of the YSOs (Oliveira et al. 2013). Cyan lines show spines identified in the FilFinder analysis. Those marked with a yellow check mark in the top left corner have steep radial profiles and are categorized as filaments (see Section 3.2) [PITH_… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The average radial profile of CO intensity derived along the spines based on the FilFinder analysis. The black dashed line indicates half of the spatial resolution, and the gray dashed line indicates half of the maximum recovering scale (MRS). For data composed from mu…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Enlarged views of molecular clouds associated with massive YSOs in the SMC. To illustrate the diversity of their shapes, we show (a) a single filament, (b) a hub filament, (c) a spatially compact cloud, and (d) a diffuse cloud. The color-scale images show the peak brig…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The relation between the average column density (N ave H2 ) and velocity dispersion (σv) along the spine. Panel (a) visualizes the comparison between filaments and non-filaments in the SMC, while Panel (b) shows the comparison of the properties of filaments associated …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The histogram of the average brightness temperature of filamentary (purple) and non-filamentary (yellow) clouds. the assumption that the differences between filamentary and non-filamentary structures are physical in nature rather than observational effects. One of the …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The detection of spatially resolved protosteller outflows and episodic jets in the outer Galaxy

    astro-ph.GA 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ALMA observations resolve protostellar outflows and episodic jet bullets in the outer Galaxy for the first time, showing they resemble inner Galaxy sources.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

104 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    z1n Bc U')HL|6Oqc 3 Sݍzs ˍe Ƥ È T(w7< qa s Ru3 q F 6tUEt_J^ D h0| UO ];( mm i Z ǃPN |Z6A @v) (G5Uq h]!u; `KWgM! |]?y ; OSb3VuMOA Cm..g 2 A >FV ? ^S C0 A5 N<O F u

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    2022, , 940, 106, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9e55

    Abe , D., Inoue , T., Enokiya , R., & Fukui , Y. 2022, , 940, 106, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9e55

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac9e55 2022

  5. [5]

    2021, , 916, 83, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac07a1

    Abe , D., Inoue , T., Inutsuka , S.-i., & Matsumoto , T. 2021, , 916, 83, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac07a1

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac07a1 2021

  6. [6]

    2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, ed

    Andr \'e , P., Di Francesco , J., Ward-Thompson , D., et al. 2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, ed. H. Beuther , R. S. Klessen , C. P. Dullemond , & T. Henning , 27--51, 10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch002

    doi:10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch002 2014

  7. [7]

    2016, , 592, A54, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628378

    Andr \'e , P., Rev \'e ret , V., K \"o nyves , V., et al. 2016, , 592, A54, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628378

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628378 2016

  8. [8]

    2013, , 553, A119, 10.1051/0004-6361/201220822

    Arzoumanian , D., Andr \'e , P., Peretto , N., & K \"o nyves , V. 2013, , 553, A119, 10.1051/0004-6361/201220822

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220822 2013

Show all 104 references
  1. [9]

    2011, , 529, L6, 10.1051/0004-6361/201116596

    Arzoumanian , D., Andr \'e , P., Didelon , P., et al. 2011, , 529, L6, 10.1051/0004-6361/201116596

    2011 doi

  2. [10]

    M., Sip o cz , B

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, , 156, 123, 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    2018 doi

  3. [11]

    D., Leroy , A., Israel , F

    Bolatto , A. D., Leroy , A., Israel , F. P., & Jackson , J. M. 2003, , 595, 167, 10.1086/377230

    2003 doi

  4. [12]

    D., Leroy , A

    Bolatto , A. D., Leroy , A. K., Rosolowsky , E., Walter , F., & Blitz , L. 2008, , 686, 948, 10.1086/591513

    2008 doi

  5. [13]

    2013, , 764, L26, 10.1088/2041-8205/764/2/L26

    Busquet , G., Zhang , Q., Palau , A., et al. 2013, , 764, L26, 10.1088/2041-8205/764/2/L26

    2013 doi

  6. [14]

    2022, , 134, 114501, 10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642

    CASA Team , Bean , B., Bhatnagar , S., et al. 2022, , 134, 114501, 10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642

    2022 doi

  7. [15]

    2007, , 466, 165, 10.1051/0004-6361:20066834

    Chiosi , E., & Vallenari , A. 2007, , 466, 165, 10.1051/0004-6361:20066834

    2007 doi

  8. [16]

    2021, , 508, 4175, 10.1093/mnras/stab2497

    Chon , S., Omukai , K., & Schneider , R. 2021, , 508, 4175, 10.1093/mnras/stab2497

    2021 doi

  9. [17]

    2022, , 514, 4639, 10.1093/mnras/stac1549

    Chon , S., Ono , H., Omukai , K., & Schneider , R. 2022, , 514, 4639, 10.1093/mnras/stac1549

    2022 doi

  10. [18]

    Cox , A. N. 2000, Allen's astrophysical quantities

    2000

  11. [19]

    D., & Pudritz , R

    Fiege , J. D., & Pudritz , R. E. 2000, , 311, 85, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03066.x

    2000

  12. [20]

    2021, , 73, S405, 10.1093/pasj/psaa079

    Fukui , Y., Inoue , T., Hayakawa , T., & Torii , K. 2021, , 73, S405, 10.1093/pasj/psaa079

    2021 doi

  13. [21]

    2020, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2005.13750, 10.48550/arXiv.2005.13750

    Fukui , Y., Ohno , T., Tsuge , K., Sano , H., & Tachihara , K. 2020, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2005.13750, 10.48550/arXiv.2005.13750

    2020 doi arXiv

  14. [22]

    2017, , 69, L5, 10.1093/pasj/psx032

    Fukui , Y., Tsuge , K., Sano , H., et al. 2017, , 69, L5, 10.1093/pasj/psx032

    2017 doi

  15. [23]

    2015, , 807, L4, 10.1088/2041-8205/807/1/L4

    Fukui , Y., Harada , R., Tokuda , K., et al. 2015, , 807, L4, 10.1088/2041-8205/807/1/L4

    2015 doi

  16. [24]

    2019, , 886, 14, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4900

    Fukui , Y., Tokuda , K., Saigo , K., et al. 2019, , 886, 14, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4900

    2019 doi

  17. [25]

    D., Meixner , M., Meade , M

    Gordon , K. D., Meixner , M., Meade , M. R., et al. 2011, , 142, 102, 10.1088/0004-6256/142/4/102

    2011 doi

  18. [26]

    D., Roman-Duval , J., Bot , C., et al

    Gordon , K. D., Roman-Duval , J., Bot , C., et al. 2014, , 797, 85, 10.1088/0004-637X/797/2/85

    2014 doi

  19. [27]

    B., et al

    Graczyk , D., Pietrzy \'n ski , G., Thompson , I. B., et al. 2020, , 904, 13, 10.3847/1538-4357/abbb2b

    2020 doi

  20. [28]

    2024, , 971, 108, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5343

    Habel , N., Nally , C., Lenki \'c , L., et al. 2024, , 971, 108, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5343

    2024 doi

  21. [29]

    Heyer , M., & Dame , T. M. 2015, , 53, 583, 10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122324

    2015 doi

  22. [30]

    2013, , 774, L31, 10.1088/2041-8205/774/2/L31

    Inoue , T., & Fukui , Y. 2013, , 774, L31, 10.1088/2041-8205/774/2/L31

    2013 doi

  23. [31]

    2018, , 70, S53, 10.1093/pasj/psx089

    Inoue , T., Hennebelle , P., Fukui , Y., et al. 2018, , 70, S53, 10.1093/pasj/psx089

    2018 doi

  24. [32]

    2015, , 805, 73, 10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/73

    Inoue , T., & Omukai , K. 2015, , 805, 73, 10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/73

    2015 doi

  25. [33]

    2015, , 580, A49, 10.1051/0004-6361/201425584

    Inutsuka , S.-i., Inoue , T., Iwasaki , K., & Hosokawa , T. 2015, , 580, A49, 10.1051/0004-6361/201425584

    2015 doi

  26. [34]

    Inutsuka , S.-I., & Miyama , S. M. 1992, , 388, 392, 10.1086/171162

    1992 doi

  27. [35]

    Inutsuka , S.-i., & Miyama , S. M. 1997, , 480, 681, 10.1086/303982

    1997 doi

  28. [36]

    M., Finn , S

    Jackson , J. M., Finn , S. C., Chambers , E. T., Rathborne , J. M., & Simon , R. 2010, , 719, L185, 10.1088/2041-8205/719/2/L185

    2010 doi

  29. [37]

    E., Bolatto , A

    Jameson , K. E., Bolatto , A. D., Leroy , A. K., et al. 2016, , 825, 12, 10.3847/0004-637X/825/1/12

    2016 doi

  30. [38]

    E., Bolatto , A

    Jameson , K. E., Bolatto , A. D., Wolfire , M., et al. 2018, , 853, 111, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa4bb

    2018 doi

  31. [39]

    C., Nally , C., Habel , N., et al

    Jones , O. C., Nally , C., Habel , N., et al. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 694, 10.1038/s41550-023-01945-7

    2023 doi

  32. [40]

    S., Anderson , J., Dotter , A., et al

    Kalirai , J. S., Anderson , J., Dotter , A., et al. 2013, , 763, 110, 10.1088/0004-637X/763/2/110

    2013 doi

  33. [41]

    2024, Instability and Evolution of Shocked Clouds Formed by Orthogonal Collisions between Magnetized Filamentary Molecular Clouds

    Kashiwagi, R., Iwasaki, K., & Tomisaka, K. 2024, Instability and Evolution of Shocked Clouds Formed by Orthogonal Collisions between Magnetized Filamentary Molecular Clouds. 2408.08863

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    A., Tsutsumi , T., Brogan , C

    Kepley , A. A., Tsutsumi , T., Brogan , C. L., et al. 2020, , 132, 024505, 10.1088/1538-3873/ab5e14

    2020 doi

  35. [43]

    Kobayashi , M. I. N., Inoue , T., Inutsuka , S.-i., et al. 2020, , 905, 95, 10.3847/1538-4357/abc5be

    2020 doi

  36. [44]

    Kobayashi , M. I. N., Iwasaki , K., Tomida , K., et al. 2023, , 954, 38, 10.3847/1538-4357/ace34e

    2023 doi

  37. [45]

    2022, , 74, 24, 10.1093/pasj/psab107

    Kohno , M., Nishimura , A., Fujita , S., et al. 2022, , 74, 24, 10.1093/pasj/psab107

    2022 doi

  38. [46]

    2000, , 532, 980, 10.1086/308594

    Koyama , H., & Inutsuka , S.-I. 2000, , 532, 980, 10.1086/308594

    2000 doi

  39. [47]

    Kumar , M. S. N., Palmeirim , P., Arzoumanian , D., & Inutsuka , S. I. 2020, , 642, A87, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038232

    2020 doi

  40. [48]

    2014, , 52, 415, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125615

    Madau , P., & Dickinson , M. 2014, , 52, 415, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125615

    2014 doi

  41. [49]

    K., Inoue, T., Fukui, Y., et al

    Maity, A. K., Inoue, T., Fukui, Y., et al. 2024, Cloud-Cloud Collision: Formation of Hub-Filament Systems and Associated Gas Kinematics; Mass-collecting cone: A new signature of Cloud-Cloud Collision. 2408.06826

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    2013, , 146, 62, 10.1088/0004-6256/146/3/62

    Meixner , M., Panuzzo , P., Roman-Duval , J., et al. 2013, , 146, 62, 10.1088/0004-6256/146/3/62

    2013 doi

  43. [51]

    1995, , 445, L161, 10.1086/187914

    Mizuno , A., Onishi , T., Yonekura , Y., et al. 1995, , 445, L161, 10.1086/187914

    1995 doi

  44. [52]

    2001, , 53, 971, 10.1093/pasj/53.6.971

    Mizuno , N., Yamaguchi , R., Mizuno , A., et al. 2001, , 53, 971, 10.1093/pasj/53.6.971

    2001 doi

  45. [53]

    2010, , 712, 1248, 10.1088/0004-637X/712/2/1248

    Muller , E., Ott , J., Hughes , A., et al. 2010, , 712, 1248, 10.1088/0004-637X/712/2/1248

    2010 doi

  46. [54]

    2017, , 844, 98, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7a0b

    Muraoka , K., Homma , A., Onishi , T., et al. 2017, , 844, 98, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7a0b

    2017 doi

  47. [55]

    Myers , P. C. 2009, , 700, 1609, 10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/1609

    2009 doi

  48. [56]

    1998, , 116, 336, 10.1086/300392

    Nagahama , T., Mizuno , A., Ogawa , H., & Fukui , Y. 1998, , 116, 336, 10.1086/300392

    1998 doi

  49. [57]

    2021, , 908, L43, 10.3847/2041-8213/abdebb

    Neelamkodan , N., Tokuda , K., Barman , S., et al. 2021, , 908, L43, 10.3847/2041-8213/abdebb

    2021 doi

  50. [58]

    S., Smith , L

    Nigra , L., Gallagher , J. S., Smith , L. J., et al. 2008, , 120, 972, 10.1086/592236

    2008 doi

  51. [59]

    Nikoli \'c , S., Garay , G., Rubio , M., & Johansson , L. E. B. 2007, , 471, 561, 10.1051/0004-6361:20067034

    2007 doi

  52. [60]

    2015, , 216, 18, 10.1088/0067-0049/216/1/18

    Nishimura , A., Tokuda , K., Kimura , K., et al. 2015, , 216, 18, 10.1088/0067-0049/216/1/18

    2015 doi

  53. [61]

    2023, , 949, 63, 10.3847/1538-4357/accadb

    Ohno , T., Tokuda , K., Konishi , A., et al. 2023, , 949, 63, 10.3847/1538-4357/accadb

    2023 doi

  54. [62]

    M., van Loon , J

    Oliveira , J. M., van Loon , J. T., Sloan , G. C., et al. 2013, , 428, 3001, 10.1093/mnras/sts250

    2013 doi

  55. [63]

    2005, , 626, 627, 10.1086/429955

    Omukai , K., Tsuribe , T., Schneider , R., & Ferrara , A. 2005, , 626, 627, 10.1086/429955

    2005 doi

  56. [64]

    J., Indebetouw , R., Sandstrom , K., et al

    O'Neill , T. J., Indebetouw , R., Sandstrom , K., et al. 2022, , 938, 82, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8d93

    2022 doi

  57. [65]

    1999, , 51, 871, 10.1093/pasj/51.6.871

    Onishi , T., Kawamura , A., Abe , R., et al. 1999, , 51, 871, 10.1093/pasj/51.6.871

    1999 doi

  58. [66]

    Pagel , B. E. J. 2003, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 304, CNO in the Universe, ed. C. Charbonnel , D. Schaerer , & G. Meynet , 187

    2003

  59. [67]

    2013, , 550, A38, 10.1051/0004-6361/201220500

    Palmeirim , P., Andr \'e , P., Kirk , J., et al. 2013, , 550, A38, 10.1051/0004-6361/201220500

    2013 doi

  60. [68]

    C., Fall , S

    Pei , Y. C., Fall , S. M., & Hauser , M. G. 1999, , 522, 604, 10.1086/307674

    1999 doi

  61. [69]

    2019, , 567, 200, 10.1038/s41586-019-0999-4

    Pietrzy \'n ski , G., Graczyk , D., Gallenne , A., et al. 2019, , 567, 200, 10.1038/s41586-019-0999-4

    2019 doi

  62. [70]

    Rolleston , W. R. J., Dufton , P. L., McErlean , N. D., & Venn , K. A. 1999, , 348, 728

    1999

  63. [71]

    1991, , 368, 173, 10.1086/169680

    Rubio , M., Garay , G., Montani , J., & Thaddeus , P. 1991, , 368, 173, 10.1086/169680

    1991 doi

  64. [72]

    Rufflee , P. M. E., Kemper , F., Jones , O. C., et al. 2015, , 451, 3504, 10.1093/mnras/stv1106

    2015 doi

  65. [73]

    C., & Dopita , M

    Russell , S. C., & Dopita , M. A. 1992, , 384, 508, 10.1086/170893

    1992 doi

  66. [74]

    2017, , 835, 108, 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/108

    Saigo , K., Onishi , T., Nayak , O., et al. 2017, , 835, 108, 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/108

    2017 doi

  67. [75]

    P., Rubio , M., Bolatto , A

    Salda \ n o , H. P., Rubio , M., Bolatto , A. D., et al. 2023, , 672, A153, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142217

    2023 doi

  68. [76]

    2024, , 687, A26, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348436

    ---. 2024, , 687, A26, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348436

    2024 doi

  69. [77]

    P., Looney , L

    Seale , J. P., Looney , L. W., Chu , Y.-H., et al. 2009, , 699, 150, 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/150

    2009 doi

  70. [78]

    R., Seale , J

    Sewi o , M., Carlson , L. R., Seale , J. P., et al. 2013, , 778, 15, 10.1088/0004-637X/778/1/15

    2013 doi

  71. [79]

    C., Dullemond , C

    Shetty , R., Glover , S. C., Dullemond , C. P., et al. 2011, , 415, 3253, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18937.x

    2011

  72. [80]

    2019, , 632, A83, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935689

    Shimajiri , Y., Andr \'e , P., Ntormousi , E., et al. 2019, , 632, A83, 10.1051/0004-6361/201935689

    2019 doi

  73. [81]

    2023, , 672, A133, 10.1051/0004-6361/202140857

    Shimajiri , Y., Andr \'e , P., Peretto , N., et al. 2023, , 672, A133, 10.1051/0004-6361/202140857

    2023 doi

  74. [82]

    2016, , 827, 72, 10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/72

    Shimonishi , T., Onaka , T., Kawamura , A., & Aikawa , Y. 2016, , 827, 72, 10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/72

    2016 doi

  75. [83]

    Shimonishi , T., Tanaka , K. E. I., Zhang , Y., & Furuya , K. 2023, , 946, L41, 10.3847/2041-8213/acc031

    2023 doi

  76. [84]

    2018, , 862, 102, 10.3847/1538-4357/aacd0c

    Shimonishi , T., Watanabe , Y., Nishimura , Y., et al. 2018, , 862, 102, 10.3847/1538-4357/aacd0c

    2018 doi

  77. [85]

    C., & MCELS Team

    Smith , R. C., & MCELS Team . 1999, in New Views of the Magellanic Clouds, ed. Y. H. Chu , N. Suntzeff , J. Hesser , & D. Bohlender , Vol. 190, 28

    1999

  78. [86]

    M., Sault , R

    Stanimirovic , S., Staveley-Smith , L., Dickey , J. M., Sault , R. J., & Snowden , S. L. 1999, , 302, 417, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02013.x

    1999

  79. [87]

    2017, , 835, 55, 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/55

    Takekoshi , T., Minamidani , T., Komugi , S., et al. 2017, , 835, 55, 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/55

    2017 doi

  80. [88]

    2018, , 867, 117, 10.3847/1538-4357/aae48b

    ---. 2018, , 867, 117, 10.3847/1538-4357/aae48b

    2018 doi

  81. [89]

    D., Indebetouw , R., et al

    Tarantino , E., Bolatto , A. D., Indebetouw , R., et al. 2024, , 969, 101, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3def

    2024 doi

  82. [90]

    2018, , 862, 8, 10.3847/1538-4357/aac898

    Tokuda , K., Onishi , T., Saigo , K., et al. 2018, , 862, 8, 10.3847/1538-4357/aac898

    2018 doi

  83. [91]

    2019 a , , 886, 15, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab48ff

    Tokuda , K., Fukui , Y., Harada , R., et al. 2019 a , , 886, 15, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab48ff

    2019 doi

  84. [92]

    2019 b , , 71, 73, 10.1093/pasj/psz051

    Tokuda , K., Tachihara , K., Saigo , K., et al. 2019 b , , 71, 73, 10.1093/pasj/psz051

    2019 doi

  85. [93]

    2020, , 896, 36, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8ad3

    Tokuda , K., Muraoka , K., Kondo , H., et al. 2020, , 896, 36, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8ad3

    2020 doi

  86. [94]

    2021, , 922, 171, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1ff4

    Tokuda , K., Kondo , H., Ohno , T., et al. 2021, , 922, 171, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1ff4

    2021 doi

  87. [95]

    2022 a , , 936, L6, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac81c1

    Tokuda , K., Zahorecz , S., Kunitoshi , Y., et al. 2022 a , , 936, L6, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac81c1

    2022 doi

  88. [96]

    2022 b , , 933, 20, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6b3c

    Tokuda , K., Minami , T., Fukui , Y., et al. 2022 b , , 933, 20, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6b3c

    2022 doi

  89. [97]

    Tokuda , K., Harada , N., Tanaka , K. E. I., et al. 2023, , 955, 52, 10.3847/1538-4357/acefb7

    2023 doi

  90. [98]

    2019, , 871, 44, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf4fb

    Tsuge , K., Sano , H., Tachihara , K., et al. 2019, , 871, 44, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf4fb

    2019 doi

  91. [99]

    2024, , 10.1093/pasj/psae035

    ---. 2024, , 10.1093/pasj/psae035

    2024 doi

  92. [100]

    C., & Zamora-Avil \'e s , M

    V \'a zquez-Semadeni , E., Palau , A., Ballesteros-Paredes , J., G \'o mez , G. C., & Zamora-Avil \'e s , M. 2019, , 490, 3061, 10.1093/mnras/stz2736

    2019 doi

  93. [101]

    L., Oliveira , J

    Ward , J. L., Oliveira , J. M., van Loon , J. T., & Sewi o , M. 2017, , 464, 1512, 10.1093/mnras/stw2386

    2017 doi

  94. [102]

    F., Filipovic , M

    Wong , G. F., Filipovic , M. D., Crawford , E. J., et al. 2012, Serbian Astronomical Journal, 185, 53, 10.2298/SAJ1285053W

    2012 doi

  95. [103]

    2023, , 943, 137, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac94d5

    Yasui , C., Kobayashi , N., Saito , M., Izumi , N., & Ikeda , Y. 2023, , 943, 137, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac94d5

    2023 doi

  96. [104]

    Zinnecker , H., & Yorke , H. W. 2007, , 45, 481, 10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092549

    2007 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.