Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Robotic Grasping from Classical to Modern: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.03631 v1 pith:RNGDY3QD submitted 2022-02-08 cs.RO

classification cs.RO
keywords graspingroboticrecentsurveyclassicalfutureintelligencemodern
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Robotic Grasping has always been an active topic in robotics since grasping is one of the fundamental but most challenging skills of robots. It demands the coordination of robotic perception, planning, and control for robustness and intelligence. However, current solutions are still far behind humans, especially when confronting unstructured scenarios. In this paper, we survey the advances of robotic grasping, starting from the classical formulations and solutions to the modern ones. By reviewing the history of robotic grasping, we want to provide a complete view of this community, and perhaps inspire the combination and fusion of different ideas, which we think would be helpful to touch and explore the essence of robotic grasping problems. In detail, we firstly give an overview of the analytic methods for robotic grasping. After that, we provide a discussion on the recent state-of-the-art data-driven grasping approaches rising in recent years. With the development of computer vision, semantic grasping is being widely investigated and can be the basis of intelligent manipulation and skill learning for autonomous robotic systems in the future. Therefore, in our survey, we also briefly review the recent progress in this topic. Finally, we discuss the open problems and the future research directions that may be important for the human-level robustness, autonomy, and intelligence of robots.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ActiveGrasp: Information-Guided Active Grasping with Calibrated Energy-based Model

    cs.RO 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ActiveGrasp selects the next camera view that maximizes predicted reduction in grasp-success entropy using a calibrated SE(3) energy-based model, and reports higher grasp success than prior active-grasping methods in ...

  2. A Robust Placeability Metric for Model-Free Unified Pick-and-Place Reasoning

    cs.RO 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A model-free placeability metric computed from partial point clouds jointly scores stability, clearance, and placement-conditioned graspability to select stable grasp–place pairs.

  3. Generative Grasp Detection and Estimation with Concept Learning-based Safety Criteria

    cs.RO 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A YOLOv5 + GG-CNN + concept-learning pipeline for grasping work tools reports 81.4% grasp success, but the claimed concept-based safety improvement lacks quantitative validation.

  4. Visual Prompting for Robotic Manipulation with Annotation-Guided Pick-and-Place Using ACT

    cs.RO 2025-08 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A pick-and-place system overlays bounding boxes on camera images, trains an ACT transformer on human demonstrations, and reports 80% to 100% success rates across three retail scenarios.

Pith tools