Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Decontamination of the scientific literature

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.15912 v1 pith:RNUWBPJI submitted 2022-10-28 cs.DL cs.IR

Guillaume Cabanac This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.DLcs.IR
keywords literaturescientificpeerreviewacceptedactionsai-poweredambitions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Research misconduct and frauds pollute the scientific literature. Honest errors and malevolent data fabrication, image manipulation, journal hijacking, and plagiarism passed peer review unnoticed. Problematic papers deceive readers, authors citing them, and AI-powered literature-based discovery. Flagship publishers accepted hundreds flawed papers despite claiming to enforce peer review. This application ambitions to decontaminate the scientific literature using curative and preventive actions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Unveiling tortured phrases in Humanities and Social Sciences

    cs.DL 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A screening tool built for STEM now flags 32 humanities and social science papers using 121 newly generated 'tortured abbreviation' fingerprints.

Pith tools