Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 3 minor 47 references

Reprocessing of the Parkes 70-cm Survey and Discovery of a New Radio Pulsar in the Large Magellanic Cloud

T0 review · 1 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Reprocessing the archived 70-cm pulsar survey with a wider dispersion-measure range and an acceleration search uncovers a new 0.909 s radio pulsar in the Large Magellanic Cloud.

desk verdict A careful reprocessing that yields a real new pulsar, but the LMC label is a DM-based guess that needs a caveat or a timing solution. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.21920 v1 pith:RQ3A5X4J submitted 2025-07-29 astro-ph.HE

Wenke Xia , Fronefield Crawford , Shinnosuke Hisano , Tai Jespersen , Melanie Ficarra , Mckenzie Golden , Mia Gironda This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords radiopulsarspulsarsurveysLargeMagellanicClouddispersionmeasureaccelerationsearcharchivaldataPSRJ0540-69surveyreprocessing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that re-searching the archived data of the 70-cm pulsar survey with a wider dispersion-measure range (up to 3000 pc $cm^{-3}$) and an acceleration search detects 94 known pulsars the original survey missed and uncovers one genuinely new pulsar, PSR J0540-69. The new pulsar has a spin period of 0.909 s and a dispersion measure of 80 pc $cm^{-3}$, which exceeds the expected Galactic foreground of 50-60 pc $cm^{-3}$ along that line of sight, so the paper places it in the Large Magellanic Cloud. The pulsar is strongly variable, showing up in only three 436 MHz beams and one 1368 MHz observation among dozens covering its position, and its estimated 400 MHz luminosity is typical of other LMC radio pulsars. If the interpretation is right, the LMC pulsar census grows and the value of multiple, modern searches through archival survey data is reinforced.

What carries the argument

The re-analysis uses a modern pulsar search pipeline: each archived beam is masked for radio-frequency interference, dedispersed into 1453 trial dispersion measures from 0 to 3000 pc $cm^{-3}$, and searched for periodicities with an acceleration correction that maintains sensitivity up to a Fourier bin drift of 50 bins (full sensitivity to accelerations of about 230 m $s^{-2}$ for a 3 ms pulsar). Candidates are sifted to keep only those appearing in at least 10 DM trials with periods of 3 ms or longer, then verified by folding. The distance assignment rests on comparing the measured DM of 80 pc $cm^{-3}$ with the modeled Galactic free-electron foreground of 50-60 pc $cm^{-3}$, attributing the excess to the LMC.

What would settle it

A timing parallax for PSR J0540-69, measured over at least two years, would decide the issue directly: a distance far below 50 kpc would mean the pulsar is in the Galaxy and the DM excess is foreground.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

PSR J0540-69 is a 0.909 s radio pulsar with a dispersion measure of 80 pc $cm^{-3}$ discovered while reprocessing archived 70-cm survey beams that had targeted the X-ray pulsar PSR B0540-69. Because the modeled maximum Galactic dispersion along this line of sight is only 50-60 pc $cm^{-3}$, the paper concludes the pulsar lies in the Large Magellanic Cloud at roughly 50 kpc distance. Three 436 MHz detections give flux densities between 0.4 and 0.7 mJy (adopting 0.6 mJy), and a 1368 MHz detection shows brightness variations on timescales of tens of minutes, which the paper argues explains the many non-detections at nearby positions. The integrated profile is a single moderate-width component with no evident evolution between 436 and 1368 MHz. Estimated 400 MHz luminosity, about 1725 mJy $kpc^{2}$, sits within the range of the 31 previously known LMC radio pulsars.

Load-bearing premise

The pulsar is assigned to the Large Magellanic Cloud because its dispersion measure of 80 pc $cm^{-3}$ exceeds the expected 50-60 pc $cm^{-3}$ of Galaxy in front of it, and this assumes no unusually dense foreground plasma along exactly this line of sight.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The Large Magellanic Cloud pulsar census grows from 31 to 32 radio pulsars, with PSR J0540-69 joining the population at a typical luminosity.
  • Because the reprocessing found 94 known pulsars missed by the original survey and missed 33 the original survey saw, no single search of a dataset is complete; multiple independent searches are needed to maximize the yield.
  • Acceleration searching recovers binary pulsars whose signals would be smeared in a standard search; three of the detected binaries show significant power-spectrum degradation when searched without acceleration.
  • Extending the dispersion-measure search to 3000 pc cm^-3 recovers five known pulsars with DMs above the original survey's threshold, showing that high-DM pulsars can be hidden in archival data.
  • The new pulsar's strong variability on tens-of-minutes timescales means that single-epoch surveys can easily miss it, so the true LMC pulsar population may be larger than current counts.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same kind of re-search could be applied profitably to other archival pulsar surveys: the combination of a wide DM range and an acceleration search is cheap by modern computing standards and the yield here suggests many old datasets still contain undetected pulsars.
  • The variability of PSR J0540-69 resembles nulling or intermittent pulsars; targeted repeated observations at 436 MHz could measure its nulling fraction and determine whether it belongs to that class.
  • That the higher-sensitivity TRAMPUM survey did not see the pulsar, while a 7.6-hour L-band observation did, implies that variability, not sensitivity, is the limiting factor for such sources; population statistics from single-epoch surveys may be biased low.
  • A timing campaign on PSR J0540-69 would refine the crude period derivative of about 3e-15 s/s and could reveal whether it is isolated or binary, since the acceleration search hints at the kind of signal binaries produce.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper reports a reprocessing of the archived Parkes 70-cm pulsar survey data using PRESTO, with an expanded dispersion-measure search (to 3000 pc cm^-3) and an acceleration search. The authors detect 359 known pulsars (265 previously detected in the original survey and 94 not), miss 33 of the original detections, and report the discovery of one new pulsar, PSR J0540-69, with spin period 0.909 s and a dispersion measure of about 80 pc cm^-3. The new pulsar is claimed to reside in the Large Magellanic Cloud on the basis of its DM exceeding the modeled Galactic foreground by 20-30 pc cm^-3. The paper also estimates a 436 MHz flux density of about 0.6 mJy, discusses strong variability seen at 1368 MHz, and compares the pulsar's luminosity with other LMC radio pulsars.

Significance. If the LMC membership of PSR J0540-69 holds, this is a genuine addition to the small population of known LMC radio pulsars and demonstrates the scientific value of re-searching archival survey data with modern software and expanded parameter spaces. The paper is careful in its bookkeeping of detections and non-detections, provides folded profiles for the new pulsar, and makes clear that the detection is supported by four independent observations at two frequencies. However, the central claim that the pulsar is located in the LMC rests entirely on a modest DM excess over a modeled foreground; the paper's own data at 1368 MHz show a best-fit DM below that foreground, and the DM is poorly localized. The conclusion would be substantially weakened if the pulsar is instead a foreground Galactic object.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section 3.3, flux density estimate] The flux density estimate of 0.4-0.7 mJy at 436 MHz is scaled from the survey sensitivity assuming the pulsar is near the beam center of the PKS70 beams, justified by the 1368 MHz constraint of within 7 arcmin of PSR B0540-69. However, the 1368 MHz detection itself is variable and the pulsar's position within that 7 arcmin is not constrained. If the source is offset from the PKS70 beam center by more than about half the beam radius, the attenuation could be non-negligible, and the derived luminosity in Fig. 8 would be biased. The paper should provide a quantitative estimate of the beam attenuation uncertainty or explicitly state the positional uncertainty in the flux density calculation.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract, Section 1.1] The manuscript has a few typographical errors: 'Manch ester' in Section 3.2 should be 'Manchester', and 'PK70 archive' in Section 2 should be 'PKS70 archive'.
  2. [Figure 5 and Table 7] The text alternates between 'PSR B0540-69' and 'PSR 0540-69'; please use a consistent designation, and ensure the nomenclature in the figure captions matches the text.
  3. [Section 3.3, paragraph on period derivative] The period derivative estimate of about 3e-15 s/s is based on only two epochs separated by about 27 years. Given the 30% uncertainty and the possibility of timing noise or DM variations, I suggest adding a brief caveat that this is an order-of-magnitude estimate only.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the reprocessing results and new pulsar discovery are independent of the paper's own inputs.

full rationale

The paper is an observational reprocessing campaign, not a derivation whose conclusions are built into its inputs. The new pulsar claim rests on four independent archival detections (three at 436 MHz and one at 1368 MHz) folded at a consistent spin period near 0.909 s; the period and DM are measured from the data and are not fitted parameters that are later renamed as predictions. The DM-based LMC membership in Section 3.3 compares DM = 80 pc cm^-3 with an external Galactic foreground estimate of 50-60 pc cm^-3 taken from Cordes & Lazio (2002) and Yao et al. (2017); this is a comparison against independent models, not an input derived from the pulsar itself, and the paper explicitly reports that the 1368 MHz DM (52.7 pc cm^-3) is not well localized, so there is no statistical forcing of the membership claim. The flux density estimate (0.4-0.7 mJy, with 0.6 mJy adopted) is obtained by scaling the published PKS70 survey sensitivity with the radiometer equation, using independently assumed system temperature, duty cycle, integration time, and S/N; this is a standard calibration, and the luminosity shown in Fig. 8 is an illustrative consequence, not a self-referential fit. Self-citations appear only as context: Crawford et al. (2022) for the prior single-pulse/FRB search, and Manchester et al. (2005) as the ATNF catalog source for comparison pulsar parameters; neither is load-bearing for the discovery. No equation in the paper reduces to its own input, no fitted parameter is presented as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work. The possible weakness that LMC membership rests on a modest ~20-30 pc cm^-3 DM excess over a modeled Galactic foreground is a scientific uncertainty about external electron-density models, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free-fit theory parameters or invented entities; the discovery is an observational result. The spectral index prior is the main extra input used in luminosity comparisons, and several domain assumptions about DM-based distance, source identification, and variability are required to interpret the detections.

free parameters (1)
  • spectral_index = -1.6
    Assumed spectral index used to scale 1400 MHz flux densities to 400 MHz for the LMC pulsar population and to derive the 400 MHz luminosity of PSR J0540-69. Taken from Jankowski et al. (2018), not fitted to the data in this paper.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The Galactic dispersion measure along the line of sight to the LMC position of PSR J0540-69 is expected to be at most 50-60 pc cm^-3.
    Used in Section 3.3 to conclude that DM = 80 pc cm^-3 places the pulsar in the LMC rather than the Milky Way.
  • domain assumption The 1368 MHz detection is the same object as the 436 MHz detections.
    The similarity in spin period and the overlapping positional constraint justify combining the epochs to estimate a period derivative and to shrink the position to within 7 arcmin of PSR B0540-69 (Section 3.3).
  • ad hoc to paper The non-detections of PSR J0540-69 in most overlapping archival beams are due to intrinsic flux variability rather than to instrumental artifacts or confusion.
    The paper explains 43 of 47 non-detections by variability, citing the time-variable 1368 MHz fold. This assumption is necessary to reconcile the detection pattern and is not independently tested.
  • domain assumption The flux density of PSR J0540-69 can be estimated by scaling the nominal PKS70 sensitivity limit using the radiometer equation with an assumed system temperature of 87 K.
    Section 3.3 derives 0.4-0.7 mJy from the survey sensitivity using assumed receiver and sky temperatures and a 6% duty cycle; this scaling is standard but depends on several external inputs.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Reprocessing of the Parkes 70-cm Survey and Discovery of a New Radio Pulsar in the Large Magellanic Cloud." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RQ3A5X4J

@misc{pith2026250721920,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Reprocessing of the Parkes 70-cm Survey and Discovery of a New Radio Pulsar in the Large Magellanic Cloud},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RQ3A5X4J}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.21920}
}
abstract

We have reprocessed the data archived from the Parkes 70-cm pulsar (PKS70) survey with an expanded DM search range and an acceleration search. Our goal was to detect pulsars that might have been missed in the original survey processing. Of the original 43842 pointings, 34869 pointings were archived, along with 440 additional pointings for confirmation or timing. We processed all of these archived data and detected 359 known pulsars: 265 of these were detected in the original survey, while an additional 94 currently known pulsars were detected in our reprocessing. A few among those 94 pulsars are highly accelerated binary pulsars. Furthermore, we detected 5 more pulsars with DMs higher than the original survey thresholds, as well as 6 more pulsars below the nominal survey sensitivity threshold (from the original survey beams with longer integrations). We missed detection of 33 (of the 298) pulsars detected in the original survey, in part because portions of the survey data were missing in the archive and our early stage candidate sifting method. We discovered one new pulsar in the re-analysis, PSR J0540$-$69 which has a spin period of 0.909 s and resides in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). This new pulsar appeared in three PKS70 beams and one additional L-band observation that targeted the LMC pulsar PSR B0540$-$69. The numerous pulsar detections found in our re-analysis and the discovery of a new pulsar in the LMC highlight the value of conducting multiple searches through pulsar datasets.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.21920 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Sky plot of the PKS70 survey beam coverage from archival survey beams (small gray circles) and additional observations (small blue circles), shown in Galactic coordinates. The white patches in the sky coverage indicate where the survey beam data are missing in the archive. Pulsars detected by both the original survey and our reprocessing are shown as green squares, while pulsars detected only in our reprocessing are… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. DMs of detected pulsars in both the original survey and this new reprocessing. The left panel shows the DM vs. galactic latitude b of known pulsars detected in the original survey (red circles and green squares) and in this new reprocessing (blue triangles and green squares), along with the maximum DM searched in the original survey (black line). With a higher maximum DM (up to 3000 pc/cm3 ), 5 additional known puls… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Flux density vs. spin period of known pulsars in the region observed; pulsars detected from at least one survey beam are shown in panel (a), and the pulsars detected only from targeted beams are shown in panel (b) and (c). In panel (a), sensitivity curves are shown for representative DMs (0, 50, 100, 300, and 500 pc cm−3 ) and are assuming a duty cycle of 0.08, a detection S/N of 8, and a digitization loss constant … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The maximum expected acceleration during the course of the binary orbit is plotted for the set of binary pulsars that were detected. The dashed line indicates the acceleration search limit in the reprocessing for which full sensitivity to accelerated signals was mainta…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (Top) Detection of J0540−69 in a 1400 MHz 7.6 hr Parkes observation obtained from the CSIRO archive. This was the only other detection (apart from the three PKS70 detections) out of 47 archived observations that over￾lapped the beam area of the original PKS70 detection…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Signal strength (from the sigma value in prep￾fold) vs. trial DM for folds of PSR J0540−69 at the dis￾covery periods. The top and bottom plots show folds at a range of DM trials for both the 436 MHz and 1380 MHz observations, respectively. The DM is more well-localized…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Estimated 400 MHz luminosity vs. DM for the 31 currently known radio pulsars in the LMC (black crosses) and the new pulsar PSR J0540−69 reported here (red square). This includes the 24 pulsars currently listed in the ATNF pulsar catalog (but not PSR J0537−6910 since it…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    c9ɔ|TܱO¸ f ¸ IqeYc:+ ,;S/cqeIqξB? e Bu,ӵQq >!!R x2/2z +

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    2021

  4. [4]

    A., Ackermann , M., Ajello , M., et al

    Abdo , A. A., Ackermann , M., Ajello , M., et al. 2010, apj, 712, 957, 10.1088/0004-637X/712/2/957

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/712/2/957 2010

  5. [5]

    A., Lorimer, D

    Bailes, M., Harrison, P. A., Lorimer, D. R., et al. 1994, apjl, 425, L41

    work page 1994

  6. [6]

    F., et al

    Bailes, M., Johnston, S., Bell, J. F., et al. 1997, apj, 481, 386

    work page 1997

  7. [7]

    D., Champion , D

    Cameron , A. D., Champion , D. J., Kramer , M., et al. 2018, , 475, L57, 10.1093/mnrasl/sly003

    doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sly003 2018

  8. [8]

    R., & Lyne, A

    Clifton, T. R., & Lyne, A. G. 1986, na, 320, 43

    work page 1986

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    M., & Lazio , T

    Cordes , J. M., & Lazio , T. J. W. 2002, arXiv e-prints, astro, 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0207156

    2002 doi arXiv

  2. [10]

    2022, , 515, 3698, 10.1093/mnras/stac2101

    Crawford , F., Hisano , S., Golden , M., et al. 2022, , 515, 3698, 10.1093/mnras/stac2101

    2022 doi

  3. [12]

    N., Lentati , L., et al

    Desvignes , G., Caballero , R. N., Lentati , L., et al. 2016, mnras, 458, 3341, 10.1093/mnras/stw483

    2016 doi

  4. [13]

    J., Taylor, J

    Dewey, R. J., Taylor, J. H., Weisberg, J. M., & Stokes, G. H. 1985, apjl, 294, L25

    1985

  5. [14]

    P., Kramer , M., Lyne , A

    Eatough , R. P., Kramer , M., Lyne , A. G., & Keith , M. J. 2013, , 431, 292, 10.1093/mnras/stt161

    2013 doi

  6. [15]

    2023, , 678, A48, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346841

    EPTA Collaboration , Antoniadis , J., Babak , S., et al. 2023, , 678, A48, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346841

    2023 doi

  7. [16]

    Haslam , C. G. T., Salter , C. J., Stoffel , H., & Wilson , W. E. 1982, , 47, 1

    1982

  8. [17]

    G., Kramer, M., Martin, C

    Hobbs, G., Lyne, A. G., Kramer, M., Martin, C. E., & Jordan, C. 2004, mnras, 353, 1311

    2004

  9. [18]

    F., et al

    Jankowski , F., van Straten , W., Keane , E. F., et al. 2018, , 473, 4436, 10.1093/mnras/stx2476

    2018 doi

  10. [19]

    Kaplan , D. L. 2022, PSS: Pulsar Survey Scraper , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2210.001

    2022

  11. [20]

    J., Eatough , R

    Keith , M. J., Eatough , R. P., Lyne , A. G., et al. 2009, , 395, 837, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14543.x

    2009

  12. [21]

    J., Johnston , S., Karastergiou , A., et al

    Keith , M. J., Johnston , S., Karastergiou , A., et al. 2024, , 530, 1581, 10.1093/mnras/stae937

    2024 doi

  13. [22]

    P., Kim , H., et al

    Knispel , B., Eatough , R. P., Kim , H., et al. 2013, , 774, 93, 10.1088/0004-637X/774/2/93

    2013 doi

  14. [23]

    G., Stappers , B

    Knispel , B., Lyne , A. G., Stappers , B. W., et al. 2015, , 806, 140, 10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/140

    2015 doi

  15. [24]

    R., Lyne, A

    Lorimer, D. R., Lyne, A. G., Bailes, M., et al. 1996, mnras, 283, 1383

    1996

  16. [25]

    R., Yates, J

    Lorimer, D. R., Yates, J. A., Lyne, A. G., & Gould, D. M. 1995, mnras, 273, 411

    1995

  17. [26]

    E., Bailes , M., Shannon , R

    Lower , M. E., Bailes , M., Shannon , R. M., et al. 2020, mnras, 494, 228, 10.1093/mnras/staa615

    2020 doi

  18. [27]

    G., Manchester , R

    Lyne , A. G., Manchester , R. N., Lorimer , D. R., et al. 1998, , 295, 743, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01144.x

    1998

  19. [28]

    N., Hobbs , G

    Manchester , R. N., Hobbs , G. B., Teoh , A., & Hobbs , M. 2005, , 129, 1993, 10.1086/428488

    2005 doi

  20. [29]

    N., Lyne, A

    Manchester, R. N., Lyne, A. G., Taylor, J. H., et al. 1978, MNRAS, 185, 409

    1978

  21. [30]

    N., Lyne , A

    Manchester , R. N., Lyne , A. G., D'Amico , N., et al. 1996, , 279, 1235, 10.1093/mnras/279.4.1235

    1996 doi

  22. [31]

    D., Stappers , B

    Morello , V., Barr , E. D., Stappers , B. W., Keane , E. F., & Lyne , A. G. 2020, , 497, 4654, 10.1093/mnras/staa2291

    2020 doi

  23. [32]

    D., Cooper , S., et al

    Morello , V., Barr , E. D., Cooper , S., et al. 2019, , 483, 3673, 10.1093/mnras/sty3328

    2019 doi

  24. [33]

    2013, , 495, 76, 10.1038/nature11878

    Pietrzy \'n ski , G., Graczyk , D., Gieren , W., et al. 2013, , 495, 76, 10.1038/nature11878

    2013 doi

  25. [34]

    2024, , 533, 2570, 10.1093/mnras/stae1917

    Prayag , V., Levin , L., Geyer , M., et al. 2024, , 533, 2570, 10.1093/mnras/stae1917

    2024 doi

  26. [35]

    2011, PRESTO: PulsaR Exploration and Search TOolkit , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1107.017

    Ransom , S. 2011, PRESTO: PulsaR Exploration and Search TOolkit , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1107.017

    2011

  27. [36]

    Ransom , S. M. 2001, PhD thesis, Harvard University, Massachusetts

    2001

  28. [37]

    M., Eikenberry , S

    Ransom , S. M., Eikenberry , S. S., & Middleditch , J. 2002, , 124, 1788, 10.1086/342285

    2002 doi

  29. [38]

    2023, , 522, 1071, 10.1093/mnras/stad508

    Sengar , R., Bailes , M., Balakrishnan , V., et al. 2023, , 522, 1071, 10.1093/mnras/stad508

    2023 doi

  30. [39]

    2025, , 536, 3159, 10.1093/mnras/stae2716

    ---. 2025, , 536, 3159, 10.1093/mnras/stae2716

    2025 doi

  31. [40]

    D., Harnden , Jr., F

    Seward , F. D., Harnden , Jr., F. R., & Helfand , D. J. 1984, , 287, L19, 10.1086/184388

    1984 doi

  32. [41]

    T., et al

    Spiewak , R., Bailes , M., Miles , M. T., et al. 2022, arXiv:2204.04115, arXiv:2204.04115. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022arXiv220404115S

    2022 arXiv

  33. [42]

    H., Thorsett, S

    Stairs, I. H., Thorsett, S. E., & Camilo, F. 1999, apjss, 123, 627

    1999

  34. [43]

    Taylor , J. H. 1974, , 15, 367

    1974

  35. [44]

    H., & Weisberg , J

    Taylor , J. H., & Weisberg , J. M. 1989, , 345, 434, 10.1086/167917

    1989 doi

  36. [45]

    1998, apj, 506, 863

    Toscano, M., Bailes, M., Manchester, R., & Sandhu, J. 1998, apj, 506, 863

    1998

  37. [46]

    M., & Taylor , J

    Weisberg , J. M., & Taylor , J. H. 2003, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 302, Radio Pulsars, ed. M. Bailes , D. J. Nice , & S. E. Thorsett , 93, 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0211217

    2003 doi arXiv

  38. [47]

    M., & Taylor , J

    Weisberg , J. M., & Taylor , J. H. 2005, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 328, Binary Radio Pulsars, ed. F. A. Rasio & I. H. Stairs , 25, 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0407149

    2005 doi arXiv

  39. [48]

    M., Manchester , R

    Yao , J. M., Manchester , R. N., & Wang , N. 2017, , 835, 29, 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/29

    2017 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.