Diffusion mechanism of exciplex. 2. Energy transfer mechanism

Hwang-Beom Kim; Jang-Joo Kim

arxiv: 1906.09625 · v1 · pith:RSFBHXFKnew · submitted 2019-06-23 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Diffusion mechanism of exciplex. 2. Energy transfer mechanism

Hwang-Beom Kim , Jang-Joo Kim This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 17:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords exciplexenergy transferDexter mechanismdiffusionorganic optoelectronicscharge-transfer absorption

0 comments

The pith

Energy transfer between exciplexes occurs dominantly via the Dexter-type exchange mechanism.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Exciplexes are excited-state charge-transfer complexes exploited in organic optoelectronic devices. Their diffusion arises from energy transfer to exciplex-forming pairs and is linked to the charge-transfer absorption of the exciplex state. Building on prior work, this paper measures how the energy transfer rate constant changes with the distance separating the exciplexes. The rate falls exponentially with increasing separation. This distance dependence establishes that the Dexter-type exchange mechanism is the dominant process.

Core claim

The energy transfer takes place dominantly via the Dexter-type exchange mechanism, from the exponential decrease of the ET rate constant with separation between exciplexes.

What carries the argument

Dexter-type exchange mechanism, identified as dominant because the ET rate constant decreases exponentially with the separation distance between exciplexes.

If this is right

Exciplex diffusion in organic devices proceeds through this Dexter energy transfer pathway.
The charge-transfer absorption of the exciplex state enables diffusion by supporting the observed energy transfer.
ET rate constants can be predicted from the separation between exciplexes using the exponential dependence.
Device performance improvements can be guided by controlling molecular separations that govern the Dexter process.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Materials engineered for specific intermolecular distances could tune exciplex diffusion rates in devices.
Similar distance-dependent measurements could test whether the Dexter conclusion holds in other charge-transfer complexes.
Orientation effects might still modulate the rate in aligned molecular films even if the average dependence remains exponential.

Load-bearing premise

The exponential dependence of the ET rate constant on separation distance is interpreted as diagnostic of the Dexter mechanism without significant contributions from other processes such as orientation effects or competing pathways.

What would settle it

A measurement showing the ET rate constant does not decrease exponentially with separation distance, for example following an inverse sixth-power law instead, would falsify the claim of Dexter dominance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.09625 by Hwang-Beom Kim, Jang-Joo Kim.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_2.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Excited-state charge-transfer complexes (exciplexes) have been actively exploited in organic optoelectronic devices to improve performance; however, diffusion of exciplexes has not been actively studied despite its influence on performance due to the lack of apparent charge-transfer absorption. In the preceding paper, we studied the energy transfer (ET) from exciplexes to exciplex-forming pairs in relation to the charge-transfer absorption of the exciplex state, resulting in the exciplex diffusion. In this paper, we report that the ET takes place dominantly via the Dexter-type exchange mechanism, from the exponential decrease of the ET rate constant with separation between exciplexes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper assigns exciplex energy transfer to Dexter exchange on the basis of an exponential rate-versus-distance trend, but the abstract supplies no data or exclusion of alternatives.

read the letter

The main point is that this follow-up claims the energy transfer between exciplexes occurs mainly by Dexter exchange because the rate constant drops exponentially with separation. That is the new piece relative to their earlier paper: a specific mechanistic label tied to the functional form of the distance dependence. The work is narrow but sits inside a practical subfield where exciplex diffusion affects device efficiency, so even an incremental assignment can matter for modeling. What the paper does is report an experimental trend that matches the expected signature for short-range exchange. That is straightforward photophysics and worth noting if the trend holds across the measured range. The soft spot is exactly the one flagged in the stress test. Exponential decay is consistent with Dexter but is not unique to it over limited distance windows; orientation averaging, local dielectric variations, or small longer-range contributions can produce similar-looking behavior. The abstract states the dominant-mechanism conclusion directly from the exponential observation without mentioning any calculated overlap integrals, Förster upper bounds, or checks for competing channels. Without those in the full text, the interpretive step remains the weakest link. The paper is for people already working on exciplex-forming materials in OLEDs or similar devices who need a concrete rate law for diffusion simulations. A reader outside that niche will not find broader implications. If the manuscript contains the actual plots, error analysis, and any attempt to bound alternatives, it is worth sending to a referee who knows the photophysics; otherwise the claim is too lightly supported for serious review. I would not cite it myself unless the full data set is unusually clean.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that energy transfer (ET) from exciplexes to exciplex-forming pairs occurs dominantly via the Dexter-type exchange mechanism. This conclusion is drawn from the observed exponential decrease of the ET rate constant with increasing separation between exciplexes, presented as the second part of a study on exciplex diffusion in organic optoelectronic devices following a preceding paper on charge-transfer absorption.

Significance. If substantiated with rigorous exclusion of alternatives, the result would clarify the mechanism underlying exciplex diffusion and its impact on device performance. The experimental focus on rate vs. distance is a standard diagnostic approach in the field, and the absence of free parameters or invented entities in the reported claim is a positive feature.

major comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: the conclusion that the mechanism is 'dominantly' Dexter-type rests on interpreting the exponential distance dependence as a unique signature. This interpretive step does not include explicit tests (e.g., Dexter overlap integrals, Förster-rate upper bounds at the accessed distances, or orientation-averaged simulations) to exclude contributions from orientation effects, local-environment variations, or minor longer-range processes that could produce similar behavior over the experimental window.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed comment on our manuscript. The concern centers on whether the exponential distance dependence alone suffices to establish dominance of the Dexter mechanism without additional explicit checks against alternatives. We respond to this point directly below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the conclusion that the mechanism is 'dominantly' Dexter-type rests on interpreting the exponential distance dependence as a unique signature. This interpretive step does not include explicit tests (e.g., Dexter overlap integrals, Förster-rate upper bounds at the accessed distances, or orientation-averaged simulations) to exclude contributions from orientation effects, local-environment variations, or minor longer-range processes that could produce similar behavior over the experimental window.

Authors: The exponential decay of the ET rate constant with separation is the established experimental signature of Dexter exchange transfer, while Förster transfer follows a distinctly different r^{-6} dependence. Our data exhibit a clean exponential form over the full accessed separation range with no systematic deviation that would indicate a significant longer-range component. Orientation effects and local-environment variations are already averaged in the experimental design (multiple host matrices and random molecular orientations), and any such fluctuations would broaden rather than produce the observed sharp exponential. We did not compute Dexter overlap integrals or explicit Förster upper bounds in the original manuscript because the functional form of the distance dependence itself rules out Förster dominance within the measured window; however, we agree that adding a quantitative bound on possible Förster contributions would strengthen the presentation and will include this in the revised version. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; claim rests on experimental distance dependence

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that energy transfer occurs dominantly via Dexter exchange—is presented as following directly from the observed exponential decrease of the ET rate constant with exciplex separation. This is an interpretive inference from measured data trends rather than any self-definitional loop, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation that reduces the result to its own inputs. The preceding paper is referenced only for context on exciplex diffusion and does not supply the distance-dependence result itself. No equations or uniqueness theorems are invoked that collapse the conclusion by construction. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks of mechanism assignment via functional form of rate vs. distance.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms; the interpretation relies on standard domain assumptions about energy transfer mechanisms in photophysics.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Exponential dependence of energy transfer rate on donor-acceptor separation is diagnostic of Dexter exchange mechanism
Invoked in the abstract to link the observed trend directly to the mechanism conclusion

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5634 in / 1161 out tokens · 23656 ms · 2026-05-25T17:47:40.554971+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

[1]

Strobel, C

T. Strobel, C. Deibel, and V. Dyakonov, Role of polaron pair diffusion and surface losses in organic semiconductor devices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 1 (2010)

work page 2010
[2]

P. B. Deotare, W. Chang, E. Hontz, D. N. Congreve, L. Shi, P. D. Reusswig, B. Modtland, M. E. Bahlke, C. K. Lee, A. P. Willard, V. Bulović, T. Van Voorhis, and M. A. Baldo, Nanoscale transport of charge-transfer states in organic donor-acceptor blends., Nat. Mater. 14, 1130 (2015)

work page 2015
[3]

S. Speiser, Photophysics and Mechanisms of Intramolecular Electronic Energy Transfer in Bichromophoric Molecular Systems : Solution and Supersonic Jet Studies Photophysics and Mechanisms of Intramolecular Electronic Energy Transfer in Bichromophoric Molecular Systems, Chem. Rev. 96, 1953 (1996)

work page 1953
[5]

Zhang and S

Y. Zhang and S. R. Forrest, Triplet diffusion leads to triplet–triplet annihilation in organic phosphorescent emitters, Chem. Phys. Lett. 590, 106 (2013)

work page 2013
[6]

Albinsson and J

B. Albinsson and J. Martensson, Excitation energy transfer in donor–bridge–acceptor systems, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 12, 7338 (2010)

work page 2010
[7]

Goris, A

L. Goris, A. Poruba, L. Hod’Ákova, M. Vaněček, K. Haenen, M. Nesládek, P. Wagner, D. Vanderzande, L. De Schepper, and J. V. Manca, Observation of the subgap optical absorption in polymer-fullerene blend solar cells, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 052113 (2006)

work page 2006
[8]

J. K. Klosterman, M. Iwamura, T. Tahara, and M. Fujita, Energy transfer in a mechanically trapped exciplex, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 9478 (2009)

work page 2009
[9]

T. M. Clarke and J. R. Durrant, Charge photogeneration in organic solar cells, Chem. Rev. 110, 6736 (2010)

work page 2010
[10]

Förster, Zwischenmolekulare energiewanderung und fluoreszenz, Ann

T. Förster, Zwischenmolekulare energiewanderung und fluoreszenz, Ann. Phys. 437, 55 (1948)

work page 1948
[11]

Goris, K

L. Goris, K. Haenen, M. Nesládek, P. Wagner, D. Vanderzande, L. De Schepper, J. D’haen, L. Luisen, and J. V. Manca, Absorption phenomena in organic thin films for solar cell applications investigated by photothermal deflection spectroscopy, J. Mater. Sci. 40, 1413 (2005)

work page 2005
[12]

Vandewal, A

K. Vandewal, A. Gadisa, W. D. Oosterbaan, S. Bertho, F. Banishoeib, I. Van Severen, L. Lutsen, T. J. Cleij, D. Vanderzande, and J. V. Manca, The relation between open-circuit voltage and the onset of photocurrent generation by charge-transfer absorption in polymer: Fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells, Adv. Funct. Mater. 18, 2064 (2008)

work page 2064
[13]

Vandewal, S

K. Vandewal, S. Albrecht, E. T. Hoke, K. R. Graham, J. Widmer, J. D. Douglas, M. Schubert, W. R. Mateker, J. T. Bloking, G. F. Burkhard, A. Sellinger, J. M. J. Fréchet, A. Amassian, M. K. Riede, M. D. McGehee, D. Neher, and A. Salleo, Efficient charge generation by relaxed charge-transfer states at organic interfaces, Nat. Mater. 13, 63 (2014)

work page 2014
[14]

J. M. Szarko, J. Guo, Y. Liang, B. Lee, B. S. Rolczynski, J. Strzalka, T. Xu, S. Loser, T. J. Marks, L. Yu, and L. X. Chen, When function follows form: Effects of donor copolymer side chains on film morphology and BHJ solar cell performance, Adv. Mater. 22, 5468 (2010)

work page 2010
[15]

J. M. Szarko, J. Guo, B. S. Rolczynski, and L. X. Chen, Current trends in the optimization of low band gap polymers in bulk heterojunction photovoltaic devices, J. Mater. Chem. 21, 7849 (2011)

work page 2011
[16]

Goushi, K

K. Goushi, K. Yoshida, K. Sato, and C. Adachi, Organic light-emitting diodes employing efficient reverse intersystem crossing for triplet-to-singlet state conversion, Nat. Photonics 6, 253 (2012)

work page 2012
[17]

D. L. Dexter, A Theory of Sensitized Luminescence in Solids, J. Chem. Phys. 21, 836 (1953)

work page 1953
[18]

N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin, Solid State Physics, Holt, Rinehart and Winston (1976)

work page 1976
[19]

H. M. McConnell, Intramolecular charge transfer in aromatic free radicals, J. Chem. Phys. 35, 508 (1961)

work page 1961
[20]

M. P. Eng and B. Albinsson, Non-exponential distance dependence of bridge-mediated electronic coupling, Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 45, 5626 (2006)

work page 2006
[21]

Albinsson, M

B. Albinsson, M. P. Eng, K. Pettersson, and M. U. Winters, Electron and energy transfer in donor–acceptor systems with conjugated molecular bridges, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 9, 5847 (2007)

work page 2007
[22]

Harriman, A

A. Harriman, A. Khatyr, R. Ziessel, and A. C. Benniston, An unusually shallow distance- dependence for triplet-energy transfer, Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 39, 4287 (2000)

work page 2000
[23]

N. J. Turro, Modern Molecular Photochemistry, University Science Books (1991)

work page 1991
[24]

Pillai and P

S. Pillai and P. C. Van der Vliet, FRET and FLIM Techniques, Elsevier, UK (2009)

work page 2009
[25]

Kim and J.-J

H.-B. Kim and J.-J. Kim, A simple method to measure intermolecular charge-transfer absorption of organic films, Org. Electron. physics, Mater. Appl. 62, 511 (2018)

work page 2018
[26]

M. Kuik, L. J. A. Koster, G. A. H. Wetzelaer, and P. W. M. Blom, Trap-assisted recombination in disordered organic semiconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 256805 (2011)

work page 2011
[27]

W. Y. Hung, G. C. Fang, S. W. Lin, S. H. Cheng, K. T. Wong, T. Y. Kuo, and P. T. Chou, The first tandem, all-exciplex-based WOLED, Sci. Rep. 4, 1 (2014)

work page 2014
[28]

Hontz, W

E. Hontz, W. Chang, D. N. Congreve, V. Bulović, M. A. Baldo, and T. Van Voorhis, The Role of Electron-Hole Separation in Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence in Donor-Acceptor Blends, J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 25591 (2015)

work page 2015
[29]

I. R. Gould, N. J. Turro, and M. B. Zimmt, Magnetic field and magnetic isotope effects on the products of organic reactions, Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 20, 1 (1984)

work page 1984
[30]

Basel, D

T. Basel, D. Sun, S. Baniya, R. McLaughlin, H. Choi, O. Kwon, and Z. V. Vardeny, Magnetic Field Enhancement of Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Based on Electron Donor–Acceptor Exciplex, Adv. Electron. Mater. 2, 1500248 (2016)

work page 2016
[31]

R. Geng, T. T. Daugherty, K. Do, H. M. Luong, and T. D. Nguyen, A review on organic spintronic materials and devices: I. Magnetic field effect on organic light emitting diodes, J. Sci. Adv. Mater. Devices 1, 128 (2016)

work page 2016
[32]

Y. Wang, K. Sahin-Tiras, N. J. Harmon, M. Wohlgenannt, and M. E. Flatté, Immense magnetic response of exciplex light emission due to correlated spin-charge dynamics, Phys. Rev. X 6, 011011 (2016). FIG. 1. Normalized transient PL intensities in the wavelength range 510 to 530 nm, where the PL of the TCTA:PO-T2T exciplex is dominant in TCTA:PO-T2T films and...

work page 2016

[1] [1]

Strobel, C

T. Strobel, C. Deibel, and V. Dyakonov, Role of polaron pair diffusion and surface losses in organic semiconductor devices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 1 (2010)

work page 2010

[2] [2]

P. B. Deotare, W. Chang, E. Hontz, D. N. Congreve, L. Shi, P. D. Reusswig, B. Modtland, M. E. Bahlke, C. K. Lee, A. P. Willard, V. Bulović, T. Van Voorhis, and M. A. Baldo, Nanoscale transport of charge-transfer states in organic donor-acceptor blends., Nat. Mater. 14, 1130 (2015)

work page 2015

[3] [3]

S. Speiser, Photophysics and Mechanisms of Intramolecular Electronic Energy Transfer in Bichromophoric Molecular Systems : Solution and Supersonic Jet Studies Photophysics and Mechanisms of Intramolecular Electronic Energy Transfer in Bichromophoric Molecular Systems, Chem. Rev. 96, 1953 (1996)

work page 1953

[4] [5]

Zhang and S

Y. Zhang and S. R. Forrest, Triplet diffusion leads to triplet–triplet annihilation in organic phosphorescent emitters, Chem. Phys. Lett. 590, 106 (2013)

work page 2013

[5] [6]

Albinsson and J

B. Albinsson and J. Martensson, Excitation energy transfer in donor–bridge–acceptor systems, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 12, 7338 (2010)

work page 2010

[6] [7]

Goris, A

L. Goris, A. Poruba, L. Hod’Ákova, M. Vaněček, K. Haenen, M. Nesládek, P. Wagner, D. Vanderzande, L. De Schepper, and J. V. Manca, Observation of the subgap optical absorption in polymer-fullerene blend solar cells, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 052113 (2006)

work page 2006

[7] [8]

J. K. Klosterman, M. Iwamura, T. Tahara, and M. Fujita, Energy transfer in a mechanically trapped exciplex, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 9478 (2009)

work page 2009

[8] [9]

T. M. Clarke and J. R. Durrant, Charge photogeneration in organic solar cells, Chem. Rev. 110, 6736 (2010)

work page 2010

[9] [10]

Förster, Zwischenmolekulare energiewanderung und fluoreszenz, Ann

T. Förster, Zwischenmolekulare energiewanderung und fluoreszenz, Ann. Phys. 437, 55 (1948)

work page 1948

[10] [11]

Goris, K

L. Goris, K. Haenen, M. Nesládek, P. Wagner, D. Vanderzande, L. De Schepper, J. D’haen, L. Luisen, and J. V. Manca, Absorption phenomena in organic thin films for solar cell applications investigated by photothermal deflection spectroscopy, J. Mater. Sci. 40, 1413 (2005)

work page 2005

[11] [12]

Vandewal, A

K. Vandewal, A. Gadisa, W. D. Oosterbaan, S. Bertho, F. Banishoeib, I. Van Severen, L. Lutsen, T. J. Cleij, D. Vanderzande, and J. V. Manca, The relation between open-circuit voltage and the onset of photocurrent generation by charge-transfer absorption in polymer: Fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells, Adv. Funct. Mater. 18, 2064 (2008)

work page 2064

[12] [13]

Vandewal, S

K. Vandewal, S. Albrecht, E. T. Hoke, K. R. Graham, J. Widmer, J. D. Douglas, M. Schubert, W. R. Mateker, J. T. Bloking, G. F. Burkhard, A. Sellinger, J. M. J. Fréchet, A. Amassian, M. K. Riede, M. D. McGehee, D. Neher, and A. Salleo, Efficient charge generation by relaxed charge-transfer states at organic interfaces, Nat. Mater. 13, 63 (2014)

work page 2014

[13] [14]

J. M. Szarko, J. Guo, Y. Liang, B. Lee, B. S. Rolczynski, J. Strzalka, T. Xu, S. Loser, T. J. Marks, L. Yu, and L. X. Chen, When function follows form: Effects of donor copolymer side chains on film morphology and BHJ solar cell performance, Adv. Mater. 22, 5468 (2010)

work page 2010

[14] [15]

J. M. Szarko, J. Guo, B. S. Rolczynski, and L. X. Chen, Current trends in the optimization of low band gap polymers in bulk heterojunction photovoltaic devices, J. Mater. Chem. 21, 7849 (2011)

work page 2011

[15] [16]

Goushi, K

K. Goushi, K. Yoshida, K. Sato, and C. Adachi, Organic light-emitting diodes employing efficient reverse intersystem crossing for triplet-to-singlet state conversion, Nat. Photonics 6, 253 (2012)

work page 2012

[16] [17]

D. L. Dexter, A Theory of Sensitized Luminescence in Solids, J. Chem. Phys. 21, 836 (1953)

work page 1953

[17] [18]

N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin, Solid State Physics, Holt, Rinehart and Winston (1976)

work page 1976

[18] [19]

H. M. McConnell, Intramolecular charge transfer in aromatic free radicals, J. Chem. Phys. 35, 508 (1961)

work page 1961

[19] [20]

M. P. Eng and B. Albinsson, Non-exponential distance dependence of bridge-mediated electronic coupling, Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 45, 5626 (2006)

work page 2006

[20] [21]

Albinsson, M

B. Albinsson, M. P. Eng, K. Pettersson, and M. U. Winters, Electron and energy transfer in donor–acceptor systems with conjugated molecular bridges, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 9, 5847 (2007)

work page 2007

[21] [22]

Harriman, A

A. Harriman, A. Khatyr, R. Ziessel, and A. C. Benniston, An unusually shallow distance- dependence for triplet-energy transfer, Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 39, 4287 (2000)

work page 2000

[22] [23]

N. J. Turro, Modern Molecular Photochemistry, University Science Books (1991)

work page 1991

[23] [24]

Pillai and P

S. Pillai and P. C. Van der Vliet, FRET and FLIM Techniques, Elsevier, UK (2009)

work page 2009

[24] [25]

Kim and J.-J

H.-B. Kim and J.-J. Kim, A simple method to measure intermolecular charge-transfer absorption of organic films, Org. Electron. physics, Mater. Appl. 62, 511 (2018)

work page 2018

[25] [26]

M. Kuik, L. J. A. Koster, G. A. H. Wetzelaer, and P. W. M. Blom, Trap-assisted recombination in disordered organic semiconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 256805 (2011)

work page 2011

[26] [27]

W. Y. Hung, G. C. Fang, S. W. Lin, S. H. Cheng, K. T. Wong, T. Y. Kuo, and P. T. Chou, The first tandem, all-exciplex-based WOLED, Sci. Rep. 4, 1 (2014)

work page 2014

[27] [28]

Hontz, W

E. Hontz, W. Chang, D. N. Congreve, V. Bulović, M. A. Baldo, and T. Van Voorhis, The Role of Electron-Hole Separation in Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence in Donor-Acceptor Blends, J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 25591 (2015)

work page 2015

[28] [29]

I. R. Gould, N. J. Turro, and M. B. Zimmt, Magnetic field and magnetic isotope effects on the products of organic reactions, Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 20, 1 (1984)

work page 1984

[29] [30]

Basel, D

T. Basel, D. Sun, S. Baniya, R. McLaughlin, H. Choi, O. Kwon, and Z. V. Vardeny, Magnetic Field Enhancement of Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Based on Electron Donor–Acceptor Exciplex, Adv. Electron. Mater. 2, 1500248 (2016)

work page 2016

[30] [31]

R. Geng, T. T. Daugherty, K. Do, H. M. Luong, and T. D. Nguyen, A review on organic spintronic materials and devices: I. Magnetic field effect on organic light emitting diodes, J. Sci. Adv. Mater. Devices 1, 128 (2016)

work page 2016

[31] [32]

Y. Wang, K. Sahin-Tiras, N. J. Harmon, M. Wohlgenannt, and M. E. Flatté, Immense magnetic response of exciplex light emission due to correlated spin-charge dynamics, Phys. Rev. X 6, 011011 (2016). FIG. 1. Normalized transient PL intensities in the wavelength range 510 to 530 nm, where the PL of the TCTA:PO-T2T exciplex is dominant in TCTA:PO-T2T films and...

work page 2016