Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Model Balancing Helps Low-data Training and Fine-tuning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.12178 v1 pith:RSS675FW submitted 2024-10-16 cs.LG stat.ML

Model Balancing Helps Low-data Training and Fine-tuning

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords trainingfine-tuninglow-datamodelmodelstempbalanceacrossfoundation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advances in foundation models have emphasized the need to align pre-trained models with specialized domains using small, curated datasets. Studies on these foundation models underscore the importance of low-data training and fine-tuning. This topic, well-known in natural language processing (NLP), has also gained increasing attention in the emerging field of scientific machine learning (SciML). To address the limitations of low-data training and fine-tuning, we draw inspiration from Heavy-Tailed Self-Regularization (HT-SR) theory, analyzing the shape of empirical spectral densities (ESDs) and revealing an imbalance in training quality across different model layers. To mitigate this issue, we adapt a recently proposed layer-wise learning rate scheduler, TempBalance, which effectively balances training quality across layers and enhances low-data training and fine-tuning for both NLP and SciML tasks. Notably, TempBalance demonstrates increasing performance gains as the amount of available tuning data decreases. Comparative analyses further highlight the effectiveness of TempBalance and its adaptability as an "add-on" method for improving model performance.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. One LR Doesn't Fit All: Heavy-Tail Guided Layerwise Learning Rates for LLMs

    cs.LG 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    Heavy-tail guided layerwise learning rates improve LLM convergence speed and generalization across LLaMA, GPT variants, AdamW and Muon optimizers from 60M to 1B parameters.

  2. One LR Doesn't Fit All: Heavy-Tail Guided Layerwise Learning Rates for LLMs

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LLR uses heavy-tailed self-regularization theory to set per-layer learning rates in Transformers, yielding faster convergence and higher zero-shot accuracy than uniform rates across model scales.