REVIEW 2 cited by
Astrophysical Neutrinos and Blazars
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We review and discuss recent results on the search for correlations between astrophysical neutrinos and gamma-ray-detected sources, with many extra-galactic studies reporting potential associations with different types of blazars. We investigate possible dependencies on blazar sub-classes by using the largest catalogues and all the multi-frequency data available. Through the study of similarities and differences in these sources we conclude that blazars come in two distinct flavors: LBLs and IHBLs (low-energy-peaked and intermediate-high-energy-peaked objects). These are distinguished by widely different properties such as the overall spectral energy distribution shape, jet speed, cosmological evolution, broad-band spectral variability, and optical polarization properties. Although blazars of all types have been proposed as neutrino sources, evidence is accumulating in favor of IHBLs being the counterparts of astrophysical neutrinos. If this is indeed the case, we argue that the peculiar observational properties of IHBLs may be indirectly related to proton acceleration to very high energies.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Did IceCube discover Dark Matter around Blazars?
Sub-GeV dark matter scattering off protons in blazar jets can produce the IceCube neutrino from TXS 0506+056 while evading current dark matter constraints.
-
Blazars Jets and prospects for TeV-PeV neutrinos & gamma-rays through cosmic-ray interactions
A single-zone model with added proton-proton collisions suggests W Comae and 1ES 1959+650 need hadronic emission, and CTAO sensitivity forecasts show all four BL Lacs are detectable.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.