REVIEW 2 cited by
Learning to Sketch with Deep Q Networks and Demonstrated Strokes
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Doodling is a useful and common intelligent skill that people can learn and master. In this work, we propose a two-stage learning framework to teach a machine to doodle in a simulated painting environment via Stroke Demonstration and deep Q-learning (SDQ). The developed system, Doodle-SDQ, generates a sequence of pen actions to reproduce a reference drawing and mimics the behavior of human painters. In the first stage, it learns to draw simple strokes by imitating in supervised fashion from a set of strokeaction pairs collected from artist paintings. In the second stage, it is challenged to draw real and more complex doodles without ground truth actions; thus, it is trained with Qlearning. Our experiments confirm that (1) doodling can be learned without direct stepby- step action supervision and (2) pretraining with stroke demonstration via supervised learning is important to improve performance. We further show that Doodle-SDQ is effective at producing plausible drawings in different media types, including sketch and watercolor.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
SketchAgent: Language-Driven Sequential Sketch Generation
SketchAgent uses a multimodal LLM prompted with a numbered-grid sketching language to generate, edit, and collaboratively draw sequential vector sketches without any training.
-
MakeAnything: Harnessing Diffusion Transformers for Multi-Domain Procedural Sequence Generation
Fine-tuning a diffusion transformer with asymmetric LoRA plus a new 24,000-sequence dataset enables multi-domain, step-by-step procedural generation and image-to-process reconstruction.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.