REVIEW 1 cited by
Towards Understanding Asynchronous Advantage Actor-critic: Convergence and Linear Speedup
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Asynchronous and parallel implementation of standard reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms is a key enabler of the tremendous success of modern RL. Among many asynchronous RL algorithms, arguably the most popular and effective one is the asynchronous advantage actor-critic (A3C) algorithm. Although A3C is becoming the workhorse of RL, its theoretical properties are still not well-understood, including its non-asymptotic analysis and the performance gain of parallelism (a.k.a. linear speedup). This paper revisits the A3C algorithm and establishes its non-asymptotic convergence guarantees. Under both i.i.d. and Markovian sampling, we establish the local convergence guarantee for A3C in the general policy approximation case and the global convergence guarantee in softmax policy parameterization. Under i.i.d. sampling, A3C obtains sample complexity of $\mathcal{O}(\epsilon^{-2.5}/N)$ per worker to achieve $\epsilon$ accuracy, where $N$ is the number of workers. Compared to the best-known sample complexity of $\mathcal{O}(\epsilon^{-2.5})$ for two-timescale AC, A3C achieves \emph{linear speedup}, which justifies the advantage of parallelism and asynchrony in AC algorithms theoretically for the first time. Numerical tests on synthetic environment, OpenAI Gym environments and Atari games have been provided to verify our theoretical analysis.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Model-Free RL Agents Demonstrate System 1-Like Intentionality
A conceptual argument that model-free reinforcement learning agents can be considered intentional under definitions of intent that do not require planning or foresight.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.