Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 57 references

Optimizing Human Pose Estimation Through Focused Human and Joint Regions

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read VREMD claims that steering visual and motion features toward the target person and its keypoints, rather than all pixels, yields state-of-the-art video pose estimation on three PoseTrack benchmarks.

desk verdict Solid video pose estimation paper with real gains but an overclaimed DCA constraint and a cherry-picked wrist highlight; worth refereeing with requests for code and revised claims. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.14439 v1 pith:RYW4ELVT submitted 2025-01-24 cs.CV

Yingying Jiao , Zhigang Wang , Zhenguang Liu , Shaojing Fan , Sifan Wu , Zheqi Wu , Zhuoyue Xu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords videohumanposeestimationTransformerdeformablecrossattentionmaskkeypointbidirectionalmotiondisentanglementTracktemporalmodeling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to show that video human pose estimation improves sharply when the model deliberately ignores most of the image and concentrates on the target person and their joints. It proposes a dual-stream Transformer, VREMD, whose visual stream builds a coarse human mask and then a fine keypoint mask to refine tokens, and whose motion stream disentangles forward and backward motion with a deformable cross attention mechanism steered by those enhanced features. The paper reports state-of-the-art mean average precision on three PoseTrack benchmarks, with the largest gains on hard joints such as the wrist and ankle. If true, this would mean that explicit region focusing is a more effective remedy for occlusion and blur than learning motion from every pixel.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the deformable cross attention of the Adaptive Deformable Cross block. Given query $x$ from a motion feature (forward or backward residual) and the enhanced feature $F$ from the mask module, it computes reference offsets $\Delta p = \theta(\psi(q \oplus z))$ with $z = W_z F$, samples features $\bar{x} = \phi(\Delta p + p_z)$, and applies attention $\mathrm{DCA}(x,z,p_z) = \sum_{n=1}^N \sigma\!\left( q \otimes (W_k \otimes \bar{x}_n)^T / \sqrt{d}\right)(W_v \otimes \bar{x}_n)$. The role of $F$ is to steer sampling toward regions associated with the target person's joints, so that the motion stream selects pose-related cues rather than background motion; the bidirectional separation then treats forward and backward residuals as parallel trajectories instead of concatenating them.

What would settle it

Track where the deformable cross attention actually samples in clips where a second person moves close to or occludes the target. If the sampled points frequently land on the other person or on moving background yet the mAP still holds, then the reported gains are not caused by the claimed region constraint; if they stay inside the target body, the constraint is doing the work.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a pose estimator's accuracy on video is limited less by its backbone than by what it attends to: models that compute motion clues from all pixels are misled by background changes and by other people, and Transformer-based global modeling misses the precise local context joints need. VREMD addresses this with a coarse-to-fine mask that first highlights the human body and then the keypoint regions, and with a bidirectional motion module whose deformable cross attention uses the enhanced keyframe feature to generate sampling offsets, so that only motion features near the target joints serve as keys and values. On PoseTrack2017 the method reaches an mAP of 87.6, on PoseTrack2018 84.6, and on PoseTrack2021 84.5, with wrist mAP of 84.8 on 2017 against 81.5 for the previous state of the art.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that the deformable cross attention confines itself to the target person's joint regions is an architectural intention, not a verified property; the offsets are learned without any explicit spatial constraint keeping them inside the target body.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Focusing on human and keypoint regions, not all pixels, is sufficient to beat prior methods that use more frames.
  • The largest gains on wrists and ankles suggest hard, fast-moving joints benefit most from disentangled bidirectional motion cues.
  • The dual-mask coarse-to-fine refinement adds substantial gains over using either mask alone.
  • Deformable cross attention outperforms both deformable convolution and plain deformable attention for this task.
  • With only three input frames, the method outperforms five-frame methods, indicating better use of temporal context rather than more of it.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extension: The same coarse-to-fine masking idea could transfer to fine-grained video tasks beyond pose, such as hand or animal keypoint tracking, where background clutter is also a major error source.
  • Extension: Adding an explicit spatial penalty that keeps sampling offsets inside the predicted human mask could push occlusion robustness further, something the paper itself does not test.
  • Extension: A direct way to verify the claimed 'constraint' is to measure where the deformable cross attention samples; if offsets spread to other people or background without hurting mAP, the focusing mechanism is not the operative cause of the gains.
  • Extension: Because the method uses only three frames, a fair comparison swapping in five frames for the same architecture could isolate whether the advantage comes from feature focus or from frame count.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes VREMD, a dual-stream framework for video-based human pose estimation. A Human-Keypoint Mask Enhanced module (HKME) performs coarse-to-fine token refinement using a human mask and a keypoint mask, while a Bidirectional Motion Disentanglement module (BMD) extracts forward and backward motion cues through a proposed deformable cross attention (DCA). The authors report state-of-the-art mean AP on PoseTrack2017 (87.6), PoseTrack2018 (84.6), and PoseTrack2021 (84.5), with notable wrist and ankle improvements, and they provide component-level ablations on PoseTrack2017. The paper also claims that DCA is mathematically formulated to constrain the model to focus solely on target-person joint regions.

Significance. If the empirical results are reproducible, the work is a useful engineering contribution to video pose estimation: it compares against many prior methods on three datasets, uses three input frames rather than five in several recent baselines, and reports transparent component ablations together with an honest limitations section. The claimed conceptual novelty, however, is that DCA provides a mathematical constraint forcing attention to stay on the target body, and that claim is not supported by the equations; the abstract also contains an inaccurate comparison baseline for the wrist result. The empirical SOTA claim is plausible but rests on single-run, code-free results, so the central quantitative conclusion needs stronger reproducibility evidence.

major comments (3)
  1. [Our Method, 'Deformable cross attention' (Eqs. (3)-(4))] The paper's central novelty claim—that DCA is 'mathematically formulated' to 'constrain' the model to focus solely on target human joint regions—is not supported by Eqs. (3)-(4). These equations describe standard learnable deformable attention in which the enhanced feature F is concatenated with the query to predict offsets (z = WzF, Δp = θ(ψ(q⊕z))); there is no hard spatial mask, no penalty for sampling outside the target bounding box, and no explicit restriction that the sampled points x̄ = φ(Δp + pz) lie on the target person. The limitations paragraph concedes that under severe occlusion the method may incorporate temporal cues from non-target individuals, which is exactly the failure mode the claimed constraint is supposed to forbid. The Table 6 ablation comparing DCA (row c) with plain deformable attention (row b) does not isolate the offset-localization effect, because row (b) also removes the F-conditioning signal. I therefore treat the SOTA gains as empirical but not as evidence for the mathematical-constraint claim; the abstract, introduction, and method text should be revised to describe F-conditioned deformable attention, and the constraint claim should either be removed or supported by an explicit mechanism (e.g., a mask or loss) and by diagnostic evidence that learned offsets stay on the target body.
  2. [Abstract and Table 1] The abstract's highlight that wrist mAP 84.8 significantly outperforms the 81.5 mAP achieved by 'the current state-of-the-art method' is inconsistent with Table 1. In Table 1, DSTA reports wrist AP 82.6 and KPM reports 81.8, both higher than 81.5; 81.5 is TDMI-ST's wrist AP. The margin over the actual best wrist entry in the table is 2.2 mAP, not 3.3. Please correct the abstract, introduction, and PoseTrack2017 discussion to compare against the best wrist result reported in the table and to state the baseline explicitly.
  3. [Experimental Settings / Tables 1-3] All reported results are single runs on a single validation split, and no code or trained models are provided. The claimed advantages over TDMI-ST are 1.7, 1.0, and 0.7 mAP on the three datasets; without multiple seeds, error bars, or a reproducibility artifact, these margins are compatible with run-to-run variance. Please report at least three seeds with mean and standard deviation, or release code with training and evaluation scripts, so that the state-of-the-art claim is verifiable.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (1)] The notation in Eq. (1) is garbled: the large operator over δ is printed as an 'M' but the text introduces 'L, δ, ⊙, ⊗, and TT' as denotations, and L does not appear in the equation; please rewrite the concatenation and indexing formally.
  2. [Throughout] Several typos should be corrected: 'fliter' in the Contributions list, 'recognization' in the Introduction, and 'articular' in the HKME section.
  3. [Table 2] Table 2 cites M-HANet as (Jin et al. 2023), while the reference list and Table 1 cite it as 2024; please unify the citation year.
  4. [PoseTrack2017 discussion (Table 1)] The statement that 'our VREMD consistently outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods' should be qualified, because Table 1 shows the head AP of VREMD (89.9) is below TDMI-ST (90.6) and M-HANet (90.3); the claim is about mean mAP and should be phrased accordingly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity is present: the benchmark comparisons are external measurements, and the self-cited baselines are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central performance claims are evaluated against external benchmarks (PoseTrack2017, PoseTrack2018, PoseTrack2021) and external prior methods, so the reported mAP numbers are measurements rather than quantities re-derived from the paper's own definitions. The HKME and BMD modules are trained with the standard heatmap loss in Eq. (5); no parameter is fitted to the target result and then renamed as a prediction. The self-cited prior works (DCPose, FAMI-Pose) appear as baselines in Tables 1-3 and as references for deformable-convolution components, but the claimed improvement over TDMI-ST is an external comparison, not a consequence of those citations. The DCA equations (3)-(4) are standard deformable attention with an additional conditioning input z = W_z F; the paper's assertion that this 'constrains' attention to the target body is not implemented by those formulas, and the limitations section concedes that 'when the target person is severely occluded by others, our method may mistakenly incorporate temporal cues from non-target individuals.' That is a correctness or verifiability concern, not circularity, because the model's predictions are not equivalent to its inputs by construction. The abstract's wrist comparison (84.8 vs 81.5) is also inconsistent with Table 1, where DSTA reports 82.6 and TDMI-ST reports 81.5, but this is an internal numerical inconsistency rather than a circular derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard deep learning building blocks and empirical benchmark evaluation. There are no free physical constants; the learned network weights and hand-set hyperparameters are the main free parameters. The mask tokens and DCA module are architectural components with no independent falsifiable evidence outside the benchmark numbers, but they are not physical entities.

free parameters (3)
  • Final heatmap fusion weight = 0.5 / 0.5
    The final heatmap is the sum of H^k and H^m with equal weights; the paper does not ablate this weighting, so its contribution to the reported gains is unknown.
  • Number of input frames = 3
    Set to one key frame plus immediate neighbors, mirroring DCPose; no sweep is reported, although the paper claims an advantage over 5-frame methods.
  • Learning rate schedule = 2e-3, decay by 10x at epoch 16
    Standard AdamW schedule with frozen backbone; effects on mAP are not isolated from other design choices.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Softmax attention, matrix multiplication, and bilinear interpolation behave as differentiable, well-defined operations.
    Used in mask generation and deformable cross attention (Eqs. 1 through 4); no formal verification but standard.
  • domain assumption ViT-L pretrained on COCO provides features in which human and keypoint class tokens can generate useful masks without extra supervision.
    The human-keypoint mask module relies entirely on backbone features; failure cases where masks are wrong are not analyzed.
  • domain assumption A three-frame window centered on the key frame contains enough motion evidence for accurate pose estimation.
    The bidirectional motion module only sees t-1 and t+1; faster motion or longer-range dependencies are not modeled.
  • domain assumption The top-down detector's bounding boxes, expanded by 25 percent, isolate the target person in all frames.
    The method inherits detector errors; the limitations section acknowledges that severe occlusion can leak cues from other people.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Optimizing Human Pose Estimation Through Focused Human and Joint Regions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RYW4ELVT

@misc{pith2026250114439,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Optimizing Human Pose Estimation Through Focused Human and Joint Regions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RYW4ELVT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.14439}
}
read the original abstract

Human pose estimation has given rise to a broad spectrum of novel and compelling applications, including action recognition, sports analysis, as well as surveillance. However, accurate video pose estimation remains an open challenge. One aspect that has been overlooked so far is that existing methods learn motion clues from all pixels rather than focusing on the target human body, making them easily misled and disrupted by unimportant information such as background changes or movements of other people. Additionally, while the current Transformer-based pose estimation methods has demonstrated impressive performance with global modeling, they struggle with local context perception and precise positional identification. In this paper, we try to tackle these challenges from three aspects: (1) We propose a bilayer Human-Keypoint Mask module that performs coarse-to-fine visual token refinement, which gradually zooms in on the target human body and keypoints while masking out unimportant figure regions. (2) We further introduce a novel deformable cross attention mechanism and a bidirectional separation strategy to adaptively aggregate spatial and temporal motion clues from constrained surrounding contexts. (3) We mathematically formulate the deformable cross attention, constraining that the model focuses solely on the regions centered at the target person body. Empirically, our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on three large-scale benchmark datasets. A remarkable highlight is that our method achieves an 84.8 mean Average Precision (mAP) on the challenging wrist joint, which significantly outperforms the 81.5 mAP achieved by the current state-of-the-art method on the PoseTrack2017 dataset.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.14439 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A high-level overview of our proposed VREMD, which utilizes a dual-stream architecture to collaboratively process [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The overall pipeline of our VREMD framework. Given an input sequence [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Qualitative comparison of our VREMD, DC [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Visual results of our VREMD on PoseTrack [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Andriluka, M.; Iqbal, U.; Insafutdinov, E.; Pishchulin, L.; Milan, A.; Gall, J.; and Schiele, B. 2018. Posetrack: A benchmark for human pose estimation and tracking. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 5167--5176

    2018

  2. [2]

    Bao, Q.; Liu, W.; Cheng, Y.; Zhou, B.; and Mei, T. 2020. Pose-guided tracking-by-detection: Robust multi-person pose tracking. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 23: 161--175

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Bergmann, P.; Meinhardt, T.; and Leal-Taixe, L. 2019. Tracking without bells and whistles. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 941--951

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Bertasius, G.; Feichtenhofer, C.; Tran, D.; Shi, J.; and Torresani, L. 2019. Learning temporal pose estimation from sparsely-labeled videos. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32

    2019

  5. [5]

    Cao, Z.; Simon, T.; Wei, S.-E.; and Sheikh, Y. 2017. Realtime multi-person 2d pose estimation using part affinity fields. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 7291--7299

    2017

  6. [6]

    Dai, J.; Qi, H.; Xiong, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, G.; Hu, H.; and Wei, Y. 2017. Deformable convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, 764--773

    2017

  7. [7]

    Doering, A.; Chen, D.; Zhang, S.; Schiele, B.; and Gall, J. 2022. Posetrack21: A dataset for person search, multi-object tracking and multi-person pose tracking. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 20963--20972

    2022

  8. [8]

    Doering, A.; Iqbal, U.; and Gall, J. 2018. Joint flow: Temporal flow fields for multi person tracking. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.04596

    arXiv 2018

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    Dosovitskiy, A.; Beyer, L.; Kolesnikov, A.; Weissenborn, D.; Zhai, X.; Unterthiner, T.; Dehghani, M.; Minderer, M.; Heigold, G.; Gelly, S.; et al. 2020. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929

    2020 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Fang, H.-S.; Xie, S.; Tai, Y.-W.; and Lu, C. 2017. Rmpe: Regional multi-person pose estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, 2334--2343

    2017

  3. [11]

    Feng, R.; Gao, Y.; Ma, X.; Tse, T. H. E.; and Chang, H. J. 2023. Mutual information-based temporal difference learning for human pose estimation in video. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 17131--17141

    2023

  4. [12]

    Fu, Z.; Zuo, W.; Hu, Z.; Liu, Q.; and Wang, Y. 2023. Improving Multi-Person Pose Tracking with A Confidence Network. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia

    2023

  5. [13]

    Gai, D.; Feng, R.; Min, W.; Yang, X.; Su, P.; Wang, Q.; and Han, Q. 2023. Spatiotemporal learning transformer for video-based human pose estimation. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 33(9): 4564--4576

    2023

  6. [14]

    Geng, Z.; Wang, C.; Wei, Y.; Liu, Z.; Li, H.; and Hu, H. 2023. Human pose as compositional tokens. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 660--671

    2023

  7. [15]

    Girdhar, R.; Gkioxari, G.; Torresani, L.; Paluri, M.; and Tran, D. 2018. Detect-and-track: Efficient pose estimation in videos. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 350--359

    2018

  8. [16]

    Guo, H.; Tang, T.; Luo, G.; Chen, R.; Lu, Y.; and Wen, L. 2018. Multi-domain pose network for multi-person pose estimation and tracking. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) Workshops, 0--0

    2018

  9. [17]

    He, J.; and Yang, W. 2024. Video-Based Human Pose Regression via Decoupled Space-Time Aggregation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.19926

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    He, K.; Zhang, X.; Ren, S.; and Sun, J. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 770--778

    2016

  11. [19]

    Hwang, J.; Lee, J.; Park, S.; and Kwak, N. 2019. Pose estimator and tracker using temporal flow maps for limbs. In 2019 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), 1--8. IEEE

    2019

  12. [20]

    Iqbal, U.; Milan, A.; and Gall, J. 2017. Posetrack: Joint multi-person pose estimation and tracking. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2011--2020

    2017

  13. [21]

    Jin, K.-M.; Lee, G.-H.; and Lee, S.-W. 2022. OTPose: occlusion-aware transformer for pose estimation in sparsely-labeled videos. In 2022 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), 3255--3260. IEEE

    2022

  14. [22]

    Jin, K.-M.; Lee, G.-H.; Nam, W.-J.; Kang, T.-K.; Kim, H.-W.; and Lee, S.-W. 2024. Masked Kinematic Continuity-aware Hierarchical Attention Network for pose estimation in videos. Neural Networks, 169: 282--292

    2024

  15. [23]

    Jin, K.-M.; Lim, B.-S.; Lee, G.-H.; Kang, T.-K.; and Lee, S.-W. 2023. Kinematic-aware hierarchical attention network for human pose estimation in videos. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, 5725--5734

    2023

  16. [24]

    Jin, S.; Liu, W.; Ouyang, W.; and Qian, C. 2019. Multi-person articulated tracking with spatial and temporal embeddings. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 5664--5673

    2019

  17. [25]

    Li, Y.; Mao, H.; Girshick, R.; and He, K. 2022. Exploring plain vision transformer backbones for object detection. In European conference on computer vision, 280--296. Springer

    2022

  18. [26]

    Li, Y.; Zhang, S.; Wang, Z.; Yang, S.; Yang, W.; Xia, S.-T.; and Zhou, E. 2021. Tokenpose: Learning keypoint tokens for human pose estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International conference on computer vision, 11313--11322

    2021

  19. [27]

    Lin, T.-Y.; Maire, M.; Belongie, S.; Hays, J.; Perona, P.; Ramanan, D.; Doll \'a r, P.; and Zitnick, C. L. 2014. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In Computer Vision--ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, September 6-12, 2014, Proceedings, Part V 1...

    2014

  20. [28]

    Liu, Z.; Chen, H.; Feng, R.; Wu, S.; Ji, S.; Yang, B.; and Wang, X. 2021. Deep dual consecutive network for human pose estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 525--534

    2021

  21. [29]

    Liu, Z.; Feng, R.; Chen, H.; Wu, S.; Gao, Y.; Gao, Y.; and Wang, X. 2022 a . Temporal feature alignment and mutual information maximization for video-based human pose estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 11006--11016

    2022

  22. [30]

    Liu, Z.; Wu, S.; Xu, C.; Wang, X.; Zhu, L.; Wu, S.; and Feng, F. 2022 b . Copy motion from one to another: Fake motion video generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.01373

    2022 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Pfister, T.; Charles, J.; and Zisserman, A. 2015. Flowing convnets for human pose estimation in videos. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, 1913--1921

    2015

  24. [32]

    Rafi, U.; Doering, A.; Leibe, B.; and Gall, J. 2020. Self-supervised keypoint correspondences for multi-person pose estimation and tracking in videos. In Computer Vision--ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23--28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XX 16, 36--52. Springer

    2020

  25. [33]

    Sapp, B.; Toshev, A.; and Taskar, B. 2010. Cascaded models for articulated pose estimation. In Computer Vision--ECCV 2010: 11th European Conference on Computer Vision, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, September 5-11, 2010, Proceedings, Part II 11, 406--420. Springer

    2010

  26. [34]

    Shuai, C.; Zhong, J.; Wu, S.; Lin, F.; Wang, Z.; Ba, Z.; Liu, Z.; Cavallaro, L.; and Ren, K. 2023. Locate and verify: A two-stream network for improved deepfake detection. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 7131--7142

    2023

  27. [35]

    Strudel, R.; Garcia, R.; Laptev, I.; and Schmid, C. 2021. Segmenter: Transformer for semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 7262--7272

    2021

  28. [36]

    Su, P.; Liu, Z.; Wu, S.; Zhu, L.; Yin, Y.; and Shen, X. 2021. Motion prediction via joint dependency modeling in phase space. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM international conference on multimedia, 713--721

    2021

  29. [37]

    Sun, K.; Xiao, B.; Liu, D.; and Wang, J. 2019. Deep high-resolution representation learning for human pose estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 5693--5703

    2019

  30. [38]

    Tse, T. H. E.; De Martini, D.; and Marchegiani, L. 2019. No need to scream: Robust sound-based speaker localisation in challenging scenarios. In Social Robotics: 11th International Conference, ICSR 2019, Madrid, Spain, November 26--29, 2019, Proceedings 11, 176--185. Springer

    2019

  31. [39]

    N.; Kaiser, .; and Polosukhin, I

    Vaswani, A.; Shazeer, N.; Parmar, N.; Uszkoreit, J.; Jones, L.; Gomez, A. N.; Kaiser, .; and Polosukhin, I. 2017. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30

    2017

  32. [40]

    Wang, D.; and Zhang, S. 2022. Contextual instance decoupling for robust multi-person pose estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 11060--11068

    2022

  33. [41]

    Wang, M.; Tighe, J.; and Modolo, D. 2020. Combining detection and tracking for human pose estimation in videos. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 11088--11096

    2020

  34. [42]

    Wang, Y.; and Mori, G. 2008. Multiple tree models for occlusion and spatial constraints in human pose estimation. In Computer Vision--ECCV 2008: 10th European Conference on Computer Vision, Marseille, France, October 12-18, 2008, Proceedings, Part III 10, 710--724. Springer

    2008

  35. [43]

    Wei, S.-E.; Ramakrishna, V.; Kanade, T.; and Sheikh, Y. 2016. Convolutional pose machines. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 4724--4732

    2016

  36. [44]

    Wu, S.; Chen, H.; Yin, Y.; Hu, S.; Feng, R.; Jiao, Y.; Yang, Z.; and Liu, Z. 2024 a . Joint-Motion Mutual Learning for Pose Estimation in Video. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 8962--8971

    2024

  37. [45]

    Wu, S.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, B.; Zimmermann, R.; Ba, Z.; Zhang, X.; and Ren, K. 2024 b . Do as I Do: Pose Guided Human Motion Copy. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing

    2024

  38. [46]

    Xiao, B.; Wu, H.; and Wei, Y. 2018. Simple baselines for human pose estimation and tracking. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), 466--481

    2018

  39. [47]

    Xiu, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, H.; Fang, Y.; and Lu, C. 2018. Pose Flow: Efficient online pose tracking. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.00977

    2018 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Xu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Q.; and Tao, D. 2022. Vitpose: Simple vision transformer baselines for human pose estimation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35: 38571--38584

    2022

  41. [49]

    Yang, Y.; Chen, H.; Liu, Z.; Lyu, Y.; Zhang, B.; Wu, S.; Wang, Z.; and Ren, K. 2023. Action recognition with multi-stream motion modeling and mutual information maximization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.07576

    2023 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Yang, Y.; Ren, Z.; Li, H.; Zhou, C.; Wang, X.; and Hua, G. 2021. Learning dynamics via graph neural networks for human pose estimation and tracking. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 8074--8084

    2021

  43. [51]

    Yu, D.; Su, K.; Sun, J.; and Wang, C. 2018. Multi-person pose estimation for pose tracking with enhanced cascaded pyramid network. In Proceedings of the european conference on computer vision (ECCV) Workshops, 0--0

    2018

  44. [52]

    Zhang, J.; Zhu, Z.; Zou, W.; Li, P.; Li, Y.; Su, H.; and Huang, G. 2019. Fastpose: Towards real-time pose estimation and tracking via scale-normalized multi-task networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.05593

    2019 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Zhao, Y.; Xiong, Y.; and Lin, D. 2018. Recognize actions by disentangling components of dynamics. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 6566--6575

    2018

  46. [54]

    H.; et al

    Zheng, S.; Lu, J.; Zhao, H.; Zhu, X.; Luo, Z.; Wang, Y.; Fu, Y.; Feng, J.; Xiang, T.; Torr, P. H.; et al. 2021. Rethinking semantic segmentation from a sequence-to-sequence perspective with transformers. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern ...

    2021

  47. [55]

    Zhu, X.; Su, W.; Lu, L.; Li, B.; Wang, X.; and Dai, J. 2020. Deformable detr: Deformable transformers for end-to-end object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.04159

    2020 arXiv

  48. [56]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all...

  49. [57]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.