REVIEW 2 cited by
Zero-Label Prompt Selection
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Natural language prompts have been shown to facilitate cross-task generalization for large language models. However, with no or limited labeled examples, the cross-task performance is highly sensitive to the choice of prompts, while selecting a high-performing prompt is challenging given the scarcity of labels. To address the issue, we propose a Zero-Label Prompt Selection (ZPS) method that selects prompts without any labeled data or gradient update. Specifically, given the candidate human-written prompts for a task, ZPS labels a set of unlabeled data with a prompt ensemble and uses the pseudo-labels for prompt selection. Experiments show that ZPS improves over prior methods by a sizeable margin in zero-label performance. We also extend ZPS to a few-shot setting and show its advantages over strong baselines such as prompt tuning and model tuning.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Evolving Prompts In-Context: An Open-ended, Self-replicating Perspective
Pruning example prompts given to a language model into 'gibberish' through evolutionary search can match or beat automatic prompt optimizers across several tasks.
-
Object Search in Partially-Known Environments via LLM-informed Model-based Planning and Prompt Selection
LLM-estimated object-location probabilities plus map costs yield a model-based planner that beats pure-LLM and optimistic search, while offline replay selects prompts/LLMs faster than UCB.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.