Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Comments on "Necessary optimality conditions of an optimization problem governed by a double phase PDE"

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.09142 v1 pith:S4HJPEDQ submitted 2023-12-14 math.AP

Comments on "Necessary optimality conditions of an optimization problem governed by a double phase PDE"

classification math.AP
keywords problemconditionsdoubleequationgovernedjmaanecessaryoptimality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

This note concerns the paper by Benslimane et Gadhi (JMAA. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2023.127117) where the authors established necessary optimality conditions for an optimization problem (P) governed by a double phase partial di{\S}erential equation (Pf): Having noticed inconsistencies between the investigated problem (Pf ) and the weak formulation of the equation that is associated with it, we propose some modi\"O- cations that, from our perspective, correct the forthmentioned issue. Some careless mistakes and typos that caught our interest are also underlined and recti\"Oed.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CoT-X: An Adaptive Framework for Cross-Model Chain-of-Thought Transfer and Optimization

    cs.AI 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0

    An adaptive summarization framework compresses chain-of-thought traces and transfers them across model families, claiming up to 40.5% accuracy gains over truncation on medical QA and 84% fewer configuration evaluation...