Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Numerical Relativity Simulations of Dark Matter Admixed Binary Neutron Stars

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Dark matter's spatial layout—core or halo—decides how a neutron star merger ends and whether standard gravitational-wave models break.

desk verdict First constraint-solved NR simulations of DM-admixed BNS mergers, with a real technical advance and a robust core/halo phenomenology; but the tidal-deformability conclusion rests on a hand-fitted Lambda_est and should not be used to reopen DM parameter space yet. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.20825 v2 pith:SAEZGHYP submitted 2025-04-29 astro-ph.HE gr-qc

Edoardo Giangrandi , Hannes R. Rüter , Nina Kunert , Mattia Emma , Adrian Abac , Ananya Adhikari , Tim Dietrich , Violetta Sagun
show 2 more authors
Wolfgang Tichy Constança Providência
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEgr-qc
keywords binaryneutronstarmergersdarkmatteradmixedstarsnumericalrelativitygravitationalwavestidaldeformabilityfermionicpromptcollapsecommonenvelope
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first numerical-relativity simulations of binary neutron star mergers that contain dark matter and begin from constraint-solved initial data, meaning the two stars are set up as a consistent two-fluid gravitational system rather than superposed single-star snapshots. Modeling dark matter as a non-interacting fermionic gas, the paper finds that the spatial arrangement of dark matter—a compact core inside each star or a diffuse halo surrounding it—changes the merger outcome. Cores make the remnant more compact and promote prompt collapse to a black hole; halos merge early into a common envelope embedding the whole binary. The gravitational waves from halo mergers also disagree with analytical waveform models when the tidal deformability is computed in the standard two-fluid way, suggesting that earlier gravitational-wave-based exclusions of dark matter parameter space may need revisiting.

What carries the argument

The argument rests on a two-fluid general-relativistic framework in which baryonic matter and dark matter are separate perfect fluids whose energy-momentum tensors are conserved independently and coupled only through gravity. The initial data are generated as quasi-equilibrium, constraint-solved binaries using an extended conformal thin-sandwich formulation of the Einstein constraint equations, with the dark matter treated as a non-interacting, zero-temperature Fermi gas of spin-1/2 particles; two particle masses (1 GeV and 0.17 GeV) reproduce the two morphologies, a dense core and an extended halo. The evolution follows both fluids with ideal general-relativistic hydrodynamics, and the tidal deformability is computed by integrating Love's equation to the outermost radius. The machinery's job is to allow the two fluids to interact self-consistently through spacetime curvature throughout inspiral, merger, and post-merger, so that morphology-driven differences in dynamics and gravitational waves can be attributed to the dark matter structure rather than to inconsistent initial data.

What would settle it

Rerun the halo configuration (0.5% dark matter, 0.17 GeV particle mass) with a self-interacting or warm dark-matter equation of state and check whether the common envelope still forms and whether the standard two-fluid tidal deformability still overpredicts the gravitational-wave phase; if the mismatch disappears, the morphology-driven conclusion is an artifact of the non-interacting model.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that dark matter morphology, not just its mass fraction, controls the merger dynamics of dark-matter-admixed neutron star binaries. With a 3% dark matter core, the baryonic stars are more compact and the post-merger remnant has higher central density; in the heavier 2.8 solar mass case this leads to prompt collapse to a black hole with a slightly more massive black hole than in dark-matter-free runs. With a 0.5% dilute halo, the two halos come into contact before the baryonic stars, forming a common dark matter envelope that embeds the binary, and the final remnant keeps a halo-like distribution. The tidal-deformability calculation in a standard two-fluid framework, integrating to the outermost radius, gives values roughly three times larger than the waveform-consistent estimate for halos, and with the lower estimate the numerical-relativity waveforms match an analytical waveform model within the error band. The paper concludes that previous constraints on fermionic dark matter from gravitational-wave observations may need to be revisited.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that dark matter inside these stars is a cold, non-interacting fermionic gas that couples to ordinary matter only through gravity; if dark matter self-interacts, has finite temperature, or has other statistics, the core-versus-halo outcomes could change or vanish.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If dark matter forms a dilute halo around each neutron star, mergers should show an early common-envelope phase and a suppression of baryonic ejecta by roughly an order of magnitude compared with dark-matter-free binaries.
  • If dark matter forms a dense core, heavier binaries are more likely to collapse promptly to a black hole, and the resulting black hole can be slightly more massive than in the dark-matter-free case.
  • Standard two-fluid tidal deformabilities computed to the outermost halo radius overestimate the halo's tidal effect by about a factor of three, and using a lower, waveform-consistent value brings the gravitational-wave phase into agreement with analytical models.
  • Dark matter ejecta masses in these mergers lie in the range 10^-6 to 10^-4 solar masses, with halos ejecting more dark matter than cores.
  • Post-merger angular-velocity profiles differ by dark matter morphology: dark matter cores rotate faster than the baryonic component, while halo remnants show a central plateau in baryonic angular velocity.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the halo tidal-deformability mismatch is real, gravitational-wave searches that use two-fluid tidal deformabilities to exclude dark-matter parameter regions may be excluding configurations that are actually consistent with observed events; the exclusion regions would need to be recomputed with a halo-aware tidal deformability.
  • The common-envelope phase formed by halos could leave an observable imprint in the pre-merger gravitational-wave signal that is not captured by current waveform models, because the envelope changes the effective quadrupole moment and tidal response before the baryonic stars touch.
  • Dark matter ejected during the merger could later be re-accreted by surrounding objects, a 'dark matter recycling' channel that would modify the inferred accumulation history of neutron stars in dense dark-matter environments.
  • A testable extension would be to build initial data that already contain a common dark-matter envelope, which the current initial-data solver cannot represent, and check whether the envelope forms even earlier and strengthens the gravitational-wave dephasing.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents numerical-relativity simulations of dark-matter-admixed binary neutron star mergers, using constraint-solved initial data from the sgrid code and dynamical evolutions with BAM. Dark matter is modeled as a non-interacting, zero-temperature fermionic gas coupled to baryonic matter only through gravity, with baryonic matter described by the SLy4 equation of state. Six configurations are simulated: two total masses (2.4 and 2.8 solar masses), with DM-free, DM-core (3% DM fraction), and DM-halo (0.5% DM fraction) morphologies. The main reported results are that DM-core systems retain a compact central DM structure and can lead to more compact remnants or prompt collapse, while DM-halo systems develop a common DM envelope embedding the binary; that halo configurations suppress baryonic ejecta; and that gravitational-wave dephasing comparisons with IMRPhenomXAS NRTidalv3 show large disagreement for halo configurations when the standard two-fluid tidal deformability Lambda_out is used, whereas a hand-chosen Lambda_est roughly three times smaller restores agreement. Based on this, the authors suggest that the standard two-fluid tidal-deformability calculation is inadequate for extended halos and that previously excluded dark-matter parameter space may be allowed by GW170817 and GW190425.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this would be a meaningful step: it is, to my knowledge, the first set of BNS merger simulations with DM-admixed initial data that satisfy the Einstein constraint equations and use a two-fluid treatment with tabulated microphysical equations of state. The morphological findings—DM halos forming a common envelope, DM cores remaining distinct and tidally deformed, and the preservation of DM morphology in the remnant—come directly from the simulations and are the paper's strongest contribution. The paper also provides useful quantitative data on DM ejecta masses, post-merger angular-velocity profiles, and the gravitational-wave l=2,|m|=1 mode, and it makes waveform data available on Zenodo. However, the externally consequential claim about tidal deformability and previous GW-based DM constraints is underdetermined, and the numerical convergence support for that claim is incomplete. The paper is therefore best viewed as a promising initial exploration whose quantitative and phenomenological conclusions need further substantiation.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section III F, Fig. 9] The conclusion that halo configurations invalidate the standard two-fluid tidal-deformability calculation and that previously excluded DM parameter space may be allowed rests on the ad hoc choices Lambda_est = 810 and 340, which are selected to reduce the NR-vs-model dephasing rather than derived from an independent computation. Because Lambda is a free parameter of IMRPhenomXAS NRTidalv3, tuning it to improve agreement does not validate the physical interpretation; if the true effective tidal deformability is close to Lambda_out, the mismatch instead signals that a single-Lambda quasi-circular model is inadequate for two-fluid extended halos. The claim needs support from an independent effective-tidal calculation or an explicit demonstration of why integrating the two-fluid Love equation to R_out overestimates the tidal response. As written, the abstract statement that 'previous conclusions' may be invalid is not justified by the evidence presented.
  2. [Appendix C and Fig. 9] The convergence analysis shows no well-defined convergence order, and the adopted error band is the R2-R1 phase difference. For the two halo runs that carry the main tidal claim, Table II shows only R1 and R2 resolutions (M2405H and M2805H have no R3 entries), so the 'error band' in Fig. 9 for these configurations is a single two-resolution difference without an R3 check. Similarly, Table IV lists f2 for M2405H only at R2. The quantitative dephasing comparison for the halo configurations is therefore not validated at the same level as the DM-core runs, and the error estimate should be treated as provisional until a third resolution is available.
  3. [Table I and Sections III A, III E] The DM-free baselines have substantially larger initial separations than the DM-admixed runs: d_in = 53.05 km for M2400 and 56.02 km for M2800, compared with approximately 47 km for the DM-admixed configurations. Because a longer inspiral increases numerical diffusion before merger, the quantitative ejecta suppression factors ('factor of approximately 10' and 'suppression by factor 100') and the BH mass differences cannot be cleanly attributed to dark matter. The authors acknowledge this issue for the BH mass, but the ejecta claims are stated without the same caveat. Matched-separation baselines or a quantitative estimate of the diffusion-driven mass loss are needed before these factors can be taken at face value.
  4. [Abstract and Section III C] The statement that scenarios with a dark matter core 'tend to exhibit a higher probability of prompt collapse' is not supported by the two simulated total masses. Only the M28 series collapses, and within that series all configurations except the low-resolution DM-free R1 run collapse regardless of DM morphology at the higher resolutions. With two mass points and one resolution-dependent survivor, the data cannot establish a probability trend; the conclusion should be restricted to these specific configurations or softened to a qualitative statement about the simulated cases.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section III F] The text contains a typo: 'more accuratly' should read 'more accurately'.
  2. [Table IV, Section III F] The f2 values for M243C at R2 (2.990 kHz) and R3 (3.156 kHz) differ by approximately 5%; the statement of 'consistent peak frequencies' should either quantify this spread or explain why it does not affect the conclusions, especially given the later caveat about resolution dependence.
  3. [Section III A] The meaning of 'adapted coordinates of the XCTS system' for the initial separation d_in is unclear; a definition of how this coordinate separation relates to the actual orbital separation would help readers interpret Table I.
  4. [Figure 9 caption] The caption uses the word 'Lambda' in the text for Λ; the notation should be unified with the symbol used elsewhere in the paper.
  5. [Section II E] The atmosphere parameters f_atm and f_th are specified, but no test of sensitivity to these choices is presented; a brief justification or a reference to a convergence test would strengthen the ejecta analysis, which depends on the density floor.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The halo tidal-deformability conclusion rests on a hand-picked Lambda_est, making that part of the argument partly circular; the main merger-morphology results are self-contained.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. III F (Gravitational Waves), discussion of Fig. 9; also the Conclusions bullet 'GW signal and Tidal Deformability']
    "If we assume the Λ to be similar to the other purely baryonic configurations the phase difference (orange) is significantly reduced and the agreement between the waveform and the model improves. In Fig. 9 we demonstrate this using estimated tidal deformabilities Λ est = 810 and 340 for the M24 05H and M28 05H respectively."

    Lambda_est is not obtained from an independent effective-tidal calculation; it is assumed to be close to the pure-BM/DM-core values, and this assumption is what reduces the dephasing in the waveform model. Because Lambda is a free parameter in IMRPhenomXAS NRTidalv3, the improved agreement is enforced by the input choice rather than by a derived prediction. The subsequent conclusion that the standard two-fluid Love-number calculation is inadequate, and that previously excluded fDM-mDM parameter space may need to be revisited, therefore rests on this fitted value. No independent derivation of an effective tidal deformability for an extended dilute halo is provided, so the load-bearing step reduces to the assumed Lambda_est.

full rationale

The central merger-morphology results are not circular: the core-versus-halo behavior, common-envelope formation, prompt-collapse tendency, ejecta masses, and angular-velocity profiles are obtained directly from two-fluid Einstein-hydrodynamics evolutions with the stated initial data and EOSs. No derived quantity is reinserted into those simulations to force the reported outcome. The main circular element is confined to the tidal-deformability analysis in Sec. III F, where Lambda_est is hand-picked to make IMRPhenomXAS NRTidalv3 agree with the NR dephasing. Since Lambda is a free parameter of the waveform model, the resulting agreement is a fitting demonstration rather than independent evidence that the true effective tidal deformability of a halo-admixed star is roughly three times smaller than Lambda_out. The paper itself acknowledges the convergence limitation: Appendix C states there is no clear convergence order and that the adopted error band comes from the difference between the two highest resolutions, which further weakens the quantitative phase-difference claim. The self-citations to Ref. [41] for the sgrid initial-data solver and Ref. [88] for previous DM constraints are normal tool provenance and contrast references, not load-bearing circular justifications. Overall, the paper's main numerical findings are self-contained, but one externally consequential claim reduces to a fitted input, giving a partial-circularity score of 4.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on the non-interacting fermionic DM model, the two-fluid splitting, and the choice of DM mass and fraction. No new particles or forces are introduced. The only quantity effectively fitted to the NR data is Lambda_est, used to illustrate that the two-fluid Lambda is inadequate for halos.

free parameters (5)
  • mDM = 1 GeV and 0.17 GeV
    Chosen to realize the two DM morphologies (core and halo). Not fitted to the merger results, but the choice defines the parameter space explored.
  • fDM = 3% (core), 0.5% (halo)
    Chosen to avoid overlapping DM halos in the initial data given the surface-fitting limitation, and as an extreme case. The different fractions across morphologies confound morphology with DM amount.
  • Lambda_est = 810 (M24 05H), 340 (M28 05H)
    Hand-chosen tidal deformabilities used to demonstrate improved waveform agreement for halo configurations; not derived from a two-fluid Love-number calculation.
  • Gamma_th^(DM) = 1 (isothermal, p_th = 0)
    DM thermal pressure neglected; a modeling choice that affects the DM dynamics during the merger.
  • atmosphere parameters = f_atm = 1e-11, f_th = 10
    Numerical parameters for the artificial atmosphere; affect mass conservation and ejecta measurements at low density.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Dark matter is a non-interacting fermionic gas interacting with baryonic matter only through gravity.
    Introduced in Sec. II A and II D; justified by Bullet Cluster and direct detection limits, but excludes self-interactions and non-gravitational DM-BM coupling.
  • domain assumption Two-fluid description with separate energy-momentum conservation for each component.
    Eqs. (1)-(3) and Eq. (12) assume the fluids exchange no energy-momentum except through the common gravitational field.
  • domain assumption Zero-temperature EOSs for both fluids; DM is isothermal.
    Sec. II D; temperature dependence of the DM EOS is neglected, which may affect the halo structure and ejecta.
  • standard math Quasi-equilibrium initial data via XCTS with approximate Killing vector.
    Sec. II B; standard method for BNS initial data, but its validity for extended DM halos is assumed rather than proven.
  • standard math Geodesic criterion (u_t < -1 and v_r > 0) identifies unbound ejecta.
    Sec. III E; standard criterion for fluid elements on extraction spheres.
  • domain assumption IMRPhenomXAS NRTidalv3 is an appropriate model for the baryonic part of the waveform.
    Sec. III F; the model assumes no DM and may have systematic errors that contribute to the observed dephasing.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Numerical Relativity Simulations of Dark Matter Admixed Binary Neutron Stars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SAEZGHYP

@misc{pith2026250420825,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Numerical Relativity Simulations of Dark Matter Admixed Binary Neutron Stars},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SAEZGHYP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.20825}
}
read the original abstract

Binary neutron star mergers provide insight into strong-field gravity and the properties of ultra-dense nuclear matter. These events offer the potential to search for signatures of physics beyond the standard model, including dark matter. We present the first numerical-relativity simulations of binary neutron star mergers admixed with dark matter, based on constraint-solved initial data. Modeling dark matter as a non-interacting fermionic gas, we investigate the impact of varying dark matter fractions and particle masses on the merger dynamics, ejecta mass, post-merger remnant properties, and the emitted gravitational waves. Our simulations suggest that the dark matter morphology - a dense core or a diluted halo - may alter the merger outcome. Scenarios with a dark matter core tend to exhibit a higher probability of prompt collapse, while those with a dark matter halo develop a common envelope, embedding the whole binary. Furthermore, gravitational wave signals from mergers with dark matter halo configurations exhibit significant deviations from analytical models when the tidal deformability is calculated in a standard two-fluid framework. This highlights the need for refined models in calculating the tidal deformability when considering mergers with extended dark matter structures. These initial results provide a basis for further exploration of dark matter's role in binary neutron star mergers and their associated gravitational wave emission and can serve as a benchmark for future observations from advanced detectors and multi-messenger astrophysics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.20825 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Comparison of the central rest-mass densities during [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Equatorial density distributions for both BM and DM components, for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Comparison of the central rest-mass densities during [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Equatorial density distributions for both BM and DM components, for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Azimuthally-averaged angular velocity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The ejecta mass as a function of time for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. GW waveform strain and instantaneous frequency of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Time-domain dephasing comparisons for the different NR configurations with the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Spectral density of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Time evolution of the L2-norm of the Hamiltonian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_11.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Evolution of the absolute value of the phase dif [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_14.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Relative change of the rest mass as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_13.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Evolution of the absolute value of the phase dif [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: presents the characteristic spectral density of the l = 2, |m| = 1 mode for the M24R2 and M24R3 con￾figurations. This mode becomes prominent in compact binary merger events characterized by precessing orbital planes or significant mass asymmetries. As the NSs in our c…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Rotating Fermion-Boson Stars in $R$-squared Gravity

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    R-squared gravity enlarges the equilibrium domain of rotating fermion-boson stars and raises static and Keplerian maximum masses relative to GR while remaining compatible with current compact-object constraints.

  2. Amplified capture rate of dark matter in compact binaries and constraints on bosonic dark matter from GW170817

    astro-ph.HE 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Dark matter capture onto neutron stars is amplified by about 4-5 times in circular binaries, tightening cross-section limits from GW170817 and capping the accreted DM fraction near 1e-3.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

111 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    However, as soon as the BH forms the ejecta are suppressed and the ejecta mass reaches a stable plateau

    BM ejecta The values of the BM ejecta masses increase sharply around the merger and then transition to a gradual in- crease for all setups. However, as soon as the BH forms the ejecta are suppressed and the ejecta mass reaches a stable plateau. Compared to DM-free setups DM halos lead to a sup- pression of BM ejecta by a factor of approximately 10. This s...

  2. [2]

    Fundamental physics with neutron stars and their mergers

    DM ejecta Beyond the BM ejecta, our simulations also reveal the presence of DM ejecta, providing direct insight into its dynamic behavior during these mergers. In theM24 configurations, for DM halos, the ejecta mass ofM24 05HR2 reaches a plateau around 5·10 −5M⊙. In comparison, DM cores show reduced ejecta masses, saturating at 14 5·10−6M⊙ forM24 3CR2. Th...

    arXiv

  3. [3]

    V. M. Lipunovet al., MASTER Optical Detec- tion of the First LIGO/Virgo Neutron Star Binary Merger GW170817, Astrophys. J. Lett.850, L1 (2017), arXiv:1710.05461 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neu- tron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2017

  5. [5]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Estimating the Contribution of Dynamical Ejecta in the Kilonova Associated with GW170817, Astrophys. J. Lett.850, L39 (2017), arXiv:1710.05836 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2017

  6. [6]

    Goldsteinet al., An Ordinary Short Gamma-Ray Burst with Extraordinary Implications: Fermi-GBM Detection of GRB 170817A, Astrophys

    A. Goldsteinet al., An Ordinary Short Gamma-Ray Burst with Extraordinary Implications: Fermi-GBM Detection of GRB 170817A, Astrophys. J. Lett.848, L14 (2017), arXiv:1710.05446 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    B. J. Shappeeet al., Early Spectra of the Gravitational Wave Source GW170817: Evolution of a Neutron Star Merger, Science358, 1574 (2017), arXiv:1710.05432 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    Utsumiet al.(J-GEM), J-GEM observations of an electromagnetic counterpart to the neutron star merger GW170817, Publ

    Y. Utsumiet al.(J-GEM), J-GEM observations of an electromagnetic counterpart to the neutron star merger GW170817, Publ. Astron. Soc. Jap.69, 101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05848 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2017

Show all 111 references
  1. [9]

    P. S. Cowperthwaiteet al., The Electromagnetic Coun- terpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger LIGO/Virgo GW170817. II. UV, Optical, and Near-infrared Light Curves and Comparison to Kilonova Models, Astro- phys. J. Lett.848, L17 (2017), arXiv:1710.05840 [astro- ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  2. [10]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, Fermi- GBM, INTEGRAL), Gravitational Waves and Gamma- rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A, Astrophys. J. Lett.848, L13 (2017), arXiv:1710.05834 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  3. [11]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, Fermi GBM, INTEGRAL, IceCube, AstroSat Cadmium Zinc Telluride Imager Team, IPN, Insight-Hxmt, ANTARES, Swift, AGILE Team, 1M2H Team, Dark Energy Camera GW-EM, DES, DLT40, GRAWITA, Fermi-LAT, ATCA, ASKAP, Las Cumbres Observa- tory Grou...

    2017 arXiv

  4. [12]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(The LIGO Scientific Collabora- tion and the Virgo Collaboration), Gw170817: Measure- ments of neutron star radii and equation of state, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 161101 (2018)

    2018

  5. [13]

    J. S. Read, C. Markakis, M. Shibata, K. Uryu, J. D. E. Creighton, and J. L. Friedman, Measuring the neutron star equation of state with gravitational wave observa- tions, Phys. Rev. D79, 124033 (2009), arXiv:0901.3258 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  6. [14]

    B. D. Metzger, Kilonovae, Living Rev. Rel.23, 1 (2020), arXiv:1910.01617 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  7. [15]

    M. C. Milleret al., PSR J0030+0451 Mass and Radius fromNICERData and Implications for the Properties of Neutron Star Matter, Astrophys. J. Lett.887, L24 (2019), arXiv:1912.05705 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  8. [16]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GW190425: Observation of a Compact Binary Coalescence with To- tal Mass∼3.4M ⊙, Astrophys. J. Lett.892, L3 (2020), arXiv:2001.01761 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  9. [17]

    R. Dudi, A. Adhikari, B. Br¨ ugmann, T. Dietrich, K. Hayashi, K. Kawaguchi, K. Kiuchi, K. Kyutoku, M. Shibata, and W. Tichy, Investigating GW190425 with numerical-relativity simulations, Phys. Rev. D 106, 084039 (2022), arXiv:2109.04063 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  10. [18]

    T. E. Rileyet al., A NICER View of the Massive Pul- sar PSR J0740+6620 Informed by Radio Timing and XMM-Newton Spectroscopy, Astrophys. J. Lett.918, L27 (2021), arXiv:2105.06980 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  11. [19]

    M. C. Milleret al., The Radius of PSR J0740+6620 from NICER and XMM-Newton Data, Astrophys. J. Lett. 918, L28 (2021), arXiv:2105.06979 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  12. [20]

    T. E. Rileyet al., ANICERView of PSR J0030+0451: Millisecond Pulsar Parameter Estimation, Astrophys. J. Lett.887, L21 (2019), arXiv:1912.05702 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Fonsecaet al., Refined Mass and Geometric Measure- ments of the High-mass PSR J0740+6620, Astrophys

    E. Fonsecaet al., Refined Mass and Geometric Measure- ments of the High-mass PSR J0740+6620, Astrophys. J. Lett.915, L12 (2021), arXiv:2104.00880 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Raaijmakerset al., Constraining the dense matter equation of state with joint analysis of NICER and LIGO/Virgo measurements, Astrophys

    G. Raaijmakerset al., Constraining the dense matter equation of state with joint analysis of NICER and LIGO/Virgo measurements, Astrophys. J. Lett.893, L21 (2020), arXiv:1912.11031 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Antoniadiset al., A Massive Pulsar in a Com- pact Relativistic Binary, Science340, 6131 (2013), arXiv:1304.6875 [astro-ph.HE]

    J. Antoniadiset al., A Massive Pulsar in a Com- pact Relativistic Binary, Science340, 6131 (2013), arXiv:1304.6875 [astro-ph.HE]

    2013 arXiv

  16. [24]

    N¨ attil¨ a, M

    J. N¨ attil¨ a, M. C. Miller, A. W. Steiner, J. J. E. Kajava, V. F. Suleimanov, and J. Poutanen, Neutron star mass and radius measurements from atmospheric model fits to X-ray burst cooling tail spectra, Astron. Astrophys. 608, A31 (2017), arXiv:1709.09120 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  17. [25]

    R. W. Romani, D. Kandel, A. V. Filippenko, T. G. Brink, and W. Zheng, PSR J1810+1744: Companion Darkening and a Precise High Neutron Star Mass, As- trophys. J. Lett.908, L46 (2021), arXiv:2101.09822 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  18. [26]

    R. W. Romani, D. Kandel, A. V. Filippenko, T. G. Brink, and W. Zheng, PSR J0952−0607: The Fastest and Heaviest Known Galactic Neutron Star, Astro- phys. J. Lett.934, L18 (2022), arXiv:2207.05124 [astro- ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Panotopoulos and I

    G. Panotopoulos and I. Lopes, Dark matter effect on realistic equation of state in neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D96, 083004 (2017), arXiv:1709.06312 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  20. [28]

    A. J. Goodwin, D. K. Galloway, A. Heger, A. Cumming, and Z. Johnston, A Bayesian Approach to Matching Thermonuclear X-ray Burst Observations with Mod- els, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.490, 2228 (2019), arXiv:1907.00996 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Koehn, H

    H. Koehn, H. Rose, P. T. H. Pang, R. Somasundaram, B. T. Reed, I. Tews, A. Abac, O. Komoltsev, N. Kunert, A. Kurkela, M. W. Coughlin, B. F. Healy, and T. Diet- rich, From existing and new nuclear and astrophysical constraints to stringent limits on the equation of state of neu...

    2025 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Hippert, E

    M. Hippert, E. Dillingham, H. Tan, D. Curtin, J. Noronha-Hostler, and N. Yunes, Dark matter or reg- ular matter in neutron stars? How to tell the difference from the coalescence of compact objects, Phys. Rev. D 107, 115028 (2023), arXiv:2211.08590 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  23. [31]

    A. G. Abac, C. C. Bernido, and J. P. H. Esguerra, Sta- bility of neutron stars with dark matter core using three crustal types and the impact on mass–radius relations, Phys. Dark Univ.40, 101185 (2023), arXiv:2104.04969 [nucl-th]

    2023 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Giangrandi, V

    E. Giangrandi, V. Sagun, O. Ivanytskyi, C. Providˆ encia, and T. Dietrich, The Effects of Self-interacting Bosonic Dark Matter on Neutron Star Properties, Astrophys. J. 953, 115 (2023), arXiv:2209.10905 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [34]

    R. F. Diedrichs, N. Becker, C. Jockel, J.-E. Christian, L. Sagunski, and J. Schaffner-Bielich, Tidal deforma- bility of fermion-boson stars: Neutron stars admixed with ultralight dark matter, Phys. Rev. D108, 064009 (2023), arXiv:2303.04089 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  26. [35]

    Giangrandi, A

    E. Giangrandi, A. ´Avila, V. Sagun, O. Ivanytskyi, and C. Providˆ encia, The Impact of Asymmetric Dark Matter on the Thermal Evolution of Nucleonic and Hyperonic Compact Stars, Particles7, 179 (2024), arXiv:2401.03295 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  27. [36]

    Weber and W

    M. Weber and W. de Boer, Determination of the Local Dark Matter Density in our Galaxy, Astron. Astrophys. 22 509, A25 (2010), arXiv:0910.4272 [astro-ph.CO]

    2010 arXiv

  28. [37]

    Ellis, A

    J. Ellis, A. Hektor, G. H¨ utsi, K. Kannike, L. Marzola, M. Raidal, and V. Vaskonen, Search for Dark Matter Ef- fects on Gravitational Signals from Neutron Star Merg- ers, Phys. Lett. B781, 607 (2018), arXiv:1710.05540 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  29. [38]

    The peaks of thel= 2,|m|= 1 mode are observed atf peak (l=2,|m|=1) = 1.512,1.461,1.541 kHz forM24 00R2,M24 3CR2 andM24 05HR2, respectively

    observed a similar behavior and argued that the pres- ence of DM could enhance the growth of this asymmetry. The peaks of thel= 2,|m|= 1 mode are observed atf peak (l=2,|m|=1) = 1.512,1.461,1.541 kHz forM24 00R2,M24 3CR2 andM24 05HR2, respectively. Notably, DM-core configurati...

  30. [39]

    Stadel, D

    J. Stadel, D. Potter, B. Moore, J. Diemand, P. Madau, M. Zemp, M. Kuhlen, and V. Quilis, Quantifying the heart of darkness with GHALO - a multi-billion particle simulation of our galactic halo, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.398, L21 (2009), arXiv:0808.2981 [astro-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  31. [40]

    Kouvaris and P

    C. Kouvaris and P. Tinyakov, Can Neutron stars con- strain Dark Matter?, Phys. Rev. D82, 063531 (2010), arXiv:1004.0586 [astro-ph.GA]

    2010 arXiv

  32. [41]

    Bezares, D

    M. Bezares, D. Vigan` o, and C. Palenzuela, Gravita- tional wave signatures of dark matter cores in binary neutron star mergers by using numerical simulations, Phys. Rev. D100, 044049 (2019), arXiv:1905.08551 [gr- qc]

    2019 arXiv

  33. [42]

    Bauswein, G

    A. Bauswein, G. Guo, J.-H. Lien, Y.-H. Lin, and M.- R. Wu, Compact dark objects in neutron star merg- ers, Phys. Rev. D107, 083002 (2023), arXiv:2012.11908 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [43]

    M. Emma, F. Schianchi, F. Pannarale, V. Sagun, and T. Dietrich, Numerical Simulations of Dark Matter Ad- mixed Neutron Star Binaries, Particles5, 273 (2022), arXiv:2206.10887 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  35. [44]

    H. R. R¨ uter, V. Sagun, W. Tichy, and T. Dietrich, Quasiequilibrium configurations of binary systems of dark matter admixed neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D108, 124080 (2023), arXiv:2301.03568 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  36. [45]

    Tichy, A New numerical method to construct binary neutron star initial data, Class

    W. Tichy, A New numerical method to construct binary neutron star initial data, Class. Quant. Grav.26, 175018 (2009), arXiv:0908.0620 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  37. [46]

    Tichy, Constructing quasi-equilibrium initial data for binary neutron stars with arbitrary spins, Phys

    W. Tichy, Constructing quasi-equilibrium initial data for binary neutron stars with arbitrary spins, Phys. Rev. D86, 064024 (2012), arXiv:1209.5336 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  38. [47]

    Dietrich, N

    T. Dietrich, N. Moldenhauer, N. K. Johnson-McDaniel, S. Bernuzzi, C. M. Markakis, B. Br¨ ugmann, and W. Tichy, Binary Neutron Stars with Generic Spin, Eccentricity, Mass ratio, and Compactness - Quasi- equilibrium Sequences and First Evolutions, Phys. Rev. D92, 124007 (2015), ...

    2015 arXiv

  39. [48]

    Tichy, A

    W. Tichy, A. Rashti, T. Dietrich, R. Dudi, and B. Br¨ ugmann, Constructing binary neutron star ini- tial data with high spins, high compactnesses, and high mass ratios, Phys. Rev. D100, 124046 (2019), arXiv:1910.09690 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  40. [49]

    C. B. Owen, A. Tucker, Y. Kahn, and N. Yunes, Con- straining dark-sector effects using gravitational waves from compact binary inspirals (2025), arXiv:2503.04916 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  41. [50]

    Su´ arez-Fontanella, D

    D. Su´ arez-Fontanella, D. Barba-Gonz´ alez, C. Alber- tus, and M. A. P´ erez-Garc´ ıa, Gravitational wave emis- sion in binary neutron star early post-merger within a dark environment, Phys. Lett. B862, 139358 (2025), arXiv:2408.05226 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  42. [51]

    Branchesiet al., Science with the Einstein Telescope: a comparison of different designs, JCAP2023(07), 068, arXiv:2303.15923 [gr-qc]

    M. Branchesiet al., Science with the Einstein Telescope: a comparison of different designs, JCAP2023(07), 068, arXiv:2303.15923 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  43. [52]

    Punturoet al., The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory, Class

    M. Punturoet al., The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory, Class. Quant. Grav.27, 194002 (2010)

    2010

  44. [53]

    Abacet al., The Science of the Einstein Telescope (2025), arXiv:2503.12263 [gr-qc]

    A. Abacet al., The Science of the Einstein Telescope (2025), arXiv:2503.12263 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  45. [54]

    Reitzeet al., The US program in ground-based grav- itational wave science: Contribution from the LIGO laboratory, Bull

    D. Reitzeet al., The US program in ground-based grav- itational wave science: Contribution from the LIGO laboratory, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51, 141 (2019), arXiv:1903.04615 [astro-ph.IM]

    2019 arXiv

  46. [55]

    Reitzeet al., Cosmic Explorer: The U.S

    D. Reitzeet al., Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribu- tion to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51, 035 (2019), arXiv:1907.04833 [astro-ph.IM]

    2019 arXiv

  47. [56]

    Ackleyet al., Neutron Star Extreme Matter Obser- vatory: A kilohertz-band gravitational-wave detector in the global network, Publ

    K. Ackleyet al., Neutron Star Extreme Matter Obser- vatory: A kilohertz-band gravitational-wave detector in the global network, Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral.37, e047 (2020), arXiv:2007.03128 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020

  48. [57]

    Roszkowski, E

    L. Roszkowski, E. M. Sessolo, and S. Trojanowski, WIMP dark matter candidates and searches—current status and future prospects, Rept. Prog. Phys.81, 066201 (2018), arXiv:1707.06277 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  49. [58]

    Pospelov, A

    M. Pospelov, A. Ritz, and M. B. Voloshin, Secluded WIMP Dark Matter, Phys. Lett. B662, 53 (2008), arXiv:0711.4866 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  50. [59]

    Foot, Mirror dark matter: Cosmology, galaxy struc- ture and direct detection, Int

    R. Foot, Mirror dark matter: Cosmology, galaxy struc- ture and direct detection, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A29, 1430013 (2014), arXiv:1401.3965 [astro-ph.CO]

    2014 arXiv

  51. [60]

    Paraficz, J

    D. Paraficz, J. P. Kneib, J. Richard, A. Morandi, M. Limousin, E. Jullo, and J. Martinez, The Bullet clus- ter at its best: weighing stars, gas, and dark matter, Astron. Astrophys.594, A121 (2016), arXiv:1209.0384 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  52. [61]

    Robertson, R

    A. Robertson, R. Massey, and V. Eke, What does the Bullet Cluster tell us about self-interacting dark mat- ter?, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.465, 569 (2017), arXiv:1605.04307 [astro-ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  53. [62]

    Aalberset al.(LZ), First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment, Phys

    J. Aalberset al.(LZ), First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 041002 (2023), arXiv:2207.03764 [hep-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  54. [63]

    Aprileet al.(XENON), First Dark Matter Search with Nuclear Recoils from the XENONnT Experiment, Phys

    E. Aprileet al.(XENON), First Dark Matter Search with Nuclear Recoils from the XENONnT Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 041003 (2023), arXiv:2303.14729 [hep-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  55. [64]

    Ivanytskyi, V

    O. Ivanytskyi, V. Sagun, and I. Lopes, Neutron stars: New constraints on asymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rev. D102, 063028 (2020), arXiv:1910.09925 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  56. [65]

    Rafiei Karkevandi, S

    D. Rafiei Karkevandi, S. Shakeri, V. Sagun, and O. Ivanytskyi, Bosonic dark matter in neutron stars and its effect on gravitational wave signal, Phys. Rev. D105, 023001 (2022), arXiv:2109.03801 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  57. [66]

    J. W. York, Jr., Conformal ’thin sandwich’ data for the initial-value problem, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 1350 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9810051

    1999 arXiv

  58. [67]

    H. P. Pfeiffer and J. W. York, Jr., Extrinsic curvature and the Einstein constraints, Phys. Rev. D67, 044022 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0207095

    2003 arXiv

  59. [68]

    T. W. Baumgarte and S. L. Shapiro,Numerical Rel- ativity: Solving Einstein’s Equations on the Computer (Cambridge University Press, 2010)

    2010

  60. [69]

    Tichy, The initial value problem as it relates to nu- merical relativity, Rept

    W. Tichy, The initial value problem as it relates to nu- merical relativity, Rept. Prog. Phys.80, 026901 (2017), arXiv:1610.03805 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  61. [70]

    Moldenhauer, C

    N. Moldenhauer, C. M. Markakis, N. K. Johnson- McDaniel, W. Tichy, and B. Br¨ ugmann, Initial data for binary neutron stars with adjustable eccentricity, Phys. Rev. D90, 084043 (2014), arXiv:1408.4136 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  62. [71]

    Runge, ¨Uber empirische funktionen und die interpo- lation zwischen ¨ aquidistanten ordinaten, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Mathematik und Physik46, 224 (1901)

    C. Runge, ¨Uber empirische funktionen und die interpo- lation zwischen ¨ aquidistanten ordinaten, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Mathematik und Physik46, 224 (1901)

    1901

  63. [72]

    Br¨ ugmann, J

    B. Br¨ ugmann, J. A. Gonz´ alez, M. Hannam, S. Husa, U. Sperhake, and W. Tichy, Calibration of moving puncture simulations, Phys. Rev. D77, 024027 (2008), arXiv:gr-qc/0610128

    2008 arXiv

  64. [73]

    Thierfelder, S

    M. Thierfelder, S. Bernuzzi, and B. Br¨ ugmann, Numer- ical relativity simulations of binary neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D84, 044012 (2011), arXiv:1104.4751 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  65. [74]

    Dietrich, S

    T. Dietrich, S. Bernuzzi, M. Ujevic, and B. Br¨ ugmann, 23 Numerical relativity simulations of neutron star merger remnants using conservative mesh refinement, Phys. Rev. D91, 124041 (2015), arXiv:1504.01266 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  66. [75]

    Bernuzzi and T

    S. Bernuzzi and T. Dietrich, Gravitational wave- forms from binary neutron star mergers with high- order weighted-essentially-nonoscillatory schemes in nu- merical relativity, Phys. Rev. D94, 064062 (2016), arXiv:1604.07999 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  67. [76]

    Dietrich, D

    T. Dietrich, D. Radice, S. Bernuzzi, F. Zappa, A. Perego, B. Br¨ ugmann, S. V. Chaurasia, R. Dudi, W. Tichy, and M. Ujevic, CoRe database of binary neu- tron star merger waveforms, Class. Quant. Grav.35, 24LT01 (2018), arXiv:1806.01625 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  68. [77]

    Neuweiler, T

    A. Neuweiler, T. Dietrich, B. Br¨ ugmann, E. Giangrandi, K. Kiuchi, F. Schianchi, P. M¨ osta, S. Shankar, B. Gi- acomazzo, and M. Shibata, General relativistic magne- tohydrodynamic simulations with bam: Implementation and code comparison, Phys. Rev. D110, 084046 (2024), arXiv...

    2024 arXiv

  69. [78]

    H. Gieg, F. Schianchi, M. Ujevic, and T. Dietrich, On the Role of Muons in Binary Neutron Star Mergers: First Simulations (2024), arXiv:2409.04420 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  70. [79]

    Schianchi, H

    F. Schianchi, H. Gieg, V. Nedora, A. Neuweiler, M. Uje- vic, M. Bulla, and T. Dietrich, M1 neutrino transport within the numerical-relativistic code BAM with appli- cation to low mass binary neutron star mergers, Phys. Rev. D109, 044012 (2024), arXiv:2307.04572 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  71. [80]

    C. Bona, T. Ledvinka, C. Palenzuela, and M. Zacek, General covariant evolution formalism for numerical relativity, Phys. Rev. D67, 104005 (2003), arXiv:gr- qc/0302083

    2003

  72. [81]

    C. Bona, L. Lehner, and C. Palenzuela-Luque, Geo- metrically motivated hyperbolic coordinate conditions for numerical relativity: Analysis, issues and imple- mentations, Phys. Rev. D72, 104009 (2005), arXiv:gr- qc/0509092

    2005

  73. [82]

    Gundlach, J

    C. Gundlach, J. M. Martin-Garcia, G. Calabrese, and I. Hinder, Constraint damping in the Z4 formulation and harmonic gauge, Class. Quant. Grav.22, 3767 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0504114

    2005 arXiv

  74. [83]

    Bernuzzi and D

    S. Bernuzzi and D. Hilditch, Constraint violation in free evolution schemes: Comparing BSSNOK with a con- formal decomposition of Z4, Phys. Rev. D81, 084003 (2010), arXiv:0912.2920 [gr-qc]

    2010 arXiv

  75. [84]

    Hilditch, S

    D. Hilditch, S. Bernuzzi, M. Thierfelder, Z. Cao, W. Tichy, and B. Br¨ ugmann, Compact binary evolu- tions with the z4c formulation, Phys. Rev. D88, 084057 (2013), arXiv:1212.2901 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  76. [85]

    Alcubierre, B

    M. Alcubierre, B. Br¨ ugmann, P. Diener, M. Koppitz, D. Pollney, E. Seidel, and R. Takahashi, Gauge condi- tions for long-term numerical black hole evolutions with- out excision, Phys. Rev. D67, 084023 (2003), arXiv:gr- qc/0206072

    2003

  77. [86]

    Banyuls, J

    F. Banyuls, J. A. Font, J. M. Ib´ a˜ nez, J. M. Mart´ ı, and J. A. Miralles, Numerical{3 + 1}General Relativis- tic Hydrodynamics: A Local Characteristic Approach, Astrophys. J.476, 221 (1997)

    1997

  78. [87]

    Gulminelli and A

    F. Gulminelli and A. R. Raduta, Unified treatment of subsaturation stellar matter at zero and finite tempera- ture, Phys. Rev. C92, 055803 (2015), arXiv:1504.04493 [nucl-th]

    2015 arXiv

  79. [88]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GW170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equation of state, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 161101 (2018), arXiv:1805.11581 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  80. [89]

    Bauswein, H

    A. Bauswein, H. T. Janka, and R. Oechslin, Testing Approximations of Thermal Effects in Neutron Star Merger Simulations, Phys. Rev. D82, 084043 (2010), arXiv:1006.3315 [astro-ph.SR]

    2010 arXiv

  81. [90]

    Zwerger and E

    T. Zwerger and E. M¨ uller, Dynamics and gravitational wave signature of axisymmetric rotational core collapse, Astron. Astrophys.320, 209 (1997)

    1997

  82. [91]

    Sagun, E

    V. Sagun, E. Giangrandi, O. Ivanytskyi, I. Lopes, and K. A. Bugaev, Constraints on the fermionic dark matter from observations of neutron stars, PoSP ANIC2021, 313 (2022), arXiv:2111.13289 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  83. [92]

    Rezzolla and O

    L. Rezzolla and O. Zanotti,Relativistic Hydrodynamics (Oxford University Press, 2013)

    2013

  84. [93]

    Baiotti and L

    L. Baiotti and L. Rezzolla, Binary neutron star mergers: a review of Einstein’s richest laboratory, Rept. Prog. Phys.80, 096901 (2017), arXiv:1607.03540 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  85. [94]

    Dietrich, S

    T. Dietrich, S. Ossokine, and K. Clough, Full 3D nu- merical relativity simulations of neutron star–boson star collisions with BAM, Class. Quant. Grav.36, 025002 (2019), arXiv:1807.06959 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  86. [95]

    Berger and P

    M. Berger and P. Colella, Local adaptive mesh refine- ment for shock hydrodynamics, Journal of Computa- tional Physics82, 64 (1989)

    1989

  87. [96]

    M. J. Berger and J. Oliger, Adaptive mesh refinement for hyperbolic partial differential equations, Journal of Computational Physics53, 484 (1984)

    1984

  88. [97]

    Borges, M

    R. Borges, M. Carmona, B. Costa, and W. S. Don, An improved weighted essentially non-oscillatory scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws, Journal of Computa- tional Physics227, 3191 (2008)

    2008

  89. [98]

    A. Das, T. Malik, and A. C. Nayak, Dark matter ad- mixed neutron star properties in light of gravitational wave observations: A two fluid approach, Phys. Rev. D 105, 123034 (2022), arXiv:2011.01318 [nucl-th]

    2022 arXiv

  90. [99]

    Hinderer, Tidal love numbers of neutron stars, The Astrophysical Journal677, 1216 (2008)

    T. Hinderer, Tidal love numbers of neutron stars, The Astrophysical Journal677, 1216 (2008)

    2008

  91. [100]

    Leung, M.-c

    K.-L. Leung, M.-c. Chu, and L.-M. Lin, Tidal deforma- bility of dark matter admixed neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D105, 123010 (2022), arXiv:2207.02433 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  92. [101]

    Hanauske, K

    M. Hanauske, K. Takami, L. Bovard, L. Rezzolla, J. A. Font, F. Galeazzi, and H. St¨ ocker, Rotational proper- ties of hypermassive neutron stars from binary mergers, Phys. Rev. D96, 043004 (2017), arXiv:1611.07152 [gr- qc]

    2017 arXiv

  93. [102]

    Hotokezaka, K

    K. Hotokezaka, K. Kiuchi, K. Kyutoku, H. Okawa, Y.-i. Sekiguchi, M. Shibata, and K. Taniguchi, Mass ejection from the merger of binary neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 87, 024001 (2013), arXiv:1212.0905 [astro-ph.HE]

    2013 arXiv

  94. [103]

    A. Abac, T. Dietrich, A. Buonanno, J. Steinhoff, and M. Ujevic, New and robust gravitational-waveform model for high-mass-ratio binary neutron star systems with dynamical tidal effects, Phys. Rev. D109, 024062 (2024), arXiv:2311.07456 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  95. [104]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, LIGO Algorithm Li- brary - LALSuite, free software (GPL) (2018)

    2018

  96. [105]

    Pratten, S

    G. Pratten, S. Husa, C. Garcia-Quiros, M. Colleoni, A. Ramos-Buades, H. Estelles, and R. Jaume, Setting the cornerstone for a family of models for gravitational waves from compact binaries: The dominant harmonic for nonprecessing quasicircular black holes, Phys. Rev. D102, 064...

    2020 arXiv

  97. [106]

    Dietrich, S

    T. Dietrich, S. Bernuzzi, and W. Tichy, Closed-form tidal approximants for binary neutron star gravitational 24 waveforms constructed from high-resolution numerical relativity simulations, Phys. Rev. D96, 121501 (2017), arXiv:1706.02969 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  98. [107]

    Dietrichet al., Matter imprints in waveform models for neutron star binaries: Tidal and self-spin effects, Phys

    T. Dietrichet al., Matter imprints in waveform models for neutron star binaries: Tidal and self-spin effects, Phys. Rev. D99, 024029 (2019), arXiv:1804.02235 [gr- qc]

    2019 arXiv

  99. [108]

    Dietrich, A

    T. Dietrich, A. Samajdar, S. Khan, N. K. Johnson- McDaniel, R. Dudi, and W. Tichy, Improving the NR- Tidal model for binary neutron star systems, Phys. Rev. D100, 044003 (2019), arXiv:1905.06011 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  100. [109]

    Hotokezaka, K

    K. Hotokezaka, K. Kyutoku, H. Okawa, and M. Shibata, Exploring tidal effects of coalescing binary neutron stars in numerical relativity. II. Long-term simulations, Phys. Rev. D91, 064060 (2015), arXiv:1502.03457 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  101. [110]

    Nelson, S

    A. Nelson, S. Reddy, and D. Zhou, Dark halos around neutron stars and gravitational waves, JCAP07, 012, arXiv:1803.03266 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  102. [111]

    Liu, J.-B

    H.-M. Liu, J.-B. Wei, Z.-H. Li, G. F. Burgio, H. C. Das, and H. J. Schulze, Dark matter effects on the properties of neutron stars: Compactness and tidal deformabil- ity, Phys. Rev. D110, 023024 (2024), arXiv:2403.17024 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  103. [112]

    Breschi, S

    M. Breschi, S. Bernuzzi, F. Zappa, M. Agathos, A. Perego, D. Radice, and A. Nagar, kiloHertz gravita- tional waves from binary neutron star remnants: time- domain model and constraints on extreme matter, Phys. Rev. D100, 104029 (2019), arXiv:1908.11418 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.