Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Structural Neural Additive Models: Enhanced Interpretable Machine Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.09275 v1 pith:SB45I5DE submitted 2023-02-18 cs.LG stat.CO

classification cs.LGstat.CO
keywords neuralinterpretableadditivednnsmodelsnetworkspredictivesnams
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep neural networks (DNNs) have shown exceptional performances in a wide range of tasks and have become the go-to method for problems requiring high-level predictive power. There has been extensive research on how DNNs arrive at their decisions, however, the inherently uninterpretable networks remain up to this day mostly unobservable "black boxes". In recent years, the field has seen a push towards interpretable neural networks, such as the visually interpretable Neural Additive Models (NAMs). We propose a further step into the direction of intelligibility beyond the mere visualization of feature effects and propose Structural Neural Additive Models (SNAMs). A modeling framework that combines classical and clearly interpretable statistical methods with the predictive power of neural applications. Our experiments validate the predictive performances of SNAMs. The proposed framework performs comparable to state-of-the-art fully connected DNNs and we show that SNAMs can even outperform NAMs while remaining inherently more interpretable.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fisher-Guided Selective Forgetting: Mitigating The Primacy Bias in Deep Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2025-02 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    FGSF, periodic FIM-scaled weight noise for SAC, improves Humanoid and Quadruped but underperforms plain SAC on five of ten DMC tasks.

Pith tools