REVIEW 6 cited by
LMM-enhanced Safety-Critical Scenario Generation for Autonomous Driving System Testing From Non-Accident Traffic Videos
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Safety testing serves as the fundamental pillar for the development of autonomous driving systems (ADSs). To ensure the safety of ADSs, it is paramount to generate a diverse range of safety-critical test scenarios. While existing ADS practitioners primarily focus on reproducing real-world traffic accidents in simulation environments to create test scenarios, it's essential to highlight that many of these accidents do not directly result in safety violations for ADSs due to the differences between human driving and autonomous driving. More importantly, we observe that some accident-free real-world scenarios can not only lead to misbehaviors in ADSs but also be leveraged for the generation of ADS violations during simulation testing. Therefore, it is of significant importance to discover safety violations of ADSs from routine traffic scenarios (i.e., non-crash scenarios). We introduce LEADE, a novel methodology to achieve the above goal. It automatically generates abstract and concrete scenarios from real-traffic videos. Then it optimizes these scenarios to search for safety violations of the ADS in semantically consistent scenarios where human-driving worked safely. Specifically, LEADE enhances the ability of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) to accurately construct abstract scenarios from traffic videos and generate concrete scenarios by multi-modal few-shot Chain of Thought (CoT). Based on them, LEADE assesses and increases the behavior differences between the ego vehicle and human-driving in semantic equivalent scenarios (here equivalent semantics means that each participant in test scenarios has the same behaviors as those observed in the original real traffic scenarios). We implement and evaluate LEADE on the industrial-grade Level-4 ADS, Apollo.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
Chat2Scenic: An Iterative RAG-Based Framework for Scenario Generation in Autonomous Driving
Chat2Scenic generates executable Scenic driving-scenario scripts from regulation-style text with 76.4% compilation success, using iterative component-wise generation with retrieval-augmented prompting.
-
Adversarial Generation and Collaborative Evolution of Safety-Critical Scenarios for Autonomous Vehicles
ScenGE generates more collision-prone autonomous driving test scenarios by combining LLM-suggested adversarial events with optimized background traffic, beating prior generators on CARLA benchmarks.
-
From Failures to Fixes: LLM-Driven Scenario Repair for Self-Evolving Autonomous Driving
SERA uses LLM-driven failure analysis and scenario retrieval to select training scenarios for few-shot fine-tuning, improving simulated autonomous driving scores.
-
Multi-modal Traffic Scenario Generation for Autonomous Driving System Testing
TrafficComposer combines an LLM text parser and computer-vision object and lane detectors to generate executable CARLA/LGSVL traffic scenarios, reporting 97% IR accuracy and improved ADS fuzz testing.
-
Generative AI for Testing of Autonomous Driving Systems: A Survey
A systematic survey that organizes 91 studies of generative AI for autonomous driving testing into six scenario-based tasks and catalogs 27 limitations.
-
Survey of GenAI for Automotive Software Development: From Requirements to Executable Code
A review of roughly 60 papers and 9 industry respondents finds GPT-family models dominate automotive code generation while requirements handling lags due to confidentiality constraints.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.