Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Fourier ptychographic microscopy aided with transport of intensity equation for robust full phase spectrum reconstruction

T0 review · 5 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A single extra defocused image restores full phase spectrum in Fourier ptychography.

desk verdict FPM+TIE hybrid is a genuinely useful practical idea, but the paper's own data undercuts the 'accurate full-spectrum' claim for the largest low-frequency features. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.24322 v1 pith:SFDLYOLG submitted 2025-05-30 physics.optics

Miko{l}aj Rogalski , Juan Martinez-Carranza , Bartosz Górski , Piotr Arcab , Micha{l} Jóźwik , Piotr Zdańkowski , Magdalena Sobień , Marzena Stefaniuk
show 3 more authors
Shun Zhou Chao Zuo Maciej Trusiak
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics PACS 42.30.Rx42.30.Va
keywords Fourierptychographicmicroscopytransportofintensityequationphaseretrievallow-frequencyquantitativeimagingdefocustransferfunctionLEDarray
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that Fourier ptychographic microscopy (FPM), a computational technique that stitches together images taken under many illumination angles, loses low-frequency phase whenever the illumination numerical aperture does not exactly match the objective aperture, a condition real LED-array systems rarely meet across the whole field of view. To fix this, the authors add a single on-axis defocused image to the standard FPM dataset, solve the transport of intensity equation (TIE) on that pair of images to recover low-frequency phase, and use that estimate as the initial guess for FPM's iterative refinement. The result is a full-spectrum quantitative phase reconstruction from one extra image, with high frequencies supplied by FPM and low frequencies supplied by TIE. The authors show the combined method tolerates large defocus distances, which suppresses the low-frequency artifacts that plague small-defocus TIE, and can reconstruct phase values beyond the usual 0–2π range in optically thick samples.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the phase transfer function of the imaging system. For shifted brightfield pupils the PTF is $i[P(u+u_0)-P(u-u_0)]$, which vanishes at low frequencies when the pupils overlap, while defocus changes it to $P(u)\sin(\pi\lambda u\cdot\Delta z)$, restoring a nonzero low-frequency response. TIE turns one in-focus and one defocused intensity image into an axial intensity derivative and provides a low-frequency phase map via an FFT solver; that map seeds Eq. (2) as the FPM initial guess. The affine transform estimated from three manually chosen corresponding points compensates the global magnification and translation between the two planes, and a quasi-Newton loop refines the combined estimate.

What would settle it

Register many small image patches between the in-focus and defocused planes on a target with known markers spread across the entire field of view; if the patch-wise displacement field deviates from the global affine model by more than the local feature size, the correction is inadequate. A direct experiment would image a phase-only target with known large flat phase regions near the corners and check whether FPM+TIE corner values drift away from the reference while the center matches.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the missing low-frequency phase can be recovered by defocus rather than by satisfying the matching-NA condition. In brightfield FPM the phase transfer function cancels for overlapping shifted pupil functions, so low-frequency phase is simply not encoded in the data; defocusing introduces a PTF that is nonzero at low frequencies. The paper therefore uses one additional defocused on-axis image, solves TIE with an FFT solver, and embeds the resulting low-frequency phase into the initial guess of a quasi-Newton FPM reconstruction. An affine transform estimated from three corresponding points corrects the magnification change caused by spherical LED illumination at large defocus. With this pipeline the reconstructed phase matches a quantitative phase target at small and medium features, resolves biological structures in cheek cells, neurons, and brain slices, and exceeds the 2π limit where standard FPM fails.

Load-bearing premise

The whole pipeline depends on one global affine transform, estimated from three manually selected corresponding points, being able to correct the magnification and translation between in-focus and defocused images over the entire field of view; if local or non-affine geometric distortion is present, the TIE-derived low-frequency phase is biased and the improvement over FPM would degrade.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Standard FPM setups can quantitatively image phase without achieving the matching-NA condition, removing a major practical constraint for LED-array microscopes.
  • Only one extra defocused image is needed per dataset, so the method slots into existing FPM acquisition workflows with minimal changes.
  • Because high frequencies come from FPM, the TIE defocus can be made large (up to 300 µm here), making the phase estimate robust to intensity noise.
  • The method reconstructs wrapped phase beyond the 0–2π range, opening quantitative phase imaging of optically thick samples to FPM-style systems.
  • Biological samples such as neurons and brain tissue show features in the hybrid reconstruction that are faint or absent in either standalone method.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the choice of low-frequency seed is generic, other low-frequency phase estimators (for example multi-plane TIE or regularized solvers) could replace the single-plane TIE step without changing the rest of the pipeline.
  • A global affine transform holds only under locally constant magnification; for larger fields of view or strongly tilted samples, a per-patch or model-based warping of the defocused image would likely be needed to preserve low-frequency accuracy.
  • The beyond-2π phase recovery suggests that FPM+TIE could provide quantitative dry-mass or refractive-index maps of thick cells without holographic reference beams, but the paper leaves this as future work.
  • If the registration step were automated, the method would become essentially hands-off, since the manual three-point affine estimate is the only user intervention.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a hybrid quantitative phase imaging method that combines Fourier ptychographic microscopy (FPM) with transport of intensity equation (TIE). The acquisition adds one on-axis defocused image to the standard FPM dataset; TIE reconstructs the low-frequency phase from this image at a large defocus distance, and that phase is used to initialize the FPM reconstruction. An affine transform, estimated from three manually selected points, corrects the defocus-induced magnification mismatch. The authors validate the method on simulated phase objects, a quantitative phase target, and biological samples (cheek cells, mouse neurons, mouse brain slices), reporting that the hybrid method recovers low-frequency phase content that FPM alone misses and achieves higher resolution than TIE alone.

Significance. If fully supported, the proposed method would be a practical, low-cost improvement to standard FPM: it adds only one extra image per dataset and requires no hardware modification, while addressing a known limitation of FPM in low-frequency phase retrieval. The paper includes both numerical simulations and a range of experimental demonstrations, and the core idea of seeding FPM with a TIE-derived low-frequency phase is clearly articulated and plausible. However, the quantitative validation is not yet sufficient to support the abstract's claim of 'accurate, full-spectrum phase retrieval': the principal quantitative benchmark shows a substantial underestimation for the largest low-frequency test element, and key implementation details of the TIE solver are omitted. The biological results are encouraging but primarily qualitative.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section 4, Table 1] The largest low-frequency test element (LE, 250×250 µm) is recovered by FPM+TIE as 0.22 ± 0.09 rad against a grating-interferometer reference of 0.52 ± 0.08 rad, a 58% low bias. This element lies exactly in the low-frequency regime that the method is designed to restore, so the central 'accurate, full-spectrum phase retrieval' claim is not supported by the presented data. The text attributes the underestimate to LFAs but does not quantify the mechanism or explain why the FPM+TIE pipeline cannot correct it. The authors should provide a quantitative low-frequency transfer-function characterization of their TIE solver (as a function of Δz and regularization) and demonstrate that the final FPM+TIE result preserves a known low-frequency phase value within a stated tolerance.
  2. [Section 2, TIE reconstruction details] The TIE implementation is described only by a citation to an 'FFT solver' [42]. The manuscript does not specify the finite-difference scheme used for the axial derivative (the paper uses two images separated by up to 300 µm), the regularization or filter applied in the FFT inversion, or the boundary/padding handling. Given that Table 1 shows a strong low-frequency bias and that large-defocus two-image axial derivatives are known to be nonlinear, these details are needed to reproduce the results and to assess whether the bias originates from the derivative approximation or the inversion. Please provide the full algorithmic description and an error analysis as a function of Δz.
  3. [Section 2, affine transform correction] The magnification-mismatch correction is a load-bearing step for the large defocus distances used here, but the manuscript provides no analysis of the accuracy or robustness of the manual three-point affine registration. A single global affine map cannot correct local magnification variations that arise from the spherical LED wavefront across the full field of view; residual misregistration will directly corrupt the axial derivative and bias the TIE phase. The authors should report the residual registration error after correction (e.g., a displacement map) and show that the TIE result is stable with respect to the chosen control points.
  4. [Section 2, Eq. (2) and Section 3] The TIE result enters the FPM reconstruction only as an initial guess; FPM then iterates. Because the FPM PTF has near-zero response at low frequencies (Eq. 4), the low-frequency content of the final reconstruction is not explicitly constrained and may drift or be modified during optimization. The paper does not analyze convergence of the low-frequency component from the TIE seed, nor does it show a spectral comparison of the TIE seed and the final FPM+TIE result. Such an analysis would clarify whether the method truly preserves the TIE low-frequency information or whether the final result is merely a compromise between the seed and the FPM data.
  5. [Section 5 and Fig. 6] The claim of recovering phase values beyond the conventional 0–2π range is supported only by a single unquantified observation on cheek cells (yellow arrow in Fig. 6(d)). The abstract phrases this as 'appears capable,' and the Discussion calls it a potential application, which is acceptable as a preliminary observation. However, the manuscript also states that the method 'successfully reconstructs phase features with values exceeding the 2π limit' in the Introduction, which overstates the evidence. The authors should either quantitatively validate this capability on a known thick sample or consistently qualify it as preliminary.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3, Eq. (5)] Equation (5) as written, PTF(u) = [P(u) sin(πλu · Δz)], is dimensionally inconsistent: the argument of the sine should be a scalar, typically πλ|u|^2 Δz. Please correct the expression.
  2. [Figure 3 caption] The caption lists panels (d) and (f) for the noisy TIE reconstructions, while the text refers to (d) and (e). Please align the panel labels in the caption with the figure and the text.
  3. [Section 2, Eq. (2)] The use of the ⌈·⌉ operator to denote image resizing is nonstandard and could be confused with ceiling notation. Please define it explicitly or use a clearer symbol.
  4. [Table 1] Please clarify whether the reported ± values are the standard deviation of the phase within each element or the standard error of the mean; the choice materially affects the comparison with the reference value.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the FPM+TIE pipeline composes two independently established phase-retrieval methods and is benchmarked against an external grating-interferometer reference.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not self-referential. The low-frequency phase seed from TIE is obtained from a separately acquired defocused image by an FFT solver (ref. 42) that does not use any FPM output, and the FPM reconstruction (refs. 43-44) does not use the TIE result except as an initial guess (Eq. 2). The claimed advantage, restoration of low-frequency phase absent when the matching-NA condition fails, is supported by PTF analysis (Eqs. 3-5) and by simulations; the experimental benchmark against a phase target uses a grating interferometer reference value of 0.52 +/- 0.08 rad, which is external to the method and not derived from any fitted parameter. The only author-overlapping citations (refs. 32, 40, 44) are related work or implementation references, not load-bearing uniqueness theorems or fitted inputs. The reported underestimate of the large element (0.22 rad vs 0.52 rad) is a quantitative-accuracy limitation, not a circularity: the LE value is not the quantity being fitted, and no parameter was tuned to reproduce the reference. Therefore no step reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The method introduces no new physical entities. It relies on standard TIE and FPM solvers, a two-image axial derivative approximation, and the plane-wave assumption for FPM, along with a hand-selected defocus distance and manual affine calibration. The most fragile inputs are the manual affine registration and the empirical defocus choice, both of which affect the TIE phase map that seeds FPM.

free parameters (2)
  • Defocus distance Δz = 20, 100, 300 µm (hand-selected)
    The defocus distance is chosen by the user to balance noise robustness and low-frequency accuracy; the paper states it 'can be easily adjusted' and 'empirically selected in practice.' It is not derived from first principles.
  • Affine transform coefficients = Estimated manually from three corresponding points
    The magnification correction and alignment rely on a manually identified affine transform, which is a calibration step rather than a physics-derived parameter, but it is a free choice that affects the TIE input.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math TIE FFT solver (Paganin-Nugent) provides a valid solution for the axial intensity derivative.
    The paper uses the FFT solver from ref. 42 without modification; this is a standard, established solver.
  • domain assumption The axial intensity derivative is approximated by a finite difference between two images (in-focus and defocused).
    TIE requires the intensity derivative; the paper uses only two images, which is a first-order approximation. The validity of this approximation at large defocus (up to 300 µm) is assumed.
  • domain assumption FPM's forward model treats each LED as a plane wave with a specific angle (after illumination calibration).
    Standard FPM reconstruction assumes plane-wave illumination; the paper acknowledges LED wavefronts are spherical and only corrects for global magnification in the TIE branch, not in the FPM forward model.
  • domain assumption The defocused PTF model of Eq. (5) applies to the experimental conditions.
    Eq. (5) is derived for coherent on-axis illumination; the experiment uses a partially coherent LED source, and the paper does not validate the PTF model under those conditions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fourier ptychographic microscopy aided with transport of intensity equation for robust full phase spectrum reconstruction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SFDLYOLG

@misc{pith2026250524322,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fourier ptychographic microscopy aided with transport of intensity equation for robust full phase spectrum reconstruction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SFDLYOLG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.24322}
}
read the original abstract

Fourier ptychographic microscopy (FPM) is a pivotal computational imaging technique that achieves phase and amplitude reconstruction with high resolution and wide field of view, using low numerical aperture objectives and LED array illumination. Despite its unique strengths, FPM remains fundamentally limited in retrieving low spatial frequency phase information due to the absence of phase encoding in all brightfield illumination angles. To overcome this, we present a novel hybrid approach that combines FPM with the transport of intensity equation (TIE), enabling accurate, full-spectrum phase retrieval without compromising system simplicity. Our method extends standard FPM acquisitions with a single additional on-axis defocused image, from which low-frequency phase components are reconstructed via TIE method, employing large defocus distance to suppress low-frequency artifacts and enhance robustness to intensity noise. To additionally compensate for defocus-induced magnification variations caused by spherical wavefront illumination, we employ an affine transform-based correction scheme upon image registration. Notably, by restoring the missing low-frequency content, our hybrid method appears capable of recovering phase values beyond the conventional 0-2{\pi} range - an area where conventional FPM techniques often struggle when dealing with optically thick samples. We validated our method using a quantitative phase test target for benchmarking accuracy and biological cheek cells, mouse neurons, and mouse brain tissue slice samples to demonstrate applicability for in vitro bioimaging. Experimental results confirm substantial improvements in phase reconstruction fidelity across spatial frequencies, establishing this hybrid FPM+TIE framework as a practical and high-performance solution for quantitative phase imaging in biomedical and optical metrology applications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Designing across domains with declarative thinking: Insights from the 96-Eyes ptychographic imager project

    physics.optics 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    Formalizing imaging system requirements in a declarative, machine-readable language is claimed to improve traceability and reduce cross-team misalignment, based on the 96-Eyes project.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [42]

    Noninterferometric Phase Imaging with Partially Coherent Light,

    D. Paganin and K. A. Nugent, "Noninterferometric Phase Imaging with Partially Coherent Light," Phys. Rev. Lett. 80(12), 2586–2589 (1998)

    work page 1998

  2. [1]

    Quantitative phase imaging in biomedicine,

    Y. Park, C. Depeursinge, and G. Popescu, "Quantitative phase imaging in biomedicine," Nature Photon 12(10), 578–589 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [2]

    Quantitative Phase Imaging: Recent Advances and Expanding Potential in Biomedicine,

    T. L. Nguyen, S. Pradeep, R. L. Judson-Torres, J. Reed, M. A. Teitell, and T. A. Zangle, "Quantitative Phase Imaging: Recent Advances and Expanding Potential in Biomedicine," ACS Nano 16(8), 11516–11544 (2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [3]

    Quantitative phase imaging based on holography: trends and new perspectives,

    Z. Huang and L. Cao, "Quantitative phase imaging based on holography: trends and new perspectives," Light Sci Appl 13(1), 145 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [4]

    Review of bio-optical imaging systems with a high space-bandwidth product,

    J. Park, D. J. Brady, G. Zheng, L. Tian, and L. Gao, "Review of bio-optical imaging systems with a high space-bandwidth product," AP 3(4), 044001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [5]

    Wide-field, high-resolution Fourier ptychographic microscopy,

    G. Zheng, R. Horstmeyer, and C. Yang, "Wide-field, high-resolution Fourier ptychographic microscopy," Nature Photon 7(9), 739–745 (2013)

    work page 2013

  7. [6]

    Fourier ptychography: current applications and future promises,

    P. C. Konda, L. Loetgering, K. C. Zhou, S. Xu, A. R. Harvey, and R. Horstmeyer, "Fourier ptychography: current applications and future promises," Opt. Express, OE 28(7), 9603–9630 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [7]

    High-resolution and large field-of-view Fourier ptychographic microscopy and its applications in biomedicine,

    A. Pan, C. Zuo, and B. Yao, "High-resolution and large field-of-view Fourier ptychographic microscopy and its applications in biomedicine," Rep. Prog. Phys. 83(9), 096101 (2020)

    work page 2020

Show all 46 references
  1. [8]

    Concept, implementations and applications of Fourier ptychography,

    G. Zheng, C. Shen, S. Jiang, P. Song, and C. Yang, "Concept, implementations and applications of Fourier ptychography," Nat Rev Phys 3(3), 207–223 (2021)

    2021

  2. [9]

    Fourier ptychographic reconstruction using Wirtinger flow optimization,

    L. Bian, J. Suo, G. Zheng, K. Guo, F. Chen, and Q. Dai, "Fourier ptychographic reconstruction using Wirtinger flow optimization," Opt. Express, OE 23(4), 4856–4866 (2015)

    2015

  3. [10]

    Adaptive denoising method for Fourier ptychographic microscopy,

    Y. Fan, J. Sun, Q. Chen, M. Wang, and C. Zuo, "Adaptive denoising method for Fourier ptychographic microscopy," Optics Communications 404, 23–31 (2017)

    2017

  4. [11]

    Deep learning approach for Fourier ptychography microscopy,

    T. Nguyen, Y. Xue, Y. Li, L. Tian, and G. Nehmetallah, "Deep learning approach for Fourier ptychography microscopy," Opt. Express, OE 26(20), 26470–26484 (2018)

    2018

  5. [12]

    Fourier ptychographic microscopy image stack reconstruction using implicit neural representations,

    H. Zhou, B. Y. Feng, H. Guo, S. (Steven) Lin, M. Liang, C. A. Metzler, and C. Yang, "Fourier ptychographic microscopy image stack reconstruction using implicit neural representations," Optica, OPTICA 10(12), 1679–1687 (2023)

    2023

  6. [13]

    Computational illumination for high-speed in vitro Fourier ptychographic microscopy,

    L. Tian, Z. Liu, L.-H. Yeh, M. Chen, J. Zhong, and L. Waller, "Computational illumination for high-speed in vitro Fourier ptychographic microscopy," Optica, OPTICA 2(10), 904–911 (2015)

    2015

  7. [14]

    Wide-field Fourier ptychographic microscopy using laser illumination source,

    J. Chung, H. Lu, X. Ou, H. Zhou, and C. Yang, "Wide-field Fourier ptychographic microscopy using laser illumination source," Biomed. Opt. Express, BOE 7(11), 4787–4802 (2016)

    2016

  8. [15]

    High-speed Fourier ptychographic microscopy based on programmable annular illuminations,

    J. Sun, C. Zuo, J. Zhang, Y. Fan, and Q. Chen, "High-speed Fourier ptychographic microscopy based on programmable annular illuminations," Sci Rep 8(1), 7669 (2018)

    2018

  9. [16]

    Efficient positional misalignment correction method for Fourier ptychographic microscopy,

    J. Sun, Q. Chen, Y. Zhang, and C. Zuo, "Efficient positional misalignment correction method for Fourier ptychographic microscopy," Biomed. Opt. Express, BOE 7(4), 1336–1350 (2016)

    2016

  10. [17]

    System calibration method for Fourier ptychographic microscopy,

    A. Pan, Y. Zhang, T. Zhao, Z. Wang, D. Dan, M. Lei, and B. Yao, "System calibration method for Fourier ptychographic microscopy," JBO 22(9), 096005 (2017)

    2017

  11. [18]

    Fast and robust misalignment correction of Fourier ptychographic microscopy for full field of view reconstruction,

    A. Zhou, W. Wang, N. Chen, E. Y. Lam, B. Lee, and G. Situ, "Fast and robust misalignment correction of Fourier ptychographic microscopy for full field of view reconstruction," Opt. Express, OE 26(18), 23661– 23674 (2018)

    2018

  12. [19]

    Fourier Holo-Ptychographic Microscopy: A Hybrid Digital Holography-Fourier Ptychography Approach to Synthetic-Aperture Quantitative Phase Microscopy,

    Z. Li, Y. Shu, L. Lu, J. Sun, Q. Shen, P. Gao, P. Zdańkowski, M. Trusiak, M. Kujawinska, Q. Chen, and C. Zuo, "Fourier Holo-Ptychographic Microscopy: A Hybrid Digital Holography-Fourier Ptychography Approach to Synthetic-Aperture Quantitative Phase Microscopy," ACS Photonics (2025)

    2025

  13. [20]

    Quantitative differential phase contrast imaging in an LED array microscope,

    L. Tian and L. Waller, "Quantitative differential phase contrast imaging in an LED array microscope," Opt. Express, OE 23(9), 11394–11403 (2015)

    2015

  14. [21]

    Single-shot quantitative phase microscopy with color-multiplexed differential phase contrast (cDPC),

    Z. F. Phillips, M. Chen, and L. Waller, "Single-shot quantitative phase microscopy with color-multiplexed differential phase contrast (cDPC)," PLOS ONE 12(2), e0171228 (2017)

    2017

  15. [22]

    Deterministic phase retrieval: a Green’s function solution,

    M. R. Teague, "Deterministic phase retrieval: a Green’s function solution," J. Opt. Soc. Am., JOSA 73(11), 1434–1441 (1983)

    1983

  16. [23]

    Transport of Intensity phase-amplitude imaging with higher order intensity derivatives,

    L. Waller, L. Tian, and G. Barbastathis, "Transport of Intensity phase-amplitude imaging with higher order intensity derivatives," Opt. Express, OE 18(12), 12552–12561 (2010)

    2010

  17. [24]

    Transport of intensity equation: a tutorial,

    C. Zuo, J. Li, J. Sun, Y. Fan, J. Zhang, L. Lu, R. Zhang, B. Wang, L. Huang, and Q. Chen, "Transport of intensity equation: a tutorial," Optics and Lasers in Engineering 135, 106187 (2020)

    2020

  18. [25]

    Optimal illumination scheme for isotropic quantitative differential phase contrast microscopy,

    Y. Fan, J. Sun, Q. Chen, X. Pan, L. Tian, and C. Zuo, "Optimal illumination scheme for isotropic quantitative differential phase contrast microscopy," Photon. Res., PRJ 7(8), 890–904 (2019)

    2019

  19. [26]

    On a universal solution to the transport-of-intensity equation,

    J. Zhang, Q. Chen, J. Sun, L. Tian, and C. Zuo, "On a universal solution to the transport-of-intensity equation," Opt. Lett., OL 45(13), 3649–3652 (2020)

    2020

  20. [27]

    A new symmetrized solution for phase retrieval using the transport of intensity equation,

    V. V. Volkov, Y. Zhu, and M. De Graef, "A new symmetrized solution for phase retrieval using the transport of intensity equation," Micron 33(5), 411–416 (2002)

    2002

  21. [28]

    Optimum plane selection for transport-of-intensity- equation-based solvers,

    J. Martinez-Carranza, K. Falaggis, and T. Kozacki, "Optimum plane selection for transport-of-intensity- equation-based solvers," Appl. Opt., AO 53(30), 7050–7058 (2014)

    2014

  22. [29]

    Linear algorithms for phase retrieval in the Fresnel region,

    T. E. Gureyev, A. Pogany, D. M. Paganin, and S. W. Wilkins, "Linear algorithms for phase retrieval in the Fresnel region," Optics Communications 231(1), 53–70 (2004)

    2004

  23. [30]

    Optimum measurement criteria for the axial derivative intensity used in transport of intensity-equation-based solvers,

    J. Martinez-Carranza, K. Falaggis, and T. Kozacki, "Optimum measurement criteria for the axial derivative intensity used in transport of intensity-equation-based solvers," Opt. Lett., OL 39(2), 182–185 (2014)

    2014

  24. [31]

    Quantitative phase microscopy via optimized inversion of the phase optical transfer function,

    M. H. Jenkins and T. K. Gaylord, "Quantitative phase microscopy via optimized inversion of the phase optical transfer function," Appl. Opt., AO 54(28), 8566–8579 (2015)

    2015

  25. [32]

    Transport-of-intensity Fourier ptychographic diffraction tomography: defying the matched illumination condition,

    S. Zhou, J. Li, J. Sun, N. Zhou, H. Ullah, Z. Bai, Q. Chen, and C. Zuo, "Transport-of-intensity Fourier ptychographic diffraction tomography: defying the matched illumination condition," Optica, OPTICA 9(12), 1362–1373 (2022)

    2022

  26. [33]

    Multiplexed superresolution phase microscopy with transport of intensity equation,

    J. Á. Picazo-Bueno, L. Granero-Montagud, M. Sanz, J. García, and V. Micó, "Multiplexed superresolution phase microscopy with transport of intensity equation," Optics and Lasers in Engineering 166, 107601 (2023)

    2023

  27. [34]

    Optimal illumination pattern for transport-of-intensity quantitative phase microscopy,

    J. Li, Q. Chen, J. Sun, J. Zhang, X. Pan, and C. Zuo, "Optimal illumination pattern for transport-of-intensity quantitative phase microscopy," Opt. Express, OE 26(21), 27599–27614 (2018)

    2018

  28. [35]

    Hybrid brightfield and darkfield transport of intensity approach for high-throughput quantitative phase microscopy,

    L. Lu, J. Li, Y. Shu, J. Sun, J. Zhou, E. Y. Lam, Q. Chen, and C. Zuo, "Hybrid brightfield and darkfield transport of intensity approach for high-throughput quantitative phase microscopy," AP 4(5), 056002 (2022)

    2022

  29. [36]

    High-throughput transport-of- intensity quantitative phase imaging with aberration correction,

    L. Lu, S. Zhou, Y. Shu, Y. Jin, J. Sun, R. Ye, M. Trusiak, P. Gao, and C. Zuo, "High-throughput transport-of- intensity quantitative phase imaging with aberration correction," gxjzz 5(4), 532–541 (2025)

    2025

  30. [37]

    Method for estimating the axial intensity derivative in the TIE with higher order intensity derivatives and noise suppression,

    R. Bie, X.-H. Yuan, M. Zhao, and L. Zhang, "Method for estimating the axial intensity derivative in the TIE with higher order intensity derivatives and noise suppression," Opt. Express, OE 20(7), 8186–8191 (2012)

    2012

  31. [38]

    Multi-filter transport of intensity equation solver with equalized noise sensitivity,

    J. Martinez-Carranza, K. Falaggis, and T. Kozacki, "Multi-filter transport of intensity equation solver with equalized noise sensitivity," Opt. Express, OE 23(18), 23092–23107 (2015)

    2015

  32. [39]

    Quantitative phase-amplitude microscopy. III. The effects of noise,

    D. Paganin, A. Barty, P. J. McMahon, and K. A. Nugent, "Quantitative phase-amplitude microscopy. III. The effects of noise," Journal of Microscopy 214(1), 51–61 (2004)

    2004

  33. [40]

    Transport-of-intensity differential phase contrast imaging: defying weak object approximation and matched-illumination condition,

    J. Wang, X. Zhao, Y. Wang, and D. Li, "Transport-of-intensity differential phase contrast imaging: defying weak object approximation and matched-illumination condition," Photon. Res., PRJ 12(11), 2712–2725 (2024)

    2024

  34. [41]

    Dual-wavelength Fourier ptychography using a single LED,

    G.-J. Choi, J. Lim, S. Jeon, J. Cho, G. Lim, N.-C. Park, and Y.-P. Park, "Dual-wavelength Fourier ptychography using a single LED," Opt. Lett., OL 43(15), 3526–3529 (2018)

    2018

  35. [43]

    Multiplexed coded illumination for Fourier Ptychography with an LED array microscope,

    L. Tian, X. Li, K. Ramchandran, and L. Waller, "Multiplexed coded illumination for Fourier Ptychography with an LED array microscope," Biomed. Opt. Express, BOE 5(7), 2376–2389 (2014)

    2014

  36. [44]

    FPM app: an open-source MATLAB application for simple and intuitive Fourier ptychographic reconstruction,

    M. Rogalski, P. Zdańkowski, and M. Trusiak, "FPM app: an open-source MATLAB application for simple and intuitive Fourier ptychographic reconstruction," Bioinformatics 37(20), 3695–3696 (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    High-resolution transport-of-intensity quantitative phase microscopy with annular illumination,

    C. Zuo, J. Sun, J. Li, J. Zhang, A. Asundi, and Q. Chen, "High-resolution transport-of-intensity quantitative phase microscopy with annular illumination," Sci Rep 7(1), 7654 (2017)

    2017

  38. [46]

    Astrocyte- Secreted Lcn2 Modulates Dendritic Spine Morphology,

    M. Doliwa, B. Kuzniewska, K. Nader, P. Reniewicz, L. Kaczmarek, P. Michaluk, and K. Kalita, "Astrocyte- Secreted Lcn2 Modulates Dendritic Spine Morphology," Cells 14(3), 159 (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.