Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

GNNDelete: A General Strategy for Unlearning in Graph Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.13406 v1 pith:SFJ7J2KP submitted 2023-02-26 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords graphgnndeletemodeldeletedunlearningedgeedgeselements
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Graph unlearning, which involves deleting graph elements such as nodes, node labels, and relationships from a trained graph neural network (GNN) model, is crucial for real-world applications where data elements may become irrelevant, inaccurate, or privacy-sensitive. However, existing methods for graph unlearning either deteriorate model weights shared across all nodes or fail to effectively delete edges due to their strong dependence on local graph neighborhoods. To address these limitations, we introduce GNNDelete, a novel model-agnostic layer-wise operator that optimizes two critical properties, namely, Deleted Edge Consistency and Neighborhood Influence, for graph unlearning. Deleted Edge Consistency ensures that the influence of deleted elements is removed from both model weights and neighboring representations, while Neighborhood Influence guarantees that the remaining model knowledge is preserved after deletion. GNNDelete updates representations to delete nodes and edges from the model while retaining the rest of the learned knowledge. We conduct experiments on seven real-world graphs, showing that GNNDelete outperforms existing approaches by up to 38.8% (AUC) on edge, node, and node feature deletion tasks, and 32.2% on distinguishing deleted edges from non-deleted ones. Additionally, GNNDelete is efficient, taking 12.3x less time and 9.3x less space than retraining GNN from scratch on WordNet18.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MOON: Multi-Objective OrthoNormalized Updates for Multitask Learning

    cs.LG 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    MOON applies spectral-nuclear-norm geometry to multi-objective gradient manipulation and uses polar-factor updates, with O(T^-1/2) deterministic and O(T^-1/4) stochastic convergence to Pareto stationarity.

  2. Enabling Group Fairness in Graph Unlearning via Bi-level Debiasing

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    FGU is a shard-based graph unlearning framework with a local fairness regularizer plus a global disparity alignment step, reporting lower demographic parity and equal opportunity gaps than existing graph unlearning baselines.

Pith tools