pith. sign in

arxiv: 1607.00292 · v1 · pith:SL5ZIOUXnew · submitted 2016-07-01 · 🧮 math.ST · stat.TH

Bayes factor consistency

classification 🧮 math.ST stat.TH
keywords bayesconsistencyfactormodelposteriorcomparisondensitieslikelihoods
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Good large sample performance is typically a minimum requirement of any model selection criterion. This article focuses on the consistency property of the Bayes factor, a commonly used model comparison tool, which has experienced a recent surge of attention in the literature. We thoroughly review existing results. As there exists such a wide variety of settings to be considered, e.g. parametric vs. nonparametric, nested vs. non-nested, etc., we adopt the view that a unified framework has didactic value. Using the basic marginal likelihood identity of Chib (1995), we study Bayes factor asymptotics by decomposing the natural logarithm of the ratio of marginal likelihoods into three components. These are, respectively, log ratios of likelihoods, prior densities, and posterior densities. This yields an interpretation of the log ratio of posteriors as a penalty term, and emphasizes that to understand Bayes factor consistency, the prior support conditions driving posterior consistency in each respective model under comparison should be contrasted in terms of the rates of posterior contraction they imply.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. From Evidence to Evident: Decisive Cosmological Evidence for the Normal Neutrino Mass Hierarchy

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DESI DR2 data constrain the neutrino mass sum below the inverted hierarchy minimum, yielding Bayes factor K>460 for normal hierarchy in standard cosmology.