pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.02943 · v1 · pith:SL7UZXP7new · submitted 2026-06-01 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th· quant-ph

Testing the {rm ER=EPR} conjecture with entangled photons

Kimet Jusufi , Francisco S.N. Lobo , Douglas Singleton This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 13:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-thquant-ph
keywords ER=EPR conjectureEinstein-Rosen wormholeentangled photonsgravitational self-energyAichelburg-Sexl metricentanglement entropyshock-wave geometry
0
0 comments X

The pith

Regularized Aichelburg-Sexl metric for photons produces zero-throat ER wormhole connecting entangled pairs, with self-energy emerging only after separation and scaling as 1/L.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that smearing the point source in the Aichelburg-Sexl shock-wave metric over a string-inspired length l0 yields a singularity-free potential whose transverse geometry, after coordinate change, is a zero-throat Einstein-Rosen wormhole. This supplies an explicit geometric realization of the ER=EPR conjecture for entangled photons. The gravitational self-energy of a transversely separated pair is suppressed by the photon's longitudinal extent L, taking the form 4G(ℏω)^2/(c^4 L) ln(d^2/l0^2), and appears only after the photons move apart from their coincident creation point in e+ e- annihilation. An entanglement-entropy calculation in the shock-wave geometry, using an effective temperature k_B T_ent ~ ℏc/(2πL), recovers identical scaling and normalization. For optical photons the implied gravity-induced collapse time exceeds 10^30 years.

Core claim

By smearing the point-like source over the string-inspired length scale l0, the Aichelburg-Sexl metric becomes singularity-free and its transverse section is a zero-throat Einstein-Rosen wormhole. The gravitational self-energy depends on the photon's longitudinal extent L (wavelength) and is suppressed by 1/L for transversely separated pairs, giving E^GSE ~ 4G(ℏω)^2/(c^4 L) ln(d^2/l0^2). For the coincident back-to-back pair created in e+ e- → 2γ the wormhole carries no additional binding energy; the logarithmic interaction energy emerges only after the entangled photons separate to distance d. Computing the entanglement entropy of null intervals and introducing an effective entanglement temp

What carries the argument

Regularized Aichelburg-Sexl shock-wave metric smeared over length l0, whose transverse geometry after coordinate transformation is a zero-throat Einstein-Rosen wormhole connecting the entangled photons.

If this is right

  • The wormhole carries no extra binding energy while the photons remain coincident at creation.
  • The logarithmic gravitational interaction energy appears only after the photons separate to distance d and stretch the bridge.
  • Entanglement entropy of null intervals with effective temperature proportional to 1/L reproduces the gravitational self-energy scaling.
  • For optical photons the gravity-induced collapse time exceeds 10^30 years, rendering isolated photons immune.
  • The construction supplies a concrete model for testing the ER=EPR conjecture with photon pairs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 1/L suppression holds, gravitational effects on photon entanglement remain unobservably small in ordinary laboratory conditions.
  • The same regularization approach could be applied to other massless entangled quanta to predict when ER bridges become energetically relevant.
  • Higher-frequency photons would exhibit stronger gravitational binding, suggesting a possible regime where quantum-gravity corrections to entanglement become measurable.
  • The zero-throat geometry may impose specific constraints on photon interference or propagation that differ from flat-space predictions.

Load-bearing premise

Smearing the point-like source over the string-inspired length scale l0 yields a singularity-free gravitational potential whose transverse geometry after coordinate transformation is a zero-throat Einstein-Rosen wormhole.

What would settle it

Measurement of the interaction energy between separated entangled photons showing either no 1/L suppression with wavelength or absence of the logarithmic dependence on separation d.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.02943 by Douglas Singleton, Francisco S.N. Lobo, Kimet Jusufi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. An entangled [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We regularize the Aichelburg-Sexl shock-wave metric for massless particles by smearing the point-like source over a string-inspired length scale $l_0$, obtaining a singularity-free gravitational potential. A coordinate transformation reveals that the transverse geometry is a zero-throat Einstein-Rosen wormhole, providing an explicit geometric realization of the ER=EPR conjecture for entangled photons. Crucially, we show that the gravitational self-energy depends on the photon's longitudinal extent $L$ (its wavelength) and, for a transversely separated photon pair, is suppressed by a factor $1/L$, giving $E^{\rm GSE}\sim 4G(\hbar\omega)^2/(c^4 L)\ln(d^2/l_0^2)$. For the coincident back-to-back pair created in $e^{+} e^{-}\to2\gamma$, the wormhole carries no additional binding energy; the logarithmic interaction energy emerges only after the entangled photons separate to a distance $d$, stretching the ER bridge. We further provide an entanglement-entropy interpretation: by computing the entanglement entropy of null intervals in the shock-wave geometry and introducing an effective entanglement temperature $k_B T_{\rm ent}\sim\hbar c/(2\pi L)$, we recover the same scaling and normalization of the gravitational self-energy. For optical photons the corresponding collapse time exceeds $10^{30}$ years, making isolated photons immune to gravity-induced wave-function collapse. These findings establish a rigorous playground for testing ER=EPR and reveal a deep suppression of quantum-gravity effects for ultra-relativistic quanta.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to regularize the Aichelburg-Sexl shock-wave metric for massless particles by smearing the point source over a string-inspired length l_0, after which a coordinate transformation shows the transverse geometry to be a zero-throat Einstein-Rosen wormhole that realizes the ER=EPR conjecture for entangled photons. It derives a gravitational self-energy E^GSE ∼ 4G(ℏω)^2/(c^4 L) ln(d^2/l_0^2) that depends on the photon's longitudinal extent L (its wavelength), vanishes for coincident back-to-back pairs, and appears only after transverse separation d stretches the bridge; this is matched to an entanglement-entropy calculation via an effective temperature k_B T_ent ∼ ℏc/(2π L), yielding collapse times >10^30 years for optical photons.

Significance. If the regularization and coordinate change produce a genuine ER bridge and the entropy matching is independent of the GSE formula, the work would supply an explicit, quantitative geometric model for ER=EPR in photonic systems together with a concrete suppression factor 1/L and a falsifiable prediction for gravity-induced decoherence. The attempt to equate GSE directly with entanglement entropy of null intervals is a constructive step toward making the conjecture testable in the laboratory.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / GSE derivation] Abstract (GSE formula): The reported expression E^GSE ∼ 4G(ℏω)^2/(c^4 L) ln(d^2/l_0^2) depends explicitly on the two introduced scales l_0 and L; the effective temperature T_ent is defined so as to recover the identical scaling and normalization, indicating that the entanglement-entropy interpretation is constructed to match the GSE rather than derived independently.
  2. [Abstract / coordinate transformation] Abstract (coordinate transformation): The central claim that smearing the null Aichelburg-Sexl source over l_0 followed by a coordinate transformation produces a zero-throat Einstein-Rosen wormhole requires explicit verification (e.g., curvature invariants, minimal-surface condition, or asymptotic matching to the standard ER bridge); without such checks the geometry may remain a local regularization artifact of the pp-wave rather than a genuine connecting bridge.
  3. [Abstract / entanglement-entropy interpretation] Abstract (entanglement entropy): The matching of entanglement entropy of null intervals in the shock-wave geometry to the GSE via the introduced T_ent presupposes the same functional dependence on d, L and l_0; an independent entropy calculation performed without reference to the GSE result is needed to establish that the agreement is not tautological.
minor comments (2)
  1. The symbol ∼ is used repeatedly without stating the regime of validity or the neglected higher-order terms; explicit error estimates would improve clarity.
  2. The identification of L with the photon wavelength and the physical meaning of the transverse separation d should be defined at first use in the main text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough and constructive report. We address each major comment below. Where the comments identify opportunities for added rigor or clarity, we will revise the manuscript accordingly while maintaining that the core derivations are independent and the geometric identification is valid.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / GSE derivation] Abstract (GSE formula): The reported expression E^GSE ∼ 4G(ℏω)^2/(c^4 L) ln(d^2/l_0^2) depends explicitly on the two introduced scales l_0 and L; the effective temperature T_ent is defined so as to recover the identical scaling and normalization, indicating that the entanglement-entropy interpretation is constructed to match the GSE rather than derived independently.

    Authors: The scales are physically distinct: l_0 is the fixed string-inspired regulator for the source, while L is the independently measured longitudinal extent set by the photon's wavelength. The GSE is obtained by direct integration of the regularized stress-energy after the coordinate change. The entanglement entropy is computed separately via the replica method applied to null intervals in the same geometry; T_ent is then identified as the characteristic scale ℏc/(2πL) arising from that geometry. The numerical match is a consistency check. We will revise the abstract and insert an explicit subsection that presents the entropy calculation first, before any reference to the GSE expression, to make the logical order unambiguous. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract / coordinate transformation] Abstract (coordinate transformation): The central claim that smearing the null Aichelburg-Sexl source over l_0 followed by a coordinate transformation produces a zero-throat Einstein-Rosen wormhole requires explicit verification (e.g., curvature invariants, minimal-surface condition, or asymptotic matching to the standard ER bridge); without such checks the geometry may remain a local regularization artifact of the pp-wave rather than a genuine connecting bridge.

    Authors: The manuscript already performs the smearing and the coordinate transformation that yields the standard ER form with vanishing throat radius. To meet the referee's request for explicit verification we will add, in the revised version, the computation of the Ricci scalar and Kretschmann invariant in the new coordinates, confirmation that the throat is a minimal surface, and explicit asymptotic matching to the classic Einstein-Rosen bridge. These additions will establish that the geometry is a genuine bridge. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract / entanglement-entropy interpretation] Abstract (entanglement entropy): The matching of entanglement entropy of null intervals in the shock-wave geometry to the GSE via the introduced T_ent presupposes the same functional dependence on d, L and l_0; an independent entropy calculation performed without reference to the GSE result is needed to establish that the agreement is not tautological.

    Authors: The entropy calculation begins from the definition of entanglement entropy for null intervals in the regularized shock-wave metric, using the replica trick on the transverse geometry; this step makes no reference to the GSE formula. Only after the entropy expression is obtained do we introduce the effective temperature scale T_ent ∼ ℏc/(2πL) and observe the match. We will expand the relevant section to display the full, self-contained entropy derivation prior to the matching step. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Effective entanglement temperature introduced to recover GSE scaling by construction

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [abstract]
    "by computing the entanglement entropy of null intervals in the shock-wave geometry and introducing an effective entanglement temperature k_B T_ent∼ℏc/(2π L), we recover the same scaling and normalization of the gravitational self-energy"

    T_ent is introduced expressly to make the entropy calculation reproduce the GSE result already derived from the regularized metric; the agreement is therefore definitional rather than a prediction.

full rationale

The GSE expression is obtained after smearing over l0 and coordinate change to ER wormhole geometry. The entanglement-entropy section then defines T_ent specifically so that S_ent * T_ent reproduces the identical GSE scaling and normalization. This match is therefore forced by the definition of T_ent rather than emerging independently. The l0 regularization and L identification are inputs that appear directly in the final log term. No other load-bearing self-citation or ansatz smuggling is evident from the provided text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 3 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on introducing l0 as a regulator and assuming the resulting geometry is an ER wormhole; L is identified with wavelength without independent derivation.

free parameters (2)
  • l_0
    String-inspired length scale chosen to smear the point source and remove the singularity.
  • L
    Longitudinal extent of the photon, set equal to its wavelength to obtain the 1/L suppression.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption The Aichelburg-Sexl shock-wave metric admits a regularization by smearing the source that yields a well-defined potential.
    Invoked to obtain the singularity-free geometry.
  • domain assumption A coordinate transformation exists that maps the regularized transverse geometry to a zero-throat Einstein-Rosen wormhole.
    Central step realizing ER=EPR.
  • ad hoc to paper Entanglement entropy of null intervals in the shock-wave geometry can be computed and matched to gravitational self-energy via an effective temperature.
    Used to recover the same scaling.
invented entities (1)
  • zero-throat Einstein-Rosen wormhole for entangled photons no independent evidence
    purpose: Geometric realization of the ER=EPR conjecture
    Constructed via regularization and coordinate change; no independent falsifiable evidence supplied.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5819 in / 1872 out tokens · 49220 ms · 2026-06-28T13:06:14.116976+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    emerges only after the entangled photons separate to a trans- verse distanced, stretching the ER bridge. In this sepa- rated regime, the binding energy of the wormhole trans- lates into a calculable entanglement deficit: while perfect symmetry preserves the Tsirelson bound, any asymmetry introduces a geometric imperfection in the correlations, making ER=E...

  2. [2]

    (21) InsertingL= 2πc/ωgives the explicit frequency scaling τcollapse ∼ π c5 2Gℏω 3 ln(d2/l2

  3. [3]

    zero-throat

    (22) For an optical photon (ℏω≈2.5 eV≈4×10 −19 J), laboratory separationd∼1 m, andl 0 near the Planck scale (∼10 −35 m), the large logarithm is overpowered by the tiny (ℏω) 3 and the enormousc 5/G, yieldingτ collapse on the order of 1030–1040 years or longer—vastly exceed- ing the age of the universe (∼1.4×10 10 yr). Thus, isolated photons are effectively...

  4. [4]

    When the longitudinal extentLof the wave packet is identified with the affine parameter inter- val (∆u∼L, ∆v∼L), one obtains an expression that scales as∼log[(L 2 +L|Φ(d)|)/l 2 0]

    into the entropy formula. When the longitudinal extentLof the wave packet is identified with the affine parameter inter- val (∆u∼L, ∆v∼L), one obtains an expression that scales as∼log[(L 2 +L|Φ(d)|)/l 2 0]. This scaling features the same combination of scales, the photon separationd, the packet lengthL, and the minimal lengthl 0, that appears in the gravi...

  5. [5]

    is also common to both quantities. The entanglement entropy thus serves as an independent probe of the geometry, reinforcing the idea that the ER bridge carries an information-theoretic cost that mirrors its gravitational binding energy. B. Back-to-Back Entangled Photon Pair The standard Aichelburg–Sexl geometry describes a single null particle propagatin...

    work page doi:10.54499/uid/04434/2025 2025

  6. [6]

    Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem,

    E. Schr¨ odinger, “Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem,” Annalen Phys.384(1926) no.4, 361-376

    1926

  7. [7]

    A Universal Master Equation for the Gravita- tional Violation of Quantum Mechanics,

    L. Diosi, “A Universal Master Equation for the Gravita- tional Violation of Quantum Mechanics,” Phys. Lett. A 120(1987), 377

    1987

  8. [8]

    Gravitation and quantummechanical localiza- tion of macroobjects,

    L. Di´ osi, “Gravitation and quantummechanical localiza- tion of macroobjects,” Phys. Lett. A105(1984), 199-202 [arXiv:1412.0201 [quant-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1984

  9. [9]

    On gravity’s role in quantum state reduc- tion,

    R. Penrose, “On gravity’s role in quantum state reduc- tion,” Gen. Rel. Grav.28(1996), 581-600

    1996

  10. [10]

    Quantum computation, entanglement and state reduction,

    R. Penrose, “Quantum computation, entanglement and state reduction,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A356 (1998), 1927-1938

    1998

  11. [11]

    Gravity induced wave function collapse,

    G. Gasbarri, S. Donadi, A. Bassi and M. Toroˇ s, “Gravity induced wave function collapse,” Phys. Rev. D96(2017) no.10, 104013 [arXiv:1701.02236 [quant-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  12. [12]

    Gravitationally-induced wave function collapse time for molecules,

    A. A. Tomaz, R. S. Mattos and M. Barbatti, “Gravitationally-induced wave function collapse time for molecules,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.26(2024) no.31, 20785-20798

    2024

  13. [13]

    Massive quantum systems as in- terfaces of quantum mechanics and gravity,

    S. Bose, I. Fuentes, A. A. Geraci, S. M. Khan, S. Qvar- fort, M. Rademacher, M. Rashid, M. Toroˇ s, H. Ulbricht and C. C. Wanjura, “Massive quantum systems as in- terfaces of quantum mechanics and gravity,” Rev. Mod. Phys.97(2025) no.1, 015003 [arXiv:2311.09218 [quant- ph]]

    arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Di´ osi-Penrose model of classical gravity predicts gravitationally induced entan- glement,

    D. Trillo and M. Navascu´ es, “Di´ osi-Penrose model of classical gravity predicts gravitationally induced entan- glement,” Phys. Rev. D111(2025) no.12, L121101 [arXiv:2411.02287 [quant-ph]]

    arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Towards relativis- tic generalization of collapse models,

    A. Gundhi, L. Di´ osi and M. Carlesso, “Towards relativis- tic generalization of collapse models,” [arXiv:2507.06954 [quant-ph]]

    arXiv

  16. [16]

    Schr¨ odinger–Newton Equation with Sponta- neous Wave Function Collapse,

    L. Di´ osi, “Schr¨ odinger–Newton Equation with Sponta- neous Wave Function Collapse,” Quantum Rep.4(2022) no.4, 566-573 [arXiv:2210.15057 [quant-ph]]

    arXiv 2022

  17. [17]

    Underground test of gravity-related wave function collapse,

    S. Donadi, K. Piscicchia, C. Curceanu, L. Di´ osi, M. Laubenstein and A. Bassi, “Underground test of gravity-related wave function collapse,” Nature Phys.17 (2021) no.1, 74-78 [arXiv:2111.13490 [quant-ph]]

    arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    How Gravity Can Explain the Collapse of the Wavefunction,

    S. Hossenfelder, “How Gravity Can Explain the Collapse of the Wavefunction,” [arXiv:2510.11037 [quant-ph]]

    arXiv

  19. [19]

    On the Gravitization of Quantum Mechan- ics 1: Quantum State Reduction,

    R. Penrose, “On the Gravitization of Quantum Mechan- ics 1: Quantum State Reduction,” Found. Phys.44 (2014), 557-575

    2014

  20. [20]

    Exploring the uni- fication of quantum theory and general relativity with a Bose–Einstein condensate,

    R. Howl, R. Penrose and I. Fuentes, “Exploring the uni- fication of quantum theory and general relativity with a Bose–Einstein condensate,” New J. Phys.21(2019) no.4, 043047 [arXiv:1812.04630 [quant-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  21. [21]

    Duality in Statistical Mechanics and String Theory,

    B. Sathiapalan, “Duality in Statistical Mechanics and String Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett.58(1987), 1597

    1987

  22. [22]

    Duality and zero point length of space-time,

    T. Padmanabhan, “Duality and zero point length of space-time,” Phys. Rev. Lett.78(1997), 1854-1857 [arXiv:hep-th/9608182 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  23. [23]

    String theory T duality and the zero point length of space-time,

    A. Smailagic, E. Spallucci and T. Padmanabhan, “String theory T duality and the zero point length of space-time,” [arXiv:hep-th/0308122 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    Zero- point length from string fluctuations,

    M. Fontanini, E. Spallucci and T. Padmanabhan, “Zero- point length from string fluctuations,” Phys. Lett. B633 (2006), 627-630 [arXiv:hep-th/0509090 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  25. [25]

    Quantum gravity and the zero point length,

    P. Nicolini, “Quantum gravity and the zero point length,” Gen. Rel. Grav.54(2022) no.9, 106 [arXiv:2208.05390 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    Quan- tum Corrected Black Holes from String T-Duality,

    P. Nicolini, E. Spallucci and M. F. Wondrak, “Quan- tum Corrected Black Holes from String T-Duality,” Phys. Lett. B797(2019), 134888 [arXiv:1902.11242 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2019

  27. [27]

    Geodesic completeness from string T-duality,

    K. Jusufi and P. Nicolini, “Geodesic completeness from string T-duality,” Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) no.11, 1291 [arXiv:2410.19613 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Regular black holes with gravitational self-energy as dark matter,

    K. Jusufi and D. Singleton, “Regular black holes with gravitational self-energy as dark matter,” Eur. Phys. J. C86(2026) no.5, 530 [arXiv:2509.13335 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  29. [29]

    Emergence of ER = EPR from non-local grav- itational energy,

    K. Jusufi, F. S. N. Lobo, E. N. Saridakis and D. Sin- gleton, “Emergence of ER = EPR from non-local grav- itational energy,” Eur. Phys. J. C86(2026) no.3, 249 [arXiv:2512.05022 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2026

  30. [30]

    Spon- taneous wave function collapse from non-local gravita- tional self-energy,

    K. Jusufi, D. Singleton and F. S. N. Lobo, “Spon- taneous wave function collapse from non-local gravita- tional self-energy,” Phys. Lett. B877(2026), 140475 [arXiv:2512.15393 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  31. [31]

    Testing Wormhole- Mediated Entanglement with Hydrogen,

    I. Javed and E. Wilson-Ewing, “Testing Wormhole- Mediated Entanglement with Hydrogen,” Phys. Rev. Lett.136(2026) no.12, 121501 [arXiv:2512.02156 [quant- ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  32. [32]

    On the Gravitational field of a massless particle,

    P. C. Aichelburg and R. U. Sexl, “On the Gravitational field of a massless particle,” Gen. Rel. Grav.2(1971), 303-312

    1971

  33. [33]

    Cool horizons for en- 10 tangled black holes,

    J. Maldacena and L. Susskind, “Cool horizons for en- 10 tangled black holes,” Fortsch. Phys.61(2013), 781-811 [arXiv:1306.0533 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  34. [34]

    Testing theER=EPRconjecture,

    D. C. Dai, D. Minic, D. Stojkovic and C. Fu, “Testing theER=EPRconjecture,” Phys. Rev. D102(2020) no.6, 066004 [arXiv:2002.08178 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2020

  35. [35]

    Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory,

    P. Calabrese and J. L. Cardy, “Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory,” J. Stat. Mech.0406(2004), P06002 [arXiv:hep-th/0405152 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  36. [36]

    Entanglement Entropy and Quantum Field Theory: a Non-technical Intro- duction,

    P. Calabrese and J. L. Cardy, “Entanglement Entropy and Quantum Field Theory: a Non-technical Intro- duction,” Int. J. Quant. Inf.04(2006) no.03, 429-438 [arXiv:quant-ph/0505193 [quant-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  37. [37]

    Gravity from Quantum Information,

    J. W. Lee, H. C. Kim and J. Lee, “Gravity from Quantum Information,” J. Korean Phys. Soc.63(2013), 1094-1098 [arXiv:1001.5445 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2013

  38. [38]

    Holographic Dark Energy and Quantum Entanglement,

    J. W. Lee, H. C. Kim and J. Lee, “Holographic Dark Energy and Quantum Entanglement,” J. Korean Phys. Soc.74(2019) no.1, 1-11 [arXiv:1812.01993 [gr-qc]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019