Carrollian Lie Algebroids: Taming Singular Carrollian Geometries

Andrew James Bruce

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Carrollian Lie Algebroids: Taming Singular Carrollian Geometries

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read By encoding singular Carrollian geometries as Lie algebroids, the paper proves that compatible connections always exist on them, so every weak Carrollian manifold can be made strong.

desk verdict Carrollian Lie algebroids are a genuine, well-motivated framework for singular Carroll geometries; the headline existence theorem for Carrollian connections has a fixable proof gap but the framework itself is sound and worth engaging. read the letter →

arxiv 2510.03877 v4 pith:SMJ5BL6V submitted 2025-10-04 math.DG gr-qchep-thmath-phmath.MP

Andrew James Bruce This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.DGgr-qchep-thmath-phmath.MP MSC 53B0553D1753Z0583D05

keywords CarrolliangeometryLiealgebroidsdegeneratemetricssingulardistributionsStefan-SussmannfoliationsconnectionsAtiyahgravity

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Carrollian geometry describes spacetimes where light cones collapse to lines, but standard versions require the Carroll vector field to be nowhere vanishing. This paper argues that singular Carrollian geometries, where that field can vanish, are best handled by working on a Lie algebroid rather than on the manifold itself: the kernel of the degenerate metric is a trivial line bundle L, and the Carroll distribution is the image of L under the anchor map. That distribution is generally a singular Stefan-Sussmann foliation, so the null direction can collapse to rank zero while the metric and its kernel remain perfectly regular. The central result is that every Carrollian Lie algebroid admits a Carrollian connection preserving both the degenerate metric and L; as a consequence, every weak Carrollian manifold can be equipped with a compatible affine connection and upgraded to a strong Carrollian manifold. The paper also gives concrete singular examples from invariant structures on principal bundles and from mixed null-spacelike hypersurfaces, and it characterizes when torsion-free Carrollian connections exist.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Carrollian Lie algebroid (A,[-,-],rho,g,L): a Lie algebroid whose degenerate metric g has the sections of a trivial line subbundle L as its kernel. The anchor map is the mechanism that creates singularities, because the Carroll distribution C = rho(L) can have rank 1 or 0 depending on whether the anchor annihilates L at a point. The existence proofs for connections work by taking any Lie algebroid connection and adding a correction (1,2)-tensor Gamma; metric compatibility becomes a linear equation in Gamma that the paper argues is underdetermined, since components of Gamma lying in the kernel of g are unconstrained. The quotient bundle A/L with its induced non-degen

What would settle it

Take a concrete Carrollian Lie algebroid with a rank drop, such as the action example in Example 2.35, choose an arbitrary connection, and try to solve g(Gamma(u,v),w) + g(v,Gamma(u,w)) = (nabla^0_u g)(v,w). If at some point the right-hand side fails to satisfy the kernel and symmetry identities that the left-hand side satisfies automatically, no solution exists and the claimed existence result is false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

A Carrollian Lie algebroid is a quintuple (A,[-,-],rho,g,L) in which A is a Lie algebroid over M, g is a degenerate metric whose kernel is exactly the sections of a trivial line bundle L, and the anchor map rho sends L to the Carroll distribution C = rho(L) subset TM. The paper's claim is that this is the right home for singular Carrollian geometry: the singular behaviour lives in the anchor, so C can be a Stefan-Sussmann distribution jumping between rank 1 and rank 0, while ker(g) stays a line bundle and the quotient A/L inherits a non-degenerate metric. The main theorems assert that (i) every Carrollian Lie algebroid admits a Carrollian connection, meaning a Lie algebroid connection that i

Load-bearing premise

The existence theorems rest on the assertion in Section 2.5 that the linear equations for the correction tensor are underdetermined and therefore always solvable; the paper does not verify the consistency conditions that such solvability requires.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Singular Carrollian geometries, where the Carroll vector field vanishes on a locus, fit in the same formalism as ordinary Carrollian manifolds, so the singular points do not need to be treated as exceptions.
Every Carrollian Lie algebroid carries Carrollian connections, so parallel transport, geodesics, and matter couplings that respect both the degenerate metric and the null line bundle are always available.
Any weak Carrollian manifold can be made strong: a compatible affine connection always exists, and one can arrange for the Carroll vector field to be parallel.
Torsion-free Carrollian connections exist exactly on stationary Carrollian Lie algebroids; on non-stationary ones, one must choose between compatibility and torsion-freeness.
The framework covers concrete singular examples, including Carrollian Atiyah algebroids built from invariant structures on principal bundles and models constructed from mixed null-spacelike hypersurfaces.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the linear-algebra step in the proof of Proposition 2.49 can be made fully rigorous, the same underdetermination mechanism would likely apply to other degenerate-metric settings, including Galilean analogues obtained by Carroll/Galilei duality.
The large freedom in Carrollian connections is a resource: additional physical principles, such as minimal torsion or prescribed parallel transport, could select preferred connections on Carrollian Lie algebroids in the way the Levi-Civita condition selects one on a Riemannian manifold.
A direct test of the main theorem would be to solve the compatibility equations explicitly for one of the paper's own examples, such as the gl2(R) action Lie algebroid, at points where the Carroll distribution has rank 0; a single inconsistent system would falsify the existence claim.
The singular-foliation picture suggests that Carrollian singularities are rank-drops of the anchor rather than defects of the metric, which may give a geometric way to define and study Carrollian black-hole-type horizons.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

You should read this one. The core definition — Carrollian Lie algebroid (Def 2.15) as a Lie algebroid with a degenerate metric whose kernel is a trivial line subalgebroid, plus the Carroll distribution C := rho(L) as a singular Stefan–Sussmann distribution — is genuinely new and directly answers Ecker et al.'s question about singular Carroll vector fields. The Atiyah algebroid example (§2.3) is a nice payoff: invariant Carroll structures on principal bundles naturally produce singular Carroll distributions. The paper is honest, mostly careful, and the surrounding literature is well covered. The dictionary table in the introduction is a good idea.

The soft spots are real but localized. (1) The existence proofs (Prop 2.49, Thm 2.52, Cor 2.58) rest on "the system is underdetermined, so a solution exists." That is not valid as stated. An inhomogeneous linear system needs the RHS in the image of the adjoint map. The stress-test note gives the missing consistency check and a direct construction via a splitting A ≈ E ⊕ L — the check does go through, so the theorem is probably true, but the proof as written is incomplete. That is the main thing to fix. (2) Prop 2.55 contains a sign error in the displayed identity (2.9): metric compatibility plus torsion-free should give L_u g = -g(T(u,v),w)?? Actually with ∇g=0 and T=0 you get L_u g(v,w) = -g(∇_v u, w) - g(v, ∇_w u). But the displayed identity (2.9) appears to have signs off when compared with the standard identity L_u g = ∇_u g + ... — the paper writes a plus g(T(u,v),w)+..., and even if the final conclusion survives, the displayed equation is wrong. Minor, but worth flagging. (3) The mixed null-spacelike hypersurface example (§2.4) is presented with assumptions the author himself calls "very restrictive and rare," and the TΣ ≃ A_0 ⊕ L identification is asserted without real justification. The author is upfront about this, which helps, but the example is thin. (4) The TΣ ≃ A_0 ⊕ L bit also feeds into the ``minimal model'' — the physical content is really just the singular distribution generated by κ, and the rest is scaffolding. That is fine as a remark, but it weakens the example.

Overall: the central idea is right, the definitions are clean, and the connection theory — once the gap is patched — holds. I would send this to a referee who knows both Lie algebroids and Carrollian geometry, not to a generic DG referee. The author's self-assessment that Cor 2.58 is "undoubtedly known to experts" is plausible and he says so. No circularity issues. Cite it if you work on Carrollian geometry or singular distributions.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces Carrollian Lie algebroids as a framework for handling singular Carrollian geometries. A Carrollian Lie algebroid is a Lie algebroid (A,[−,−],ρ) over M with a degenerate metric g and a trivial line subbundle L such that ker(g)=Sec(L); the Carroll distribution C=ρ(L)⊂TM is allowed to be a singular Stefan–Sussmann distribution. The paper develops basic properties (L is a Lie subalgebroid; E=A/L carries a non-degenerate induced metric), gives examples including Carrollian tangent algebroids, action Lie algebroids, Atiyah algebroids, and a minimal model for mixed null-spacelike hypersurfaces, and then studies compatible connections. The main results are Theorem 2.52 (every Carrollian Lie algebroid admits a Carrollian connection) and Corollary 2.58 (every weak Carrollian manifold can be made strong); Theorem 2.57 characterizes torsion-free Carrollian connections by stationarity.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper provides a natural mathematical home for singular Carroll vector fields that arise in Carrollian gravity and holography, and it establishes the foundational connection theory for such geometries. The framework is firmly anchored to standard Carrollian geometry via Example 2.30, and the connection statements are consistent with independent manifold-level results in [8,29,43]. The paper is clearly structured and contains many worked examples, including the physically motivated Atiyah algebroid and mixed-hypersurface constructions. The central existence theorem is plausible and, as far as the referee can determine, actually true; however, its proof as written omits a nontrivial consistency check, and one of the general examples (Example 2.36) is not a Lie algebroid as stated. Both issues are fixable but require substantive revision.

major comments (2)

[§2.5, Prop 2.49 and Thm 2.52] The proof of Prop 2.49 asserts that the metric-compatibility equations are solvable because the linear system is 'underdetermined'. This is not a valid inference by itself: one must verify that the right-hand side B_u(v,w)=(∇0_u g)(v,w) lies in the image of the map Γ↦g(Γ(v),w)+g(v,Γ(w)) for each u. Equivalently, B_u must vanish when both arguments are in Sec(L). The paper does not show this. The check is true — if σ,τ∈Sec(L), then g(σ,τ)=0 and all pairings with elements of ker(g) vanish, so B_u(σ,τ)=0 — but it must be stated. Since Thm 2.52 and Cor 2.58 rest on Prop 2.49, the proof of the paper's headline result is incomplete as written. I recommend adding the consistency check explicitly, or replacing the argument with an explicit construction using a splitting A≅E⊕L (for example, πΓ(u,σ)=−π∇0_uσ and πΓ(u,e)=½B_u^#e for e∈E). Prop 2.56 has the same kind of compressed solvability asserti
[§2.3, Example 2.36 (and Ex. 2.38)] The direct sum bracket defined in Example 2.36, with cross-brackets set to zero, is not a Lie algebroid bracket for a general Riemannian Lie algebroid A0. Indeed, for u∈Sec(A0), ψ∈Sec(L), and f∈C∞(M), the Leibniz rule requires [u, fψ]=ρ_u(f)ψ+f[u,ψ]; with [u,ψ]=0 this reduces to ρ_u(f)ψ=0, which is false unless the anchor of A0 is zero on L. Thus the structure is invalid for A0=TM in Example 2.38 (spacetimes). The construction in §2.4 avoids the issue because A0 is given zero anchor and zero bracket, but the general claim in Example 2.36 needs either a zero-anchor assumption or a genuine semidirect product with a representation of A0 on L. This is load-bearing for the paper's catalogue of examples, though not for Theorem 2.52.

minor comments (5)

[§2.2, Prop 2.28 proof] The text 'C:=A/L' should read 'C:=ρ(L)'; the Carroll distribution is defined in Definition 2.24 as ρ(L).
[§2.1, Def 2.3] The kernel ker(g) is defined as a set of sections of E, but the bundle E has not been introduced at that point; it should be Sec(A).
[§2.4] The phrase 'κ∈Sec(L)' is imprecise: κ is a vector field on Σ that defines the anchor of L (via ρ_ψ=ψκ), not literally a section of the abstract trivial line bundle L→Σ.
[§2.5, Definition 2.42] The sentence 'An A-path can be considered as a section of A' is misleading; an A-path is a curve in the total space A, not a section over M. Rephrase for clarity.
[§2.4, filtration (2.7)] For a null hypersurface, L_null^⊥=TΣ|Σ_null because the null generator lies in the kernel of the induced metric; the notation L_null⊂L_null^⊥⊂TΣ may suggest a proper filtration. This is harmless but could be clarified.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the flagged existence-proof gaps in §2.5 are incompleteness, not circular reductions; the framework is definitional and externally anchored.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. Definition 2.15 fixes what a Carrollian Lie algebroid is, and Definition 2.24 then defines the Carroll distribution as C = ρ(L), so the occurrence of singular Stefan–Sussmann distributions is a design consequence rather than a predicted output. Example 2.30 verifies that weak Carrollian manifolds embed by taking A = TM and L = ker(g), matching Definition 2.14; this is an instance check, not a self-referential proof. The principal result, Theorem 2.52, is a substantive mathematical claim. Its proof via Proposition 2.49 does contain a genuine gap: 'The system of linear equations is underdetermined, and so a solution can always be found' is not a valid inference, since an inhomogeneous system must also satisfy consistency conditions. A consistent solution does exist (e.g. by splitting A ≅ E⊕L and solving on the nondegenerate quotient), but §2.5 does not show it; this is a correctness/completeness defect, not a reduction of the conclusion to the premise. The same holds for the compressed solvability claim in Proposition 2.56. The corollary for weak Carrollian manifolds is obtained by specializing the algebroid statement to A = TM, not by assuming the manifold-level result. Self-citations are not load-bearing: [7] appears only in an illustrative list of Lie algebroid applications, and the cited uniqueness/connection facts [6,29] are external. No fitted parameters, no renaming of an external result as a new prediction. Score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The paper adds a new definitional framework on top of standard Lie algebroid and Carrollian geometry. There are no fitted numbers; the load-bearing axioms are standard algebroid/connection existence results plus two domain assumptions specific to the examples (G-invariance in 2.39; characteristic vector field and screen-bundle triviality in 2.4). The definitional choice of a constant-rank, globally trivial kernel is the framework's designed scope rather than an unstated assumption.

assumptions (5)

standard math Background Lie algebroid theory (Mackenzie [35]): anchor images of Lie algebroids are integrable Stefan–Sussmann distributions; Lie algebroid connections always exist (Křížka [30]).
Invoked throughout §2.1–2.5: used for Def 2.24 (Carroll distribution integrable) and Prop 2.26 (integral curves lie in leaves), and for the existence of some connection ∇⁰ from which compatible connections are constructed.
standard math Every Lie algebroid admits a Lie algebroid connection.
Load-bearing for Prop 2.45, 2.49, 2.56 and Theorem 2.52; cited to [30] and justified by partition-of-unity arguments.
ad hoc to paper L is a globally trivial line bundle with ker(g) of constant rank 1 (Definition 2.15).
Definitional choice that pushes all singular behavior into the anchor. Remark 2.16 notes the triviality can be relaxed with 'minor changes' and that orientability of A then forces vanishing Euler class. The framework's scope is exactly the class of structures with constant-rank kernel.
domain assumption In the Atiyah example (2.39): the Carrollian structure (ĝ, κ) on the principal bundle P is G-invariant, including G-invariance of κ.
Needed so that g(u,v) := ĝ(ιu, ιv) descends to a well-defined metric on A = TP/G and σ := ι⁻¹κ is a genuine section. Not every Carrollian structure on P satisfies this.
ad hoc to paper In §2.4: existence of a characteristic vector field κ on Σ that vanishes identically on Σ_space and is nowhere vanishing on Σ_null, plus triviality of the screen bundle S and of its smooth extension A_0.
Explicitly stated by the author, who concedes these assumptions are 'very restrictive and rare for realistic spacetime embeddings'. Without them the mixed null-spacelike construction is not a Carrollian Lie algebroid. The author notes the K-theoretic obstruction to extending S in §3.

invented entities (3)

Carrollian Lie algebroid
purpose: Central framework object replacing the tangent bundle so that singular (vanishing) Carroll vector fields become anchored distributions on the base manifold.
A definitional mathematical construct, not a physical entity; it carries no falsifiable physical handle outside the paper. Its value is organizational: Example 2.30 reproduces standard Carrollian geometry as the special case A = TM.
Carroll distribution C := ρ(L)
purpose: Singular Stefan–Sussmann distribution encoding the (possibly vanishing) null direction; the main physical output of the framework.
Mathematical construct; no independent physical evidence. Its physical interpretation (worldlines confined to leaves, freezing at singular points) is asserted by the author, not derived from data.
Carrollian Lie groupoid
purpose: Introduced in Remark 2.40 as the future integrating object for Carrollian Lie algebroids.
Mentioned only as future work; not used in any result of the paper. Listed for exhaustiveness.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Carrollian Lie Algebroids: Taming Singular Carrollian Geometries." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SMJ5BL6V

@misc{pith2026251003877,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Carrollian Lie Algebroids: Taming Singular Carrollian Geometries},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SMJ5BL6V}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2510.03877}
}

read the original abstract

Developments in Carrollian gravity and holography necessitate the use of singular Carroll vector fields, a feature that cannot be accommodated within standard Carrollian geometry. We introduce Carrollian Lie algebroids as a framework to study such singular Carrollian geometries. In this approach, we define the Carroll distribution as the image of the kernel of the degenerate metric under the anchor map. The Carroll distribution is, in general, a singular Stefan--Sussmann distribution that will fluctuate between rank-1 and rank-0, and so captures the notion of a singular Carroll vector field. As an example, we show that an invariant Carrollian structure on a principal bundle leads to a Carrollian structure on the associated Atiyah algebroid that will, in general, have a singular Carroll distribution. Mixed null-spacelike hypersurfaces, under some simplifying assumptions, also lead to examples of Carrollian Lie algebroids. Furthermore, we establish the existence of compatible connections on Carrollian Lie algebroids, and as a direct consequence, we conclude that Carrollian manifolds can always be equipped with compatible affine connections.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Foundations of Noncommutative Carrollian Geometry via Lie-Rinehart Pairs
math-ph 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Carrollian geometric structures are generalized to almost-commutative algebras via ρ-Lie-Rinehart pairs, with explicit examples on the extended quantum plane and noncommutative 2-torus.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 6 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

F., Nocchi, M., Ruzziconi, R., & Srikant, A

Alday, L. F., Nocchi, M., Ruzziconi, R., & Srikant, A. Y., Carrollian amplitudes from holographic corre- lators,J. High Energy Phys.2025, No. 3, Paper No. 158, 43 p. (2025)

2025
[2]

& G ˆ ırt ¸u, M., Einstein equations in Lie algebroids,Sci

Anastasiei, M. & G ˆ ırt ¸u, M., Einstein equations in Lie algebroids,Sci. Stud. Res., Ser. Math. Inform.24, No. 1, 5–16 (2014)

2014
[3]

& Shukla, A., The Carrollian Kaleidoscope, arXiv:2506.16164 [hep-th]

Bagchi, A., Banerjee, A., Dhivakar, P., Mondal, S. & Shukla, A., The Carrollian Kaleidoscope, arXiv:2506.16164 [hep-th]

arXiv
[4]

High Energy Phys.2017, No

Barnich, G., Centrally extended BMS4 Lie algebroid,J. High Energy Phys.2017, No. 6, Paper No. 7, 14 p. (2017)

2017
[5]

Blohmann, C., Barbosa F. M. C. & Weinstein, A., Groupoid symmetry and constraints in general relativity, Commun. Contemp. Math.15, No. 1, Paper No. 1250061, 25 p. (2013)

2013
[6]

Boucetta, M., Riemannian geometry of Lie algebroids,J. Egypt. Math. Soc.19, No. 1-2, 57-70 (2011)

2011
[7]

J., Killing sections and sigma models with Lie algebroid targets,Rep

Bruce, A. J., Killing sections and sigma models with Lie algebroid targets,Rep. Math. Phys.78, No. 1, 1–18 (2016)

2016
[8]

Quantum Grav.41, No

Ciambelli, L., Dynamics of Carrollian scalar fields,Class. Quantum Grav.41, No. 16, Article ID 165011, 17 p. (2024)

2024

Show all 44 references

[9]

& Jai-akson P., Foundations of Carrollian Geometry, arXiv:2510.21651 [hep-th]

Ciambelli, L. & Jai-akson P., Foundations of Carrollian Geometry, arXiv:2510.21651 [hep-th]

arXiv
[10]

C., Petropoulos, P

Ciambelli, L., Marteau, C., Petkou, A. C., Petropoulos, P. M. & Siampos, K., Covariant Galilean versus Carrollian hydrodynamics from relativistic fluids,Class. Quantum Grav.35, No. 16, Article ID 165001, 44 p. (2018)

2018
[11]

& Fernandes, R

Crainic, M. & Fernandes, R. L., Integrability of Lie brackets,Ann. Math.157, No. 2, 575–620 (2003)

2003
[12]

& Vandoren, S., Carroll Symmetry, Dark Energy and Inflation,Front

de Boer, J., Hartong, J., Obers, N.A., Sybesma, W. & Vandoren, S., Carroll Symmetry, Dark Energy and Inflation,Front. Phys.10, 810405 (2022)

2022
[13]

& Ruzziconi, R.,, Carrollian, Perspective on Celestial Holography, Phys

Donnay, L., Fiorucci, A., Herfray, Y. & Ruzziconi, R.,, Carrollian, Perspective on Celestial Holography, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, no. 7, 071602 (2022)

2022
[14]

& Ruzziconi, R., Bridging Carrollian and celestial holography,Phys

Donnay, L., Fiorucci, A., Herfray, Y. & Ruzziconi, R., Bridging Carrollian and celestial holography,Phys. Rev. D107, 126027 (2023)

2023
[15]

& Horvathy, P.A., Conformal Carroll groups,J

Duval, C., Gibbons, G.W. & Horvathy, P.A., Conformal Carroll groups,J. Phys. A, Math. Theor.47, No. 33, Article ID 335204, 23 p. (2014). 22 CARROLLIAN LIE ALGEBROIDS: TAMING SINGULAR CARROLLIAN GEOMETRIES

2014
[16]

& Horvathy, P.A., Conformal Carroll groups and BMS symmetry,Class

Duval, C., Gibbons, G.W. & Horvathy, P.A., Conformal Carroll groups and BMS symmetry,Class. Quan- tum Grav.31, 092001 (2014)

2014
[17]

& Zhang, P.M., Carroll versus Newton and Galilei: Two Dual Non-Einsteinian Concepts of Time,Class

Duval, C., Gibbons, G.W., Horvathy, P.A. & Zhang, P.M., Carroll versus Newton and Galilei: Two Dual Non-Einsteinian Concepts of Time,Class. Quantum Grav.31, 085016 (2014)

2014
[18]

& Troncoso, R., Carroll black holes,SciPost Phys.15, No

Ecker, F., Grumiller, D., Hartong, J., Perez, A., Prohazka, S. & Troncoso, R., Carroll black holes,SciPost Phys.15, No. 6, Paper No. 245, 59 p. (2023)

2023
[19]

& Salgado-Rebolledo, P., Carroll-invariant propagating fields, Phys.Rev.D110, L041901 (2024)

Ecker, F., Grumiller, D., Henneaux, M. & Salgado-Rebolledo, P., Carroll-invariant propagating fields, Phys.Rev.D110, L041901 (2024)

2024
[20]

& Hou, S., On the gauge features of gravity on a Lie algebroid structure,J

Fabi, S., Harms, B. & Hou, S., On the gauge features of gravity on a Lie algebroid structure,J. Math. Phys.55, No. 3, 032502, 9 p. (2014)

2014
[21]

Figueroa-O’Farrill, J., Non-lorentzian spacetimes,Differ. Geom. Appl.82, Article ID 101894, 24 p. (2022)

2022
[22]

Figueroa-O’Farrill, J., Lie algebraic Carroll/Galilei duality,J. Math. Phys.64, No. 1, Article ID 013503, 15 p. (2023)

2023
[23]

& Prohazka, S., Carroll/fracton particles and their correspondence,J

Figueroa-O’Farrill, J., P´ erez, A. & Prohazka, S., Carroll/fracton particles and their correspondence,J. High Energy Phys.2023, No. 6, Paper No. 207, 51 p. (2023)

2023
[24]

& Payne O., A Carroll Limit of AdS/CFT: A Triality with Flat Space Holography?, arXiv:2508.10085 [hep-th]

Fontanella A. & Payne O., A Carroll Limit of AdS/CFT: A Triality with Flat Space Holography?, arXiv:2508.10085 [hep-th]

arXiv
[25]

Gibbons, G.W., The Ashtekar-Hansen universal structure at spatial infinity is weakly pseudo-Carrollian, arXiv:1902.09170 [gr-qc]

1902 arXiv
[26]

& Marmo, G., Information geometry on groupoids: the case of singular metrics,Open Syst

Grabowska, K., Grabowski, J., Ku´ s, M. & Marmo, G., Information geometry on groupoids: the case of singular metrics,Open Syst. Inf. Dyn.27, No. 3, Article ID 2050015, 19 p. (2020)

2020
[27]

Henneaux, M., Zero Hamiltonian signature spacetimes,Bull. Soc. Math. Belg., S´ er. A31, 47–63 (1979)

1979
[28]

& Watamura, S., Contravariant gravity on Poisson manifolds and Einstein gravity, Class

Kaneko, Y., Muraki, H. & Watamura, S., Contravariant gravity on Poisson manifolds and Einstein gravity, Class. Quantum Grav.34, No. 11, Article ID 115002, 18 p. (2017)

2017
[29]

E., Levi-Civita connections on degenerate pseudo-Riemannian manifolds,J

Kozlov, S. E., Levi-Civita connections on degenerate pseudo-Riemannian manifolds,J. Math. Sci.104, No. 4, 1338-1342 (2001)

2001
[30]

Math., Brno44, No

Kˇ riˇ zka, L., Moduli spaces of Lie algebroid connections,Arch. Math., Brno44, No. 5, 403–418 (2008)

2008
[31]

& Ryvkin L., An invitation to singular foliations, arXiv:2407.14932 [math.DG]

Laurent-Gengoux, C., Louis, R. & Ryvkin L., An invitation to singular foliations, arXiv:2407.14932 [math.DG]

arXiv
[32]

L´ evy-Leblond, J.M., Une nouvelle limite non-relativistic du groupe de Poincar´ e,Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e, Nouv. S´ er., Sect. A3, 1–12 (1965)

1965
[33]

Proc.14, 006 (2023)

L´ evy-Leblond, J.M., On the unexpected fate of scientific ideas: An archeology of the Carroll group,SciPost Phys. Proc.14, 006 (2023)

2023
[34]

& Srikant, A

Lipstein, A., Ruzziconi, R. & Srikant, A. Y., Towards a flat space Carrollian hologram from AdS4/CFT3, J. High Energy Phys.2025, No. 6, Paper No. 73, 45 p. (2025)

2025
[35]

xxxviii+501 pp

Mackenzie, K.C.H., General theory of Lie groupoids and Lie algebroids, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, 213,Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005. xxxviii+501 pp

2005
[36]

& Senovilla, J

Mars, M. & Senovilla, J. M. M., Geometry of general hypersurfaces in spacetime: junction conditions, Class.Quant.Grav.10, No. 9, 1865–1897 (1993)

1993
[37]

Pradines, J., Repr´ esentation des jets non holonomes par des morphismes vectoriels doubles soud´ es,C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S´ er. A278(1974), 1523–1526

1974
[38]

(ed.) et al., The ninth Marcel Grossmann meeting

Rovelli, C., Notes for a brief history of quantum gravity, Gurzadyan, Vahe G. (ed.) et al., The ninth Marcel Grossmann meeting. On recent developments in theoretical and experimental general relativity, gravitation, and relativistic field theories. Proceedings of the MGIX MM m...
[39]

Sen Gupta, N.D., On an analogue of the Galilei group,Nuovo Cimento A44, 512–517 (1966)

1966
[40]

Strobl, T., Gravity from Lie algebroid morphisms,Commun. Math. Phys.246, No. 3, 475–502 (2004)

2004
[41]

I., Nonholonomic algebroids, Finsler geometry, and Lagrange-Hamilton spaces,Math

Vacaru, S. I., Nonholonomic algebroids, Finsler geometry, and Lagrange-Hamilton spaces,Math. Sci., Springer6, Paper No. 18, 33 p. (2012)

2012
[42]

S., Lie groups, Lie algebras, and their representations, Reprint of the 1974 edition, Grad- uate Texts in Mathematics

Varadarajan, V. S., Lie groups, Lie algebras, and their representations, Reprint of the 1974 edition, Grad- uate Texts in Mathematics. 102. New York, NY: Springer. xiii, 430 p. (1984)

1974
[43]

& Read, J., Affine connections for Galilean and Carrollian structures: a unified perspective,Class

Vigneron, Q., Barzegar, H. & Read, J., Affine connections for Galilean and Carrollian structures: a unified perspective,Class. Quantum Grav.42, No. 17, Article ID 175018, 20 p. (2025)

2025
[2000]

Singapore: World Scientific

In 3 vols. Singapore: World Scientific. 742-768 (2002). Also avaliable as arXiv:gr-qc/0006061

2002 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

F., Nocchi, M., Ruzziconi, R., & Srikant, A

Alday, L. F., Nocchi, M., Ruzziconi, R., & Srikant, A. Y., Carrollian amplitudes from holographic corre- lators,J. High Energy Phys.2025, No. 3, Paper No. 158, 43 p. (2025)

2025

[2] [2]

& G ˆ ırt ¸u, M., Einstein equations in Lie algebroids,Sci

Anastasiei, M. & G ˆ ırt ¸u, M., Einstein equations in Lie algebroids,Sci. Stud. Res., Ser. Math. Inform.24, No. 1, 5–16 (2014)

2014

[3] [3]

& Shukla, A., The Carrollian Kaleidoscope, arXiv:2506.16164 [hep-th]

Bagchi, A., Banerjee, A., Dhivakar, P., Mondal, S. & Shukla, A., The Carrollian Kaleidoscope, arXiv:2506.16164 [hep-th]

arXiv

[4] [4]

High Energy Phys.2017, No

Barnich, G., Centrally extended BMS4 Lie algebroid,J. High Energy Phys.2017, No. 6, Paper No. 7, 14 p. (2017)

2017

[5] [5]

Blohmann, C., Barbosa F. M. C. & Weinstein, A., Groupoid symmetry and constraints in general relativity, Commun. Contemp. Math.15, No. 1, Paper No. 1250061, 25 p. (2013)

2013

[6] [6]

Boucetta, M., Riemannian geometry of Lie algebroids,J. Egypt. Math. Soc.19, No. 1-2, 57-70 (2011)

2011

[7] [7]

J., Killing sections and sigma models with Lie algebroid targets,Rep

Bruce, A. J., Killing sections and sigma models with Lie algebroid targets,Rep. Math. Phys.78, No. 1, 1–18 (2016)

2016

[8] [8]

Quantum Grav.41, No

Ciambelli, L., Dynamics of Carrollian scalar fields,Class. Quantum Grav.41, No. 16, Article ID 165011, 17 p. (2024)

2024