Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 101 references

Vortices for lake equations (review with questions and speculations)

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proposes that point vortices in the lake equations follow a Hamiltonian whose interaction energy is the Green function of $-\operatorname{div}(b^{-1}\nabla\psi)$ and whose self-energy is a logarithmic term in the bathymetry.

desk verdict Honest, readable survey of lake-equation vortices whose central Hamiltonian (16) has a concrete self-velocity mismatch and needs correction before the proposal can be taken seriously. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.10433 v2 pith:SMTKHVHK submitted 2025-01-12 math-ph math.APmath.MP

Jair Koiller This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.APmath.MP MSC 76B4776M6034C2337E35
keywords lakeequationspointvorticesbathymetryGreen'sfunctionpseudoharmonicformsvortexringsripcurrentsRiemannsurfaces
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the lake equations—shallow-water flow over a variable bottom, with incompressibility $\mathrm{div}(bu)=0$—can be described at the vortex level by a Hamiltonian point-vortex system. The proposed dynamics uses the Green function of the elliptic operator $-\operatorname{div}(b^{-1}\nabla\psi)$ for vortex interactions, adds a logarithmic self-velocity term coming from matched asymptotics, and weights the phase-space symplectic form by the bathymetry $b$. If this description is right, it transfers the classical vortex-ring machinery to nearshore flows, predicts that vortex pairs on a sloping beach form rip currents that can travel far offshore, and extends, via pseudoharmonic forms, to domains with islands and to closed Riemann surfaces. The paper is openly a geometric-mechanics outline: it sets aside hard analysis, flags the point-vortex limit as needing justification when $b$ varies, and leaves one boundary-circulation identity unproved.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Green function $G_{L_b}$ of the elliptic operator $L_b\psi=-\operatorname{div}(b^{-1}\nabla\psi)$ with zero boundary values: it supplies the interaction energy between vortices and, through its boundary behavior, the circulation around islands. The paper couples this object with a logarithmic self-energy $\mathrm{Rich}_b$ and with the bathymetry-weighted symplectic form $\Omega=\sum_j\Gamma_j b(z_j)\,dx_j\wedge dy_j$, so that the phase-space geometry encodes the variable depth. For multiply connected domains and higher-genus surfaces, the kernel of $L_b$ enters: its elements are the $b$-harmonic functions, whose capacity matrix $P^b$ completes the Hamiltonian. An alternative stream function $b(x_0)\tilde G_{1/b}(x,x_0)$ built from the Green function of $\Delta_{1/b}$ is proposed as a practical equivalent with unit circulation.

What would settle it

Test the Hamiltonian against resolved vortex-patch simulations: initialize a small vortex patch of radius $\epsilon$ over a sloping bottom $b(y)=\alpha y$, track its self-induced drift, and compare with the predicted logarithmic self-velocity; a mismatch in direction or magnitude would falsify the self-energy part. Separately, on a multiply connected domain with one island, compute numerically both sides of the unproved identity (48) for a unit vortex at several positions; any disagreement breaks the proposed vortex–island coupling.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central proposal is that the motion of $N$ point vortices in the lake equations is governed by the Hamiltonian $$H=\sum_{j<k}\Gamma_j\Gamma_k G_{L_b}(z_j,z_k)+\frac12\sum_j\$Gamma_j^{2}$\,\mathrm{Rich}_b(z_j)$$ with symplectic form $\Omega=\sum_j\Gamma_j b(z_j)\,dx_j\wedge dy_j$. Here $G_{L_b}$ is the Green function of $L_b\psi=-\operatorname{div}(b^{-1}\nabla\psi)$ with zero boundary values, and $\mathrm{Rich}_b$ is the logarithmic self-energy obtained by matched asymptotics for a small vortex patch. The paper claims this Hamiltonian is complete only on simply connected domains or the sphere; for multiply connected domains and higher-genus surfaces it must be augmented by pseudoharmonic flows, encoded through a $b$-capacity matrix. It also proposes an equivalent stream function built from the Green function of $\Delta_{1/b}$, and works out the consequence that opposite-signed vortex pairs on a uniformly sloping beach move offshore and approach each other, producing a rip current.

Load-bearing premise

The construction rests on the premise that point vortices remain valid in lake equations with variable bathymetry, supported by a Green function with the singular form $\sqrt{b(x)b(y)}G_D$ and a logarithmic self-velocity; the paper concedes this limit 'requires the analyst's attention' and leaves the boundary-circulation identity (48) unproved.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • On a uniformly sloping beach, the paper's Hamiltonian plus the vortex-ring analogy predicts that an opposite-signed vortex pair drifts offshore and toward each other, producing a rip current; the toy model gives $\dot x=-p\Gamma/(2y)$, $\dot y=\Gamma/(2x)$, with $x\to 0$ and $y\to\infty$ in finite time.
  • The Green-function formulation gives a concrete algorithm: for a given bathymetry, compute $G_{L_b}$ (or its $\tilde G_{1/b}$ variant), insert it into the Hamiltonian, and integrate the resulting vortex equations for any number of vortices.
  • In domains with islands, the stream function must include $b$-harmonic terms; combining them with the $b$-capacity matrix yields vortex–boundary-circulation feedback, so vortex paths are corrected by the pseudoharmonic flow.
  • On closed Riemann surfaces, the same construction leads to 'planet equations': pure vorticity fields are orthogonal to pseudopotential flows, and the paper predicts the vortex–pseudoharmonic interaction follows the same pattern as the planar case.
  • When the bathymetry tends to a constant, the logarithmic self-energy should pass to the classical Robin function; the paper raises the question whether to interpolate or add the Robin term, making the constant-bathymetry limit a testable prediction.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The unproved boundary-circulation identity (48) is the cheapest point of attack: if it fails for some bathymetry, the vortex–island coupling in the amended Hamiltonian would need replacement, while the simply connected part of the paper would survive.
  • The alternative stream function suggests a numerical route the paper notes but does not develop: approximate the bathymetry by piecewise-constant layers, reduce the inhomogeneous elliptic problem to an integral equation on the interfaces, and compare the resulting Green function against the proposed singular form (23).
  • The paper's cutoff ansatz $p=p(\alpha)$ is qualitative; direct numerical simulation of finite-size vortex patches on a slope could fix $p$, turning the rip-current prediction from a structural analogy into a quantitative forecast.
  • If the pseudoharmonic decomposition (56) extends to closed surfaces, the lake-equation vortex system sits naturally in the Hamiltonian reduction picture of ideal hydrodynamics, which is likely why the paper expects the interaction terms to mirror the planar case.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Formalized claims in Lean

  1. Claim #1: The paper's central proposal is that the motion of $N$ point vortices in the lake equations is governed by the Hamiltonian $$H=\sum_{j<k}\Gamma_j\Gamma_k G_{L_b}(z_j,z_k)+\frac12\sum_j\$Gamma_j^{2}$\,\mathrm{Rich}_b(z_j)$$ with symplectic form $\Omega=\sum_j\Gamma_j b(z_j)\,dx_j\wedge dy_j$. Here $G_{L_b}$ is the Green function of $L_b\psi=-\operatorname{div}(b^{-1}\nabla\psi)$ with zero boundary

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a Hamiltonian point-vortex formulation for the lake equations, using the Green function of L_b = -div(grad(·)/b) for interactions and Richardson's logarithmic self-energy, with the weighted symplectic form Ω = Σ Γ_j b(z_j) dx_j∧dy_j. It then sketches an extension to multiply connected planar domains through b-harmonic (pseudoharmonic) forms, a conjectural generalization to closed Riemann surfaces via 'planet equations', and a toy model for rip currents on a sloping beach. The paper is explicitly a review with open questions and speculations: it states that hard analysis is glossed over and leaves several key identities and consistency checks as questions.

Significance. If the proposed Hamiltonian and its extensions were justified, the paper would provide a useful geometric-mechanics bridge between lake vortex dynamics, vortex-ring theory, and quasiconformal methods, and it would give a concrete framework for studying rip currents. Its strengths are the clear articulation of a research program, the broad synthesis of the existing literature on lake equations, vortex rings, and pseudoanalytic functions, and the honest identification of open problems. However, the central Hamiltonian as written fails an internal algebraic consistency check with the Richardson self-velocity it is meant to encode, and several load-bearing identities are explicitly left unproved; the manuscript is therefore best read as a position paper whose main proposal still requires substantive correction and proof.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3, Eqs. (16)–(17) and Eq. (2)] The Hamiltonian (16) is internally inconsistent with the self-velocity (2) that it is designed to reproduce. For a single vortex, set c = (1/2π)log(1/ε) so that H_self = (1/2)Γ² c log b and Ω = Γ b dx∧dy. Hamilton's equations i_X Ω = dH give \dot{x} = H_y/(Γ b) = Γ c b_y/(2b²), \dot{y} = -H_x/(Γ b) = -Γ c b_x/(2b²). This is (1/b) times the Richardson velocity (2), which is (Γ c/2)∇⊥ log b. For b = αy, the prediction is \dot{x} = Γ log(1/ε)/(4π α y²), whereas (2) gives Γ log(1/ε)/(4π y). Thus the self-term (17), or the symplectic form, must be corrected before (16) can be used; no choice of sign convention removes the extra factor 1/b.
  2. [§6, Eq. (48)] The underbraced equality -∮_{γ_ℓ} ⋆dG_b(z,z_0)/b = m_ℓ(z_0) is explicitly marked with a question mark and described as something that 'should be valid in general'. This identity is used directly to derive the boundary-circulation coefficients B_ℓ in (49) and, through (50), the reduced Hamiltonian with capacities. Since the multiply connected reduction is one of the paper's main extensions, this identity is load-bearing and must be proved, or replaced by a precise cited proof, for the operator L_b with Dirichlet Green function.
  3. [§4, Eqs. (22), (23), (29)] Two different leading-order singular expansions for the Green function of L_b are given, (22) and (23), and the paper itself asks 'Which one to use?' without answering. The interaction part of the Hamiltonian (16) depends on G_{L_b}; the two expansions differ in their regular parts and in the scaling of the logarithmic argument, so they lead to different off-diagonal behaviour. The toy model subsequently uses (29)/(33) without resolving this choice. Please reconcile the expansions or specify, with justification, which one is used in (16) and in the toy model.
  4. [§4, 'Toy example'] The toy model for the rip current depends on the parameter p = |log ε|/(2π), for which the paper posits p = p(α) decreasing with α and p→0 as α→0, but no functional form or derivation is given. The claimed finite-time behaviour x(t)→0 and y(t)→∞ is then a consequence of an unspecified free parameter. Please derive p(α) from the inner vortex structure or state the finite-time escape as an explicit conjecture for a concrete family of bathymetries, rather than as an unconditional conclusion.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3, Eq. (16)] The summation label in the interaction term is inconsistent: the sum is written over j<k but the integrand uses Γ_iΓ_k; this should be Γ_jΓ_k.
  2. [§4, Eq. (26)] The notation in (26) is confusing: the same symbol G is used for the Green function and for its symmetrized version a(y)\tilde G(x,y) = a(x)\tilde G(y,x). Please use distinct symbols to avoid collision with G_D and G_b.
  3. [§5, Eqs. (42)–(43)] The symbol Δ_b is used with opposite sign conventions before and after (42): earlier L_b = -div(grad(·)/b), while the displayed identity in (42) appears to use Δ_b = div(grad(·)/b). Please fix the convention so that the displayed equality is unambiguous.
  4. [§5–§6, text around (46) and (48)] There are several typos: 'Fredholm theoryl 3' should be 'Fredholm theory', and 'For cleanless' should be 'For cleanliness'. Also, in (46) the inverse matrix (P^b)^{-1} appears before the capacity matrix is shown to be invertible; please state the nondegeneracy condition explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central Hamiltonian is an openly proposed model that imports Richardson's self-velocity as an input and relies on external Green-function results; open identities are explicitly flagged.

full rationale

The paper explicitly frames itself as a 'review with questions and speculations' and does not claim to derive its central objects from first principles. The load-bearing Hamiltonian (16) is introduced as 'a natural proposal' suggested by the coaxial vortex-ring literature, and the self-term (17) states that 'the vortex self-velocity comes from Richardson's (phenomenological in ε_j)': Richardson's formula (2) is therefore an input to the Hamiltonian, not a prediction extracted from it. The Green-function singularity (23) is quoted from the external paper [18] (Proposition 3.1), and the preference for (23) over (22) is justified by the independent article [73]; neither is a self-citation. The multiply connected extension is said to 'mimic [15]', but [15] is a separate published derivation with stated assumptions, and the manuscript also notes that its results 'essentially coincide' with the independent work [18]. The unproven equality in (48) is explicitly marked with a question mark and the words 'It should be valid in general', so it is an openly disclosed open premise rather than a conclusion disguised as a derivation. No step in the paper reduces, by its own equations or by an unverified self-citation chain, to its own inputs. A separate internal-consistency issue does exist: with Ω = Σ Γ_j b(z_j) dx_j ∧ dy_j and H_self = (1/2) Γ² (1/2π) log(1/ε) log b, Hamilton's equations give a self-velocity equal to (1/2b) times Richardson's (2), so the proposed Hamiltonian (16)-(17) does not reproduce the self-velocity it was designed to encode. That is an algebraic mismatch, not a circularity, and it does not affect the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central proposal depends on unproven analytic assumptions about Green functions, on the validity of point vortex limits, and on a parameter posited by hand in the toy model. The paper is honest about these gaps, but the ledger shows how much is assumed rather than derived.

free parameters (2)
  • vortex core size ε_j = unspecified; appears in Rich_b(z_j) = (1/2π) log(1/ε_j) log b
    The self-velocity term in Hamiltonian (16) depends on the phenomenological vortex core size ε_j, introduced from Richardson's matching asymptotics, not derived from first principles.
  • toy model parameter p = |log ε|/2π = posited p(α) decreasing with α, p→0 as α→0
    In the toy model ODEs (34), the phenomenological parameter p is posited to depend on beach slope α with no derivation or data calibration.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Point vortex desingularization is valid for the lake equations
    The paper states 'when b ≠ const justifying point vortex models requires the analyst's attention' and explicitly glosses over hard analysis; the Hamiltonian (16) assumes the point vortex approximation.
  • domain assumption The Green function singularity for Lb is given by the claimed dominant terms
    The paper compares two different singular expansions (22) and (23) and does not settle which is correct.
  • ad hoc to paper The 'underbraced equality' in (48)
    The equality -∮γℓ ⋆dG_b(z,z_o)/b =? m_ℓ(z_o) is marked with a question mark and used to compute boundary circulations; the proof is deferred.
  • ad hoc to paper The Hamiltonian (16) is proposed by analogy
    The paper says 'The literature on coaxial vortex rings suggests a natural proposal' and does not derive the Hamiltonian from first principles.
invented entities (2)
  • 'Planet equations'
    purpose: A proposed generalization of lake equations to closed Riemann surfaces with non-uniform bathymetry
    Introduced as a speculation ('Uniformly elliptic equations on Riemann surfaces could be called planet equations') with no predictions or evidence.
  • Pseudoharmonic flows on closed surfaces in this context
    purpose: To extend the Hodge decomposition to the lake equations on closed surfaces
    The interaction dynamics between vortices and pseudopotential flows is speculated, not proven.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Vortices for lake equations (review with questions and speculations)." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SMTKHVHK

@misc{pith2026250110433,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Vortices for lake equations (review with questions and speculations)},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SMTKHVHK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.10433}
}
abstract

The `lake equation' on a planar domain D with bathymetry b(x,y) is given by $ \partial_t u + (u \cdot {\rm grad}) u= -{\rm grad}\, p \,, \,\,{\rm div} (b u) = 0 \,,\, \text{with}\,\, u \parallel \partial D.$ % \, \,\, \,\,\, \text{),}$$ We focus on Geometric Mechanics aspects, glossing over hard analysis issues. % related to the desingularization. Motivating example is a `rip current' produced by vortex pairs near a beach shore. For uniform slope beach there is a perfect analogy with \ Thomson's vortex rings. The stream function produced by a vortex is defined as the Green function of the operator $- {\rm div} ( {\rm grad} \psi/b)$ with Dirichlet boundary conditions. As in elasticity, the lake equations give rise to pseudoanalytical functions and quasiconformal mappings. Uniformly elliptic equations on closed Riemann surfaces could be called `planet equations'.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.10433 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Collision of two vortex rings. An important parameter is the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Source: wikipedia (public domain). The wide head of the current [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Rip currents periodic pattern [86]. Clearly visible are the necks [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

101 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages

  1. [15]

    Grotta-Ragazzo, B

    C. Grotta-Ragazzo, B. Gustafsson, J. Koiller, On the Interplay Between Vortices and Harmonic Flows: Hodge Decomposition of Euler’s Equa- tions in 2d , Regul. Chaot. Dyn. 29 (2024), 241–303

    2024

  2. [18]

    Dekeyser, J

    J. Dekeyser, J. van Schaftingen, Vortex Motion for the Lake Equations , Commun. Math. Phys. 375 (2020), 1459–1501

    2020

  3. [1]

    Camassa, D

    R. Camassa, D. D. Holm, C. Levermore, Long-time effects of bottom topography in shallow water, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena98, Issues 2–4 (1996), 258-286

    1996

  4. [2]

    Camassa, D

    R. Camassa, D. D. Holm, C. Levermore, Long-time shallow-water equa- tions with a varying bottom , J. Fluid Mech. 349 (1997), 173–189

    1997

  5. [3]

    Levermore, M

    C. Levermore, M. Oliver, E. Titi, (1996). Global well-posedness for the lake equations, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 98 Issues 2-4 (1996), 492–509

    1996

  6. [4]

    Richardson, Vortex motion in shallow water with varying bottom to- pography and zero Froude number, J

    G. Richardson, Vortex motion in shallow water with varying bottom to- pography and zero Froude number, J. Fluid Mech. 411 (2000), 351–374

    2000

  7. [5]

    Crowdy, Solving Problems in Multiply Connected Domains , SIAM, 2020

    D. Crowdy, Solving Problems in Multiply Connected Domains , SIAM, 2020

    2020

  8. [6]

    Lin, On the motion of vortices in two dimension - I

    C.C. Lin, On the motion of vortices in two dimension - I. Existence of the Kirchhoff-Routh function , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 27 (1941), 570–575

    1941

Show all 101 references
  1. [7]

    Marchioro, M

    C. Marchioro, M. Pulvirenti, Vortex Methods in Two Dimensional Fluid Dynamics, Lecture Notes in Physics 203, Springer, Berlin, 1984. 24

    1984

  2. [8]

    Smets, D., J

    D. Smets, D., J. Van Schaftingen, Desingularization of Vortices for the Euler Equation Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 198 (2010), 869–925

    2010

  3. [9]

    D. Cao, Z. Liu, J. Wei, Regularization of point vortices for the Eu- ler equation in dimension two , Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 212 (2014), 179–217

    2014

  4. [10]

    Flucher, B

    M. Flucher, B. Gustafsson, Vortex motion in two-dimensional hydrome- chanics (TRITA-MAT-1997-MA-02), (Partly published as Ch.15 in M. Flucher: Variational Problems with Concentration, Birkh¨ auser, 1999.)

    1997

  5. [11]

    Chang, D

    S, Boatto, J.Koiller, Vortices on Closed Surfaces , in: D. Chang, D. Holm, G. Patrick, T. Ratiu, (eds), Geometry, Mechanics, and Dynamics, Fields Institute Communications, 73, Springer, New York, 2015

    2015

  6. [12]

    Grotta-Ragazzo C., The motion of a vortex on a closed surface of constant negative curvature, Proc

    C. Grotta-Ragazzo C., The motion of a vortex on a closed surface of constant negative curvature, Proc. R. Soc. A. (2017), 47320170447

    2017

  7. [13]

    Hydrodynamic Vortex on Surfaces

    C. Grotta-Ragazzo, Errata and Addenda to: “Hydrodynamic Vortex on Surfaces” and “The Motion of a Vortex on a Closed Surface of Constant Negative Curvature”, J Nonlinear Sci 32 (2022), 63

    2022

  8. [14]

    Gustafsson, Vortex Pairs and Dipoles on Closed Surfaces J Nonlinear Sci 32, 62 (2022)

    B. Gustafsson, Vortex Pairs and Dipoles on Closed Surfaces J Nonlinear Sci 32, 62 (2022)

    2022

  9. [16]

    de Valeriola, J

    S. de Valeriola, J. Van Schaftingen, Desingularization of Vortex Rings and Shallow Water Vortices by a Semilinear Elliptic Problem . Arch Ra- tional Mech Anal 210 (2013), 409-450

    2013

  10. [17]

    Dekeyser, Desingularization of a Steady Vortex Pair in the Lake Equation, Potential Anal

    J. Dekeyser, Desingularization of a Steady Vortex Pair in the Lake Equation, Potential Anal. 56 (2022), 97–135

    2022

  11. [19]

    D. Cao, W. Zhan, C. Zou, On desingularization of steady vortex for the lake equations , IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics, 87, 1 (2022) 50-79. 25

    2022

  12. [20]

    M´ enard,Mean-Field Limit of Point Vortices for the Lake Equations (2023)

    M. M´ enard,Mean-Field Limit of Point Vortices for the Lake Equations (2023). (hal-04210709)

    2023

  13. [21]

    L. E. Hientzsch, C. Lacave, E. Miot, Dynamics of several point vortices for the lake equations , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 377 (2024), 203-248

    2024

  14. [22]

    J. J. Thomson, A Treatise on the Motion of Vortex Rings , Macmillan, London, 1883

  15. [23]

    W. M. Hicks, On the Steady Motion of a Hollow Vortex , Proc.R.Soc.London 35 (1883), 304–308

  16. [24]

    F. W. Dyson, The potential of an anchor ring. Part II , Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 184 (1893), 1041–1106

  17. [25]

    Horace Lamb, Hydrodynamics, Sixth ed., Dover Publications, New York, 1965, p. 241

    1965

  18. [26]

    Hicks, On the mutual threading of vortex rings , Proc

    W.M. Hicks, On the mutual threading of vortex rings , Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 102 (1922), 111–131

    1922

  19. [27]

    Auerbach, Some open questions on the flow of circular vortex rings , Fluid Dyn

    D. Auerbach, Some open questions on the flow of circular vortex rings , Fluid Dyn. Res. 2 (1988), 209–213

    1988

  20. [28]

    P. G. Saffman, The Velocity of Viscous Vortex Ring, Stud. Appl. Math. 49 (1970), 371–380

    1970

  21. [29]

    P. H. Roberts, R. J. Donnelly, Dynamics of vortex rings , Phys. Lett. A 31 (1970), 137–138

    1970

  22. [30]

    Shariff, A

    K. Shariff, A. Leonard, Vortex rings . Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 24 (1992), 235–279

    1992

  23. [31]

    T.T. Lim, T. B. Nickels, Instability and reconnection in the head-on collision of two vortex rings , Nature 357 (1992), 225–227

    1992

  24. [32]

    T.T. Lim, T. B. Nickels, Vortex rings , in: S. I. Green (ed.), Fluid Vortices, Kluwer, 1995, 95-153

    1995

  25. [33]

    Sullivan, J

    I.S. Sullivan, J. J. Niemela, R. R. Hershberger, D. Bolster, R. J. Don- nely, Dynamics of thin vortex rings , Journal of Fluid Mechanics 609 (2008), 319-347

    2008

  26. [34]

    Ambrosetti , M

    A. Ambrosetti , M. Struwe, Existence of steady vortex rings in an ideal fluid, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 108, 2 (1989), 97–109. 26

    1989

  27. [35]

    V. V. Meleshko, Coaxial axisymmetric vortex rings: 150 years after Helmholtz, Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 24 (2010), 403–431

    2010

  28. [36]

    V. V. Meleshko, A. A. Gourjii , T. S. Krasnopolskaya, Vortex rings: history and state-of-the-art , J. of Mathematical Sciences, 173 (2012), 772-808

    2012

  29. [37]

    A. A. Gurzhii, M. Y. Konstantinov, V. V. Meleshko, Interaction of coaxial vortex rings in an ideal fluid , Fluid Dyn 23 (1988), 224–229

    1988

  30. [38]

    Shashikanth, J

    B.N. Shashikanth, J. E. Marsden, J.E., Leapfrogging vortex rings: Hamiltonian structure, geometric phases and discrete reduction , Fluid Dyn. Res. 33 (2003), 333–356

    2003

  31. [39]

    Borisov, A

    A.V. Borisov, A. A. Kilin, I. S. Mamaev, The dynamics of vortex rings: Leapfrogging, Choreographies and the Stability Problem , Regular and Chaotic Dynamics 18 nos. 1-2 (2013), 33–62

    2013

  32. [40]

    Yang, Vortex Motion of the Euler and Lake Equations , J.Nonlinear Science 31 (2021), 48

    C. Yang, Vortex Motion of the Euler and Lake Equations , J.Nonlinear Science 31 (2021), 48

    2021

  33. [41]

    S. A. Thorpe , L. R. Centurioni, On the use of the method of images to investigate nearshore dynamical processes , Journal of Marine Research 58 (2000), 779–788

    2000

  34. [42]

    Arun, Ti

    R. Arun, Ti. Colonius, Velocity gradient analysis of a head-on vortex ring collision , Journal of Fluid Mechanics 982 (2024) A16

    2024

  35. [43]

    Matsuzawa, N

    T. Matsuzawa, N. P. Mitchell, S. Perrard, W. Irvine, Turbulence through sustained vortex ring collisions , Phys. Rev. Fluids, 8, 11 (2023), 110507

    2023

  36. [44]

    Agajanian, R

    M. Agajanian, R. McKeown, J. . Newbolt, A. Mishra, R. Ostilla- Mˆ onico, S. Rubinstein,Down to the Wire: A Story of a Vortex Ring Collision, Gallery of Fluid Morion video https://doi.org/10.1103/APS.DFD.2019.GFM.V0056, 2019

    2019 doi

  37. [45]

    V. I. Arnold, B. Khesin, Topological Methods in Hydrodynamics , Springer Applied Mathematical Sciences vol. 125, Second Edition, 2021

    2021

  38. [46]

    Khesin, Topological Fluid Dynamics , Notices of the AMS, 52, 1, (2005), 9-19

    B. Khesin, Topological Fluid Dynamics , Notices of the AMS, 52, 1, (2005), 9-19. 27

    2005

  39. [47]

    Izosimov, B

    A. Izosimov, B. Khesin, M. Mousavi, Coadjoint orbits of symplectic diffeomorphisms of surfaces and ideal hydrodynamics, Ann. Inst. Fourier, Grenoble 66, 6 (2016), 2385-2433

    2016

  40. [48]

    Izosimov , B

    A. Izosimov , B. Khesin, Characterization of Steady Solutions to the 2D Euler Equation , International Mathematics Research Notices, 2017, 24 (2017), 7459-7503

    2017

  41. [49]

    P. R. Garabedian, Partial differential equations , John Wiley & Sons, 1964 (chapter 5)

    1964

  42. [50]

    Gilbarg,N

    D. Gilbarg,N. S. Trudinger, Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order Springer-Verlag, 1983 (chapter 12)

    1983

  43. [51]

    Bergman, M

    S. Bergman, M. Schiffer, Kernel Functions and Elliptic Differential Equations in Mathematical Physics , Academic Press, New York, 1953

    1953

  44. [52]

    I. N. Vekua, Generalized Analytic Functions, Pergamon Press, 1962

    1962

  45. [53]

    Bers, Quasiconformal mappings, with applications to differential equations, function theory and topology , Bull

    L. Bers, Quasiconformal mappings, with applications to differential equations, function theory and topology , Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 83, 6, (1977), 1083-1100

    1977

  46. [54]

    Henrici, A survey of I

    P. Henrici, A survey of I. N. Vekua’s theory of elliptic partial differ- ential equations with analytic coefficients , Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Mathematik und Physik, 8, issue 3 (1957), 169-203

    1957

  47. [55]

    Bergman, Functions satisfying certain partial differential equations of elliptic type and their representation , Duke Mathematical Journal,14, issue 2 (1947), 349-366

    S. Bergman, Functions satisfying certain partial differential equations of elliptic type and their representation , Duke Mathematical Journal,14, issue 2 (1947), 349-366

    1947

  48. [56]

    Bers, Partial Differential Equations and Generalized Analytic Func- tions, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 36, 2 (1950) 130-136

    L. Bers, Partial Differential Equations and Generalized Analytic Func- tions, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 36, 2 (1950) 130-136

    1950

  49. [57]

    Bers, Partial Differential Equations and Generalized Analytic Func- tions: Second Note , Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    L. Bers, Partial Differential Equations and Generalized Analytic Func- tions: Second Note , Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1951 Jan; 37, 1 (1951), 42-47

    1951

  50. [58]

    Bers, Theory of Pseudo-Analytic Functions , New York University Institute for Mathematics and Mechanic, 1953

    L. Bers, Theory of Pseudo-Analytic Functions , New York University Institute for Mathematics and Mechanic, 1953. 28

    1953

  51. [59]

    Bers, Lipman

    L. Bers, Lipman. Partial differentail equations and pseudo-analytic functions on Riemann surfaces , in .V. Ahlfors, E. Calabi, M. Morse, L.Sario anD. C. Spencer (eds) Contributions to the Theory of Riemann Surfaces , Princeton University Press, 1953, pp. 157-166

    1953

  52. [60]

    Agmon, L

    S. Agmon, L. Bers, The Expansion Theorem for Pseudo-Analytic Func- tions, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 3, 5 (1952), 757-764

    1952

  53. [61]

    D. A. Storvick, On Pseudo-Analytic Functions, Nagoya Mathematical Journal, 12 (1957), 131-138

    1957

  54. [62]

    Koppelman, Boundary value problems for pseudoanalytic functions , Bull

    W. Koppelman, Boundary value problems for pseudoanalytic functions , Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 67, 4 (1961), 371-376

    1961

  55. [63]

    Y. L. Rodin, Algebraic theory of generalized analytic functions on closed Riemann surfaces, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,e 142, 5 (1962), 1030–1033

    1962

  56. [64]

    Sakai, Existence of Pseudo-Analytic Differentials on Riemann Sur- faces

    A. Sakai, Existence of Pseudo-Analytic Differentials on Riemann Sur- faces. I and II , Proceedings of the Japan Academy, 39, 1, (1963), 1-6; II, 7-9

    1963

  57. [65]

    I. A. Bikchantaev, Solutions of an elliptic system of first-order dif- ferential equations on a Riemann surface . Mathematical Notes of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 33, 1 (1983), 48–54

    1983

  58. [66]

    Y. L. Rodin, Generalized Analytic Functions on Riemann Surfaces , Springer-Verlag, 1987

    1987

  59. [67]

    Vladislav V

    V.V. Vladislav V. Kravchenko, Applied Pseudoanalytic Function The- ory, Springer-Verlag, 2009

    2009

  60. [68]

    Akhalaia, G

    G. Akhalaia, G. Giorgadze, V. Jikia, N. Kaldani. G. Makatsaria, N. Manjavidze, Elliptic systems on Riemann surfaces , Lecture Notes of TICMI, Vol.13, Tbilisi University Press, 2012. (chapter 9)

    2012

  61. [69]

    Astala, T

    K. Astala, T. Iwaniec, G. Martin, Elliptic Partial Differential Equations and Quasiconformal Mappings in the Plane , Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 2009

    2009

  62. [70]

    D. Cao, J. Wan, Structure of Green ’s function of elliptic equations and helical vortex patches for 3D incompressible Euler equations, Math. Ann. 388, (2024) 2627–2669. 29

    2024

  63. [71]

    D. Cao, J. Wan, Expansion of Green ’s function and regularity of Robin ’s function for elliptic operators in divergence form , arXiv:2401.11486 [math.AP]

    arXiv

  64. [72]

    Donati, C

    M. Donati, C. Lacave, E. Miot, , Dynamics of helical vortex filaments in non viscous incompressible flows arXiv:2403.00389[math.AP]

    arXiv

  65. [73]

    Khenissy, Y

    S. Khenissy, Y. Rebai, D. Ye, Expansion of the Green ’s function for divergence form operators , C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I, 348 (2010), 891–896

    2010

  66. [74]

    Fern´ andez-Real, X

    X. Fern´ andez-Real, X. Ros-Oton,Regularity Theory for Elliptic PDE , European Math. Soc. Press, 2022

    2022

  67. [75]

    B¨ uhler, T

    O. B¨ uhler, T. Jacobson, Wave-driven currents and vortex dynamics on barred beaches, J. Fluid Mech. 449 (2001), 313–339

    2001

  68. [76]

    A. S. Fokas, A. Nachbin, Water waves over a variable bottom: a non- local formulation and conformal mapping Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 695 (2012), 288–309

    2012

  69. [77]

    Kambe, Spiral vortex solution of Birkhoff-Rott equation , Physica D 37, 1–3 (1989), 463-473

    T. Kambe, Spiral vortex solution of Birkhoff-Rott equation , Physica D 37, 1–3 (1989), 463-473

    1989

  70. [78]

    Protas, Stability of confined vortex sheets , Theor

    B. Protas, Stability of confined vortex sheets , Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 35 (2021), 109–118

    2021

  71. [79]

    K. M. Wijnberg, A. Kroon, Barred beaches, Geomorphology 4 (2002) 103 – 120

    2002

  72. [80]

    R. A. Dalrymple, J. H. MacMahan, A. J. Reniers, V. Nelko, Rip currents, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 43 (2011), 551-581

    2011

  73. [81]

    Castelle, T

    B. Castelle, T. Scott, R.W. Brander, R.J. McCarroll, Rip current types, circulation and hazard , Earth-Science Reviews 163 (2016), 1-21

    2016

  74. [82]

    Mabiala, R

    F.Floc’h, G. Mabiala, R. Almar, B. Castelle, N. Hall, Y. Penhoat, T. Scott, C. Delacourt, Flash Rip Statistics from Video Images , Journal of Coastal Research, 81(sp1) (2018), 100-106

    2018

  75. [83]

    Houser, P

    C. Houser, P. Wernette, S. Trimble, S.Locknick, Rip currents , in D. Jackson, A. Short (eds.) Sandy Beach Morphodynamics , Elsevier, 2020, 255-276. 30

    2020

  76. [84]

    Castelle, G

    B. Castelle, G. Masselink, Morphodynamics of wave-dominated beaches, Cambridge Prisms: Coastal Futures 1 (2023), 1–13

    2023

  77. [85]

    R. S. Arthur, A Note on the Dynamics of Rip Currents , J. Geophysical Research 67, 7 (1962), 2777-2779

    1962

  78. [86]

    D. H. Peregrine, Surf Zone Currents , Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dynam- ics (1998) 10, 295–309

    1998

  79. [87]

    E. R. Johnson, N. R. McDonald, Surf-zone vortices over stepped to- pography, J. Fluid Mech. (2004), 511 (2004), 265–283

    2004

  80. [88]

    A. K. Hinds, E. R. Johnson, N. R. McDonald, Vortex scattering by step topography, J. Fluid Mech. 571 (2007), 495–505

    2007

  81. [89]

    Uchiyama, J

    Y. Uchiyama, J. C. McWilliams, A. F. Shchepetkin, Wave–current in- teraction in an oceanic circulation model with a vortex-force formalism: Application to the surf zone , Ocean Modelling 34 (2010), 16–35

    2010

  82. [90]

    J. C. McWilliams, C. Akan, Y. Uchiyama, Robustness of Nearshore Vortices, J. Fluid Mech. 50 (2018), R2, 850

    2018

  83. [91]

    S., Reduction of the Equations of Motion of Coaxial Vortex Rings to Canonical Form , Zap

    Vasilev, N. S., Reduction of the Equations of Motion of Coaxial Vortex Rings to Canonical Form , Zap. Fiz.-Mat. Fak. Imp. Novoross. Univ. 21 (1913), 1–12 (Russian)

    1913

  84. [92]

    Weinstein, Generalized axially symmetric potential theory , Bull

    A. Weinstein, Generalized axially symmetric potential theory , Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 59, 1 (1953), 20-38

    1953

  85. [93]

    Fryant, Ultraspherical expansions and pseudo analytic function , Pa- cific J

    A. Fryant, Ultraspherical expansions and pseudo analytic function , Pa- cific J. Math., 94:1 (1981), 83–105

    1981

  86. [94]

    Khesin, B., The vortex filament equation in any dimension , Procedia IUTAM 7 (2013), 135-140

    2013

  87. [95]

    Izosimov, A., Khesin, B., Vortex sheets and diffeomorphism groupoids , Advances in Mathematics 338 (2018), 447-501

    2018

  88. [96]

    Send, U., Vorticity and Instability during Flow Reversals on the Con- tinental Shelf , J. Phys. Ocean. 19 (1989), 1620–1633

    1989

  89. [97]

    Grimshaw, Z

    R. Grimshaw, Z. Yi, Evolution of a Potential Vorticity Front over a Topographic Slope, Journal of Physical Oceanography, 21, 8 (1991), 1240–1255. 31

    1991

  90. [98]

    Dong , H

    H. Dong , H. Li, Optimal Estimates for the Conductivity Problem by Green ’s Function Method, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 231 (2019), 1427–1453

    2019

  91. [99]

    Horv´ ath, T.,Adaptive finite element methods for elliptic equations Ph. d. thesis, Eotcos Lorand University, Budapest, 2013

    2013

  92. [100]

    G., Notes on Green ’s functions in inhomogeneous media MIT Course 18.303 (Created October 2010, updated October 21, 2011) https://math.mit.edu/~stevenj/18.303/inhomog-notes.pdf

    Johnson, S. G., Notes on Green ’s functions in inhomogeneous media MIT Course 18.303 (Created October 2010, updated October 21, 2011) https://math.mit.edu/~stevenj/18.303/inhomog-notes.pdf

    2010

  93. [101]

    Gray, Tubes, Springer Progress in Mathematics 221, 2nd ed., 2004

    A. Gray, Tubes, Springer Progress in Mathematics 221, 2nd ed., 2004. 32

    2004

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.