Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Review of Mathematical frameworks for Fairness in Machine Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.13755 v1 pith:SOXK6YFY submitted 2020-05-26 stat.ML cs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.LG
keywords fairfairnesstextitequalitylearningmathematicaloddsoptimal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

A review of the main fairness definitions and fair learning methodologies proposed in the literature over the last years is presented from a mathematical point of view. Following our independence-based approach, we consider how to build fair algorithms and the consequences on the degradation of their performance compared to the possibly unfair case. This corresponds to the price for fairness given by the criteria $\textit{statistical parity}$ or $\textit{equality of odds}$. Novel results giving the expressions of the optimal fair classifier and the optimal fair predictor (under a linear regression gaussian model) in the sense of $\textit{equality of odds}$ are presented.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fairness-Aware Grouping for Continuous Sensitive Variables: Application for Debiasing Face Analysis with respect to Skin Tone

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A fairness-based grouping algorithm that partitions a continuous sensitive attribute into subgroups with maximally different discrimination levels, validated on synthetic data and face images.

Pith tools