Coulomb Sectors and Scattering for Maxwell-Higgs Fields on Schwarzschild and Slowly Rotating Kerr Backgrounds

Bobby Eka Gunara; Fiki Taufik Akbar; Mulyanto

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 36 references

Small-data Maxwell–Higgs scattering on Schwarzschild is complete, and on slow Kerr it reduces to one named linear condition.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 18:52 UTC pith:SPKEAK5C

load-bearing objection The Schwarzschild scattering theory is the real, solid contribution; the Kerr scattering claims are honest but conditional on an unproved final-state condition and a missing appendix proof. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2603.04202 v2 pith:SPKEAK5C submitted 2026-03-04 gr-qc hep-thmath-phmath.APmath.MP

Coulomb Sectors and Scattering for Maxwell-Higgs Fields on Schwarzschild and Slowly Rotating Kerr Backgrounds

Bobby Eka Gunara , Mulyanto , Fiki Taufik Akbar This is my paper

classification gr-qc hep-thmath-phmath.APmath.MP MSC 35Q6135L0583C57

keywords Maxwell-HiggsSchwarzschildslowly rotating Kerrsmall-data global existencenonlinear scatteringradiation fieldsLorenz gaugeCoulomb sector

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tries to establish that small-data Maxwell–Higgs dynamics on black-hole exteriors reduces to a transfer principle: whenever the decoupled linear scalar and Maxwell equations satisfy a short list of energy, decay, horizon, and far-field estimates, the nonlinear Lorenz-gauge problem automatically has global solutions, radiation fields, wave operators, and asymptotic completeness. On Schwarzschild the paper proves those linear estimates from scratch, yielding a complete scattering theory that also covers a massive scalar field with a timelike channel. On slowly rotating Kerr the paper obtains an unconditional massless forward theory in the zero and small-electric sectors, while every rotating statement about wave operators, two-sided scattering, or massive fields is an explicit reduction to named spectral and final-state conditions that the paper does not prove. The payoff is a clean separation: the nonlinear mechanism is settled, and the open rotating difficulties are located precisely in the linear spectral analysis.

Core claim

The central claim is the transfer theorem: for any admissible stationary black-hole exterior satisfying a finite list of linear estimates — coercive redshift energy, trapping-degenerate Morawetz decay, an r^p far-field hierarchy, and two-sided linear scattering maps — the Lorenz-gauge Maxwell–Higgs evolution of small data is global and nonlinear-scattering-complete. The nonlinearity is tamed in the same source norms in which the linear equations are solved, so the Cauchy bootstrap and the final-state contraction close with no further geometric input. On Schwarzschild the paper verifies the whole linear list and obtains the four main structural results; on slowly rotating Kerr the forward mas

What carries the argument

The carrier of the argument is the transfer principle (Theorem 1.15): a fixed set of top-order linear estimates for the uncharged scalar wave/Klein–Gordon and Maxwell equations — redshift boundedness, trapping-degenerate integrated local energy decay, an r^p far-field hierarchy, and two-sided final-state maps — is sufficient to run the small-data nonlinear Maxwell–Higgs theory in Lorenz gauge, the divergence-free gauge condition that turns the system into a semilinear wave system. Its companion objects are the fixed-sector Coulomb splitting (subtracting the stationary Coulomb field and working with the radiative Maxwell remainder) and the phase-renormalized scalar radiation variable U^{-1}_{

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the linear estimates the argument borrows or proves actually hold at the stated thresholds—in particular, on slowly rotating Kerr, the named Maxwell final-state map MSK(M,a) and the massive scalar spectral conditions, neither of which this paper proves.

What would settle it

Two concrete checks would settle the central claim. First, on Schwarzschild, construct two distinct small Lorenz-compatible data sets whose nonlinear solutions have identical future radiation fields on I+ ∪ H+: asymptotic completeness would then fail. Second, on slowly rotating Kerr, test whether the charged scalar resolvent for (D_{Qe})^μ D_{Qe,μ} − m^2 has a resonance inside the window 0 < |Q_e| ≤ q_el^{(0)} stated by Theorem E.8; any such resonance would falsify the small-Coulomb comparison used by the Kerr forward theory.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

On Schwarzschild, every sufficiently small Lorenz-compatible datum in the zero sector yields a unique global smooth solution with uniform energy boundedness, integrated local energy decay, and finite radiation fluxes on I+ ∪ H+.
The Cauchy-to-radiation maps are homeomorphisms on small neighborhoods, so nonlinear wave operators exist and small-data asymptotic completeness holds in both the massless and massive cases; the massive case includes a timelike/Dollard channel at i±.
On slowly rotating Kerr, the massless zero and small-electric sectors are globally well posed with radiation fields, and the remaining Kerr wave-operator statement is conditional on the Maxwell final-state condition MSK(M,a).
Positive-mass rotating Kerr admits no unconditional small-data theorem: any massive rotating scattering claim requires the stated spectral conditions, and a theorem covering all positive masses would be false.
In electric Coulomb sectors the scalar radiation variable is U^{-1}_{Qe} r φ, and all scattering maps descend to the residual Lorenz-gauge quotient, so the constructed operators are gauge invariant.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The transfer principle suggests the same reduction should apply to other semilinear gauge systems on stationary black holes once matching linear estimates exist; the paper does not claim this.
The Coulomb phase normalization U^{-1}_{Qe} r φ predicts that charged scalar radiation on black holes carries a log-corrected phase analogous to flat-space Coulomb scattering; this is derived in the paper's sector but not pursued beyond it.
A testable extension is to close the rotating massive gap by proving MSK(M,a) and the massive scalar spectral windows; the nonlinear layer of this paper would then automatically supply unconditional Kerr massive scattering.
If the Schwarzschild small-mass electric window (1.32) is sharp, it suggests that charged massive fields can scatter even with arbitrarily small positive mass, unlike the neutral massive case with its known large-mass obstruction.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

The Schwarzschild scattering theory is the real, solid contribution; the Kerr scattering claims are honest but conditional on an unproved final-state condition and a missing appendix proof.

read the letter

Colleague, here is my take. The paper is better than its title suggests: the actual deliverable is a complete small-data nonlinear scattering theory for Maxwell–Higgs on Schwarzschild, plus a transfer-principle framework that cleanly reduces the same conclusion on slowly rotating Kerr to a named list of linear and final-state estimates. The Schwarzschild part is self-contained — redshift, Morawetz, r^p hierarchy, radiation fields, wave operators, asymptotic completeness, massive timelike channel — and the bootstrap and contraction structure is internally coherent. The Coulomb-phase renormalization is a sensible bookkeeping device, and fixed-sector charge conservation is handled properly. Credit is due: the authors are unusually honest about what is proved versus what is assumed, and the rotating claims carry their conditions visibly.

Soft spots are exactly where the stress-test lands. The small-electric massless Kerr sector depends on Theorem E.8, whose proof is not in the text I saw; the Kerr Maxwell wave operators and asymptotic completeness all depend on MSK(M,a), which is defined but neither proved nor cited. If either of those fails at the stated thresholds, the corresponding Kerr conclusions collapse. This is not circularity — the reduction is transparent and the Schwarzschild theorems stand independently — but it does mean the "scattering on slowly rotating Kerr" in the title is largely a promise pending external inputs. The abstract's "robust massless forward theory" is accurate; the scattering part is more conditional than the title implies. The massive energy theorem under ME is explicitly a Cauchy theorem, not a final-state one, which I respect.

A referee must see the Appendix E proof and the Appendix F material before the Kerr small-electric sector can be accepted. Relying on the cited linear estimates [1–3] is normal and fine; the unproved condition that matters is MSK. Who is this for: researchers working on nonlinear stability and scattering for gauge fields on black holes, and anyone who wants a transfer-principle template. It deserves a serious referee, not a desk rejection.

My recommendation: engage with it, but require the missing appendix proofs and ask the authors to either prove or cite MSK, or to restate the Kerr scattering theorems as explicitly conditional corollaries — and to adjust the title accordingly. The Schwarzschild core is solid and likely correct.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a small-data global and scattering theory for the Maxwell–Higgs system in Lorenz gauge on Schwarzschild and slowly rotating Kerr exteriors. The central mechanism is a transfer principle (Theorem 1.15): given a set of linear estimates Lin_K — energy boundedness, redshift, Morawetz/ILED, far-field r^p hierarchy, and two-sided linear final-state maps — the nonlinear problem closes by a bootstrap plus tail contraction, yielding global existence, gauge-covariant radiation fields, nonlinear wave operators, asymptotic completeness, tangency, and a Born expansion. On Schwarzschild the paper presents a self-contained realization of the linear estimates and states complete nonlinear scattering in the zero and fixed-electric sectors. On Kerr, the massless zero-sector forward Cauchy theorem is presented as following from cited scalar and Maxwell estimates; the small-electric sector is said to follow from a comparison theorem in Appendix E; and all rotating Maxwell wave-operator/asymptotic-completeness statements require the explicitly named condition MSK(M,a), while massive rotating statements require further spectral conditions. The main unresolved point in the reviewed text is that the proof of Theorem E.8 is not present, so the small-electric Kerr conclusions are currently conditional on an unavailable lemma.

Significance. If the Schwarzschild results are correct, they constitute a substantive advance: a nonlinear small-data Maxwell–Higgs scattering theory on Schwarzschild with gauge-covariant radiation fields, a Coulomb long-range phase, and a clean transfer mechanism. The paper is unusually careful in separating proved results from externally supplied or open linear inputs, and I found no fitted parameters or circular use of the conclusion. The transfer principle itself is a valuable reduction: it isolates the nonlinear mechanism from the geometry-specific linear theory. The Kerr statements are largely honest reduction theorems, and the explicit list of standing conditions in Appendix A is helpful. However, the small-electric Kerr sectors are load-bearing parts of the main theorem, and the missing proof of Theorem E.8 is a substantive gap that must be addressed before the paper can be accepted.

major comments (3)

[Appendix E, Theorem E.8] The proof of Theorem E.8 is not present in the reviewed version. This is load-bearing: Theorem 1.1 includes the range 0<|Qe|≤q_el, and its proof states that the scalar comparison estimate is Theorem E.8 in that range; the introductory 'Unconditional and conditional results' paragraph says the small-Coulomb comparison is proved in Appendix E. Without the proof, the small-electric Kerr forward Cauchy, decay, and radiation statements are not established. The revision must either supply a complete proof on slowly rotating Kerr — including the full r^p hierarchy, inhomogeneous source estimates, and two-sided final-state maps for the charged scalar operator — or explicitly demote the 0<|Qe| sectors of Theorem 1.1 to conditional status and revise the abstract accordingly.
[Definition 1.6 and Theorem 1.1] MSK(M,a) is named in Definition 1.6 but is neither proved nor cited. Since every rotating Maxwell wave-operator, two-sided scattering, and asymptotic-completeness statement in Theorem 1.1 is conditioned on MSK, these are reduction theorems rather than established results. The proof is transparent about this, but the abstract and the theorem statement could mislead: the phrase 'complete' and the presence of wave-operator conclusions in a 'Main Kerr theorem' should be accompanied by an explicit statement in the theorem itself that the inverse Maxwell final-state input remains open/unproved. I recommend either adding this caveat to the theorem statement or moving the wave-operator part into a separate conditional corollary.
[Abstract and §1.1] The abstract states that the slowly rotating Kerr part gives 'a robust massless forward theory and a perturbative small-electric extension'. In the reviewed text, the massless zero-sector forward theory rests on the cited estimates [1–3], but the perturbative small-electric extension rests on Theorem E.8, whose proof is absent. The abstract should be adjusted so that the small-electric Kerr claim is labeled as unconditional only after the proof of Theorem E.8 is supplied, or as conditional on it. This is not a circularity issue, but it is a mismatch between the stated unconditional content and what the manuscript currently proves.

minor comments (5)

[§1.5 and §5.2] The symbol F is used both for the Maxwell curvature and for an external forcing term. Remark 5.1 acknowledges this, but the ambiguity is a readability burden; a different symbol such as \mathcal F for forcing would help.
[Throughout] Several phrases read 'therp hierarchy' instead of 'the r^p hierarchy'; these typos should be corrected.
[§1.5] The notation 'v_+-type bounds' is used before v_+ is defined (it is defined later in §2.6). Define v_+ and w_+ in the introduction or move the notation to a preliminary section.
[§1.1, Theorem 1.2] The massive energy theorem is explicitly conditional on ME(m)_N, which is an external spectral condition. This is acceptable, but a one-sentence reminder in the theorem statement that ME(m)_N is not proved here and is known to fail for some masses on rotating Kerr would improve precision.
[Appendix A] The collected conditions are useful, but the number of named conditions (Lin_K, SKG, ME, CE, SMS, MSK, RS) is large. A short table listing which conditions are proved, which are cited, and which are open would make the paper easier to navigate.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular derivation: Kerr claims are conditional reductions to stated linear/spectral inputs; Schwarzschild model is independently proved.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is built from honest reductions rather than circular ones. Theorem 1.15 is an explicit transfer principle: it shows that if a list of linear estimates Lin_K (redshift, Morawetz/r^p hierarchy, two-sided linear scattering) is available, then the nonlinear Maxwell-Higgs problem inherits global existence, radiation fields, wave operators, and asymptotic completeness. This is proved directly by a bootstrap and contraction argument (Subsection 2.3), not by assuming the conclusion. The Schwarzschild theorems are presented as self-contained realizations of Lin_K, with the linear estimates developed in Sections 8-11 and summarized in Proposition 2.6; hence their derivation does not reduce to their inputs by construction. The slowly rotating Kerr statements are explicitly conditional: Theorem 1.1 relies on 'the published scalar estimates [1,2] and the charge-subtracted Maxwell estimates [3]' and on Theorem E.8, while wave operators and asymptotic completeness are conditioned on MSK(M,a) as an 'additional inverse final-state part' named in Definition 1.6. The paper repeatedly separates 'established massless and small-electric forward regimes' from 'conditional' scattering claims, e.g. in the Scope and limitations paragraph: 'Every massive rotating scattering assertion, and the rotating Maxwell wave operators, are conditional: they are honest reduction theorems showing that the named linear inputs SKG, CE, SMS, and MSK suffice for the nonlinear conclusion.' No fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction: Q_e is a prescribed conserved charge sector, U_Qe is a phase normalization derived from the fixed Coulomb potential, and the thresholds are non-optimized smallness constants. The unproved status of Theorem E.8 and MSK is a conditionality/missing-proof issue, not circularity: the stated conclusions do not claim these inputs as consequences of the nonlinear theory. Therefore no quoted step exhibits the specific reduction of a claimed result to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

There are no empirical fits in this paper: all numerical thresholds are existence parameters for the proofs. The central claim rests on a list of linear estimates; on Schwarzschild they are proved, on Kerr they are either cited or explicitly named spectral/final-state conditions. This transparency is the main strength, and also the main fragility of the rotating results.

free parameters (5)

a_slow(M,K) = not specified
Slow-rotation threshold in Definition 1.1; chosen below the thresholds in the cited scalar/Maxwell linear estimates, not optimized.
q_el(M,a,K) = not specified
Small-electric-charge threshold from Theorem E.8; a small-charge window for charged massless scalar estimates, not an empirical constant.
Small-data thresholds (epsilon_K, epsilon_E, epsilon_sc, etc.) = not specified
Existence thresholds used to close the bootstrap and contraction arguments; only their existence matters, no numerical values are fitted.
delta (Kerr decay-loss exponent) = 0 < delta < 1 arbitrary
Small loss parameter in the r^p hierarchy and pointwise decay rates; fixed once and used consistently, not constrained by data.
K (commutation order) = K >= 10
Top order chosen for Sobolev embedding and tame estimates; all theorems are stated uniformly for sufficiently large K.

axioms (7)

domain assumption Assumption 1.1 on the scalar potential: P is gauge-invariant, C-infinity, P(0)=0, P>=0, and the nonlinear force is cubic or higher with polynomial growth.
Restricts the theory to small perturbations of the trivial vacuum and excludes symmetry-broken Higgs/vortex sectors; the paper explicitly notes this.
domain assumption Admissible slowly rotating Kerr background with |a| <= a_slow(M,K).
Definition 1.1; all Kerr theorems are restricted to this slow-rotation range.
domain assumption Lorenz-gauge global-potential formulation with Lorenz- and Gauss-compatible Cauchy data.
The proofs work in Lorenz gauge; constraint propagation is proved in the paper, but the global-potential formulation and admissible data classes are assumed.
domain assumption External massless linear estimates on slowly rotating Kerr: scalar estimates [1,2] and charge-subtracted Maxwell estimates [3].
These are the backbone of Theorem 1.1 and are cited, not proved, in this paper.
domain assumption Named spectral/final-state conditions for rotating massive or inverse-scattering results: ME(m)_N, SKG(m)_K, CE(m)_K, SMS(m)_K, and MSK(M,a).
Definitions 1.2-1.6; these are explicit unproved hypotheses for Theorem 1.2 and for rotating Maxwell wave operators.
domain assumption Classical massive scalar timelike/Dollard channel on Schwarzschild from [18-20].
Used in Theorem 2.8 and the massive Schwarzschild final-state construction; cited, not reproved.
standard math Kerr exterior geometry, Kerr-star foliation, redshift multiplier, and admissible commutator algebra.
Standard background geometry used throughout Definition 1.12 and the energy estimates.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 62659 in / 17069 out tokens · 168048 ms · 2026-08-02T18:52:34.047746+00:00 · methodology

0 comments

read the original abstract

We develop a small-data Maxwell--Higgs theory on Schwarzschild and slowly rotating Kerr black-hole exteriors for gauge-invariant nonnegative self-interactions near the trivial vacuum. The Schwarzschild part gives a complete global, radiative, and scattering theory, while the slowly rotating Kerr part gives a robust massless forward theory and a perturbative small-electric extension. The main mechanism is a transfer principle: once the required linear energy, decay, horizon, and far-field estimates are available, the nonlinear Lorenz-gauge problem yields global existence, gauge-covariant radiation fields, nonlinear wave operators, and asymptotic completeness. The Coulomb-sector analysis identifies the correct long-range normalization in fixed electric sectors and separates the genuinely proved results from the remaining rotating massive final-state problems. All Kerr scattering statements beyond the established massless and small-electric forward regimes are stated explicitly under their necessary spectral and final-state conditions, namely, no rapid-rotation, large-charge, and unconditional massive rotating scattering.

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages

[1]

Dafermos, I

M. Dafermos, I. Rodnianski, and Y. Shlapentokh-Rothman, A scattering theory for the wave equation on Kerr black hole exteriors,Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér.51(2018), no. 2, 371-486. DOI:10.24033/asens.2358

work page doi:10.24033/asens.2358 2018
[2]

Dafermos, I

M. Dafermos, I. Rodnianski, and Y. Shlapentokh-Rothman, Decay for solutions of the wave equation on Kerr exterior spacetimes III: The full subextremal case|a|< M,Ann. of Math. 183(2016), no. 3, 787-913

2016
[3]

Andersson and P

L. Andersson and P. Blue, Uniform energy bound and asymptotics for the Maxwell field on a slowly rotating Kerr black hole exterior,J. Hyperbolic Differ. Equ.12(2015), no. 4, 689-743. DOI:10.1142/S0219891615500204

work page doi:10.1142/s0219891615500204 2015
[4]

Shlapentokh-Rothman, Exponentially growing finite energy solutions for the Klein-Gordon equation on sub-extremal Kerr spacetimes,Comm

Y. Shlapentokh-Rothman, Exponentially growing finite energy solutions for the Klein-Gordon equation on sub-extremal Kerr spacetimes,Comm. Math. Phys.329(2014), no. 3, 859-891. DOI:10.1007/s00220-014-2033-x

work page doi:10.1007/s00220-014-2033-x 2014
[5]

E. D. Fackerell and J. R. Ipser, Weak electromagnetic fields around a rotating black hole,Phys. Rev. D5(1972), no. 10, 2455-2458. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.5.2455. Maxwell-Higgs dynamics, Coulomb sectors, and scattering156

doi:10.1103/physrevd.5.2455 1972
[6]

Dafermos and I

M. Dafermos and I. Rodnianski, The red-shift effect and radiation decay on black hole space- times,Comm. Pure Appl. Math.62(2009), 859-919. DOI:10.1002/cpa.20281

doi:10.1002/cpa.20281 2009
[7]

Blue and J

P. Blue and J. Sterbenz, Uniform decay of local energy and the semi-linear wave equation on Schwarzschild space,Comm. Math. Phys.268(2006), no. 2, 481-504

2006
[8]

Dafermos and I

M. Dafermos and I. Rodnianski, A new physical-space approach to decay for the wave equation with applications to black hole spacetimes, inXVIth International Congress on Mathematical Physics, World Scientific, 2010, pp. 421-432

2010
[9]

Dafermos and I

M. Dafermos and I. Rodnianski, A proof of the uniform boundedness of solutions to the wave equation on slowly rotating Kerr backgrounds,Invent. Math.185(2011), no. 3, 467-559

2011
[10]

Tataru and M

D. Tataru and M. Tohaneanu, A local energy estimate on Kerr black hole backgrounds,Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN2011, no. 2, 248-292
[11]

Moschidis, Ther p-weighted energy method of Dafermos and Rodnianski in general asymp- totically flat spacetimes and applications,Ann

G. Moschidis, Ther p-weighted energy method of Dafermos and Rodnianski in general asymp- totically flat spacetimes and applications,Ann. PDE2(2016), no. 1, Paper 6

2016
[12]

Finster, N

F. Finster, N. Kamran, J. Smoller, and S.-T. Yau, Decay of solutions of the wave equation in the Kerr geometry,Comm. Math. Phys.264(2006), no. 2, 465-503

2006
[13]

Wunsch and M

J. Wunsch and M. Zworski, Resolvent estimates for normally hyperbolic trapped sets,Ann. Henri Poincaré12(2011), no. 7, 1349-1385

2011
[14]

Metcalfe, D

J. Metcalfe, D. Tataru, and M. Tohaneanu, Price’s law on nonstationary space-times,Adv. Math.230(2012), no. 3, 995-1028

2012
[15]

Blue, Decay of the Maxwell field on the Schwarzschild manifold,J

P. Blue, Decay of the Maxwell field on the Schwarzschild manifold,J. Hyperbolic Differ. Equ. 5(2008), no. 4, 807-856. DOI:10.1142/S0219891608001714

work page doi:10.1142/s0219891608001714 2008
[16]

Andersson, T

L. Andersson, T. Bäckdahl, and P. Blue, Decay of solutions to the Maxwell equa- tion on the Schwarzschild background,Class. Quantum Grav.33(2016), 085010. DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/33/8/085010

work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/33/8/085010 2016
[17]

Nicolas and G

J.-P. Nicolas and G. Taujanskas, Conformal scattering of Maxwell potentials,Ann. Inst. Fourier, online first (2025). DOI:10.5802/aif.3733. PreprintarXiv:2211.14579

arXiv 2025
[18]

Dimock and B

J. Dimock and B. S. Kay, Classical and quantum scattering theory for linear scalar fields on the Schwarzschild metric. I,Ann. Phys.175(1987), no. 2, 366-426

1987
[19]

Bachelot, Asymptotic completeness for the Klein-Gordon equation on the Schwarzschild metric,Ann

A. Bachelot, Asymptotic completeness for the Klein-Gordon equation on the Schwarzschild metric,Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Phys. Théor.61(1994), no. 4, 411-441

1994
[20]

Nicolas, Conformal scattering on the Schwarzschild metric,Annales de l’Institut Fourier 66(2016), no

J.-P. Nicolas, Conformal scattering on the Schwarzschild metric,Annales de l’Institut Fourier 66(2016), no. 3, 1175-1216. DOI:10.5802/aif.3034

work page doi:10.5802/aif.3034 2016
[21]

D.M.EardleyandV.Moncrief, TheglobalexistenceofYang-Mills-Higgsfieldsin4-dimensional Minkowski space. I. Local existence and smoothness properties,Comm. Math. Phys.83(1982), no. 2, 171-191

1982
[22]

D.M.EardleyandV.Moncrief, TheglobalexistenceofYang-Mills-Higgsfieldsin4-dimensional Minkowski space. II. Completion of proof,Comm. Math. Phys.83(1982), no. 2, 193-212. Maxwell-Higgs dynamics, Coulomb sectors, and scattering157

1982
[23]

Ginibre and G

J. Ginibre and G. Velo, The Cauchy problem for coupled Yang-Mills and scalar fields in the Lorentz gauge,Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Phys. Théor.36(1982), no. 1, 59-78

1982
[24]

Klainerman and M

S. Klainerman and M. Machedon, On the Maxwell-Klein-Gordon equation with finite energy, Duke Math. J.74(1994), no. 1, 19-44

1994
[25]

Machedon and J

M. Machedon and J. Sterbenz, Almost optimal local well-posedness for the (3+1)-dimensional Maxwell-Klein-Gordon equations,J. Amer. Math. Soc.17(2004), no. 2, 297-359

2004
[26]

Masmoudi and K

N. Masmoudi and K. Nakanishi, Uniqueness of finite energy solutions for Maxwell-Dirac and Maxwell-Klein-Gordon equations,Comm. Math. Phys.243(2003), no. 1, 123-136

2003
[27]

Candy, C

T. Candy, C. Kauffman, and H. Lindblad, Asymptotic behavior of the Maxwell-Klein-Gordon system,Comm. Math. Phys.367(2019), no. 2, 683-716

2019
[28]

He, Scattering from infinity of the Maxwell-Klein-Gordon equations in Lorenz gauge,Comm

L. He, Scattering from infinity of the Maxwell-Klein-Gordon equations in Lorenz gauge,Comm. Math. Phys.386(2021), no. 3, 1747-1801

2021
[29]

Chen, Asymptotics and scattering for massive Maxwell-Klein-Gordon equations,Comm

X. Chen, Asymptotics and scattering for massive Maxwell-Klein-Gordon equations,Comm. Math. Phys.405(2024), no. 5, Article 133. DOI:10.1007/s00220-024-05023-5. Preprint arXiv:2309.15834

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[30]

W. Dai, H. Mei, D. Wei, and S. Yang, The Maxwell-Klein-Gordon equation with scatter- ing data,Adv. Math.471(2025), 110271. DOI:10.1016/j.aim.2025.110271. Preprint arXiv:2302.08732

arXiv 2025
[31]

Nicolas, A nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation on Kerr metrics,J

J.-P. Nicolas, A nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation on Kerr metrics,J. Math. Pures Appl.81 (2002), no. 9, 885-914. DOI:10.1016/S0021-7824(02)01272-2

work page doi:10.1016/s0021-7824(02)01272-2 2002
[32]

P. T. Xuan, Geometric scattering for nonlinear wave equations on the Schwarzschild met- ric,Anal. Math. Phys.16(2026), Article 40. DOI:10.1007/s13324-026-01181-y. Preprint arXiv:2410.17745v2

arXiv 2026
[33]

Taujanskas, Conformal scattering of the Maxwell-scalar field system on de Sitter space,J

G. Taujanskas, Conformal scattering of the Maxwell-scalar field system on de Sitter space,J. Hyperbolic Differ. Equ.16(2019), no. 4, 743-791. DOI:10.1142/S021989161950019X. Preprint arXiv:1809.01559

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[34]

Mokdad, Decay of Maxwell fields on Reissner-Nordström-de Sitter black holes, Lett

M. Mokdad, Decay of Maxwell fields on Reissner-Nordström-de Sitter black holes, Lett. Math. Phys.110(2020), 1961-2018. DOI:10.1007/s11005-020-01273-1. Preprint arXiv:1704.06441

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020
[35]

Bachelot, Superradiance and scattering of the charged Klein-Gordon field by a step- like electrostatic potential,J

A. Bachelot, Superradiance and scattering of the charged Klein-Gordon field by a step- like electrostatic potential,J. Math. Pures Appl.83(2004), no. 10, 1179-1239. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpur.2004.03.007

work page doi:10.1016/j.matpur.2004.03.007 2004
[36]

Furuhashi and Y

H. Furuhashi and Y. Nambu, Instability of massive scalar fields in Kerr-Newman space- time,Prog. Theor. Phys.112(2004), no. 6, 983-995. DOI:10.1143/PTP.112.983. Preprint gr-qc/0402037

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

[1] [1]

Dafermos, I

M. Dafermos, I. Rodnianski, and Y. Shlapentokh-Rothman, A scattering theory for the wave equation on Kerr black hole exteriors,Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér.51(2018), no. 2, 371-486. DOI:10.24033/asens.2358

work page doi:10.24033/asens.2358 2018

[2] [2]

Dafermos, I

M. Dafermos, I. Rodnianski, and Y. Shlapentokh-Rothman, Decay for solutions of the wave equation on Kerr exterior spacetimes III: The full subextremal case|a|< M,Ann. of Math. 183(2016), no. 3, 787-913

2016

[3] [3]

Andersson and P

L. Andersson and P. Blue, Uniform energy bound and asymptotics for the Maxwell field on a slowly rotating Kerr black hole exterior,J. Hyperbolic Differ. Equ.12(2015), no. 4, 689-743. DOI:10.1142/S0219891615500204

work page doi:10.1142/s0219891615500204 2015

[4] [4]

Shlapentokh-Rothman, Exponentially growing finite energy solutions for the Klein-Gordon equation on sub-extremal Kerr spacetimes,Comm

Y. Shlapentokh-Rothman, Exponentially growing finite energy solutions for the Klein-Gordon equation on sub-extremal Kerr spacetimes,Comm. Math. Phys.329(2014), no. 3, 859-891. DOI:10.1007/s00220-014-2033-x

work page doi:10.1007/s00220-014-2033-x 2014

[5] [5]

E. D. Fackerell and J. R. Ipser, Weak electromagnetic fields around a rotating black hole,Phys. Rev. D5(1972), no. 10, 2455-2458. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.5.2455. Maxwell-Higgs dynamics, Coulomb sectors, and scattering156

doi:10.1103/physrevd.5.2455 1972

[6] [6]

Dafermos and I

M. Dafermos and I. Rodnianski, The red-shift effect and radiation decay on black hole space- times,Comm. Pure Appl. Math.62(2009), 859-919. DOI:10.1002/cpa.20281

doi:10.1002/cpa.20281 2009

[7] [7]

Blue and J

P. Blue and J. Sterbenz, Uniform decay of local energy and the semi-linear wave equation on Schwarzschild space,Comm. Math. Phys.268(2006), no. 2, 481-504

2006

[8] [8]

Dafermos and I

M. Dafermos and I. Rodnianski, A new physical-space approach to decay for the wave equation with applications to black hole spacetimes, inXVIth International Congress on Mathematical Physics, World Scientific, 2010, pp. 421-432

2010

[9] [9]

Dafermos and I

M. Dafermos and I. Rodnianski, A proof of the uniform boundedness of solutions to the wave equation on slowly rotating Kerr backgrounds,Invent. Math.185(2011), no. 3, 467-559

2011

[10] [10]

Tataru and M

D. Tataru and M. Tohaneanu, A local energy estimate on Kerr black hole backgrounds,Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN2011, no. 2, 248-292

[11] [11]

Moschidis, Ther p-weighted energy method of Dafermos and Rodnianski in general asymp- totically flat spacetimes and applications,Ann

G. Moschidis, Ther p-weighted energy method of Dafermos and Rodnianski in general asymp- totically flat spacetimes and applications,Ann. PDE2(2016), no. 1, Paper 6

2016

[12] [12]

Finster, N

F. Finster, N. Kamran, J. Smoller, and S.-T. Yau, Decay of solutions of the wave equation in the Kerr geometry,Comm. Math. Phys.264(2006), no. 2, 465-503

2006

[13] [13]

Wunsch and M

J. Wunsch and M. Zworski, Resolvent estimates for normally hyperbolic trapped sets,Ann. Henri Poincaré12(2011), no. 7, 1349-1385

2011

[14] [14]

Metcalfe, D

J. Metcalfe, D. Tataru, and M. Tohaneanu, Price’s law on nonstationary space-times,Adv. Math.230(2012), no. 3, 995-1028

2012

[15] [15]

Blue, Decay of the Maxwell field on the Schwarzschild manifold,J

P. Blue, Decay of the Maxwell field on the Schwarzschild manifold,J. Hyperbolic Differ. Equ. 5(2008), no. 4, 807-856. DOI:10.1142/S0219891608001714

work page doi:10.1142/s0219891608001714 2008

[16] [16]

Andersson, T

L. Andersson, T. Bäckdahl, and P. Blue, Decay of solutions to the Maxwell equa- tion on the Schwarzschild background,Class. Quantum Grav.33(2016), 085010. DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/33/8/085010

work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/33/8/085010 2016

[17] [17]

Nicolas and G

J.-P. Nicolas and G. Taujanskas, Conformal scattering of Maxwell potentials,Ann. Inst. Fourier, online first (2025). DOI:10.5802/aif.3733. PreprintarXiv:2211.14579

arXiv 2025

[18] [18]

Dimock and B

J. Dimock and B. S. Kay, Classical and quantum scattering theory for linear scalar fields on the Schwarzschild metric. I,Ann. Phys.175(1987), no. 2, 366-426

1987

[19] [19]

Bachelot, Asymptotic completeness for the Klein-Gordon equation on the Schwarzschild metric,Ann

A. Bachelot, Asymptotic completeness for the Klein-Gordon equation on the Schwarzschild metric,Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Phys. Théor.61(1994), no. 4, 411-441

1994

[20] [20]

Nicolas, Conformal scattering on the Schwarzschild metric,Annales de l’Institut Fourier 66(2016), no

J.-P. Nicolas, Conformal scattering on the Schwarzschild metric,Annales de l’Institut Fourier 66(2016), no. 3, 1175-1216. DOI:10.5802/aif.3034

work page doi:10.5802/aif.3034 2016

[21] [21]

D.M.EardleyandV.Moncrief, TheglobalexistenceofYang-Mills-Higgsfieldsin4-dimensional Minkowski space. I. Local existence and smoothness properties,Comm. Math. Phys.83(1982), no. 2, 171-191

1982

[22] [22]

D.M.EardleyandV.Moncrief, TheglobalexistenceofYang-Mills-Higgsfieldsin4-dimensional Minkowski space. II. Completion of proof,Comm. Math. Phys.83(1982), no. 2, 193-212. Maxwell-Higgs dynamics, Coulomb sectors, and scattering157

1982

[23] [23]

Ginibre and G

J. Ginibre and G. Velo, The Cauchy problem for coupled Yang-Mills and scalar fields in the Lorentz gauge,Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Phys. Théor.36(1982), no. 1, 59-78

1982

[24] [24]

Klainerman and M

S. Klainerman and M. Machedon, On the Maxwell-Klein-Gordon equation with finite energy, Duke Math. J.74(1994), no. 1, 19-44

1994

[25] [25]

Machedon and J

M. Machedon and J. Sterbenz, Almost optimal local well-posedness for the (3+1)-dimensional Maxwell-Klein-Gordon equations,J. Amer. Math. Soc.17(2004), no. 2, 297-359

2004

[26] [26]

Masmoudi and K

N. Masmoudi and K. Nakanishi, Uniqueness of finite energy solutions for Maxwell-Dirac and Maxwell-Klein-Gordon equations,Comm. Math. Phys.243(2003), no. 1, 123-136

2003

[27] [27]

Candy, C

T. Candy, C. Kauffman, and H. Lindblad, Asymptotic behavior of the Maxwell-Klein-Gordon system,Comm. Math. Phys.367(2019), no. 2, 683-716

2019

[28] [28]

He, Scattering from infinity of the Maxwell-Klein-Gordon equations in Lorenz gauge,Comm

L. He, Scattering from infinity of the Maxwell-Klein-Gordon equations in Lorenz gauge,Comm. Math. Phys.386(2021), no. 3, 1747-1801

2021

[29] [29]

Chen, Asymptotics and scattering for massive Maxwell-Klein-Gordon equations,Comm

X. Chen, Asymptotics and scattering for massive Maxwell-Klein-Gordon equations,Comm. Math. Phys.405(2024), no. 5, Article 133. DOI:10.1007/s00220-024-05023-5. Preprint arXiv:2309.15834

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

[30] [30]

W. Dai, H. Mei, D. Wei, and S. Yang, The Maxwell-Klein-Gordon equation with scatter- ing data,Adv. Math.471(2025), 110271. DOI:10.1016/j.aim.2025.110271. Preprint arXiv:2302.08732

arXiv 2025

[31] [31]

Nicolas, A nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation on Kerr metrics,J

J.-P. Nicolas, A nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation on Kerr metrics,J. Math. Pures Appl.81 (2002), no. 9, 885-914. DOI:10.1016/S0021-7824(02)01272-2

work page doi:10.1016/s0021-7824(02)01272-2 2002

[32] [32]

P. T. Xuan, Geometric scattering for nonlinear wave equations on the Schwarzschild met- ric,Anal. Math. Phys.16(2026), Article 40. DOI:10.1007/s13324-026-01181-y. Preprint arXiv:2410.17745v2

arXiv 2026

[33] [33]

Taujanskas, Conformal scattering of the Maxwell-scalar field system on de Sitter space,J

G. Taujanskas, Conformal scattering of the Maxwell-scalar field system on de Sitter space,J. Hyperbolic Differ. Equ.16(2019), no. 4, 743-791. DOI:10.1142/S021989161950019X. Preprint arXiv:1809.01559

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

[34] [34]

Mokdad, Decay of Maxwell fields on Reissner-Nordström-de Sitter black holes, Lett

M. Mokdad, Decay of Maxwell fields on Reissner-Nordström-de Sitter black holes, Lett. Math. Phys.110(2020), 1961-2018. DOI:10.1007/s11005-020-01273-1. Preprint arXiv:1704.06441

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

[35] [35]

Bachelot, Superradiance and scattering of the charged Klein-Gordon field by a step- like electrostatic potential,J

A. Bachelot, Superradiance and scattering of the charged Klein-Gordon field by a step- like electrostatic potential,J. Math. Pures Appl.83(2004), no. 10, 1179-1239. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpur.2004.03.007

work page doi:10.1016/j.matpur.2004.03.007 2004

[36] [36]

Furuhashi and Y

H. Furuhashi and Y. Nambu, Instability of massive scalar fields in Kerr-Newman space- time,Prog. Theor. Phys.112(2004), no. 6, 983-995. DOI:10.1143/PTP.112.983. Preprint gr-qc/0402037

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004