Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Further analysis of cGAN: A system for Generative Deep Learning Post-processing of Precipitation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.15689 v1 pith:SQFS7E7K submitted 2023-09-27 physics.ao-ph

classification physics.ao-ph
keywords trainedmodelrainfallcganregiondataimprovedregions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The conditional generative adversarial rainfall model "cGAN" developed for the UK \cite{Harris22} was trained to post-process into an ensemble and downscale ERA5 rainfall to 1km resolution over three regions of the USA and the UK. Relative to radar data (stage IV and NIMROD), the quality of the forecast rainfall distribution was quantified locally at each grid point and between grid points using the spatial correlation structure. Despite only having information from a single lower quality analysis, the ensembles of post processed rainfall produced were found to be competitive with IFS ensemble forecasts with lead times of between 8 and 16 hours. Comparison to the original cGAN trained on the UK using the IFS HRES forecast indicates that improved training forecasts result in improved post-processing. The cGAN models were additionally applied to the regions that they were not trained on. Each model performed well in their own region indicating that each model is somewhat region specific. However the model trained on the Washington DC, Atlantic coast, region achieved good scores across the USA and was competitive over the UK. There are more overall rainfall events spread over the whole region so the improved scores might be simply due to increased data. A model was therefore trained using data from all four regions which then outperformed the models trained locally.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. RainShift: A Benchmark for Precipitation Downscaling Across Geographies

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    RainShift is a global benchmark showing that precipitation downscaling models lose up to 30% accuracy when applied to unseen Global South regions, and input quantile mapping recovers some of that loss.

Pith tools