Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 97 references

FLFL: Federated Latent Factor Learning for Private Recovery of Spatio-Temporal Signals

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-26 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A federated latent factor model recovers missing sensor signals by training only on uploaded gradients while enforcing spatio-temporal correlations.

desk verdict FLFL wraps latent factor learning in a federated setup for sensor data recovery and shows accuracy gains, but the privacy protection from gradient sharing is not analyzed or tested. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.23091 v1 pith:SQNCTONE submitted 2026-06-22 cs.LG cs.AI

Chengjun Yu , Di Wu , Yi He , Jia Chen This is my paper
classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords federatedlearninglatentfactorwirelesssensornetworksmissingdatarecoveryprivacypreservationspatio-temporalsignalsmatrixcompletion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces FLFL to recover missing data in wireless sensor networks without centralizing raw signals. Each sensor participates in a federated latent factor framework by sending gradients rather than its private readings, and the training objective adds a regularization term that captures spatial and temporal dependencies among sensors. This design targets the tension between accurate matrix completion and growing privacy demands from data owners. Experiments on four real WSN datasets compare FLFL against eight existing federated and centralized recovery methods.

What carries the argument

sensor-level federated learning framework on latent factor models with spatio-temporal regularization constraint

What would settle it

Demonstrate an attack that reconstructs any original sensor reading to high accuracy from the sequence of gradients uploaded by that sensor alone.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

FLFL shows that a sensor-level federated learning setup built on latent factor models, augmented with spatio-temporal correlation regularization, can produce accurate missing-data estimates while ensuring that raw sensing values never leave their originating nodes.

Load-bearing premise

Sharing only gradient information during federated training is enough both to learn an accurate recovery model and to keep the original raw sensing signals private.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Recovery accuracy exceeds that of eight prior federated and non-federated baselines on real WSN traces.
  • Raw data never leaves individual sensors, satisfying privacy requirements that block centralized latent factor learning.
  • Spatio-temporal regularization improves completion quality inside the federated setting.
  • The same framework can be applied to any collection of sensors whose readings exhibit both spatial proximity and temporal continuity.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If gradient inversion attacks prove stronger than assumed, the privacy guarantee would require additional defenses such as differential privacy noise.
  • The approach could be tested on mobile or edge-deployed sensor arrays where communication cost is the dominant constraint.
  • Extending the regularization term to include known physical constraints (for example, diffusion equations) might further raise accuracy without extra data sharing.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes FLFL, a sensor-level federated latent factor learning model for recovering missing spatio-temporal signals in wireless sensor networks. Sensors upload only local gradients (not raw data) to a central server; a spatio-temporal regularization term is added to the LFL objective. The authors claim that this simultaneously achieves accurate recovery and privacy preservation, and that FLFL significantly outperforms eight federated and non-federated baselines on four real-world WSN datasets.

Significance. If the empirical gains are reproducible and the privacy claim is supported by analysis, the work would usefully extend latent-factor methods to privacy-sensitive distributed sensing. The sensor-level FL framing and the explicit spatio-temporal regularizer are natural and potentially impactful for WSN applications.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3 (Method): the central claim that 'uploading gradient information rather than raw data' ensures privacy-preserving recovery is unsupported by any formal privacy analysis, differential-privacy mechanism, secure-aggregation protocol, or empirical leakage evaluation (e.g., gradient-inversion or membership-inference bounds). This assumption is load-bearing for both the title and the stated contribution.
  2. [§4] §4 (Experiments): the abstract asserts outperformance on four datasets, yet the provided description supplies neither quantitative recovery metrics (MAE/RMSE), error bars, baseline hyper-parameter settings, nor privacy-leakage measurements. Without these, the comparative claim cannot be verified and is load-bearing for the empirical contribution.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§3] Notation for the latent-factor matrices and the spatio-temporal regularizer should be introduced with explicit dimensions and update rules to allow reproduction.
  2. [Introduction] The paper should cite the specific prior LFL works it builds upon and clarify what is novel versus inherited.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point-by-point below, indicating planned revisions where appropriate. Our responses focus on clarifying the existing contributions while acknowledging areas that require strengthening.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3 (Method): the central claim that 'uploading gradient information rather than raw data' ensures privacy-preserving recovery is unsupported by any formal privacy analysis, differential-privacy mechanism, secure-aggregation protocol, or empirical leakage evaluation (e.g., gradient-inversion or membership-inference bounds). This assumption is load-bearing for both the title and the stated contribution.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript does not provide a formal privacy analysis (e.g., differential privacy bounds or empirical attacks). The privacy claim rests on the standard federated learning design in which raw sensor data never leaves the local device and only gradients are communicated. This is consistent with the privacy motivation in many FL papers for WSNs. To address the concern, we will revise §3 and add a new subsection in the discussion that explicitly qualifies the privacy guarantees, cites relevant FL privacy literature, and notes the absence of formal mechanisms as a limitation. We will also tone down the title and abstract wording from 'private' to 'privacy-preserving via federated gradients' if that better reflects the current analysis. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (Experiments): the abstract asserts outperformance on four datasets, yet the provided description supplies neither quantitative recovery metrics (MAE/RMSE), error bars, baseline hyper-parameter settings, nor privacy-leakage measurements. Without these, the comparative claim cannot be verified and is load-bearing for the empirical contribution.

    Authors: The full §4 of the manuscript already contains tables reporting MAE and RMSE for FLFL versus the eight baselines on all four datasets, with error bars shown as standard deviations over repeated runs. Hyper-parameter values and search ranges are listed in the experimental setup paragraph. Privacy-leakage measurements are indeed absent, which we will handle together with the first comment by adding a short discussion of why such measurements were not performed and what they would entail. If any numerical values or settings appear insufficiently detailed in the current version, we will expand the tables and text accordingly. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity; claims rest on framework design and external experiments

full rationale

The abstract and description present FLFL as a sensor-level federated extension of existing LFL models, with gradient sharing for privacy and added spatio-temporal regularization. No equations, predictions, or derivations are shown that reduce the recovery accuracy or privacy claims to fitted inputs or self-citations by construction. The evaluation relies on experiments against eight baselines on four real-world datasets, which constitute independent validation rather than tautological re-derivation of inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated or derivable from the provided text.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of FLFL: Federated Latent Factor Learning for Private Recovery of Spatio-Temporal Signals." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SQNCTONE

@misc{pith2026260623091,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: FLFL: Federated Latent Factor Learning for Private Recovery of Spatio-Temporal Signals},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SQNCTONE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.23091}
}
read the original abstract

Wireless sensor network (WSNs) stands out as a burgeoning and promising domain in intelligent sensing. Owing to various factors such as sudden sensor malfunctions or deliberate shutdown of partial nodes to save energy, the collected sensing signals from WSNs commonly have massive missing data, leading to adverse effects on subsequent analysis or decision-making. Latent factor learning (LFL) has proven to be highly effective in recovering the missing data for WSNs. However, the existing LFL models require the collected sensing signals to be maintained in one central place like a central server, which is becoming unacceptable for data owners who are getting increasingly privacy-sensitive. To address this issue, this paper innovatively proposes a federated latent factor learning (FLFL) model for privacy-preserving spatio-temporal signal recovery. Its main idea is two-fold: 1) it designs a sensor-level federated learning framework based on LFL, where each sensor only needs to upload gradient information rather than raw data for training a privacy-preserving recovery model, and 2) it incorporates the spatio-temporal correlation into the designed federated learning framework as the regularization constraint to improve its recovery accuracy. With such designs, FLFL can not only accurately recover the missing data of WSNs but also ensure data owners' privacy-preserving of raw data. To evaluate the proposed FLFL model, extensive experiments have been conducted on four real-world WSN datasets. The results demonstrate that FLFL significantly outperforms eight state-of-the-art federated and non-federated signal recovery models in terms of recovery accuracy with privacy-preserving.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.23091 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. LFA Model Federation in WSNs personal training data. Privacy concerns have spurred a surge of FL methods. Among them, matrix factorization (MF) within federated frameworks has received particular attention. Chai et al. proposed a secure MF approach under FL, FedMF [46]. Lin et al. developed a federated recommender based on MF with a hybrid imputation strategy, FedRec [47]. Liang et al. further enhanced FedRec by int… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The overall framework of the proposed FLFL model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The comparison results of recovery accuracy with different sampling rates from 0.1 to 0.9 on all datasets. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The Ablation study of Spatio-Temporal Correlations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A robust latent factor analysis model for incomplete data recovery in wireless sensor networks

    Zhikai Yu, Di Wu, and Yi He. A robust latent factor analysis model for incomplete data recovery in wireless sensor networks. In2022 IEEE International Conference on Edge Computing and Communications (EDGE), pages 178–183. IEEE, 2022

    2022

  2. [2]

    Ai-empowered iot security for smart cities.ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 21:1–21, 2021

    Zhihan Lv, Liang Qiao, Amit Kumar Singh, and Qingjun Wang. Ai-empowered iot security for smart cities.ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 21:1–21, 2021

    2021

  3. [3]

    Seno Adi Putra, Bambang Riyanto Trilaksono, Muhammad Riyansyah, and Dina Shona Laila. Multiagent architecture for bridge capacity measurement system using wireless sensor network and weight in motion.IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 70:1–14, 2020

    2020

  4. [4]

    Model study of transient imaging with multi-frequency time-of-flight sensors.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 43:3523–3539, 2020

    Hongman Wang, Hui Qiao, Jingyu Lin, Rihui Wu, Yebin Liu, and Qionghai Dai. Model study of transient imaging with multi-frequency time-of-flight sensors.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 43:3523–3539, 2020

    2020

  5. [5]

    Mingwei Lin, Hengshuo Yang, Xiuqin Xu, Ling Lin, Zeshui Xu, and Xin Luo. Momentum-accelerated and biased unconstrained non-negative latent factor model for handling high-dimensional and incomplete data.ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, 2025

    2025

  6. [6]

    Adaptively-accelerated parallel stochastic gradient descent for high- dimensional and incomplete data representation learning.IEEE Transactions on Big Data, 10(1):92–107, 2023

    Wen Qin, Xin Luo, and MengChu Zhou. Adaptively-accelerated parallel stochastic gradient descent for high- dimensional and incomplete data representation learning.IEEE Transactions on Big Data, 10(1):92–107, 2023

    2023

  7. [7]

    A generalized nesterov-accelerated second-order latent factor model for high-dimensional and incomplete data.IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2023

    Weiling Li, Renfang Wang, and Xin Luo. A generalized nesterov-accelerated second-order latent factor model for high-dimensional and incomplete data.IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2023

    2023

  8. [8]

    Robust low-rank latent feature analysis for spatiotemporal signal recovery.IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 36:2829–2842, 2025

    Di Wu, Zechao Li, Zhikai Yu, Yi He, and Xin Luo. Robust low-rank latent feature analysis for spatiotemporal signal recovery.IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 36:2829–2842, 2025

    2025

Show all 97 references
  1. [9]

    An outlier-resilient autoencoder for representing high-dimensional and incomplete data.IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence, 2024

    Di Wu, Yuanpeng Hu, Kechen Liu, Jing Li, Xianmin Wang, Song Deng, Nenggan Zheng, and Xin Luo. An outlier-resilient autoencoder for representing high-dimensional and incomplete data.IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence, 2024

    2024

  2. [10]

    Pseudo gradient-adjusted particle swarm optimization for accurate adaptive latent factor analysis.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2024

    Xin Luo, Jiufang Chen, Ye Yuan, and Zidong Wang. Pseudo gradient-adjusted particle swarm optimization for accurate adaptive latent factor analysis.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2024

    2024

  3. [11]

    A fast non-negative latent factor model based on generalized momentum method.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 51:610–620, 2021

    Xin Luo, Zhigang Liu, Shuai Li, Mingsheng Shang, and Zidong Wang. A fast non-negative latent factor model based on generalized momentum method.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 51:610–620, 2021

    2021

  4. [12]

    Multi-constrained symmetric nonnegative latent factor analysis for accurately representing undirected weighted networks

    Yurong Zhong, Zhe Xie, Weiling Li, and Xin Luo. Multi-constrained symmetric nonnegative latent factor analysis for accurately representing undirected weighted networks. In2023 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), pages 4920–4925. IEEE, 2023

    2023

  5. [13]

    A fast nonnegative autoencoder-based approach to latent feature analysis on high-dimensional and incomplete data.IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 17(3):733–746, 2023

    Fanghui Bi, Tiantian He, and Xin Luo. A fast nonnegative autoencoder-based approach to latent feature analysis on high-dimensional and incomplete data.IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 17(3):733–746, 2023

    2023

  6. [14]

    A survey on federated learning systems: Vision, hype and reality for data privacy and protection.IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 35:3347–3366, 2021

    Qinbin Li, Zeyi Wen, Zhaomin Wu, Sixu Hu, Naibo Wang, Yuan Li, Xu Liu, and Bingsheng He. A survey on federated learning systems: Vision, hype and reality for data privacy and protection.IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 35:3347–3366, 2021

    2021

  7. [15]

    A survey on federated learning.Knowledge- Based Systems, 216:106775, 2021

    Chen Zhang, Yu Xie, Hang Bai, Bin Yu, Weihong Li, and Yuan Gao. A survey on federated learning.Knowledge- Based Systems, 216:106775, 2021

    2021

  8. [16]

    Federated machine learning: Concept and applications

    Qiang Yang, Yang Liu, Tianjian Chen, and Yongxin Tong. Federated machine learning: Concept and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 10:1–19, 2019

    2019

  9. [17]

    Xin Luo, Yue Zhou, Zhigang Liu, and MengChu Zhou. Fast and accurate non-negative latent factor analysis of high-dimensional and sparse matrices in recommender systems.IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 35:3897–3911, 2023

    2023

  10. [18]

    Generalized nesterov’s acceleration-incorporated, non-negative and adaptive latent factor analysis.IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 15:2809–2823, 2022

    Xin Luo, Yue Zhou, Zhigang Liu, Lun Hu, and MengChu Zhou. Generalized nesterov’s acceleration-incorporated, non-negative and adaptive latent factor analysis.IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 15:2809–2823, 2022

    2022

  11. [19]

    Xin Luo, Zidong Wang, and Mingsheng Shang. An instance-frequency-weighted regularization scheme for non-negative latent factor analysis on high-dimensional and sparse data.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 51:3522–3532, 2021. 12 Federated Latent Fact...

    2021

  12. [20]

    Temporal pattern-aware qos prediction via biased non-negative latent factorization of tensors.IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 50:1798–1809, 2020

    Xin Luo, Hao Wu, Huaqiang Yuan, and MengChu Zhou. Temporal pattern-aware qos prediction via biased non-negative latent factorization of tensors.IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 50:1798–1809, 2020

    2020

  13. [21]

    Xin Luo, Yurong Zhong, Zidong Wang, and Maozhen Li. An alternating-direction-method of multipliers- incorporated approach to symmetric non-negative latent factor analysis.IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 34:4826–4840, 2021

    2021

  14. [22]

    Xin Luo, MengChu Zhou, Shuai Li, Zhuhong You, Yunni Xia, and Qingsheng Zhu. A nonnegative latent factor model for large-scale sparse matrices in recommender systems via alternating direction method.IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems, 27(3):579–592, 2015

    2015

  15. [23]

    Two-stream graph convolutional network-incorporated latent feature analysis.IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 16(4):3027–3042, 2023

    Fanghui Bi, Tiantian He, Yuetong Xie, and Xin Luo. Two-stream graph convolutional network-incorporated latent feature analysis.IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 16(4):3027–3042, 2023

    2023

  16. [24]

    Effects of preprocessing and training biases in latent factor models for recommender systems.Neurocomputing, 275:2019–2030, 2018

    Ye Yuan, Xin Luo, and Ming-Sheng Shang. Effects of preprocessing and training biases in latent factor models for recommender systems.Neurocomputing, 275:2019–2030, 2018

    2019

  17. [25]

    A review on federated learning architectures for privacy-preserving ai: Lightweight and secure cloud–edge–end collaboration

    Shanhao Zhan, Lianfen Huang, Gaoyu Luo, Shaolong Zheng, Zhibin Gao, and Han-Chieh Chao. A review on federated learning architectures for privacy-preserving ai: Lightweight and secure cloud–edge–end collaboration. Electronics, 14(13):2512, 2025

    2025

  18. [26]

    Collaborative federated learning for healthcare: Multi-modal covid-19 diagnosis at the edge.IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society, 3:172–184, 2022

    Adnan Qayyum, Kashif Ahmad, Muhammad Ahtazaz Ahsan, Ala Al-Fuqaha, and Junaid Qadir. Collaborative federated learning for healthcare: Multi-modal covid-19 diagnosis at the edge.IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society, 3:172–184, 2022

    2022

  19. [27]

    Smart policy control for securing federated learning management system.IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 20(2):1600– 1611, 2023

    Aditya Pribadi Kalapaaking, Ibrahim Khalil, and Mohammed Atiquzzaman. Smart policy control for securing federated learning management system.IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 20(2):1600– 1611, 2023

    2023

  20. [28]

    Flock: Robust and privacy-preserving federated learning based on practical blockchain state channels

    Ruonan Chen, Ye Dong, Yizhong Liu, Tingyu Fan, Dawei Li, Zhenyu Guan, Jianwei Liu, and Jianying Zhou. Flock: Robust and privacy-preserving federated learning based on practical blockchain state channels. InProceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2025, page 884–895. Associatio...

    2025

  21. [29]

    Empowering federated graph rationale learning with latent environments

    Linan Yue, Qi Liu, Yawen Li, Fangzhou Yao, Weibo Gao, and Junping Du. Empowering federated graph rationale learning with latent environments. page 3863–3873, New York, NY , USA, 2025. Association for Computing Machinery

    2025

  22. [30]

    Personalized federated recommendation for cold-start users via adaptive knowledge fusion

    Yichen Li, Yijing Shan, Yi Liu, Haozhao Wang, Wei Wang, Yi Wang, and Ruixuan Li. Personalized federated recommendation for cold-start users via adaptive knowledge fusion. page 2700–2709, New York, NY , USA, 2025. Association for Computing Machinery

    2025

  23. [31]

    A tutorial of personalized federated recommender systems: Recent advances and future directions

    Jing Jiang, Chunxu Zhang, Honglei Zhang, Zhiwei Li, Yidong Li, and Bo Yang. A tutorial of personalized federated recommender systems: Recent advances and future directions. page 21–24, New York, NY , USA, 2025. Association for Computing Machinery

    2025

  24. [32]

    PhD thesis,

    Quande Liu.Multi-center Medical Image Computing with Robust Federated Learning and Beyond. PhD thesis,

  25. [33]

    Gebrekiros Gebreyesus Gebremariam, J Panda, and S Indu. Blockchain-based secure localization against malicious nodes in iot-based wireless sensor networks using federated learning.Wireless communications and mobile computing, 2023(1):8068038, 2023

    2023

  26. [34]

    Correlated spatio-temporal data collection in wireless sensor networks based on low rank matrix approximation and optimized node sampling.Sensors, 14(12):23137–23158, 2014

    Xinglin Piao, Yongli Hu, Yanfeng Sun, Baocai Yin, and Junbin Gao. Correlated spatio-temporal data collection in wireless sensor networks based on low rank matrix approximation and optimized node sampling.Sensors, 14(12):23137–23158, 2014

    2014

  27. [35]

    Time-varying graph signal reconstruction.IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 11(6):870–883, 2017

    Kai Qiu, Xianghui Mao, Xinyue Shen, Xiaohan Wang, Tiejian Li, and Yuantao Gu. Time-varying graph signal reconstruction.IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 11(6):870–883, 2017

    2017

  28. [36]

    Spatio-temporal signal recovery based on low rank and differential smoothness.IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 66(23):6281–6296, 2018

    Xianghui Mao, Kai Qiu, Tiejian Li, and Yuantao Gu. Spatio-temporal signal recovery based on low rank and differential smoothness.IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 66(23):6281–6296, 2018

    2018

  29. [37]

    Eldar, Haifeng Wang, Kai Kang, and Hua Qian

    Liu Yang, Yonina C. Eldar, Haifeng Wang, Kai Kang, and Hua Qian. An admm-net for data recovery in wireless sensor networks. In2020 28th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), pages 1712–1716, 2021

    2021

  30. [38]

    Recovery of corrupted data in wireless sensor networks using tensor robust principal component analysis.IEEE Communications Letters, 25(10):3389–3393, 2021

    Xiaoyue Zhang, Jingfei He, Yunpei Li, Yue Chi, and Yatong Zhou. Recovery of corrupted data in wireless sensor networks using tensor robust principal component analysis.IEEE Communications Letters, 25(10):3389–3393, 2021

    2021

  31. [39]

    Sheng, Tao Gu, and Lina Yao

    Peipei Xu, Wenjie Ruan, Quan Z. Sheng, Tao Gu, and Lina Yao. Interpolating the missing values for multi- dimensional spatial-temporal sensor data: A tensor svd approach. InProceedings of the 14th EAI International 13 Federated Latent Factor Learning for Recovering Wireless Sen...

    2017

  32. [40]

    Antonio Ortega, Pascal Frossard, Jelena Kovaˇcevi´c, José M. F. Moura, and Pierre Vandergheynst. Graph signal processing: Overview, challenges, and applications.Proceedings of the IEEE, 106(5):808–828, 2018

    2018

  33. [41]

    Graph learning for spatiotem- poral signals with long- and short-term characterization.IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks, 6:699–713, 2020

    Yueliang Liu, Wenbin Guo, Kangyong You, Lei Zhao, Tao Peng, and Wenbo Wang. Graph learning for spatiotem- poral signals with long- and short-term characterization.IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks, 6:699–713, 2020

    2020

  34. [42]

    Reconstruction of time-varying graph signals via sobolev smoothness.IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks, 8:201–214, 2022

    Jhony H Giraldo, Arif Mahmood, Belmar Garcia-Garcia, Dorina Thanou, and Thierry Bouwmans. Reconstruction of time-varying graph signals via sobolev smoothness.IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks, 8:201–214, 2022

    2022

  35. [43]

    Large-scale and scalable latent factor analysis via distributed alternative stochastic gradient descent for recommender systems.IEEE Transactions on Big Data, 8:420–431, 2022

    Xiaoyu Shi, Qiang He, Xin Luo, Yanan Bai, and Mingsheng Shang. Large-scale and scalable latent factor analysis via distributed alternative stochastic gradient descent for recommender systems.IEEE Transactions on Big Data, 8:420–431, 2022

    2022

  36. [44]

    Brendan McMahan, Eider Moore, Daniel Ramage, and Blaise Agüera y Arcas

    H. Brendan McMahan, Eider Moore, Daniel Ramage, and Blaise Agüera y Arcas. Federated learning of deep networks using model averaging.CoRR, abs/1602.05629, 2016

    2016

  37. [45]

    Reschedule gradients: Temporal non-iid resilient federated learning.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 10(1):747–762, 2023

    Xianyao You, Ximeng Liu, Nan Jiang, Jianping Cai, and Zuobin Ying. Reschedule gradients: Temporal non-iid resilient federated learning.IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 10(1):747–762, 2023

    2023

  38. [46]

    Secure federated matrix factorization.IEEE Intelligent Systems, 36:11–20, 2020

    Di Chai, Leye Wang, Kai Chen, and Qiang Yang. Secure federated matrix factorization.IEEE Intelligent Systems, 36:11–20, 2020

    2020

  39. [47]

    Fedrec: Federated recommendation with explicit feedback

    Guanyu Lin, Feng Liang, Weike Pan, and Zhong Ming. Fedrec: Federated recommendation with explicit feedback. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 36:21–30, 2020

    2020

  40. [48]

    Fedrec++: Lossless federated recommendation with explicit feedback

    Feng Liang, Weike Pan, and Zhong Ming. Fedrec++: Lossless federated recommendation with explicit feedback. InProceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 35, pages 4224–4231, 2021

    2021

  41. [49]

    Meta matrix factorization for federated rating predictions

    Yujie Lin, Pengjie Ren, Zhumin Chen, Zhaochun Ren, Dongxiao Yu, Jun Ma, Maarten de Rijke, and Xiuzhen Cheng. Meta matrix factorization for federated rating predictions. InProceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retr...

    2020

  42. [50]

    Fedgnn: Federated graph neural network for privacy-preserving recommendation

    Chuhan Wu, Fangzhao Wu, Yang Cao, Yongfeng Huang, and Xing Xie. Fedgnn: Federated graph neural network for privacy-preserving recommendation. 2021

    2021

  43. [51]

    An adaptively bias-extended non-negative latent factorization of tensors model for accurately representing the dynamic qos data.IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 2025

    Xiuqin Xu, Mingwei Lin, Xin Luo, and Zeshui Xu. An adaptively bias-extended non-negative latent factorization of tensors model for accurately representing the dynamic qos data.IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 2025

    2025

  44. [52]

    Springer Nature, 2022

    Ye Yuan and Xin Luo.Latent Factor Analysis for High-dimensional and Sparse Matrices: A particle swarm optimization-based approach. Springer Nature, 2022

    2022

  45. [53]

    A momentum-accelerated hessian-vector-based latent factor analysis model.IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 16(2):830–844, 2022

    Weiling Li, Xin Luo, Huaqiang Yuan, and MengChu Zhou. A momentum-accelerated hessian-vector-based latent factor analysis model.IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 16(2):830–844, 2022

    2022

  46. [54]

    Nonnegative latent factor analysis-incorporated and feature-weighted fuzzy double c-means clustering for incomplete data.IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 30(10):4165–4176, 2022

    Yan Song, Ming Li, Zhengyu Zhu, Guisong Yang, and Xin Luo. Nonnegative latent factor analysis-incorporated and feature-weighted fuzzy double c-means clustering for incomplete data.IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 30(10):4165–4176, 2022

    2022

  47. [55]

    Symmetry-constrained non-negative matrix factorization approach for highly-accurate community detection

    Zhigang Liu, Xin Luo, and MengChu Zhou. Symmetry-constrained non-negative matrix factorization approach for highly-accurate community detection. In2021 IEEE 17th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), pages 1521–1526. IEEE, 2021

    2021

  48. [56]

    Alternating-direction-method of multipliers-based symmetric nonnegative latent factor analysis for large-scale undirected weighted networks

    Yurong Zhong and Xin Luo. Alternating-direction-method of multipliers-based symmetric nonnegative latent factor analysis for large-scale undirected weighted networks. In2021 IEEE 17th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), pages 1527–1532. IEEE, 2021

    2021

  49. [57]

    Xin Luo, Zhigang Liu, Long Jin, Yue Zhou, and MengChu Zhou. Symmetric nonnegative matrix factorization- based community detection models and their convergence analysis.IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 33(3):1203–1215, 2021

    2021

  50. [58]

    A multilayered-and-randomized latent factor model for high-dimensional and sparse matrices.IEEE transactions on big data, 8(3):784–794, 2020

    Ye Yuan, Qiang He, Xin Luo, and Mingsheng Shang. A multilayered-and-randomized latent factor model for high-dimensional and sparse matrices.IEEE transactions on big data, 8(3):784–794, 2020

    2020

  51. [59]

    Adaptive regularization-incorporated latent factor analysis

    Xin Luo, Ye Yuan, and Di Wu. Adaptive regularization-incorporated latent factor analysis. In2020 IEEE International Conference on Knowledge Graph (ICKG), pages 481–488. IEEE, 2020. 14 Federated Latent Factor Learning for Recovering Wireless Sensor Networks Signal with Privacy-...

    2020

  52. [60]

    Incremental collaborative filtering recommender based on regularized matrix factorization.Knowledge-Based Systems, 27:271–280, 2012

    Xin Luo, Yunni Xia, and Qingsheng Zhu. Incremental collaborative filtering recommender based on regularized matrix factorization.Knowledge-Based Systems, 27:271–280, 2012

    2012

  53. [61]

    An l 1-and-l 2-norm-oriented latent factor model for recommender systems.IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 33(10):5775–5788, 2021

    Di Wu, Mingsheng Shang, Xin Luo, and Zidong Wang. An l 1-and-l 2-norm-oriented latent factor model for recommender systems.IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 33(10):5775–5788, 2021

    2021

  54. [62]

    Di Wu, Xin Luo, Yi He, and Mengchu Zhou. A prediction-sampling-based multilayer-structured latent factor model for accurate representation to high-dimensional and sparse data.IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 35:3845–3858, 2024

    2024

  55. [63]

    Robust latent factor analysis for precise representation of high-dimensional and sparse data

    Di Wu and Xin Luo. Robust latent factor analysis for precise representation of high-dimensional and sparse data. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 8:796–805, 2021

    2021

  56. [64]

    Xin Luo, MengChu Zhou, Shuai Li, and MingSheng Shang. An inherently nonnegative latent factor model for high-dimensional and sparse matrices from industrial applications.IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 14(5):2011–2022, 2017

    2011

  57. [65]

    Generating highly accurate predictions for missing qos data via aggregating nonnegative latent factor models

    Xin Luo, MengChu Zhou, Yunni Xia, Qingsheng Zhu, Ahmed Chiheb Ammari, and Ahmed Alabdulwahab. Generating highly accurate predictions for missing qos data via aggregating nonnegative latent factor models. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems, 27(3):524–537, 2015

    2015

  58. [66]

    Hierarchical particle swarm optimization-incorporated latent factor analysis for large-scale incomplete matrices.IEEE Transactions on Big Data, 8(6):1524–1536, 2021

    Jia Chen, Xin Luo, and Mengchu Zhou. Hierarchical particle swarm optimization-incorporated latent factor analysis for large-scale incomplete matrices.IEEE Transactions on Big Data, 8(6):1524–1536, 2021

    2021

  59. [67]

    An l1-and-l2-norm-oriented latent factor model for recommender systems.IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 33:5775–5788, 2022

    Di Wu, Mingsheng Shang, Xin Luo, and Zidong Wang. An l1-and-l2-norm-oriented latent factor model for recommender systems.IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 33:5775–5788, 2022

    2022

  60. [68]

    Incorpora- tion of efficient second-order solvers into latent factor models for accurate prediction of missing qos data.IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 48:1216–1228, 2018

    Xin Luo, MengChu Zhou, Shuai Li, YunNi Xia, Zhu-Hong You, QingSheng Zhu, and Hareton Leung. Incorpora- tion of efficient second-order solvers into latent factor models for accurate prediction of missing qos data.IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 48:1216–1228, 2018

    2018

  61. [69]

    A second-order symmetric non-negative latent factor model for undirected weighted network representation.IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, 10:606–618, 2023

    Weiling Li, Renfang Wang, Xin Luo, and MengChu Zhou. A second-order symmetric non-negative latent factor model for undirected weighted network representation.IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, 10:606–618, 2023

    2023

  62. [70]

    A dynamic linear bias incorporation scheme for nonnegative latent factor analysis

    Yurong Zhong, Zhe Xie, Weiling Li, and Xin Luo. A dynamic linear bias incorporation scheme for nonnegative latent factor analysis. InPacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 39–51. Springer, 2023

    2023

  63. [71]

    Alternating-direction-method of multipliers-based adaptive nonnegative latent factor analysis.IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence, 2024

    Yurong Zhong, Kechen Liu, Shangce Gao, and Xin Luo. Alternating-direction-method of multipliers-based adaptive nonnegative latent factor analysis.IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence, 2024

    2024

  64. [72]

    An adaptive divergence-based non-negative latent factor model.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 53:6475–6487, 2023

    Ye Yuan, Renfang Wang, Guangxiao Yuan, and Luo Xin. An adaptive divergence-based non-negative latent factor model.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 53:6475–6487, 2023

    2023

  65. [73]

    Position-transitional particle swarm optimization- incorporated latent factor analysis.IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 34:3958–3970, 2022

    Xin Luo, Ye Yuan, Sili Chen, Nianyin Zeng, and Zidong Wang. Position-transitional particle swarm optimization- incorporated latent factor analysis.IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 34:3958–3970, 2022

    2022

  66. [74]

    Mma: Multi-metric-autoencoder for analyzing high-dimensional and incomplete data

    Cheng Liang, Di Wu, Yi He, Teng Huang, Zhong Chen, and Xin Luo. Mma: Multi-metric-autoencoder for analyzing high-dimensional and incomplete data. InJoint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, pages 3–19. Springer, 2023

    2023

  67. [75]

    A nonlinear pid-incorporated adaptive stochastic gradient descent algorithm for latent factor analysis.IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2023

    Jinli Li, Xin Luo, Ye Yuan, and Shangce Gao. A nonlinear pid-incorporated adaptive stochastic gradient descent algorithm for latent factor analysis.IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2023

    2023

  68. [76]

    A generalized and fast-converging non-negative latent factor model for predicting user preferences in recommender systems

    Ye Yuan, Xin Luo, Mingsheng Shang, and Di Wu. A generalized and fast-converging non-negative latent factor model for predicting user preferences in recommender systems. InProceedings of The Web Conference 2020, pages 498–507, 2020

    2020

  69. [77]

    A proportional-integral-derivative-incorporated stochastic gradient descent-based latent factor analysis model.Neurocomputing, 427:29–39, 2021

    Jinli Li, Ye Yuan, Tao Ruan, Jia Chen, and Xin Luo. A proportional-integral-derivative-incorporated stochastic gradient descent-based latent factor analysis model.Neurocomputing, 427:29–39, 2021

    2021

  70. [78]

    Latent factor-based recommenders relying on extended stochastic gradient descent algorithms.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 51(2):916–926, 2019

    Xin Luo, Dexian Wang, MengChu Zhou, and Huaqiang Yuan. Latent factor-based recommenders relying on extended stochastic gradient descent algorithms.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 51(2):916–926, 2019

    2019

  71. [79]

    Asynchronous parallel fuzzy stochastic gradient descent for high-dimensional incomplete data representation.IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 32(2):445–459, 2023

    Wen Qin and Xin Luo. Asynchronous parallel fuzzy stochastic gradient descent for high-dimensional incomplete data representation.IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 32(2):445–459, 2023. 15 Federated Latent Factor Learning for Recovering Wireless Sensor Networks Signal with Pri...

    2023

  72. [80]

    Wen Qin, Xin Luo, Shuai Li, and MengChu Zhou. Parallel adaptive stochastic gradient descent algorithms for latent factor analysis of high-dimensional and incomplete industrial data.IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2023

    2023

  73. [81]

    Effects of extended stochastic gradient descent algorithms on improving latent factor-based recommender systems.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 4:618–624, 2019

    Xin Luo and MengChu Zhou. Effects of extended stochastic gradient descent algorithms on improving latent factor-based recommender systems.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 4:618–624, 2019

    2019

  74. [82]

    Predicting web service qos via matrix-factorization- based collaborative filtering under non-negativity constraint

    Xin Luo, MengChu Zhou, YunNi Xia, and QingSheng Zhu. Predicting web service qos via matrix-factorization- based collaborative filtering under non-negativity constraint. In2014 23rd Wireless and Optical Communication Conference (WOCC), pages 1–6. IEEE, 2014

    2014

  75. [83]

    Non-negative latent factor model based on β-divergence for recommender systems.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 51(8):4612–4623, 2019

    Luo Xin, Ye Yuan, MengChu Zhou, Zhigang Liu, and Mingsheng Shang. Non-negative latent factor model based on β-divergence for recommender systems.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 51(8):4612–4623, 2019

    2019

  76. [84]

    Pmlf: Prediction-sampling-based multilayer-structured latent factor analysis

    Di Wu, Long Jin, and Xin Luo. Pmlf: Prediction-sampling-based multilayer-structured latent factor analysis. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), pages 671–680, 2020

    2020

  77. [85]

    A data-aware latent factor model for web service qos prediction

    Di Wu, Xin Luo, Mingsheng Shang, Yi He, Guoyin Wang, and Xindong Wu. A data-aware latent factor model for web service qos prediction. InAdvances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining: 23rd Pacific-Asia Conference, PAKDD 2019, Macau, China, April 14-17, 2019, Proceedings, Part...

    2019

  78. [86]

    Mmlf: Multi-metric latent feature analysis for high-dimensional and incomplete data.IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 17:575–588, 2024

    Di Wu, Peng Zhang, Yi He, and Xin Luo. Mmlf: Multi-metric latent feature analysis for high-dimensional and incomplete data.IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 17:575–588, 2024

    2024

  79. [87]

    Relieving popu- larity bias in interactive recommendation: A diversity-novelty-aware reinforcement learning approach.ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 42(2):1–30, 2023

    Xiaoyu Shi, Quanliang Liu, Hong Xie, Di Wu, Bo Peng, MingSheng Shang, and Defu Lian. Relieving popu- larity bias in interactive recommendation: A diversity-novelty-aware reinforcement learning approach.ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 42(2):1–30, 2023

    2023

  80. [88]

    Generalized symmetric nonnegative latent factor analysis for large-scale undirected weighted networks

    Yurong Zhong and Xin Luo. Generalized symmetric nonnegative latent factor analysis for large-scale undirected weighted networks. In2021 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), pages 1–8. IEEE, 2021

    2021

  81. [89]

    A posterior-neighborhood-regularized latent factor model for highly accurate web service qos prediction.IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 15:793–805, 2022

    Di Wu, Qiang He, Xin Luo, Mingsheng Shang, Yi He, and Guoyin Wang. A posterior-neighborhood-regularized latent factor model for highly accurate web service qos prediction.IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 15:793–805, 2022

    2022

  82. [90]

    An α–β-divergence-generalized recommender for highly accurate predictions of missing user preferences.IEEE transactions on cybernetics, 52(8):8006–8018, 2021

    Mingsheng Shang, Ye Yuan, Xin Luo, and MengChu Zhou. An α–β-divergence-generalized recommender for highly accurate predictions of missing user preferences.IEEE transactions on cybernetics, 52(8):8006–8018, 2021

    2021

  83. [91]

    A novel approach to extracting non-negative latent factors from non-negative big sparse matrices.IEEE access, 4:2649–2655, 2016

    Xin Luo, Mengchu Zhou, Mingsheng Shang, Shuai Li, and Yunni Xia. A novel approach to extracting non-negative latent factors from non-negative big sparse matrices.IEEE access, 4:2649–2655, 2016

    2016

  84. [92]

    Xin Luo, Minzhi Chen, Hao Wu, Zhigang Liu, Huaqiang Yuan, and MengChu Zhou. Adjusting learning depth in nonnegative latent factorization of tensors for accurately modeling temporal patterns in dynamic qos data.IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 18(4):2142...

    2021

  85. [93]

    Efficient and robust regularized federated recommendation

    Langming Liu, Wanyu Wang, Xiangyu Zhao, Zijian Zhang, Chunxu Zhang, Shanru Lin, Yiqi Wang, Lixin Zou, Zitao Liu, Xuetao Wei, Hongzhi Yin, and Qing Li. Efficient and robust regularized federated recommendation. In Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Informat...

    2024

  86. [94]

    Federated social recommendation with graph neural network.ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 13:1–24, 2022

    Zhiwei Liu, Liangwei Yang, Ziwei Fan, Hao Peng, and Philip S Yu. Federated social recommendation with graph neural network.ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 13:1–24, 2022

    2022

  87. [95]

    A graph-incorporated latent factor analysis model for high-dimensional and sparse data.IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 2023

    Di Wu, Yi He, and Xin Luo. A graph-incorporated latent factor analysis model for high-dimensional and sparse data.IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 2023

    2023

  88. [96]

    Di Wu, Xin Luo, Yi He, and Mengchu Zhou. A prediction-sampling-based multilayer-structured latent factor model for accurate representation to high-dimensional and sparse data.IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems, 35(3):3845–3858, 2022

    2022

  89. [97]

    A data-characteristic-aware latent factor model for web services qos prediction.IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 34:2525–2538, 2020

    Di Wu, Xin Luo, Mingsheng Shang, Yi He, Guoyin Wang, and Xindong Wu. A data-characteristic-aware latent factor model for web services qos prediction.IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 34:2525–2538, 2020. 16

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed June 26, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.