Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Multi-wavelength disk images reveal how dust settles as disks age

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

A tutorial that reviews the physics and observational methods for measuring dust sizes and vertical settling in protoplanetary disks.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-04 challenge →

load-bearing objection A sound, clearly written tutorial that accurately synthesizes known methods for dust settling and grain size inference; the only new element is a small model grid, and the summary overstates settling confidence slightly relative to its own caveats. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2509.10614 v1 pith:STTQHOUZ submitted 2025-09-12 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.EP

An Introduction to Dust Evolution and Vertical Transport in Protoplanetary Disks

Marion Villenave This is my paper
classification astro-ph.SR astro-ph.EP
keywords protoplanetary disksdust settlinggrain growthmulti-wavelength observationsdust opacityradiative transferturbulenceplanet formation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This tutorial argues that combining spatially resolved observations at optical, near-infrared, and millimeter wavelengths lets astronomers map where dust grains of different sizes sit in a protoplanetary disk. From those maps one can read off grain sizes, the height of the emitting or scattering surface, and how far dust has settled toward the midplane relative to gas. The payoff is a direct view of where dust accumulates and grows, which is where planet formation begins. The author shows that in the outer regions of Class II disks, millimeter-sized grains are typically settled into a thin midplane layer, while in younger Class 0/I systems settling is weak or absent.

Core claim

Working through the physics of dust-gas coupling (Stokes number), opacity as a function of grain size and wavelength, and radiative transfer with scattering, the author establishes an interpretive scheme: each observing wavelength is dominated by grains close to its resonance size, so multi-wavelength images act like a sieve on grain size; and each tracer's vertical extent—the dark-lane width in edge-on disks, the offset of scattered-light rings, the minor-axis shape of millimeter rings, the channel-map emission surface of molecular lines—can be converted into a physical height above the midplane. The synthesis shows that in mature Class II disks the outer regions have dust scale heights of

What carries the argument

The central objects are the Stokes number St, which sets how tightly a grain is coupled to the gas, and the settling–diffusion balance H_d/H_g = (1 + St Sc/α_z)^(-1), which turns a measured dust scale height into a turbulence level. On the observational side, the workhorse is the intensity equation including scattering (Equation 10), used at multiple millimeter wavelengths to fit grain size and column density, plus three geometric converters: the near/far channel-map ellipse (Equation 11) for molecular emission height, the minor-axis offset (Equation 12) for scattered-light surfaces, and the minor-axis profile shape of edge-on disks for millimeter dust heights.

Load-bearing premise

The entire interpretive chain rests on modeling grains as compact spheres in the Epstein drag regime with a single isotropic turbulence coefficient; if grains are porous aggregates or turbulence is anisotropic, the inferred sizes and scale heights are systematically biased.

What would settle it

Measure the same disk's dust scale height from two independent tracers whose opacities depend differently on porosity—e.g., millimeter continuum scattering and near-infrared polarimetry. If the inferred scale heights disagree beyond the compact-sphere model uncertainties, the single-grain-population assumption fails. Alternatively, directly resolving the vertical structure of a Class 0 disk at sub-millimeter wavelengths and finding a thin midplane layer would contradict the claim that young disks are un-settled.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A measured dust-to-gas scale-height ratio yields a direct constraint on vertical turbulence α_z, typically implying values below about 10^-3 in settled outer disk regions.
  • Azimuthal brightness asymmetries in rings (the wall effect and the optically-thin ring effect) diagnose whether substructures are vertically thick or thin and where dust is concentrated.
  • Inferred maximum grain sizes around millimeters to centimeters imply growth is often limited by fragmentation or radial drift rather than by sticking alone.
  • Settled outer disks are favorable sites for pebble accretion, so planet formation may proceed efficiently exactly where dust has fallen into a thin midplane layer.
  • Comparing CO emission surfaces with scattered-light surfaces constrains the vertical temperature and gas structure and quantifies the degree of dust–gas separation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If grains are porous, the same observations would imply larger physical grain sizes and looser constraints on α_z; combining scattering albedo with polarization fractions could partially break this degeneracy.
  • A direct test would measure gas and dust scale heights independently in the same disk; a mismatch beyond the isotropic-turbulence prediction would indicate anisotropic or non-uniform turbulence.
  • The geometric methods assume circular, axisymmetric rings; applying them to spiral or warped disks would bias height estimates, so a natural extension is to generalize these methods to non-axisymmetric geometries.
  • The thin dust layers implied by the tutorial are prime sites for streaming instability, so searching for unresolved optically thick azimuthal brightness enhancements could identify where planetesimals form.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. This tutorial paper, intended as an introduction for beginners, connects basic theory of dust transport and evolution in protoplanetary disks with observational methods for inferring dust grain sizes and vertical structure. It recaps the standard equations for Epstein-regime stopping time, Stokes number, vertical settling, radial drift, and turbulent mixing; discusses dust opacities and porosity; and then reviews methods for constraining dust sizes from multi-wavelength millimeter observations and for measuring the vertical extent of dust and gas in edge-on and moderately inclined disks. It also presents a small parameterized mcfost model grid (Fig. 7) to illustrate how major-axis and minor-axis profiles depend on dust mass, scale height, and inclination, and it summarizes current observational constraints, emphasizing that millimeter dust is commonly vertically settled in outer Class II disks while settling may be less efficient in younger systems.

Significance. If the technical content is corrected, this tutorial would be a valuable pedagogical reference. Its strengths are the clear organization, the explicit listing of model parameters for the illustrative mcfost grid, the citation of publicly available analysis tools (disksurf, DISCMINER, ALFAHOR, DRAGyS), and the balanced presentation of open issues such as porosity, composition degeneracies, and the difficulty of measuring gas scale heights. The paper makes no claim to new observational results; it is a synthesis of existing methods and findings, with the author's own prior work cited appropriately for specific observational constraints. The main value lies in giving early-career readers a single, well-structured entry point to this literature.

major comments (1)
  1. [Sec. 2.1, Eqs. (5) and (6)] The dust scale-height ratio is mis-stated. The standard solution for vertical settling balanced by turbulent diffusion is H_d/H_g = (1 + St Sc/α_z)^(-1/2) (e.g., Dubrulle et al. 1995; Youdin & Lithwick 2007), not the exponent −1 printed in Eq. (5). The same issue affects Eq. (6), where the standard radial dust-ring width relation is w_d/w_g = (1 + St Sc/α_r)^(-1/2) (Dullemond et al. 2018). As written, these equations imply a linear rather than square-root dependence on St/α; in the well-coupled limit St/α ≪ 1, the inferred α_z would be off by a factor of two. This is not purely cosmetic: Section 5.2.3 and Section 6 interpret observed h_mm/r upper limits as constraints on α_z/St by reference to Eq. (5), so the incorrect exponent changes the quantitative translation from observations to turbulence parameters. Please correct the exponent and verify the prefactor against the cited sources.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. 6] The gas-scale-height limitation is correctly acknowledged in Sec. 5.1 and at the end of Sec. 6, but the abstract and the opening sentence of Sec. 6 state the settling conclusion without that caveat. Consider adding a short clause such as 'under current gas-scale-height assumptions' to avoid overstating the observational consensus.
  2. [Throughout] There are numerous typographical errors. Examples: 'co-called' → 'so-called' (Sec. 2.1), 'refereed to as' → 'referred to as' (Sec. 1), 'phenomenons' → 'phenomena' (Sec. 1), 'particule'/'particules' → 'particle'/'particles' (multiple), 'wavelenghts' → 'wavelengths' (multiple), 'an larger impact' → 'a larger impact' (Sec. 3.1), 'The later parameter' → 'The latter parameter' (Sec. 4.2), 'At the other hand' → 'On the other hand' (Sec. 5.1.2).
  3. [Fig. 5] The axis labels of Fig. 5 are garbled in the typeset version (the unicode for log(τ_ν) and ω_ν appears corrupted). Please ensure the figure is regenerated with clear axis labels.
  4. [Sec. 2.1, Eq. (1)] For readers unfamiliar with the Epstein regime, it would help to state explicitly that Eq. (1) is a proportionality, with the numerical constant of order unity (e.g., sqrt(π/8)) omitted. The current text is not wrong, but the notation could be clearer.
  5. [Sec. 3.3] The sentence 'Compact grains scatter most efficiencly within a short range of wavelength' is grammatically awkward and contains a typo. Rephrase as 'Compact grains scatter efficiently only over a narrow range of wavelengths.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; tutorial/review reports standard methods and independent observational constraints.

full rationale

The paper is an introductory tutorial and review rather than a derivation whose predictions reduce to fitted inputs. Its physical equations (Epstein stopping time, Stokes number, settling/drift velocities, H_d/H_g balance, radiative-transfer intensity with scattering, geometric emission-height relations) are standard results cited to independent literature (Youdin & Lithwick 2007; Dubrulle et al. 1995; Sierra et al. 2019; Pinte et al. 2018; Avenhaus et al. 2018), not results imported from the author's own prior work. The illustrative mcfost models in Fig. 7 are forward models with chosen scale heights, used to display morphology, not fits that are then relabeled as measurements. The summary statements about vertical settling cite a mix of the author's observational papers and independent teams (e.g., Tazaki et al. 2025; Ribas et al. 2024; Doi & Kataoka 2021), so the self-citations are not load-bearing. The paper also explicitly acknowledges the main assumption that limits its summary claim, noting in Sect. 5.1 that gas scale-height constraints remain limited and that several settling constraints rely on radiative-transfer-model midplane temperatures, needing future direct gas constraints. This is an honest limitation rather than a hidden circular step. No equation or inference was found to reduce to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The tutorial relies on standard disk physics and assumptions from prior literature. The free parameters listed are only the illustrative choices for Figure 7, not parts of the tutorial's logical structure. These assumptions are appropriate for an introduction, but readers should be aware they are simplifications.

free parameters (4)
  • H0 (dust/gas scale height at 100 au in Fig. 7 models) = 10 au, 3 au, 1 au
    Illustrative model choices in Sect. 5.1.2 for Figure 7, not fitted to data.
  • Dust mass (for Fig. 7 models) = 1e-5, 1e-4, 1e-3 Msun
    Varied to illustrate the effect of disk mass on observed profiles.
  • Size distribution slope p = 3.5
    Standard ISM value (Mathis et al. 1977) used in Fig. 7 models.
  • Radial scaling exponent for Hd = 1.125
    Chosen for the Figure 7 models; flared disk assumption.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Epstein drag regime applies to observable dust grains (Eq. 1)
    Used throughout Sect. 2.1 to derive Stokes number and settling/drift velocities; real grains may be in the Stokes regime if larger than the mean free path.
  • domain assumption Vertically isothermal, non-self-gravitating gas in hydrostatic equilibrium (Eq. 2)
    Used to define gas scale height; more complex vertical temperature structures exist.
  • domain assumption Small dust-to-gas ratio for Eqs 4a and 4b
    Stated in text: 'Equation 4a and 4b are valid if the dust-to-gas ratio is small (≪1)'.
  • domain assumption Turbulent mixing balances settling, giving Eq. 5 (Youdin & Lithwick 2007; Dubrulle et al. 1995)
    Used to relate dust scale height to turbulence level; assumes steady-state balance and a single alpha_z.
  • domain assumption Dust opacities for compact astronomical silicates (Laor & Draine 1993)
    Used in Figures 1-3 and discussed in Sect. 3.1; real dust composition and porous aggregates differ.
  • domain assumption Keplerian rotation and circular orbits for gas emission surface method (Eq. 11)
    Assumed in Sect. 5.2.1 for the geometric method to retrieve emitting heights; radial and vertical motions are neglected.

reviewed 2026-08-04 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of An Introduction to Dust Evolution and Vertical Transport in Protoplanetary Disks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/STTQHOUZ

@misc{pith2026250910614,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: An Introduction to Dust Evolution and Vertical Transport in Protoplanetary Disks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/STTQHOUZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.10614}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

This tutorial is an introduction to observational studies of dust transport and evolution in protoplanetary disks. Spatially resolved observations of disks at multiple wavelengths can allow to infer the distribution of various dust grains and gas species. Combining these observations offers a more complete understanding of dust structure and properties across different disk locations. For example, by better characterizing the disk vertical structure, observations help to constrain the level of vertical settling and identify regions of high dust density, which are favorable for grain growth and planet formation. This tutorial describes various methodologies for inferring dust properties and vertical height of different tracers, as an introduction for beginners.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.10614 by Marion Villenave.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Opacities of astronomical silicates as a function of wavelength. The grains are assumed to be compact spheres. Left: Absorption opacities of mono-disperse dust distributions (yellow to red lines) and of a dust size distribution with grains between 0.1 µm and 1 mm with a number exponent of p = 3.5 (thick blue line). Right: Absorption (solid lines) and scattering (dashed lines) opacities for grains of 1 µm a… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Total opacities as a function of grain size for different wavelengths. Grains are assumed to be compact spheres. Grain sizes contributing the most at the different wavelengths are highlighted with a vertically filled region of the same color as the opacity curves. 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 Wavelength ( m) 10 4 10 3 10 2 10 1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 10 5 A b s orptio n & s c atterin g o p a citie s (c m2 /g)… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Effect of porosity on the absorption (solid lines) and scattering (dashed lines) opacities of 1 mm grains as a function of wavelength. The filling factor f = 1 represents compact grains, while more porous particles have a lower f value. With this figure, and for the dust composition assumed here, we can see directly that emission at 1 µm is dom￾inated by grains between 0.1 and 1 µm, while emission at 1.3 m… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Illustration of the temperature structure, dust distribution, and observational constraints in protoplanetary disks from Miotello et al. (2023); Credit: T. Birnstiel. Left: main dust transport mechanisms and temperature structure. Right: typical dust and gas emission regions. The axes show the logarithmic distance to the central star, in the radial and vertical direction. the maximum of the emission λpeak … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Ratio between the emergent intensity with or without scattering effects, R = I abs+scat ν /Iabs ν , as a function of the albedo ων and the optical depth κν, from Sierra & Lizano (2020). Scattering can decrease (top right) or increase (top left) the expected intensity compared to the absorption only case. The inclusion of long wavelength observations (e.g., in the centimeter) is particularly critical to obt… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Resolved 1.3 mm images of edge-on disks at dif￾ferent evolutionary stages (from Lee et al. 2017; Lin et al. 2023; Tazaki et al. 2019b). The ellipse on the bottom left corner indicates the beam size, while the horizontal bar cor￾responds to a size of 25 au. distribution and vertical settling efficiency in the upper layers of the disks. In addition, direct molecular gas observations can be used to further di… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Integrated minor and major profiles of edge-on (solid lines) and highly inclined (dashed lines) disk models for different dust mass (left panels) or different dust scale heights (right panels) computed at 0.89 mm. are needed to fully quantify the vertical extent of the larger grains. At millimeter wavelengths, edge-on disks typically show a rectangular shape (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Single channel map with a schematic of the quan￾tities used to estimate the height of the emitting surface. The central object is marked by a star. For every x along the ma￾jor axis direction, the minor axis maxima can be identified. Connecting these points by an ellipse of a unique height and centered on the star it is possible to retrieve the height of the emitting layer (Equation 11). Credit: Pinte et a… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Emission surfaces of 12CO (blue) and 13CO (black) in two well characterized disks (adapted from Law et al. 2021). The diamond show hτ=1 for individual rings based on scattered light observations. The red dashed line shows inferred scattered light surfaces for a sample of disks. 2024; Derkink et al. 2024; Roumesy et al. 2025). A nu￾merical implementation of this method is publicly avail￾able in the DRAGyS s… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Schematic representation of different characteristics expected in a vertically thick (left) or vertically thin (right) disk, with rings. At millimeter wavelengths, dust is typically optically thinner than in the optical or infrared, which allows the observer to trace material closer to the midplane. Thus, rings are typically not strongly offset from the central location at these wavelengths and instead ot… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Dust Growth in Binary Systems: Inhibition of dust settling and growth in circumbinary discs

    astro-ph.EP 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Dust grains in circumbinary discs end up five times smaller than in single-star discs, and the conditions for streaming-instability clumping are not met, arguing against in-situ planet formation there.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

159 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Andrews, S. M. 2020, ARA&A, 58, 483, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-031220-010302

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-031220-010302 2020

  2. [2]

    M., Huang, J., Pérez, L

    Andrews, S. M., Huang, J., Pérez, L. M., et al. 2018, ApJL, 869, L41, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf741

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaf741 2018

  3. [3]

    2023, ApJ, 945, 130, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acbb01

    Angelo, I., Duchene, G., Stapelfeldt, K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 945, 130, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acbb01

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acbb01 2023

  4. [4]

    P., Garufi, A., et al

    Avenhaus, H., Quanz, S. P., Garufi, A., et al. 2018, ApJ, 863, 44, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aab846

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab846 2018

  5. [5]

    2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Bae, J., Isella, A., Zhu, Z., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 423, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2210.13314

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.13314 2023

  6. [6]

    A., & Hawley, J

    Balbus, S. A., & Hawley, J. F. 1991, ApJ, 376, 214, doi: 10.1086/170270

    doi:10.1086/170270 1991

  7. [7]

    Beckwith, S. V. W., & Sargent, A. I. 1991, ApJ, 381, 250, doi: 10.1086/170646 19

    doi:10.1086/170646 1991

  8. [8]

    2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Benisty, M., Dominik, C., Follette, K., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 605, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2203.09991

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.09991 2023

  9. [9]

    T., Bayyari, A., Sitko, M

    Berghea, C. T., Bayyari, A., Sitko, M. L., et al. 2024, ApJL, 967, L3, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad43e3

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad43e3 2024

  10. [10]

    2024, ARA&A, 62, 157, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-071221-052705

    Birnstiel, T. 2024, ARA&A, 62, 157, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-071221-052705

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-071221-052705 2024

  11. [11]

    M., Pinilla, P., & Kama, M

    Birnstiel, T., Andrews, S. M., Pinilla, P., & Kama, M. 2015, ApJL, 813, L14, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/813/1/L14

    doi:10.1088/2041-8205/813/1/l14 2015

  12. [12]

    W., & Dullemond, C

    Birnstiel, T., Ormel, C. W., & Dullemond, C. P. 2011, A&A, 525, A11, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015228

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015228 2011

  13. [13]

    2008, ARA&A, 46, 21, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145152

    Blum, J., & Wurm, G. 2008, ARA&A, 46, 21, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145152

    arXiv 2008

  14. [14]

    J., Stapelfeldt, K

    Burrows, C. J., Stapelfeldt, K. R., Watson, A. M., et al. 1996, ApJ, 473, 437, doi: 10.1086/178156

    doi:10.1086/178156 1996

  15. [15]

    K., Bergin, E

    Calahan, J. K., Bergin, E. A., Zhang, K., et al. 2021, ApJS, 257, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac143f

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac143f 2021

  16. [16]

    2015, A&A, 582, L7, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527267 Carrasco-González, C., Sierra, A., Flock, M., et al

    Canovas, H., Ménard, F., de Boer, J., et al. 2015, A&A, 582, L7, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527267 Carrasco-González, C., Sierra, A., Flock, M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 883, 71, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3d33

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527267 2015

  17. [17]

    Carrera, D., Johansen, A., & Davies, M. B. 2015, A&A, 579, A43, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425120

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425120 2015

  18. [18]

    Carrera, D., Lim, J., Eriksson, L. E. J., Lyra, W., & Simon, J. B. 2025, A&A, 696, L23, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554100

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554100 2025

  19. [19]

    S., Pérez, L

    Carvalho, A. S., Pérez, L. M., Sierra, A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 971, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5a07 D’Alessio, P., Calvet, N., Hartmann, L., Franco-Hernández, R., & Servín, H. 2006, ApJ, 638, 314, doi: 10.1086/498861 de Boer, J., Salter, G., Benisty, M., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A114, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629267

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5a07 2024

  20. [20]

    Dent, W. R. F., Pinte, C., Cortes, P. C., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 482, L29, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/sly181

    doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sly181 2019

  21. [21]

    2024, A&A, 688, A149, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348555

    Derkink, A., Ginski, C., Pinilla, P., et al. 2024, A&A, 688, A149, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348555

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348555 2024

  22. [22]

    2021, ApJ, 912, 164, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe5a6 —

    Doi, K., & Kataoka, A. 2021, ApJ, 912, 164, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe5a6 —. 2023, ApJ, 957, 11, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acf5df

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abe5a6 2021

  23. [23]

    Dominik, C., & Dullemond, C. P. 2024, A&A, 682, A144, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347716 Drążkowska, J., Bitsch, B., Lambrechts, M., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 717, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2203.09759

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.09759 2024

  24. [24]

    1995, Icarus, 114, 237, doi: 10.1006/icar.1995.1058 Duchêne, G., McCabe, C., Ghez, A

    Dubrulle, B., Morfill, G., & Sterzik, M. 1995, Icarus, 114, 237, doi: 10.1006/icar.1995.1058 Duchêne, G., McCabe, C., Ghez, A. M., & Macintosh, B. A. 2004, ApJ, 606, 969, doi: 10.1086/383126 Duchêne, G., Ménard, F., Stapelfeldt, K., & Duvert, G. 2003, A&A, 400, 559, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021906 Duchêne, G., McCabe, C., Pinte, C., et al. 2010, ApJ, 712,...

    arXiv 1995

  25. [25]

    P., & Dominik, C

    Dullemond, C. P., & Dominik, C. 2004, A&A, 421, 1075, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20040284

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20040284 2004

  26. [26]

    P., Birnstiel, T., Huang, J., et al

    Dullemond, C. P., Birnstiel, T., Huang, J., et al. 2018, ApJL, 869, L46, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf742

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaf742 2018

  27. [27]

    2017, A&A, 607, A130, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730645

    Dutrey, A., Guilloteau, S., Piétu, V., et al. 2017, A&A, 607, A130, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730645

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730645 2017

  28. [28]

    J., Looney, L

    Encalada, F. J., Looney, L. W., Takakuwa, S., et al. 2024, ApJ, 966, 32, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3442

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3442 2024

  29. [29]

    J., Megeath, S

    Fischer, W. J., Megeath, S. T., Tobin, J. J., et al. 2014, ApJ, 781, 123, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/781/2/123

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/781/2/123 2014

  30. [30]

    2021, AJ, 161, 239, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abeb1e

    Flores, C., Duchêne, G., Wolff, S., et al. 2021, AJ, 161, 239, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abeb1e

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abeb1e 2021

  31. [31]

    Fromang, S., & Nelson, R. P. 2009, A&A, 496, 597, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200811220

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200811220 2009

  32. [32]

    2006, ApJS, 165, 568, doi: 10.1086/505468

    Furlan, E., Hartmann, L., Calvet, N., et al. 2006, ApJS, 165, 568, doi: 10.1086/505468

    doi:10.1086/505468 2006

  33. [33]

    L., Espaillat, C., et al

    Furlan, E., Luhman, K. L., Espaillat, C., et al. 2011, ApJS, 195, 3, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/195/1/3

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/195/1/3 2011

  34. [34]

    F., et al

    Galloway-Sprietsma, M., Bae, J., Izquierdo, A. F., et al. 2025, ApJL, 984, L10, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adc437

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adc437 2025

  35. [35]

    Garcia, A. J. L., & Gonzalez, J.-F. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 1788, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa382

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa382 2020

  36. [36]

    G., et al

    Garufi, A., Ginski, C., van Holstein, R. G., et al. 2024, A&A, 685, A53, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347586

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347586 2024

  37. [37]

    2025, A&A, 694, A290, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452496

    Garufi, A., Carrasco-González, C., Macías, E., et al. 2025, A&A, 694, A290, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452496

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452496 2025

  38. [38]

    A., Méheut, H., & Bec, J

    Gerosa, F. A., Méheut, H., & Bec, J. 2023, European Physical Journal Plus, 138, 9, doi: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-03585-8

    work page doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-03585-8 2023

  39. [39]

    2016, A&A, 595, A112, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629265

    Ginski, C., Stolker, T., Pinilla, P., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A112, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629265

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629265 2016

  40. [40]

    2024, A&A, 685, A52, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244005

    Ginski, C., Garufi, A., Benisty, M., et al. 2024, A&A, 685, A52, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244005

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244005 2024

  41. [41]

    M., Ménard, F., Pinte, C., et al

    Glauser, A. M., Ménard, F., Pinte, C., et al. 2008, A&A, 485, 531, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065685

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20065685 2008

  42. [42]

    Goldreich, P., & Ward, W. R. 1973, ApJ, 183, 1051, doi: 10.1086/152291 Gräfe, C., Wolf, S., Guilloteau, S., et al. 2013, A&A, 553, A69, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220720

    doi:10.1086/152291 1973

  43. [43]

    L., Espaillat, C

    Grant, S. L., Espaillat, C. C., Megeath, S. T., et al. 2018, ApJ, 863, 13, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aacda7 20

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aacda7 2018

  44. [44]

    S., & Mason, B

    Greaves, J. S., & Mason, B. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 3180, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac856

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac856 2022

  45. [45]

    2003, ApJ, 586, 296, doi: 10.1086/367557

    Grosso, N., Alves, J., Wood, K., et al. 2003, ApJ, 586, 296, doi: 10.1086/367557

    doi:10.1086/367557 2003

  46. [46]

    M., Carrasco-González, C., Macías, E., et al

    Guerra-Alvarado, O. M., Carrasco-González, C., Macías, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 686, A298, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202349046

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202349046 2024

  47. [47]

    2022, A&A, 664, A137, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142303

    Guidi, G., Isella, A., Testi, L., et al. 2022, A&A, 664, A137, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142303

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142303 2022

  48. [48]

    2021, ApJ, 915, 22, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf6cf Hernández-Vera, C., Guzmán, V

    Wada, K. 2021, ApJ, 915, 22, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf6cf Hernández-Vera, C., Guzmán, V. V., Artur de la

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abf6cf 2021

  49. [49]

    2024, ApJ, 967, 68, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3cdb

    Villarmois, E., et al. 2024, ApJ, 967, 68, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3cdb

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3cdb 2024

  50. [50]

    M., Dullemond, C

    Huang, J., Andrews, S. M., Dullemond, C. P., et al. 2018, ApJL, 869, L42, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf740

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaf740 2018

  51. [51]

    Hull, C. L. H., Yang, H., Li, Z.-Y., et al. 2018, ApJ, 860, 82, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabfeb

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aabfeb 2018

  52. [52]

    F., Testi, L., Facchini, S., Rosotti, G

    Izquierdo, A. F., Testi, L., Facchini, S., Rosotti, G. P., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2021, A&A, 650, A179, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140779

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140779 2021

  53. [53]

    F., Testi, L., Facchini, S., et al

    Izquierdo, A. F., Testi, L., Facchini, S., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A113, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245425

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245425 2023

  54. [54]

    Stauffer, J. R. 2002, ApJL, 571, L51, doi: 10.1086/341202

    doi:10.1086/341202 2002

  55. [55]

    M., & Carrasco-González, C

    Jiang, H., Macías, E., Guerra-Alvarado, O. M., & Carrasco-González, C. 2024, A&A, 682, A32, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348271

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348271 2024

  56. [56]

    2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, ed

    Johansen, A., Blum, J., Tanaka, H., et al. 2014, in Protostars and Planets VI, ed. H. Beuther, R. S. Klessen, C. P. Dullemond, & T. Henning, 547–570, doi: 10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch024

    doi:10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch024 2014

  57. [57]

    2007, ApJ, 662, 627, doi: 10.1086/516730

    Johansen, A., & Youdin, A. 2007, ApJ, 662, 627, doi: 10.1086/516730

    doi:10.1086/516730 2007

  58. [58]

    M., et al

    Kamp, I., Henning, T., Arabhavi, A. M., et al. 2023, Faraday Discussions, 245, 112, doi: 10.1039/D3FD00013C

    doi:10.1039/d3fd00013c 2023

  59. [59]

    Dullemond, C. P. 2016, ApJ, 820, 54, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/820/1/54

    doi:10.3847/0004-637x/820/1/54 2016

  60. [60]

    2014, A&A, 568, A42, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323199

    Kataoka, A., Okuzumi, S., Tanaka, H., & Nomura, H. 2014, A&A, 568, A42, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323199

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201323199 2014

  61. [61]

    2013, A&A, 557, L4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322151

    Kataoka, A., Tanaka, H., Okuzumi, S., & Wada, K. 2013, A&A, 557, L4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322151

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322151 2013

  62. [62]

    2015, ApJ, 809, 78, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/78

    Kataoka, A., Muto, T., Momose, M., et al. 2015, ApJ, 809, 78, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/78

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/809/1/78 2015

  63. [63]

    E., Stapelfeldt, K

    Krist, J. E., Stapelfeldt, K. R., Golimowski, D. A., et al. 2005, AJ, 130, 2778, doi: 10.1086/497069

    doi:10.1086/497069 2005

  64. [64]

    Lada, C. J. 1987, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 115, Star Forming Regions, ed. M. Peimbert & J. Jugaku, 1

    1987

  65. [65]

    2012, A&A, 544, A32, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219127

    Lambrechts, M., & Johansen, A. 2012, A&A, 544, A32, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219127

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219127 2012

  66. [66]

    A., et al

    Lambrechts, M., Morbidelli, A., Jacobson, S. A., et al. 2019, A&A, 627, A83, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834229

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834229 2019

  67. [67]

    Laor, A., & Draine, B. T. 1993, ApJ, 402, 441, doi: 10.1086/172149

    doi:10.1086/172149 1993

  68. [68]

    J., Alarcón, F., Cleeves, L

    Law, C. J., Alarcón, F., Cleeves, L. I., Öberg, K. I., & Paneque-Carreño, T. 2023a, ApJL, 959, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0e06

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad0e06 2041

  69. [69]

    J., Teague, R., Loomis, R

    Law, C. J., Teague, R., Loomis, R. A., et al. 2021, ApJS, 257, 4, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac1439

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac1439 2021

  70. [70]

    J., Crystian, S., Teague, R., et al

    Law, C. J., Crystian, S., Teague, R., et al. 2022, ApJ, 932, 114, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6c02

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac6c02 2022

  71. [71]

    J., Teague, R., Öberg, K

    Law, C. J., Teague, R., Öberg, K. I., et al. 2023b, ApJ, 948, 60, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb3c4

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acb3c4

  72. [72]

    J., Benisty, M., Facchini, S., et al

    Law, C. J., Benisty, M., Facchini, S., et al. 2024, ApJ, 964, 190, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad24d2

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad24d2 2024

  73. [73]

    Lee, C.-F., Li, Z.-Y., Ho, P. T. P., et al. 2017, Science Advances, 3, e1602935, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1602935

    doi:10.1126/sciadv.1602935 2017

  74. [74]

    2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Lesur, G., Flock, M., Ercolano, B., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 465, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2203.09821

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.09821 2023

  75. [75]

    B., Li, R., et al

    Lim, J., Simon, J. B., Li, R., et al. 2024, ApJ, 969, 130, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad47a2

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad47a2 2024

  76. [76]

    D., Lee, C.-F., Li, Z.-Y., Tobin, J

    Lin, Z.-Y. D., Lee, C.-F., Li, Z.-Y., Tobin, J. J., & Turner, N. J. 2021, MNRAS, 501, 1316, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3685

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3685 2021

  77. [77]

    D., Li, Z.-Y., Tobin, J

    Lin, Z.-Y. D., Li, Z.-Y., Tobin, J. J., et al. 2023, ApJ, 951, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd5c9

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd5c9 2023

  78. [78]

    Liu, H. B. 2019, ApJL, 877, L22, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab1f8e

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab1f8e 2019

  79. [79]

    Liu, Y., Bertrang, G. H. M., Flock, M., et al. 2022, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 65, 129511, doi: 10.1007/s11433-022-1982-y

    doi:10.1007/s11433-022-1982-y 2022

  80. [80]

    J., et al

    Long, F., Pinilla, P., Herczeg, G. J., et al. 2018, ApJ, 869, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae8e1 Macías, E., Guerra-Alvarado, O., Carrasco-González, C., et al. 2021, A&A, 648, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039812

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aae8e1 2018

Showing first 80 references.

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 4, 2026.